Skip to main content
Log in

Word Diagrams in Teaching Classical Conditioning

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present experiment examined the value of word diagrams on the concept learning of university students. All students learned the concept of classical conditioning by reading a lesson in which the concept was defined and illustrated through examples and nonexamples. A diagram group studied a lesson in which word diagrams graphically illustrated the conditioning process in each example. A nondiagram group studied the same lesson with the diagrams omitted. On a posttest students classified novel examples and nonexamples as such and explained their reasons for their classifications. Diagram-group students were better at classifying nonexamples and at providing the correct reasons for classifying examples than were nondiagram-group students. Half the students in the diagram group drew diagrams on the posttest and half did not. Diagram drawers performed better than did nondrawers on several measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANDERSON, R. C., & KULHAVY, R. W. (1972). Learning concepts from definitions. American Educational Research Journal, 9, 385–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIERLEY, C., Mcsweeney, F. K., & VANNIEUWKERK, R. (1985). Classical conditioning of preferences for stimuli. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 316–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CANNON, D. S., & BAKER, T. B. (1981). Emetic and electric shock alcohol aversion therapy: Assessment of conditioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 20–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CANNON, D. S., Best, M. R., BATSON, J. D., & FELDMAN, M. (1983). Taste familiarity and apomorphine-induced taste aversions in humans. Behavior Research and Therapy, 21, 669–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CLARKE, J. C., & HAYES, K. (1984). Covert sensitization, stimulus relevance and the equipotentiality premise. Behavior Research and Therapy, 22, 451–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEKKER, E., PELSER, H. E., & GROEN, J. (1964). Conditioning as a cause of asthmatic attacks; a laboratory study. In C. M. FRANKS (Ed.), Conditioning techniques in clinical practice and research (pp. 116-131). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOERR, H. O. (1981). Cognitive derivation of generalization stimuli: Separation of components. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 73–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFRON, R. (1964). The conditioned inhibition of uncinate fits. In C. M. FRANKS (Ed.), Conditioning techniques in clinical practice and research (pp. 132–143). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ELLSON, D. G. (1941). Hallucinations produced by sensory conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOLDWATER, B. C., & ACKER, L. E. (1995). A descriptive notation system for contingency diagramming in behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 113–121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • GRANT, L. (1986). Categorizing and concept learning. In H. W. REESE & L. J. PARROTT (Eds.), Behavior science: Philosophical, methodological, and empirical advances (pp. 139–162). Hillsdale, Nj: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRANT, L. (1996). Positive reinforcement: A self-instructional exercise. [Www Document]. Url http://server.bmod.athabascau.ca/html/prtut/reinpair.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • GRANT, L., & EVANS, A. E. (1994). Principles of behavior analysis. New York: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRANT, L., MCAVOY, R., & KEENAN, J. B. (1982). Prompting and feedback variables in concept programming. Teaching of Psychology, 9, 173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYDUK, A. W. (1980). Increasing hand efficiency at cold temperatures by training hand vasodilation with a classical conditioning-biofeedback overlap design. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 5, 307–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HUMMEL, J. H., KAECK, D. J., BOWES, R. L., & RITTENHOUSE, R. D. (1994). Diagramming operant processes. The Aba Newsletter, 17, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, D. M., & STRATTON, R. P. (1966). Evaluation of five methods of teaching concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 48–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KASATKIN, N. I., & LEVIKOVA, A. M. (1932). On the development of early conditioned reflexes and differentiations of auditory stimuli in infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KELLER, F. S., & SCHOENFELD, W. S. (1950). Principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • MALOTT, R. W. (1992). Saving the world with contingency diagramming. The Aba Newsletter, 15, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • MATTAINI, M. A. (1995). Contingency diagrams as teaching tools. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 93–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MCCONAGHY, N. (1970). Penile response conditioning and its relationship to aversion therapy in homosexuals. Behavior Therapy, 1, 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MECHNER, F. (1959). A notational system for description of behavioral processes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2, 133–150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MERRILL, M. D., TENNYSON, R. D., & POSEY, L.O. (1992). Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide. Englewood Cliffs, Nj: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • MICHAEL, J., & SHAFER, E. (1995). State notation for teaching about behavioral procedures. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 123–140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, L. K. (1980). Principles of everyday behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Monterey, Ca: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, L. K., & Weaver, F. H. (1976). A behavioral technology for producing concept formation in university students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 289–300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PETERSON, N. (1978). An introduction to verbal behavior. Grand Rapids, Ml: Behavior Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • QUARTI, C., & RENAUD, J. (1964). A new treatment of constipation by conditioning: A preliminary report. In C. M. FRANKS (Ed.), Conditioning techniques in clinical practice and research (pp. 219–227). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • RAZRAN, G. (1949). Sentential and propositional generalization of salivary conditioning to verbal stimuli. Science, 109, 447–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • REESE, D. G., & WOOLFENDEN, R. M. (1973). Behavior analysis of everyday life: A program for the generalization of behavioral concepts. Kalamazoo, Ml: Behaviordelia.

    Google Scholar 

  • SNAPPER, A. G., KADDEN, R. M., & INGLIS, G. B. (1982). State notation of behavioral procedures. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 14, 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SWITZER, S. A. (1933). Disinhibition of the conditioned galvanic skin response. Journal of General Psychology, 9, 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TENNYSON, R. D., & COCCHIARELLA, M. J. (1986). An empirically based instructional design theory for teaching concepts. Review of Educational Research, 56, 40–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TENNYSON, R. D., Steve, M. W., & BOUTWELL, R. E. (1975). Instance sequence and analysis of instance attribute representation in concept acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 821–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VAITL, D., Gruppe, H., & Kimmel, H. D. (1985). Contextual stimulus control of conditional vasomotor and electrodermal reactions to angry and friendly faces. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 20, 124–131.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WADDILL, P. J., Mcdaniel, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1988). Illustrations as adjuncts to prose: A text-appropriate processing approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 457–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WATSON, J. B., & RAYNER, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WOLPE, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford, Ca: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grant, L.K. Word Diagrams in Teaching Classical Conditioning. Psychol Rec 52, 129–138 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395419

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395419

Navigation