Abstract
Atoh1 overexpression is essential for hair cell (HC) regeneration in the sensory epithelium of mammalian auditory and vestibular organs. However, Atoh1 overexpression alone cannot induce fully mature and functional HCs in the mammalian inner ear. In the current study, we investigated the effect of Atoh1 constitutive overexpression in native HCs by manipulating Atoh1 expression at different developmental stages. We demonstrated that constitutive overexpression of Atoh1 in native vestibular HCs did not affect cell survival but did impair vestibular function by interfering with the subtype differentiation of HCs and hair bundle development. In contrast, Atoh1 overexpression in cochlear HCs impeded their maturation, eventually leading to gradual HC loss in the cochlea and hearing dysfunction. Our study suggests that time-restricted Atoh1 expression is essential for the differentiation and survival of HCs in the inner ear, and this is pivotal for both hearing and vestibular function re-establishment through Atoh1 overexpression-induced HC regeneration strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sensory hair cells (HCs) are delicate mechano-sensors in vertebrate vestibular and auditory organs, and these cells are vulnerable to noise, ototoxic drugs, infections, and other sources of damage. Although there is limited capacity for HCs to regenerate in the mature vestibule and the neonatal cochlea following injury in mammals [1,2,3], HCs cannot be regenerated in sufficient numbers to restore inner ear function, which leads to permanent balance disorders or sensorineural hearing loss [1,2,3,4]. Supporting cells (SCs) are believed to share common progenitors with HCs [5,6,7], and SCs are regarded as the best cellular resource for HC regeneration after injury [8, 9]. Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying HC fate determination, maturation, and survival will benefit regeneration strategies.
Atoh1, which encodes a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, is one of the most important genes known to be necessary for the differentiation of inner ear HCs [7, 10, 11]. Embryonic Atoh1-null mice fail to generate vestibular and cochlear HCs [7], and conditional deletion of Atoh1 in Pax2+ progenitor cells at the embryonic stage leads to the loss of HCs and the subsequent degeneration of the organ of Corti [12]. In the vestibular sensory epithelium, Atoh1 is expressed from embryonic day (E)12.5 and is downregulated once HCs mature in type I HCs, but continues to be expressed in type II HCs [10, 13, 14]. During cochlear development, the Atoh1 level peaks at E17.5, then decreases from the postnatal period in the cochlea, and becomes almost undetectable in mature auditory HCs [15, 16]. Conditional knockout of Atoh1 at different points in HC development from E15.5 to E17.5 also leads to HC loss and defects [17,18,19,20]. However, the significance of the timely downregulation of Atoh1 during the development of HCs is not fully understood [21]. It is well known that Atoh1 is a potent driver of HC differentiation in the inner ear, and ectopic expression of Atoh1 leads to the production of new HCs in the vestibule and cochlea both in vitro and in vivo [19, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Overexpression of Atoh1 has now become a popular method for HC regeneration in both neonatal and adult mice [29,30,31,32,33]. However, functional maturation of new HCs has not yet been achieved by the ectopic expression of Atoh1 in the inner ear sensory epithelium [22, 23, 34], which might be due to insufficient factors for the direct trans-differentiation from SCs to HCs or inhibitory effects on the maturation or survival of HCs caused by the permanent expression of Atoh1.
To further investigate the effects of permanent Atoh1 expression on the maturation and survival of HCs, we developed an inducible system to overexpress Atoh1 in HCs at specific developmental stages. We found that constitutive overexpression of Atoh1 impaired vestibular function due to the disturbed differentiation of vestibular HC subtypes (Fig. 1A). Meanwhile, Atoh1 overexpression in the cochlea at different developmental stages blocked the postnatal development of HCs and led to progressive HC loss and subsequent hearing impairment (Fig. 1B). Our study suggests that the proper duration of Atoh1 expression is essential for the differentiation of HC subtypes, HC survival, and HC function in the inner ear.
Results
Overexpression of Atoh1 in vestibular HCs impaired vestibular function
Atoh1 expression in the vestibular system starts at E12.5 and is essential to vestibular HC differentiation and regeneration [7, 23, 24]. In the utricle, deletion of Atoh1 at E14.5 or E16.5 did not cause cell death but led to the obstruction of MYO7A expression and defective stereocilium formation [19]. To investigate the effect of Atoh1 overexpression on the epithelium of vestibular organs, we crossed Gfi1Cre mice with CAG-loxP-stop-loxP-Atoh1-HA mice (Fig. 2A). Gfi1 is a nuclear zinc-finger protein expressed soon after HC differentiation in the inner ear [35], and the expression of Gfi1 is first detected at E13.5 in the vestibule and at E15.5 in the cochlea [36]. We used Gfi1Cre/CAG-loxP-stop-loxP-Atoh1-HA (Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE) mice to increase the expression of Atoh1 in Gfi1+ cells in the vestibular organs, and mice lacking the Atoh1-OE allele were used as controls.
First, we assessed the gross vestibular function of Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice. We observed spontaneous head bobbing from P12–P13 in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice, which might indicate vestibular dysfunction. When we held the P35 mice by their tails and slowly lowered them onto the ground, the control mice could extend their forelimbs and reach the horizontal surface, while most Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice could only bend their bodies ventrally (Fig. S1B, C) [37]. Then we performed a swimming test at P35, and the general vestibular function of both control and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice were scored [37]. Control mice from the same litter engaged in normal swimming behaviors in which the tail propelled their movement through the water. In contrast, Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice showed unbalanced swimming behavior, in which the mice could not balance their heads or backs, or the mice would float immobile (Fig. S1D). The average score was 1.33 ± 0.33 for Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice at P35, which was significantly higher than the control mice (Fig. S1E). Next, we used a binocular video-oculography-based vestibular function testing system to quantitatively evaluate the vestibular-ocular reflex. The horizontal angular vestibulo-ocular reflexes (HAVOR) test was performed at P35 to detect the function of the horizontal cristae [38, 39]. Compared with control mice, the HAVOR gain of Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice decreased significantly at all frequencies (Fig. S1F). To observe the function of macular organs, an off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) test was conducted. The eye movement amplitude in the OVAR test was significantly reduced in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice (Fig. S1G). Together, these results indicate the gross vestibular function was impaired in the Atoh1-overexpressing mice. Meanwhile, HAVOR and OVAR responses were abnormal, which indicated that overexpression of Atoh1 in vestibular HCs brought about the dysfunction of the vestibular-ocular reflex.
Overexpression of Atoh1 obstructed subtype differentiation in HCs
To assess the morphological features of vestibular HCs in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice, we labeled HCs with MYO7A. We counted the numbers of MYO7A+ HCs in the striolar and extrastriolar regions in the utricles and saccules and the HC number in the central and peripheral crista zones separately at P15 and P35. The HC numbers were comparable in the vestibular organs of Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice and control mice at P15 and P35 (Fig. S2C). To further investigate the effect of Atoh1 overexpression on the HCs, we observed the subtype of HCs in the vestibular organs.
Vestibular HCs come in two subtypes, type I and type II, which can be distinguished by molecular markers, the morphology of the cell body, physiological features, and nerve terminals [40,41,42,43]. Type I HCs are flask-shaped with a narrow neck, have relatively long stereocilia bundles, and are innervated by calyceal endings. In contrast, type II HCs are cylindrical and have shorter stereocilia and bouton synapses (Fig. 1A). To detect the effect of Atoh1 overexpression on the subtype differentiation of HCs, we assessed the molecular, morphologic, and synaptic features representing the specialization of HC subtypes. First, we stained type I HCs with Oncomodulin (OCM), which is highly enriched in type I HCs in the striolar region [44, 45]. In the control mice, many OCM+/MYO7A+ type I HCs were observed in the striolar region of the utricle. In contrast, few OCM+/MYO7A+ HCs were identified in any sensory epithelia of the utricle in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice (Fig. 2D, E, Fig. S3, A–C). We stained Secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) to label type I HCs in the extrastriolar region [42]. In the utricles of control mice, we detected SPP1+/MYO7A+ HCs in the extrastriolar region, while we found nearly no SPP1+/MYO7A + HCs in the Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE utricles (Fig. 2F, G). Similar results were found in the saccule and crista (Figs. S2 A, B, D, E and S3 A–G).
Next, we detected the markers of type II HCs. Sox2, which is expressed in all developing HCs but persists only in type II HCs and SCs in the mature vestibular epithelia [42], is a marker to distinguish type I and type II HCs. We compared the proportion of SOX2+/MYO7A+ type II HCs from the striolar and extrastriolar regions of the utricle. In control mice, only 44.33 ± 1.28% of the HCs in the striolar region and 43.42 ± 0.84% of the HCs in the extrastriolar region were SOX2+/MYO7A+ type II HCs. In contrast, the proportion of SOX2+/MYO7A+ type II HCs increased significantly to 98.27 ± 0.23% in the striolar region and to 98.60 ± 0.04% in the extrastriolar region of the utricles from Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice (Fig. 3A, yellow arrowhead, Fig. 3C). We next observed type II HCs by staining for Annexin A4 (ANXA4), another molecular marker of type II HCs [42, 44,45,46,47]. Compared with control mice, the numbers of ANXA4+/MYO7A+ type II HCs in the Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE utricles were increased significantly in both the striolar and extrastriolar regions (Fig. 3B, D). Increased ratios of HCs with type II markers were also observed in the saccule and crista in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice (Fig. S4A–H). These data suggested that Atoh1 overexpression caused type I HCs to lose their markers SPP1 in the extrastriola and OCM in the striola and to gain the type II markers SOX2 and ANXA4 (Fig. 1A).
Atoh1 overexpression disrupted the development of calyx nerve terminals in type I HCs
We next focused on the nerve innervation and nerve terminals of Atoh1 overexpression mice. Calyceal afferent nerve terminals are well-formed in all regions of the utricles during the first postnatal week [48,49,50,51]. Tuj1 staining results showed no significant difference in the density of nerve fibers in the vestibular organs between control and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice at P35 (Fig. S8D). In the mature utricles of control mice, type I HCs were OCM+/ANXA4−/MYO7A+ in the striolar region and SPP1+/ANXA4−/MYO7A+ in the extrastriolar region, and they were enveloped with a well-developed full calyx (Figs. 2F, 3B). A total of 56.20 ± 2.80% of the HCs in the striolar region and 60.30 ± 2.20% of the HCs in the extrastriolar region of control utricles were surrounded with TUJ1+ neural terminals, while 55.20 ± 4.40% of the HCs in the striolar region and 60.40 ± 5.70% of the HCs in the extrastriolar region were surrounded in the Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE utricles. The ratios of HCs surrounded by TUJ1+ endings showed no significant difference between the two groups (Fig. 2H). In the control group, continuous TUJ1 signal enveloped the entire cell body of type I HCs at the level of the nucleus and extended along the cell’s neck (Figs. 2F, 3B, white arrow). However, in the Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE utricles, type I HCs that gained type II markers were surrounded by a discontinuous TUJ1+ calyx or were contacted with several thin neuronal processes but with no enclosed calyx (Figs. 2F, 3B, HCs labeled with “*”). This suggested that although type I HCs lost their markers and gained type II markers when Atoh1 was overexpressed, these cells were not fully differentiated into type II HCs (Fig. 1A), and these are referred to as type II-like HCs in this study.
Atoh1 overexpression altered the morphology of HCs and interfered with the development of stereocilia bundles
We next observed the cell arrangement and morphology of HCs in the utricle. In the extrastriola of the control utricle, many type I HCs had nuclei located deep in the epithelium, just above the SC nuclei (Fig. 2F, white arrows). In contrast, type II HCs had nuclei closer to the lumen (Fig. 2F, yellow arrowheads). In the Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE utricle, almost all of the HC nuclei were located at the same level, while type II-like HCs lost the long and thin “neck” that is a feature of type I HCs (Figs. 1A, 2F, 3B, see the HCs labeled with “*”).
We next assessed the stereocilia bundles, one of the markers of HC maturation, by staining the actin-rich stereocilia with fluorescently labeled phalloidin. We observed a significant loss of bundles in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE utricles at P35 (Fig. 4A, C, D), and the remaining stereocilia bundles were significantly shorter in the utricular HCs in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice at P35 (Fig. 4A). For an accurate assessment, we measured and compared the bundle length between type I HCs with continuous calyxes in control mice and type II-like HCs with discontinuous TUJ1+ calyxes in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice, and we found that the length of the tallest stereocilia bundles was decreased significantly in type II-like HCs in the Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE utricles (Fig. 4B, E). We found no significant difference in the length of the tallest stereocilia bundles between type II HCs in the control utricles and type II HCs in the Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE utricles (Fig. 4B, F). We next compared the tallest stereocilia bundle length between type II HCs in the control utricles and type II-like HCs in the Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE utricles. Although shorter than type I HC bundles in the control utricle, the bundles of type II-like HCs were significantly longer than those of type II HCs (Fig. 4B, G).
Our findings suggest that constitutive Atoh1 expression interfered with the differentiation of type I HCs and calyceal nerve terminal formation and resulted in shorter hair bundle structures, which led to the dysfunction of the vestibular system without HC loss (Fig. 1A).
Overexpression of Atoh1 in the cochlea did not affect the fate determination of HCs
Atoh1 expression, which begins between E12.5 and E14.5 in the mouse cochlear epithelium, is necessary to specify HCs in the inner ear, and the organ of Corti of the Atoh1-null mouse fails to generate HCs [7, 10]. The sufficient level and duration of Atoh1 expression are also crucial for the differentiation of HCs. A previous study showed that when Atoh1 was knocked out in mice during E15.5–E17.5, different degrees of HC loss were observed in the cochlea at P0 [17,18,19]. To test the effect of Atoh1 overexpression on cell fate determination and the survival of cochlear HCs during the embryonic stage, we used Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice in which Atoh1 was constitutively overexpressed in cochlear HCs from E15.5. We performed immunohistochemistry on whole-mount cochleae at P2 and P7 (Fig. S5 A) and found no HC death in either control or Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE cochleae (Fig. S5B–G). In Atoh1-OE cochleae at P7, the morphology of cochlear HCs looked normal, with neatly arranged a single row of inner hair cells (IHCs) and three rows of outer hair cells (OHCs), and the cochlear HCs were SOX2 negative (Fig. S5E). We next investigated the effect of Atoh1 overexpression on hair bundle structure by staining for phalloidin. The staining results showed typical hair bundle structures in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice at P2 and P7, and these were organized into a V-formation in OHCs and were aligned at the apical surface of IHCs, suggesting no defects in planar cell polarity (Fig. S5C, D). Meanwhile, qPCR results showed no difference in the transcriptional level of Espn, which encodes the actin-crosslinking protein ESPIN that is essential for HC bundle formation, between control and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE cochleae at P7 (Fig. 5C).
Overexpression of Atoh1 delayed the maturation of young HCs in the cochlea
The development of HCs in the mouse is a protracted process, extending into the postnatal period. Previous studies have shown that Atoh1 expression is gradually downregulated in cochlear HCs during postnatal maturation and falls to a low level at P7 [15, 16] when cochlear HCs begin to display the morphological and electrophysiological features of mature cochlear HCs. We therefore asked whether Atoh1 overexpression would disturb the maturation of HCs in the cochlea. We focused on two markers, vesicular glutamate transporter 3 (VGLUT3, encoded by Slc17a8) and Prestin (encoded by Slc26a5), that are necessary for the normal function of HCs. VGLUT3 is expressed explicitly in IHCs and accumulates glutamate in the presynaptic vesicles of the IHCs, and the loss of VGLUT3 causes deafness. VGLUT3 is turned on primarily in IHCs at E16.5, increases at P3, and is maintained at a steady level thereafter [52,53,54,55,56,57]. Prestin is a motor protein responsible for the fast electromotility of OHCs [58,59,60]. Prestin can be detected in the lateral wall of OHCs as early as P0, and the intensity of its labeling reaches adult levels at P9–P11 [59,60,61]. We found that protein levels of Prestin and VGLUT3 were both lower in the cochlear HCs in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice at P7 when compared to control mice (Fig. 5B). The downregulation of Slc26a5 and Slc17a8 mRNA was further confirmed by qPCR in the cochlear epithelia from P7 Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice (Fig. 5C). After another 5 days, the expression of Prestin was slightly modified in OHCs in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice. Still, its expression was distributed unevenly and divergently on the membrane of OHCs, which was significantly different from the linear and uniform distribution pattern in the OHCs from control mice (Fig. 5D). Meanwhile, the OHCs of Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE cochleae became bigger in diameter and shorter in length (Fig. 5D–F). Figure 1F shows the significant difference in the diameter and length of OHCs between control and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice.
SOX2 can be used as a marker for immature HCs, and it is expressed in both the SCs and HCs at E15.5 and then gradually diminishes in cochlear HCs [8, 62, 63]. SOX2 can still be detected in the cochlear HCs of neonatal mice but becomes undetectable at P7 [62, 64]. We further investigated the expression of SOX2 in the cochlear HCs from P7 Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice, and no SOX2+ HCs were observed (Fig. S5E). Meanwhile, there was no difference in the transcriptional level of Sox2 between the control and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE cochleae at P7 (Fig. 5C).
To further verify the effect of long-term Atoh1 expression in HCs that have already undergone primary differentiation in the cochlea at the postnatal stage, we generated Atoh1CreER-CAG-loxP-stop-loxP-Atoh1-HA (Atoh1CreER/Atoh1-OE) mice (Fig. S6A) in which constitutive activation of Atoh1 in Atoh1+ cells was induced by tamoxifen administration at P2 [13, 65]. Cochlear sensory epithelial tissues were analyzed at P7 (Fig. S6B), and mice lacking the Atoh1-OE allele were used as controls. Consistent with the results obtained from the Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE cochleae, no HC loss was observed in the cochleae (Fig. S6C, D); however, the expression levels of Prestin and VGLUT3 were down-regulated and distributed unevenly in the OHCs and IHCs from P7 Atoh1CreER/Atoh1-OE mice (Fig. S6D). The downregulation of Slc26a5 and Slc17a8 mRNA was further confirmed by qPCR in cochlear epithelial samples from P7 Atoh1CreER/Atoh1-OE mice, indicating that Atoh1 overexpression inhibited the maturation of cochlear HCs (Fig. S6E, Fig. 1B).
Overexpression of Atoh1 changed the expression pattern of Prestin in relatively mature OHCs in the cochlea
Because we showed that overexpression of Atoh1 in native cochlear HCs could inhibit the maturation of OHCs and IHCs during the first week after birth, we further investigated the effects of constitutive expression of Atoh1 on relatively mature OHCs after P7. We generated the transgenic mouse model PrestinCreER/CAG-loxP-stop-loxP-Atoh1-HA (PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE) [59] in which Atoh1 is overexpressed in Prestin+ OHCs after tamoxifen administration at P7 (Fig. S6F, G). Mice lacking the Atoh1-OE allele were used as controls. We also observed that Prestin was downregulated in the surviving OHCs (note the arrowhead pointing to MYO7A+ HCs with weak Prestin staining) and was present in an uneven and divergent pattern on the membrane of OHCs from the PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE cochleae at P25 (Fig. S6H). There was a significant difference between the control and PrestinCreER/Atoh1OE in the diameter and length of OHCs, similar to the phenomenon we observed in the OHCs from Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice (Fig. S6I).
Constitutive expression of Atoh1 led to progressive HC loss and hearing impairment in the cochlea
Although we saw no loss of HCs when we examined mice at P7, we did observe HC loss at later ages induced by the constitutive expression of Atoh1 at different developmental stages. In Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice, in which Atoh1 is overexpressed in the differentiating cochlear HCs, significant HC loss was observed in both IHCs and OHCs at P15 (Fig. 6B). The number of HCs decreased significantly compared with the control mice (Fig. 6D). At 35 days after birth, almost no OHCs and only a few IHCs were seen in the cochleae of Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice (Fig. 6C, E).
Meanwhile, the overexpression of Atoh1 in P2 Atoh1CreER/Atoh1-OE mice also induced scattered OHC loss from the apical to the basal turn of the cochlea at P11 (Fig. S7A, B). The numbers of remaining OHCs in the apical and basal turns differed significantly between the control and Atoh1CreER/Atoh1-OE mice (Fig. S7C). However, because the Atoh1CreER/Atoh1-OE mice did not survive after P11, we could not follow the status of HCs in the cochlea at older ages.
For the effects of constitutive Atoh1 expression on relatively mature OHCs, tamoxifen was administered to PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE mice at P7, and the cochlear sensory epithelium was dissected out for immunohistochemistry staining at P21, P25, P35, and P53 (Fig. S7D). Hearing was evaluated through auditory brainstem response (ABR) at P25 and P35, which showed a 45–50 dB threshold shift at P25 and a 50–55 dB threshold shift at P35 in PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE mice (Fig. S7E). In contrast, the control mice from the same litter had normal hearing thresholds. We observed scattered OHC loss from the apical to the basal turns in the cochlea at P21 and P25 and significant OHC loss at P35 and P53 (Fig. S7F) in PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE mice. We counted the residual OHCs from P21, P25, P35, and P53 PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE mice and found that the numbers decreased significantly with age (Fig. S7G). These results suggest that constitutive Atoh1 expression in relatively mature HCs results in the death of HCs and subsequent hearing loss (Fig. 1B). Next, we observed the spiral ganglion neurons and the nerve fibers in the cochlea and found no obvious loss of nerve fibers or spiral ganglion neurons at P35 (Fig. S8A, C).
We next investigated the expression of apoptosis-related genes in control and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE cochleae at P15. qPCR data showed that Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice had significantly higher expression of the pro-apoptosis genes Casp3 and Casp9 in the cochleae when compared to control mice (Fig. 6F), demonstrating that Atoh1 overexpression induced caspase-mediated apoptosis.
Discussion
Previous studies have shown that the upregulation of Atoh1 can convert SCs into HCs in mouse auditory and vestibular organs in the inner ear of the neonatal and adult mouse in vivo [22, 23, 25, 30, 34, 66]. Atoh1 has been the most critical gene for promoting the regeneration of HCs and restoring function in the inner ear. In previous studies, Atoh1 was constitutively overexpressed to drive SCs to transdifferentiate into HCs using genetic tools or transgenic mouse models [23, 25, 29,30,31, 66]. However, in previous studies, no fully mature and functional HCs have been identified by overexpressing Atoh1 alone in non-sensory cells, which might be due to insufficient signals for generating mature HCs or to side effects from the consistently high level of Atoh1 [22, 23, 34, 66]. Here we describe in detail the impact of the permanent expression of Atoh1 on the maturation and survival of HCs through overexpression of Atoh1 in HCs at three different developmental stages in the mouse inner ear. Our results suggested that the proper duration of Atoh1 expression is essential for the survival and function of HCs in the inner ear.
Atoh1 overexpression disrupts HC subtype differentiation in the vestibular organs
While spontaneous HC replacement does not occur in the cochlea, it happens to some degree in the mature mammalian vestibular epithelium, such as the utricle [3, 67,68,69,70,71]. In the damaged mature utricle, Atoh1 overexpression enhances HC regeneration, resulting in more robust vestibular-evoked potential responses [23]. Regenerated HCs have been reported to be type II HCs [2, 14]. However, Sayyid et al. showed that spontaneously regenerated HCs in the utricle consist of HCs labeled separately by both type I and type II HC markers. The proportion of HCs marked by the type I marker increased over time. In the damaged utricle with Atoh1 overexpression, the newly regenerated HCs are mainly composed of type II HCs instead of type I HCs [23]. In the utricle, Atoh1 can be detected from E12.5 and is downregulated once HCs mature in type I HCs, but continues to be expressed in type II HCs [10, 14]. Our study found that overexpression of Atoh1 in differentiating HCs in the vestibular organs resulted in a decrease in type I HCs and an increase in type II-like HCs. These type II-like HCs, which lost type I markers and gained type II markers, were surrounded by discontinuous calyx nerve terminals (Figs. 2, 3). These calyx nerve terminals were highly similar to the terminals of type I HCs in the utricle in the neonatal period [48], which suggested that Atoh1 overexpression might restrict the development of type I HCs. The mechanism through which the two subtypes of vestibular HCs develop has not been fully elucidated. However, it is hypothesized that the two subtypes of vestibular HCs diverge from common HC progenitors and that type I HCs transit through a type II stage on their way to becoming “super-differentiated” HCs [41, 72,73,74].
Atoh1 overexpression impairs hair bundle maturation
Previous research showed that regenerated HCs driven by Atoh1 overexpression displayed shorter or no hair bundles [23, 25]. In the vestibular organs, we identified fewer and shorter phalloidin-labeled hair bundle structures in type II-like HCs compared with bundles in type I HCs after the overexpression of Atoh1 (Fig. 4). This suggested that incomplete bundle maturation might be due to permanent Atoh1 expression. Previous studies have reported that the hair bundles of type II vestibular HCs are shorter and thinner than those of type I vestibular HCs [75,76,77]. We measured and compared the tallest length of bundles in type II HCs of control utricles and type II-like HCs of Gfi1Cre/Atoh1OE utricles, and the length of the bundles was significantly longer in the type II-like HCs of Gfi1Cre/Atoh1OE utricles (Fig. 4). Our results showed that overexpression of Atoh1 disturbed the differentiation of type I vestibular HCs and HC bundle formation, resulting in vestibular system dysfunction. These results thus demonstrated that the permanent overexpression of Atoh1 impedes the functional maturation of vestibular HCs. Whether Atoh1 overexpression-induced vestibular phenotypes change with increasing age needs further study in the future.
Atoh1 overexpression in the cochleae impairs the expression and function of Prestin in OHCs
We showed that overexpression of Atoh1 during early developmental stages in the Gfi1Cre mouse line (E15.5 in the cochlea) or during the neonatal stages in the Atoh1CreER mouse line (P2) did not inhibit the primary development of cochlear HCs, which presented with relatively normal HC quantity, cellular shape, cellular polarity, and hair bundles during the first week after birth (Fig. S5). However, the expression of functional markers of IHCs and OHCs, VGLUT3 and Prestin, respectively, was significantly downregulated at the mRNA and protein levels at P7 (Fig. 5 and S6). Liu et al. analyzed Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE cochleae and found varied OHC loss and retention of Prestin expression in the residual OHCs at P14 of Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE cochleae [22], so they concluded that that the absence of Prestin in SC-derived new HCs was not caused by permanent Atoh1 expression. However, in our study Prestin expression was slightly modified in OHCs in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice at P12 compared to P7, but the distribution of Prestin was uneven and divergent across the membrane of OHCs (Fig. 5). Meanwhile, once Atoh1 was re-activated in the relatively mature Prestin+ OHCs at P7, we observed the downregulation of Prestin in the OHCs, which presented as an uneven and divergent pattern across the membrane of OHCs (Fig. S6). Liberman et al. showed that the deletion of Prestin in mice results in the loss of electromotility, shortened OHCs, and loss of OHCs in the basal turn of the cochlea [78]. In another study, OHCs of mice expressing mutated Prestin were shorter than normal OHCs and died [79]. In our study, we found that OHCs became bigger in diameter and shorter in length in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice at P12 (Fig. 5D–F) and in PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE mice at P25 (Fig. S6). Our results coincided with those of mice that had mutated Prestin, which suggested that although there was expression of Prestin in the cochleae of Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE at P12, the function of HCs was still impaired. Thus, we concluded that the constitutive expression of Atoh1 might inhibit the maturation of immature HCs and induce the degeneration of mature HCs during the development of the inner ear [31, 80].
Prestin deficiency caused by Atoh1 overexpression might result in OHC loss
Evidence has already shown that Atoh1 is expressed during embryonic stages and is necessary for HC fate commitment [7, 10]. However, the expression of Atoh1 declines dramatically within the first week after birth [15, 16], which suggests that Atoh1 is not required for HC survival. In our experiments, no HC loss was detected in the cochleae of Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE or Atoh1CreER/Atoh1-OE mice at P7 (Fig. S5), indicating that Atoh1 overexpression does not affect the initial differentiation of cochlear HCs. We observed scattered OHC loss in Atoh1CreER/Atoh1-OE cochleae at P11 and progressive HC loss in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice around P15 (Fig. 6), accompanied by the decreased level and abnormal pattern of Prestin expression in the OHCs. These results coincided with the OHC loss pattern in the mice expressing mutated Prestin [79]. Prestin, a motor protein responsible for the fast electromotility of OHCs, can be detected in the lateral OHC membrane in neonatal mice, and its expression plateaus at about P10. Prestin knockout mice showed premature loss of OHCs in the basal quarter of the cochlea [78]. In mice with mutant Prestin, no missing OHCs were detected at P12, while progressive OHC loss was observed after P18 [79]. This implies that the inhibition and dysfunction of Prestin, which was caused by the consistently high level of Atoh1, impaired the survival of premature cochlear OHCs. On the other hand, Atoh1 overexpression might directly trigger apoptosis of cochlear HCs. It is possible that the downregulation of Prestin and VGLUT3 and changes in the diameter and length of OHCs might be a reflection of a protracted cell death process. Although we detected the expression changes of some HC maturation-related genes (like Slc26a5 and Slc17a8) and several apoptosis-related genes (like Casp3 and Bcl2), the expression of many other genes might also have been changed after consistent overexpression of Atoh1. A detailed analysis of the single-cell sequencing datasets of cochlear cells will better shed light on this issue.
Time-restricted regulation of genes is vital for functional HC regeneration
The importance of critical genes’ timed and quantitative expression has been observed in other organs. For example, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) gene therapy has been reported to promote motor neuron survival and axon outgrowth. However, uncontrolled delivery of GDNF results in axon entrapment and impairs axon regeneration. On the other hand, the time-restricted expression of GDNF can significantly reduce nerve hypertrophy and axon entrapment and is sufficient to promote long-term motor neuron survival and facilitate the recovery of compound muscle action [81]. In addition, Krüppel-like factor 1 (Klf1) is a core cardiomyogenic trigger in zebrafish and is induced in adult zebrafish myocardium upon injury. However, zebrafish with constitutive Klf1 expression exhibit heart failure-like symptoms and reduced survival, and only transient activation of Klf1 yields mature myocardium without pathological dilation [82].
Atoh1 is a vital gene for HC regeneration in the inner ear, and the first trial of gene therapy for deafness in humans based on delivering the recombinant adenovirus 5 vector containing the human cDNA of atonal transcription factor (Hath1), a homolog of Atoh1, is currently underway in the US (NCT02132130). The results of this trial have not been released yet. However, according to our results, the long-term expression of Atoh1 by the adenovirus 5 vector might also be detrimental to the maturation and survival of the newly regenerated HCs in humans and impede the functional recovery of hearing. Thus, the proper duration of Atoh1 expression should be considered when designing future gene therapy strategies for sensorineural deafness. Recently, we showed that co-expression of Gfi1, Pou4f3, and Atoh1 could generate relatively more mature and functional IHCs than overexpression of Atoh1 alone, which suggests that adding other crucial transcriptional factors for HCs might help overcome the limitation of Atoh1 expression alone and might promote the further maturation of newly generated HCs from the direct trans-differentiation of SCs [31, 80].
Materials and methods
Animals
Gfi1Cre mice [36] were generously provided by Lin Gan of the University of Rochester. Atoh1CreERT2/+(Atoh1CreER) [13] and PrestinCreERT2/+ (PrestinCreER) mice [59] were gifted by Liu Zhiyong of the Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences. CAG-loxP-stop-loxP-Atoh1-HA mice were kind gifts from St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. Ai14 (Stock 007924) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Transgenic mice were in the C57BL/6J background. To activate Atoh1 in vivo in HCs at different developmental stages, we bred CAG-loxP-stop-loxP-Atoh1-HA mice with mice expressing Cre under the control of different promoters. Tamoxifen diluted in corn oil was injected intraperitoneally once at P2 for Atoh1CreER mice and at P7 for PrestinCreER mice at 0.2 mg/g body weight. Male and female mice were used for all experiments, and all animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Fudan University.
Vestibular function test
The tail-hanging reflex and swimming tests were evaluated at P30–35 to observe the vestibular function. The examination of tail-hanging reflex was performed by holding the mouse by the tail, lifting it to approximately 20 cm, and then descending to the starting point. Mice with normal behaviors would extend their forelimbs toward the ground, which scored 0, while the abnormal mice always ventrally bent their bodies, which scored 1. The swimming test was performed in a standard cage with at least 15 cm of water at 24–26 °C, which allowed the free swimming of mice. Mice were recorded on camera for a maximum of 1 min to assess their swimming ability on a scale of 0 to 3 [37]. The genotype of the tested mice was blinded to the investigator.
Accurate vestibular function was evaluated by a binocular video-oculography-based vestibular function testing system provided by Prof. Fangyi Chen’s team from the Southern University of Science and Technology. The HAVOR test was conducted to evaluate the function of the semicircular canals [38, 39]. Mice were fixed on the rotating platform with a noninvasive animal-immobility setup. The HAVOR test was performed under sinusoidal rotation with a peak velocity of 40º/s. Rotation stimuli at 0.5, 0.8, 1.0, 1.6, and 3.2 Hz were applied for no less than 90 s to collect adequate video data. The side cameras synchronously recorded eye movement under infrared illumination. The mouse’s pupil movement data were calibrated and calculated to obtain HAVOR gain values, defined as the amplitude ratio between response and stimulus [38]. To detect vestibular-ocular reflex responses derived from macular organs, we conducted the OVAR test, in which mice were fixed in the platform tilted 17° relative to the ground in a nose-down position and rotated at a constant velocity [39, 83]. The amplitude data of eye movement was recorded and compared.
ABR recording
The hearing thresholds of the mice were examined with the ABR test. Animals were anesthetized with Dexdomitor (100 mg/kg) and Zoletil (25 mg/kg) and placed in a sound-attenuating chamber. Frequency-specific auditory responses were measured using the Tucker–Davis Technology system III, and all ABR tests were performed on mice at P25 and P35. Three mice were used in each experiment. Auditory thresholds were determined by decreasing the sound intensity of each stimulus from 90 to 20 dB in 5 dB steps at different frequencies (8, 16, 24, and 32 kHz) until the lowest sound intensity with reproducible and recognizable waveforms was detected. Thresholds were presented as the mean ± SEM and analyzed at individual frequencies using two-tailed t tests.
RNA isolation and qPCR
After cochlear collection, the bone labyrinth and spiral ganglion were removed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cochlear samples from P7 mice did not include spiral ligaments and striate vascularis, but cochlear samples from P15 mice did include the spiral ligament and stria vascularis which were difficult to separate from the cochlear sensory epithelia. After isolation, three cochleae from each group were rapidly pooled in TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to obtain the total RNA following the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription using the 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara) following the manufacturer’s protocol. qPCR was performed using a TB Green PrimeScript qPCR Kit (Takara) on a Bio-Rad 7500 detection system (Applied Biosystem). Gapdh was used as the housekeeping gene for endogenous reference. The quantification of relative gene expression, compared to Gapdh, was analyzed by the 2−ΔΔCT method. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Tissue preparation and immunofluorescence
For immunofluorescence staining, tissues were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS by immersion for 1 h at room temperature. Cochleae were decalcified in 120 mM EDTA overnight at 4 °C. After dissection, the samples were washed in PBS and blocked with 10% donkey serum in 10 mM PBS with 1% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies were rabbit anti-MYOSIN VIIa (MYO7A, 1: 800, Proteus Biosciences, Cat# 25-6790), goat anti-SOX2 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat# sc-17320), goat anti-Prestin (1:300, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat# sc-22692), rabbit anti-VGLUT3 (1:300, Synaptic Systems, Cat# 135203), mouse anti-PARVALBUMIN (1:800, Sigma, Cat# P3088), mouse anti-TUJ1 (1:1000, Sigma, Cat#T2200), mouse anti-Oncomodulin (OCM, 1:300, Santa Cruz, Cat# sc-7446), goat anti-ANXA4 (1:200, R&D Systems, Cat# AF4146), and goat anti-SPP1 (1:200, R&D Systems, Cat# AF808). The next day, the appropriate secondary Alexa Flour-conjugated antibodies (1:300, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were incubated at room temperature for 1–2 h. HC bundles were labeled with phalloidin (1:800, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and nuclei were labeled with DAPI (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Image acquisition and cell counts
High-magnification fluorescent images were acquired using a 63 × objective on a Leica SP8 confocal microscope, while whole utricle images were captured using a 20 × objective on the same confocal microscope. Images were analyzed using Fiji software (v1.53, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA). For utricles and saccules, the numbers of HCs were manually counted per 100 × 100 μm2 area in both the striolar and extrastriolar region (Fig. 2C). For every crista, cell counts were performed per 100 × 100 μm2 area in the central and peripheral regions. We chose HCs with bundles randomly and measured the heights of its tallest stereocilia in each cells in the utricular striola and extrastriola. Each cochlea was divided into the apical, middle, and basal turns, and two regions of 100 μm length in each turn were randomly chosen and the average number of HCs was calculated for each sample. The number of spiral ganglion neurons in Rosenthal’s canal was counted in each section, and data were obtained from five separate sections in each cochlea to obtain a mean value.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 software. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM, and two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-tests, or one- or two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis via Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were used to determine statistical significance. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Details of the experiments can be found in the figures and figure legends.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The manuscript has data included as electronic supplementary material.
References
Cox BC, Chai R, Lenoir A et al (2014) Spontaneous hair cell regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochlea in vivo. Dev Camb Engl 141:816–829. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.103036
Golub JS, Tong L, Ngyuen TB et al (2012) Hair cell replacement in adult mouse utricles after targeted ablation of hair cells with diphtheria toxin. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 32:15093–15105. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1709-12.2012
Kawamoto K, Izumikawa M, Beyer LA et al (2009) Spontaneous hair cell regeneration in the mouse utricle following gentamicin ototoxicity. Heart Res 247:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2008.08.010
McGovern MM, Randle MR, Cuppini CL et al (2019) Multiple supporting cell subtypes are capable of spontaneous hair cell regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochlea. Dev Camb Engl 146:dev171009. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.171009
White PM, Doetzlhofer A, Lee YS et al (2006) Mammalian cochlear supporting cells can divide and trans-differentiate into hair cells. Nature 441:984–987. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04849
Fekete DM, Muthukumar S, Karagogeos D (1998) Hair cells and supporting cells share a common progenitor in the avian inner ear. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 18:7811–7821. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-19-07811.1998
Bermingham NA, Hassan BA, Price SD et al (1999) Math1: an essential gene for the generation of inner ear hair cells. Science 284:1837–1841. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5421.1837
Dabdoub A, Puligilla C, Jones JM et al (2008) Sox2 signaling in prosensory domain specification and subsequent hair cell differentiation in the developing cochlea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:18396–18401. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808175105
Yamoah EN, Li M, Shah A et al (2020) Using Sox2 to alleviate the hallmarks of age-related hearing loss. Ageing Res Rev 59:101042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2020.101042
Chen P, Johnson JE, Zoghbi HY, Segil N (2002) The role of Math1 in inner ear development: uncoupling the establishment of the sensory primordium from hair cell fate determination. Dev Camb Engl 129:2495–2505. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.129.10.2495
Fritzsch B, Matei VA, Nichols DH et al (2005) Atoh1 null mice show directed afferent fiber growth to undifferentiated ear sensory epithelia followed by incomplete fiber retention. Dev Dyn Off Publ Am Assoc Anat 233:570–583. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20370
Pan N, Jahan I, Kersigo J et al (2011) Conditional deletion of Atoh1 using Pax2-Cre results in viable mice without differentiated cochlear hair cells that have lost most of the organ of Corti. Heart Res 275:66–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2010.12.002
Yang H, Xie X, Deng M et al (2000) (2010) Generation and characterization of Atoh1-Cre knock-in mouse line. Genes N Y 48:407–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20633
Bucks SA, Cox BC, Vlosich BA et al (2017) Supporting cells remove and replace sensory receptor hair cells in a balance organ of adult mice. eLife 6:e18128. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18128
Stojanova ZP, Kwan T, Segil N (2016) Epigenetic regulation of Atoh1 guides hair cell development in the mammalian cochlea. Dev Camb Engl 143:1632. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.137976
Driver EC, Sillers L, Coate TM et al (2013) The Atoh1-lineage gives rise to hair cells and supporting cells within the mammalian cochlea. Dev Biol 376:86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.01.005
Pan N, Jahan I, Kersigo J et al (2012) A novel Atoh1 “self-terminating” mouse model reveals the necessity of proper Atoh1 level and duration for hair cell differentiation and viability. PloS One 7:e30358. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030358
Cai T, Seymour ML, Zhang H et al (2013) Conditional deletion of Atoh1 reveals distinct critical periods for survival and function of hair cells in the organ of Corti. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 33:10110–10122. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5606-12.2013
Chonko KT, Jahan I, Stone J et al (2013) Atoh1 directs hair cell differentiation and survival in the late embryonic mouse inner ear. Dev Biol 381:401–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.06.022
Jahan I, Pan N, Kersigo J, Fritzsch B (2015) Neurog1 can partially substitute for Atoh1 function in hair cell differentiation and maintenance during organ of Corti development. Dev Camb Engl 142:2810–2821. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.123091
Jahan I, Elliott KL, Fritzsch B (2018) Understanding molecular evolution and development of the organ of Corti can provide clues for hearing restoration. Integr Comp Biol 58:351–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icy019
Liu Z, Dearman JA, Cox BC et al (2012) Age-dependent in vivo conversion of mouse cochlear pillar and Deiters’ cells to immature hair cells by Atoh1 ectopic expression. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 32:6600–6610. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0818-12.2012
Sayyid ZN, Wang T, Chen L et al (2019) Atoh1 directs regeneration and functional recovery of the mature mouse vestibular system. Cell Rep 28:312-324.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.028
Zheng JL, Gao WQ (2000) Overexpression of Math1 induces robust production of extra hair cells in postnatal rat inner ears. Nat Neurosci 3:580–586. https://doi.org/10.1038/75753
Gao Z, Kelly MC, Yu D et al (2016) Spatial and age-dependent hair cell generation in the postnatal mammalian utricle. Mol Neurobiol 53:1601–1612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-015-9119-0
Shou J, Zheng JL, Gao WQ (2003) Robust generation of new hair cells in the mature mammalian inner ear by adenoviral expression of Hath1. Mol Cell Neurosci 23:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1044-7431(03)00066-6
Kawamoto K, Ishimoto S-I, Minoda R et al (2003) Math1 gene transfer generates new cochlear hair cells in mature guinea pigs in vivo. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 23:4395–4400. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-11-04395.2003
Izumikawa M, Minoda R, Kawamoto K et al (2005) Auditory hair cell replacement and hearing improvement by Atoh1 gene therapy in deaf mammals. Nat Med 11:271–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1193
Walters BJ, Coak E, Dearman J et al (2017) In vivo interplay between p27Kip1, GATA3, ATOH1, and POU4F3 converts non-sensory cells to hair cells in adult mice. Cell Rep 19:307–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.044
Shu Y, Li W, Huang M et al (2019) Renewed proliferation in adult mouse cochlea and regeneration of hair cells. Nat Commun 10:5530. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13157-7
Chen Y, Gu Y, Li Y et al (2021) Generation of mature and functional hair cells by co-expression of Gfi1, Pou4f3, and Atoh1 in the postnatal mouse cochlea. Cell Rep 35:109016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109016
Jahan I, Pan N, Fritzsch B (2015) Opportunities and limits of the one gene approach: the ability of Atoh1 to differentiate and maintain hair cells depends on the molecular context. Front Cell Neurosci 9:26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00026
Fritzsch B, Eberl DF, Beisel KW (2010) The role of bHLH genes in ear development and evolution: revisiting a 10-year-old hypothesis. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 67:3089–3099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010-0403-x
Kelly MC, Chang Q, Pan A et al (2012) Atoh1 directs the formation of sensory mosaics and induces cell proliferation in the postnatal mammalian cochlea in vivo. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 32:6699–6710. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5420-11.2012
Wallis D, Hamblen M, Zhou Y et al (2003) The zinc finger transcription factor Gfi1, implicated in lymphomagenesis, is required for inner ear hair cell differentiation and survival. Dev Camb Engl 130:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00190
Yang H, Gan J, Xie X et al (2010) Gfi1-Cre knock-in mouse line: a tool for inner ear hair cell-specific gene deletion. Genes N Y N 2000 48:400–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20632
Hardisty-Hughes RE, Parker A, Brown SDM (2010) A hearing and vestibular phenotyping pipeline to identify mouse mutants with hearing impairment. Nat Protoc 5:177–190. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.204
Yang X, Zhou S, Wu J et al (2019) Surgery-free video-oculography in mouse models: enabling quantitative and short-interval longitudinal assessment of vestibular function. Neurosci Lett 696:212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.12.036
Ono K, Keller J, López Ramírez O et al (2020) Retinoic acid degradation shapes zonal development of vestibular organs and sensitivity to transient linear accelerations. Nat Commun 11:63. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13710-4
Eatock RA, Songer JE (2011) Vestibular hair cells and afferents: two channels for head motion signals. Annu Rev Neurosci 34:501–534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113710
Burns JC, Stone JS (2017) Development and regeneration of vestibular hair cells in mammals. Semin Cell Dev Biol 65:96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.11.001
McInturff S, Burns JC, Kelley MW (2018) Characterization of spatial and temporal development of type I and type II hair cells in the mouse utricle using new cell-type-specific markers. Biol Open 7:bio08083. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.038083
Rüsch A, Lysakowski A, Eatock RA (1998) Postnatal development of type I and type II hair cells in the mouse utricle: acquisition of voltage-gated conductances and differentiated morphology. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 18:7487–7501. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-18-07487.1998
Hoffman LF, Choy KR, Sultemeier DR, Simmons DD (2018) Oncomodulin expression reveals new insights into the cellular organization of the murine utricle striola. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol JARO 19:33–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-017-0652-6
Simmons DD, Tong B, Schrader AD, Hornak AJ (2010) Oncomodulin identifies different hair cell types in the mammalian inner ear. J Comp Neurol 518:3785–3802. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.22424
Collado MS, Thiede BR, Baker W et al (2011) The postnatal accumulation of junctional E-cadherin is inversely correlated with the capacity for supporting cells to convert directly into sensory hair cells in mammalian balance organs. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 31:11855–11866. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2525-11.2011
Oesterle EC, Campbell S, Taylor RR et al (2008) Sox2 and JAGGED1 expression in normal and drug-damaged adult mouse inner ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol JARO 9:65–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-007-0106-7
Warchol ME, Massoodnia R, Pujol R et al (2019) Development of hair cell phenotype and calyx nerve terminals in the neonatal mouse utricle. J Comp Neurol 527:1913–1928. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24658
Xiang M, Maklad A, Pirvola U, Fritzsch B (2003) Brn3c null mutant mice show long-term, incomplete retention of some afferent inner ear innervation. BMC Neurosci 4:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-4-2
Elliott KL, Kersigo J, Lee JH et al (2021) Sustained loss of Bdnf affects peripheral but not central vestibular targets. Front Neurol 12:768456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.768456
Kersigo J, Fritzsch B (2015) Inner ear hair cells deteriorate in mice engineered to have no or diminished innervation. Front Aging Neurosci 7:33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00033
Moser T, Starr A (2016) Auditory neuropathy–neural and synaptic mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurol 12:135–149. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.10
Akil O, Seal RP, Burke K et al (2012) Restoration of hearing in the VGLUT3 knockout mouse using virally mediated gene therapy. Neuron 75:283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.019
Li C, Shu Y, Wang G et al (2018) Characterizing a novel vGlut3-P2A-iCreER knockin mouse strain in cochlea. Hear Res 364:12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2018.04.006
Ruel J, Emery S, Nouvian R et al (2008) Impairment of SLC17A8 encoding vesicular glutamate transporter-3, VGLUT3, underlies nonsyndromic deafness DFNA25 and inner hair cell dysfunction in null mice. Am J Hum Genet 83:278–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.07.008
Seal RP, Akil O, Yi E et al (2008) Sensorineural deafness and seizures in mice lacking vesicular glutamate transporter 3. Neuron 57:263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.032
Obholzer N, Wolfson S, Trapani JG et al (2008) Vesicular glutamate transporter 3 is required for synaptic transmission in zebrafish hair cells. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 28:2110–2118. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5230-07.2008
Zheng J, Shen W, He DZ et al (2000) Prestin is the motor protein of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature 405:149–155. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012009
Fang J, Zhang W-C, Yamashita T et al (2012) Outer hair cell-specific prestin-CreERT2 knockin mouse lines. Genes N Y N 2000 50:124–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20810
Belyantseva IA, Adler HJ, Curi R et al (2000) Expression and localization of prestin and the sugar transporter GLUT-5 during development of electromotility in cochlear outer hair cells. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 20:RC116. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-j0002.2000
Abe T, Kakehata S, Kitani R et al (2007) Developmental expression of the outer hair cell motor prestin in the mouse. J Membr Biol 215:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-007-9004-5
Mak ACY, Szeto IYY, Fritzsch B, Cheah KSE (2009) Differential and overlapping expression pattern of SOX2 and SOX9 in inner ear development. Gene Expr Patterns GEP 9:444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gep.2009.04.003
Dvorakova M, Macova I, Bohuslavova R et al (2020) Early ear neuronal development, but not olfactory or lens development, can proceed without SOX2. Dev Biol 457:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.09.003
Scheffer DI, Shen J, Corey DP, Chen Z-Y (2015) Gene expression by mouse inner ear hair cells during development. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 35:6366–6380. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5126-14.2015
Chow LML, Tian Y, Weber T et al (2006) Inducible Cre recombinase activity in mouse cerebellar granule cell precursors and inner ear hair cells. Dev Dyn Off Publ Am Assoc Anat 235:2991–2998. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20948
Ni W, Lin C, Guo L et al (2016) Extensive supporting cell proliferation and mitotic hair cell generation by in vivo genetic reprogramming in the neonatal mouse cochlea. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 36:8734–8745. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0060-16.2016
Wang G-P, Chatterjee I, Batts SA et al (2010) Notch signaling and Atoh1 expression during hair cell regeneration in the mouse utricle. Hear Res 267:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2010.03.085
Oesterle EC, Cunningham DE, Westrum LE, Rubel EW (2003) Ultrastructural analysis of [3H]thymidine-labeled cells in the rat utricular macula. J Comp Neurol 463:177–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10756
Forge A, Li L, Nevill G (1998) Hair cell recovery in the vestibular sensory epithelia of mature guinea pigs. J Comp Neurol 397:69–88
Warchol ME, Lambert PR, Goldstein BJ et al (1993) Regenerative proliferation in inner ear sensory epithelia from adult guinea pigs and humans. Science 259:1619–1622. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8456285
Forge A, Li L, Corwin JT, Nevill G (1993) Ultrastructural evidence for hair cell regeneration in the mammalian inner ear. Science 259:1616–1619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8456284
Kirkegaard M, Jørgensen JM (2000) Continuous hair cell turnover in the inner ear vestibular organs of a mammal, the Daubenton’s bat (Myotis daubentonii). Naturwissenschaften 87:83–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140050015
Masetto S, Correia MJ (1997) Electrophysiological properties of vestibular sensory and supporting cells in the labyrinth slice before and during regeneration. J Neurophysiol 78:1913–1927. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1997.78.4.1913
Jan TA, Eltawil Y, Ling AH et al (2021) Spatiotemporal dynamics of inner ear sensory and non-sensory cells revealed by single-cell transcriptomics. Cell Rep 36:109358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109358
Xue J, Peterson EH (2006) Hair bundle heights in the utricle: differences between macular locations and hair cell types. J Neurophysiol 95:171–186. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00800.2005
Li A, Xue J, Peterson EH (2008) Architecture of the mouse utricle: macular organization and hair bundle heights. J Neurophysiol 99:718–733. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00831.2007
Moravec WJ, Peterson EH (2004) Differences between stereocilia numbers on type I and type II vestibular hair cells. J Neurophysiol 92:3153–3160. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00428.2004
Liberman MC, Gao J, He DZZ et al (2002) Prestin is required for electromotility of the outer hair cell and for the cochlear amplifier. Nature 419:300–304. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01059
Cheatham MA, Edge RM, Homma K et al (2015) Prestin-dependence of outer hair cell survival and partial rescue of outer hair cell loss in PrestinV499G/Y501H knockin mice. PloS One 10:e0145428. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145428
Costa A, Sanchez-Guardado L, Juniat S et al (2015) Generation of sensory hair cells by genetic programming with a combination of transcription factors. Dev Camb Engl 142:1948–1959. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.119149
Eggers R, de Winter F, Hoyng SA et al (2019) Timed GDNF gene therapy using an immune-evasive gene switch promotes long distance axon regeneration. Brain J Neurol 142:295–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy340
Ogawa M, Geng F-S, Humphreys DT et al (2021) Krüppel-like factor 1 is a core cardiomyogenic trigger in zebrafish. Science 372:201–205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe2762
Beraneck M, Bojados M, Le Séac’h A et al (2012) Ontogeny of mouse vestibulo-ocular reflex following genetic or environmental alteration of gravity sensing. PloS One 7:e40414. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040414
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022ZD0205400), the National Science Foundation for outstanding young people (81922018), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82192861, 82271159, 82071049, 82271170, 82201283), Foundation from Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (22140900800) and Foundation from Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (20234Z0007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WL and YC conceived and designed the experiments. DY, WN, YH, QZ, YZ, and TJ performed the experiments. WN, YC, and WL analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. DY, WN, and YH contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
This study followed the “Guiding Directive for Humane Treatment of Laboratory Animals” reporting guidelines enacted by the Chinese National Ministry of Science and Technology in 2006. All experiments were approved by the Shanghai Medical Experimental Animal Administrative Committee (Permit Number: 2009-0082) and were in accordance with animal welfare principles.
Consent to publish
No human subjects were involved in this research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Figure S1
Overexpression of Atoh1 led to the dysfunction of the vestibular system. (A) The experimental protocol. Atoh1 overexpression was induced from E13.5 in the vestibule, and mice were sacrificed at P35. (B) Tail-hanging test of control and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice at P35. Control mice would reach for the horizontal surface when the tail was held (score 0), while most Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice bent their bodies ventrally (score 1). (C) The tail-hanging test scores at P35 were significantly different between control and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice. (D) Swimming test. Control mice could swim normally (score 0), while Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice would swim irregularly (score 1), float immobile (score 2), or tumble underwater (score 3, not shown in the figure). (E) The swimming test scores at P35 were significantly different between control and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice. (F) Gain of HAVOR test. The gain of Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE was significantly decreased compared with the control group at all frequencies. (G) Comparison of the amplitude of eye movement in Gfi1Cre and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice in the OVAR test. Data in C, E, F, and G are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. Wilcoxon test in C and E. Unpaired t-test in G. Two-way ANOVA in F. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Supplementary file1 (TIF 4292 KB)
Figure S2
Atoh1 overexpression did not result in HC loss in the vestibular epithelium. (A) The density of MYO7A+ HCs was comparable in the saccule of control and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice at P35. (B) The density of MYO7A+ HCs was comparable in the crista of control and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice at P35. (C) Quantification of HCs per 10,000 μm2 in the striola and extrastriola of the utricle at P15 and P35. (D) Quantification of HCs per 10,000 μm2 in the striola and extrastriola of the saccule at P15 and P35. (E) Quantification of HCs per 10,000 μm2 in the crista's central and peripheral zone at P15 and P35. Scale bars: 50 μm and 25 μm in A, 25 μm in B. Data in C-E are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. Two-way ANOVA. Supplementary file2 (TIF 5680 KB)
Figure S3
Atoh1 overexpression interfered with type I HC differentiation in vestibular organs. (A) Co-immunolabeling of MYO7A+ and OCM in the saccule. OCM+ HCs decreased significantly in the striola of the Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mouse saccule. (B) Co-immunolabeling of MYO7A+ and OCM in the crista. OCM+ HCs decreased significantly in the central zone of Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mouse cristae. (C) Comparison of OCM+/ MYO7A+ HCs per 10,000 μm2 in the striola of the saccule and the central zone of the cristae. (D) Co-immunolabeling of MYO7A and SPP1 in the utricle. (E) Co-immunolabeling of MYO7A and SPP1 in the saccule. (F) Co-immunolabeling of MYO7A and SPP1 in the cristae. (G) Quantification and comparison of SPP1+/ MYO7A+ HCs in the extrastriola of the saccules and the cristae's peripheral zone. Scale bars: 50 μm in B, 100 μm in A, B, and D-G. Data in C and H are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. Two-way ANOVA. ****p < 0.0001. Supplementary file3 (TIF 7482 KB)
Figure S4
Atoh1 overexpression caused type I HCs to gain type II markers. (A) Co-immunolabeling of MYO7A+ and SOX2 in the utricle. (B) Co-immunolabeling of MYO7A and SOX2 in the saccule. (C) Co-immunolabeling of MYO7A and SOX2 in cristae. (D) Comparison of the percentage of SOX2+/MYO7A+ HCs in the saccule and cristae at P15. (E) Co-immunolabeling of MYO7A and ANXA4 in the utricle. (F) Co-immunolabeling of MYO7A and ANXA4 in the saccule. (G) Co-immunolabeling of MYO7A and ANXA4 in the cristae. (H) Quantification and comparison of the percentage of ANXA4+/ MYO7A+ HCs in the saccule and cristae. Scale bars: 50 μm in B and C, and 100 μm in others. Data in D and H are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. Two-way ANOVA. ****p < 0.0001. Supplementary file4 (TIF 10996 KB)
Figure S5
Overexpression of Atoh1 did not affect the fate determination of HCs during the embryonic stage in the cochlea. (A) The experimental protocol. Atoh1 overexpression was induced from E15.5, and mice were sacrificed at P2 and P7. (B) MYO7A+ HCs of the cochlea at P2. No HC loss was seen in Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice. (C) Hair bundles of HCs by staining for phalloidin at P2. (D) Hair bundles of HCs by staining for phalloidin at P7. (E) Staining of MYO7A and SOX2 at P7. No SOX2+/MYO7A+ HCs were observed. (F) Quantification of MYO7A+ IHCs and OHCs in the cochleae at P2. (G) Quantification of MYO7A+ IHCs and OHCs in the cochleae at P7. Scale bars: 20 μm. Data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. Two-way ANOVA. Supplementary file5 (TIF 6822 KB)
Figure S6
Overexpression of Atoh1 disturbed the maturation of HCs during the postnatal period in the cochlea. (A) Atoh1CreER mice were crossed with CAG-loxP-stop-loxP-Atoh1-HA mice to generate Atoh1CreER/Atoh1-OE mice. (B) The experimental protocol of C-E. Atoh1 overexpression was induced from P2, and mice were sacrificed at P7. (C) Comparison of IHCs and OHCs of Atoh1CreER/Atoh1-OE mice at P7. (D) Co-immunolabeling of Prestin and VGLUT3 with PARVALBUMIN at P7. The staining of Prestin and VGLUT3 was weak in Atoh1CreER/Atoh1-OE mice. (E) Relative mRNA expression at P7. (F) PrestinCreER mice were crossed with CAG-loxP-stop-loxP-Atoh1-HA mice to generate PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE mice. (G) The experimental protocol of H-I. Atoh1 overexpression was induced from P7, and mice were sacrificed at P25. (H) Co-immunolabeling of PARVALBUMIN and Prestin. Scattered HC loss and uneven staining of Prestin were observed in the cochlea of PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE mice at P25. (I) OHC diameter and length of control and PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE mice at P25. Scale bars: 20 μm. Data in C, E, and I are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. Two-way ANOVA in C. Unpaired t-test in E and I. ***p < 0.001. ****p < 0.0001. Supplementary file6 (TIF 4933 KB)
Figure S7
Atoh1 overexpression led to progressive HC death and hearing loss. (A) The experimental protocol of B-C. Atoh1 overexpression was induced from P2, and mice were sacrificed at P11. (B) HCs in the cochlea of control and Atoh1CreER/Atoh1-OE mice at P11. (C) Comparison of IHCs and OHCs at P11. (D) The experimental protocol of E and F. Atoh1 overexpression was induced from P7, and mice were sacrificed at P21, P25, P35, and P53. (E) ABR thresholds of control and PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE mice at P25 and P35. (F) MYO7A staining showed no HC loss in the cochleae of control mice. Scattered HC loss was seen in PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE cochleae at P21. Massive HC loss was seen in PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE mouse cochleae at P35. Few OHCs were observed in PrestinCreER/Atoh1-OE mouse cochleae at P53. (G) Quantification of the HC number from the apex to the base at P21, P25, P35, and P53. Scale bars: 20 μm. Data in C and G are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. Two-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, *** p<0.01, ****p < 0.0001. Supplementary file7 (TIF 4390 KB)
Figure S8
Atoh1 overexpression did not interfere with the nerve fiber and spiral ganglia neurons. (A-B) The spiral ganglion neurons and nerve fibers of control and Gfi1Cre/Atoh1-OE mice in the cochlea at P35. (C) Comparison of the number of SGNs of Rosenthal’s canal in the cochlea at P35. (D) The nerve fibers of vestibular organs. Scale bars: 50 μm. Data in C are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. Unpaired t-test. Supplementary file 8 (TIF 5357 KB)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
You, D., Ni, W., Huang, Y. et al. The proper timing of Atoh1 expression is pivotal for hair cell subtype differentiation and the establishment of inner ear function. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 80, 349 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-023-04947-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-023-04947-w