Skip to main content
Log in

State Notation for Teaching About Behavioral Procedures

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complex operant procedures are not easy to describe unambiguously and several abstract notation systems have been developed for such description. Although they have not been generally adopted, such systems could be especially valuable to the teacher and student of behavior analysis, functioning like other figures and graphs as visual aids to ordinary verbal description. One of these systems, state notation, is described in some detail, and examples are provided of its use in teaching about behavior analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davenport, D. G., & Olson, R. D. (1968). A reinterpretation of extinction in discriminative avoidance. Psychonomic Science, 13, 5–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K., & Skinner, B. F. (1941). Some quantitative properties of anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kushner, H. K., Knapp, J. Z., & Snapper, A. G. (1967). A generalized behavioral controller. In IEEE proceedings of the 20th annual conference of Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Boston, Mass. (Vol. 9, 35.2). Washington, DC: MacGregor and Werner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawhinney, T. C. (1991, May). An experimental analysis of leadership. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Philadelphia.

  • Mechner, F. (1959). A notation system for description of behavioral processes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2, 133–150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1963). Laboratory studies in operant behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1988). State notation for behavioral contingencies. (Available from Jack Michael, Psychology Department, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Millenson, J. R. (1967). Principles of behavior analysis. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, W. D., & Epling, W. F. (1995). Behavior analysis and learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, E. (1988). A program of instruction to teach state notation. (Available from Jack Michael, Psychology Department, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1948). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1958). Diagramming schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 67–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Snapper, A. G., & Kadden, R. M. (1971). Time-sharing in a small computer based on use of a behavioral notation system. In B. Weiss (Ed.), Digital computers in the behavior laboratory (pp. 41–97). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snapper, A. G., Kadden, R. M., & Inglis, G. B. (1982). State notation of behavioral procedures. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 14, 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snapper, A. G., Kadden, R. M., Knapp, J. Z., & Kushner, H. D. (1967, June). A notation system and computer program for behavioral experiments. Paper presented at the meeting of the Digital Equipment Computer Users Society, New York.

  • Snapper, A. G., Knapp, J. Z., & Kushner, H. D. (1967, August). On line programming: I. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Snapper, A. G., Knapp, J. Z., & Kushner, H. D. (1970). Mathematical descriptions of schedules of reinforcement. In W. N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules (pp. 247–275). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snapper, A. G., Ramsey, D. A., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1969). Disruption of a temporal discrimination under response-independent shock. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 423–430.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten, K., & Mechner, F. (1966). The contingency as an independent variable of social interaction. In T. Verhave (Ed.), The experimental analysis of behavior (pp. 447–459). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michael, J., Shafer, E. State Notation for Teaching About Behavioral Procedures. BEHAV ANALYST 18, 123–140 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392698

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392698

Key words

Navigation