Skip to main content
Log in

Polynomial bounds on the Sobolev norms of the solutions of the nonlinear wave equation with time dependent potential

  • Published:
Archiv der Mathematik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the Cauchy problem for the nonlinear wave equation \(u_{tt} - \Delta _x u +q(t, x) u + u^3 = 0\) with smooth potential \(q(t, x) \ge 0\) having compact support with respect to x. The linear equation without the nonlinear term \(u^3\) and potential periodic in t may have solutions with exponentially increasing \(H^1(\mathbb {R}^{3}_{x})\) norm as \(t\rightarrow \infty \). In Petkov and Tzvetkov (IMRN, https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnz014), it was established that by adding the nonlinear term \(u^3\), the \(H^1(\mathbb {R}^{3}_{x})\) norm of the solution is polynomially bounded for every choice of q. In this paper, we show that the \(H^k({{\mathbb {R}}}^3_x)\) norm of this global solution is also polynomially bounded. To prove this, we apply a different argument based on the analysis of a sequence \(\{Y_k(n\tau _k)\}_{n = 0}^{\infty }\) with suitably defined energy norm \(Y_k(t)\) and \(0< \tau _k <1\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colombini, F., Petkov, V., Rauch, J.: Exponential growth for the wave equation with compact time-periodic positive potential. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 62, 565–582 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Petkov, V., Tzvetkov, N.: On the nonlinear wave equation with time periodic potential. IMRN (to appear). https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnz014

  3. Planchon, F., Tzvetkov, N., Visciglia, N.: On the growth of Sobolev norms for NLS on 2- and 3-dimensional manifolds. Anal. PDE 10, 1123–1147 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor, M.E.: Tools for PDE. Pseudodifferential Operators, Paradifferential Operators, and Layer Potentials, vol. 81. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2000)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the referee for his/her useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vesselin Petkov.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The aim of this Appendix is to prove the following

Lemma A.1

Let \(\{\alpha _n\}_{n=0}^{\infty }\) be a sequence of nonnegative numbers such that with some constants \(0< \gamma <1\), \(C > 0\), and \(y \ge 0\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha _n \le \alpha _{n-1} + C ((\alpha _{n-1})^{1 - \gamma }+ 1)(1 + n)^y,\, \forall n \ge 1. \end{aligned}$$

Then there exists a constant \({\tilde{C}} > 0\) such that

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha _n \le {\tilde{C}}(1 + n)^{\frac{1 + y}{\gamma }},\,\forall n \ge 1. \end{aligned}$$
(A.1)

Remark A.1

A similar estimate has been established in [3] for sequences \(\{\alpha _n\}\) satisfying the inequality

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha _n \le \alpha _{n-1} + C \alpha _{n-1}^{1 - \gamma }. \end{aligned}$$

Proof

We can choose a large constant \(C_1 > 0\) such that

$$\begin{aligned} (\alpha _{n-1})^{1 - \gamma } + 1 \le C_1 (\alpha _{n-1} + 1)^{1-\gamma }, \, \forall n\ge 1. \end{aligned}$$

This implies with a new constant \(C_2 > 0\) the inequality

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha _n + 1\le \alpha _{n-1} + 1+ C_2(\alpha _{n-1} + 1)^{1 - \gamma } (1 + n)^y,\, \forall n \ge 1. \end{aligned}$$

Setting \(\beta _n = \alpha _n + 1,\) we reduce the proof to a sequence \(\alpha _n\) satisfying the inequality

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha _n \le \alpha _{n-1} + C_2 (\alpha _{n-1})^{1 - \gamma }(1 + n)^y, \,n \ge 1. \end{aligned}$$

We will prove (A.1) by recurrence. Assume that (A.1) holds for \(n-1\). Therefore

$$\begin{aligned}&\alpha _n \le {\tilde{C}} n^{\frac{1 + y}{\gamma }} + C_2 \Bigl ( {\tilde{C}} n^{\frac{1 + y}{\gamma }}\Bigr )^{1-\gamma } (1+n)^y \\&\quad = {\tilde{C}} n^{\frac{1 + y}{\gamma }} \Bigl [ 1 + C_2 {\tilde{C}}^{-\gamma }n^{-1 - y}(1+ n)^y\Bigr ] \\&\quad = {\tilde{C}} (1+n)^{\frac{1 + y}{\gamma }}\Bigl ( 1 -\frac{1}{n + 1}\Bigr )^{\frac{1 + y}{\gamma }}\Bigl [ 1 + C_2 {\tilde{C}}^{-\gamma }n^{-1}\Bigl (\frac{n}{n+1}\Bigr )^{- y}\Bigr ]. \end{aligned}$$

To establish (A.1) for n, it is sufficient to show that for large \({\tilde{C}}\), one has

$$\begin{aligned} f(n): = \Bigl ( 1 -\frac{1}{n + 1}\Bigr )^{\frac{1 + y}{\gamma }}\Bigl [ 1 + C_2 {\tilde{C}}^{-\gamma }n^{-1}\Bigl (\frac{n}{n+1}\Bigr )^{- y}\Bigr ] \le 1,\, n\ge 1. \end{aligned}$$
(A.2)

Setting \(C_2 {\tilde{C}}^{-\gamma } = \epsilon \), a simple calculus yields

$$\begin{aligned} f'(n)= & {} \frac{1 + y}{\gamma } \Bigl (1 - \frac{1}{n+1}\Bigr )^{\frac{1 + y}{\gamma }- 1}\frac{1}{(n+1)^2}\Bigl [ 1 + \frac{\epsilon }{n}\Bigl (\frac{n}{n+ 1}\Bigr )^{- y}\Bigr ] \\&+ \epsilon \Bigl (1 {-} \frac{1}{n+1}\Bigr )^{\frac{1 + y}{\gamma }}\Bigl [ -\frac{1}{n^2}\Bigl (\frac{n}{n+ 1}\Bigr )^{-y}{-}y n^{-1} \frac{1}{(n+1)^2} \Bigl (1 - \frac{1}{n+1}\Bigr )^{-y -1}\Bigr ] \\&= \Bigl (1 - \frac{1}{n+1}\Bigr )^{\frac{1 + y}{\gamma }-1}\frac{1}{(n+ 1)^2}\Bigl [ \frac{1 + y}{\gamma }+ \frac{\epsilon }{n}\frac{1 + y}{\gamma }\Bigl ( 1 - \frac{1}{n+1}\Bigr )^{-\gamma } \\&\quad - [\epsilon \frac{n+1}{n}+ \frac{\epsilon y}{n}] \Bigl ( 1 - \frac{1}{n+1}\Bigr )^{-y}\Bigr ]. \end{aligned}$$

Notice that since \(\frac{1}{2} \le 1- \frac{1}{n+ 1}\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \Bigl ( 1 - \frac{1}{n+1}\Bigr )^{-\gamma } \le \Bigl (\frac{1}{2}\Bigr )^{-\gamma } \end{aligned}$$

which implies

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1 + y}{\gamma }- \epsilon [\frac{n+1 + y}{n}] \Bigl ( 1 - \frac{1}{n+1}\Bigr )^{-y} \ge \frac{1 + y}{\gamma }- \epsilon [\frac{n+1 + y}{n}] \Bigl (\frac{1}{2}\Bigr )^{-y}. \end{aligned}$$

For small \(\epsilon > 0\), the right hand side of the above inequality is positive. Consequently, for the derivative, we have \(f'(n) > 0\) and one deduces

$$\begin{aligned} f(n) < \lim _{n \rightarrow +\infty } f(n)= 1 \end{aligned}$$

This completes the proof of (A.2). \(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petkov, V., Tzvetkov, N. Polynomial bounds on the Sobolev norms of the solutions of the nonlinear wave equation with time dependent potential. Arch. Math. 114, 71–84 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00013-019-01373-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00013-019-01373-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation