Abstract
Three pigeons were trained on a multiple VI-3 FR-50 schedule of reinforcement. An Estes-Skinner conditioned suppression procedure, with a 1 min. CS, was then superimposed on the VI component. After the suppression was stable, the number of responses required per reinforcement in the FR component was progressively increased to produce an increase in the response rate during the VI component. The results indicated no change in suppression accompanied by substantial changes in the baseline rate of response during the VI component as the FR requirement was increased. These data were interpreted to indicate that an increase in the baseline response rate is not a sufficient condition to produce a change in conditioned suppression on a variable interval schedule.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
HOFFMAN, H. S. & FLESHLER, M. Aversive control with the pigeon. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1959, 2, 213–218.
LYON, D. O. Frequency of reinforcement as a parameter of conditioned suppression. J. exp. Anal Behav., 1963, 6, 95–98.
LYON, D. O. Some notes on conditioned suppression and reinforcement schedules. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1964, 7, 289–291.
REYNOLDS, G. S. Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1961, 4, 179–184. (a)
REYNOLDS, G. S. Behavioral contrast. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1961, 4, 57–71. (b)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author is grateful to Dr. James A. Dinsmoor for his constructive criticism and guidance.
The present study was completed at Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyon, D.O. A Note on Response Rate and Conditioned Suppression. Psychol Rec 15, 441–444 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393612
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393612