Abstract
We describe a notation system for diagramming behavioral contingencies. The system is descriptive. Stimulus functions are not represented with special symbols, such as SR, SD, or UCS, but are simply described in terms of the relation between behavior and stimulus change, and the resulting outcome. The system is atheoretical, self-explanatory, and easy to use. Our goal is to provide an approach to contingency diagramming for the student that represents directly the exact relations and outcomes involved in operant and respondent processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bijou, S. W., & Baer, D. M. (1961). Child development: Vol. 1. A systematic and empirical theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Catania, A. C. (1992). Learning (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Comunidad Los Horcones. (1989, May). Natural reinforcement: A way to save education. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee, WI.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (1987). Applied behavior analysis. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Ferster, C. B., & Culbertson, S. A. (1982). Behavior principles (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Goldwater, B. C., & Acker, L. E. (1993). Looking for symbols to represent reinforcement and punishment. The ABA Newsletter, 16, 8.
Holland, J. G., & Skinner, B. F. (1961). The analysis of behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hummel, J. H., Kaeck, D. J., Bowes, R. L., & Rittenhouse, R. D. (1994). Diagramming operant processes. The ABA Newsletter, 17, 4–5.
Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Cowdery, G. E., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1994). What makes extinction work: An analysis of procedural form and function. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 131–144.
Malott, R. W. (1992). Saving the world with contingency diagramming. The ABA Newsletter, 15, 45.
Malott, R. W, Whaley, D. L., & Malott, M. E. (1993). Elementary principles of behavior (2nd ed.). Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Martin, G., & Pear, J. (1988). Behavior modification: What it is and how to do it (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mechner, R. (1959). A notation system for the description of behavioral procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2, 133–150.
Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.
Millenson, J. R., & Leslie, J. C. (1979). Principles of behavioral analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Miller, L. K. (1980). Principles of everyday behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Snapper, A. G., Kadden, R. M., & Inglis, G. B. (1982). State notation of behavioral procedures. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 14, 329–342.
Woods, P. J. (1974). A taxonomy of instrumental conditioning. American Psychologist, 29, 584–597.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldwater, B.C., Acker, L.E. A Descriptive Notation System for Contingency Diagramming in Behavior Analysis. BEHAV ANALYST 18, 113–121 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392697
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392697