Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Feasibility of a cost-effective approach to evaluate short tandem repeat markers suitable for chimerism follow-up

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Molecular Diagnosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Precise chimerism monitoring is important for the prediction of the success of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Most of the current procedures employed for chimerism follow-up with short tandem repeat (STR) markers are either time-consuming, labor-intensive, or use expensive assays, making it burdensome to perform large-scale studies of transplanted patients.

Aim: To set-up a simple nonradioactive method to investigate a set of STR markers that could be used in the evaluation of chimerism status after allogeneic BMT.

Method: Six dinucleotide STRs (D2S123, D5S107, CRTL1, D7S500, D11S1356, and TP53) were analyzed by touchdown (TD)-PCR followed by medium size non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and silver staining. The sensitivity of the approach was evaluated by dilution competition assays. Peripheral blood samples were taken from a group of 50 healthy Argentinean donors, two transplanted patients, and their respective bone marrow donors. Buccal mucosa samples were also obtained from the BMT recipients.

Results: Four markers, D2S123, D7S500, D11S1356, and TP53, presented the highest heterozygosities (0.67–0.88) under our experimental system. A sensitivity of 0.8–1.6% for chimerism detection was consistently found for the different STR. The usefulness of these STR in chimerism analysis was illustrated with the screening of related siblings analyzing two transplanted patients with persistent mixed chimerism, which were previously studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Similar proportions of mixed chimerism were obtained with STR analysis compared with those estimated by FISH.

Discussion: To our knowledge, this was the first study of mixed chimerism using TD-PCR to achieve a highly specific STR amplification. This approach allows simple and accurate chimerism quantification because it avoids slippage of Taq polymerase on repeat stretches and prevents the differential amplification of the shorter allele. STR heterozygosities and the high level of sensitivity of this method demonstrated that this approach is not only very informative in this population, but is also rapid (taking less than 14 hours) and cost-efficient.

Conclusion: The data confirms that this method is a useful tool applicable to routine large-scale STR genotyping and mixed chimerism analysis in low-complexity laboratories worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baccichet A, Benachenhou N, Couture F, et al. Microsatellite instability in childhood T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 1997 Jun; 11(6): 797–802

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber JL, May PE. Abundant class of human DNA polymorphisms which can be typed using polymerase chain reaction. Am J Hum Genet 1989 Mar; 44(3): 388–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Litt M, Luty JA. A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene. Am J Hum Genet 1989 Mar; 44(3): 397–401

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dib C, Faure S, Fizames C, et al. A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5264 microsatellites. Nature 1996 Mar; 380(6570): 152–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Peltomaki P, Lothe RA, Aaltonen LA, et al. Microsatellite instability is associated with tumors that characterise the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma syndrome. Cancer Res 1993 Dec; 53(24): 5853–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Honchel R, Hailing KC, Thibodeau SN. Genomic instability in neoplasia. Semin Cell Biol 1995 Feb; 6(1): 45–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brentnall TA. Microsatellite instability. Shifting concepts in tumorigenesis. Am J Pathol 1995 Sep; 147(3): 561–3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hearne CM, Ghosh S, Todd JA. Microsatellites for linkage analysis of genetic traits. Trends Genet 1992 Aug; 8(8): 288–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta PK, Balyan HS, Sharma PC, et al. Microsatellites in plants: a new class of molecular markers. Curr Sci 1996; 70: 45–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, et al. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for Cancer Detection and Familial Predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1998 Nov 15; 58(22): 5248–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vaurs C, Bignon YJ. What’s new about microsatellite instability significance in human carcinogenesis? Bull Cancer 1997 Nov; 84(11): 1061–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gleissner B, Blau IW, Sindram A, et al. Analysis of chimerism during early period after allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplantation. Clin Lab Haematol 2001 Dec; 23(6): 401–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Antin JH, Childs R, Filipovich AH, et al. Establishment of complete and mixed donor chimerism after allogeneic lymphohematopoietic transplantation: recommendations from a workshop at the 2001 Tandem Meetings of the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry and the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2001; 7(9): 473–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thiede C, Bornhäuser M, Oelschlägel U, et al. Sequential monitoring of chimerism and detection of minimal residual disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation (BSCT) using multiplex PCR amplification of short tandem repeat-markers. Leukemia 2001 Feb; 15(2): 293–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ambros PF, Méhes G, Hattinger C, et al. Unequivocal identification of disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow by combining immunological and genetic approaches-functional and prognostic information. Leukemia 2001 Feb; 15(2): 275–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lahiri DK, Nuremberg JI. A rapid non-enzymatic method for the preparation of HMW DNA from blood for RFLP studies [letter]. Nucleic Acids Res 1991; 19: 5444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weber JL, Kwitek AE, May PE. Dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms at the D5S107, D5S108, D5S111, D5S117 and D5S118 loci [letter]. Nucleic Acids Res 1990 Jul 11; 18(13): 4035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. The genome database: an international collaboration in support of the Human Genome Project [online]. Available from URL: http://www.gdb.org [Accessed 2004 Jul 2]

  20. Gyapay G, Morissette J, Vignal A, et al. The 1993–94 Genethon human genetic linkage map. Nat Genet 1994 Jun; 7(2 Spec. Iss.): 246–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones MH, Nakamura Y. Detection of loss of heterozygosity at the human TP53 locus using a dinucleotide repeat polymorphism. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1992 Jul; 5(1): 89–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Joseph SS. The analysis of microsatellites by silver staining of nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. In: Tietz D, editor. Nucleic acid electrophoresis. New York: Springer Verlag, 1998: 162–9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, et al. Touchdown PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification [letter]. Nucleic Acids Res 1991; 19: 4008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Thiede C, Florek M, Bornhäuser M, et al. Rapid quantification of mixed chimerism using multiplex amplification of short tandem repeat markers and fluorescence detection. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999 May; 23(10): 1055–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, et al. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 1988 Jan; 239(4839): 487–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nuckols JD, Rasheed BKA, McGlennen RC, et al. Evaluation of an automated technique for assessment of marrow engraftment after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation using a commercially available kit. Am J Clin Pathol 2000 Jan; 113(1): 135–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Alizadeh M, Bernard M, Danic B, et al. Quantitative assessment of hematopoietic chimerism after bone marrow transplantation by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Blood 2002 Jun; 99(12): 4618–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bader P, Klingebiel T, Schaudt A, et al. Prevention of relapse in pediatric patients with acute leukemias and MDS after allogeneic SCT by early immunotherapy initiated on the basis of increasing mixed chimerism: a single center experience of 12 children. Leukemia 1999 Dec; 13(12): 2076–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lion T, Daxberger H, Dubovsky J, et al. Analysis of chimerism within specific leukocyte subsets for detection of residual or recurrent leukemia in pediatric patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2001 Feb; 15(2): 307–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Walsh PS, Erlich HA, Higuchi R. Preferential PCR amplification of alleles: mechanisms and solutions. PCR Methods Appl 1992 May; 1(4): 241–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gallardo D, Rodríguez-Luaces M, Aróstegui JI, et al. Follow-up of chimerism status after allogeneic HLA-mismatched stem cell transplantation by detection of non-shared HLA alleles. Haematologica 2000 Aug; 85(8): 848–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Elmaagacli AH. Real-time PCR for monitoring minimal residual disease and chimerism in patients after allogeneic transplantation. Int J Hematol 2002 Aug; 76 Suppl. 2: 204–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank SYREX Argentina for supplying the GelPro Imager (Media Cybernetics, Inc.) and the Image-Pro 32 gel analysis software.

This project was supported in part by grants from the National Research Council (CONICET), SECyT, René Barón Foundation, and the Roemmers Foundation of Argentina.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Investigaciones Hematológicas, Academia Nacional de Medicina, Pacheco de Melo 3081, Capital Federal, 1425, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Ariela F. Fundia, Carlos De Brasi & Irene Larripa

Authors
  1. Ariela F. Fundia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos De Brasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Irene Larripa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ariela F. Fundia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fundia, A.F., De Brasi, C. & Larripa, I. Feasibility of a cost-effective approach to evaluate short tandem repeat markers suitable for chimerism follow-up. CNS Drugs 8, 87–91 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03260050

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03260050

Keywords

Search

Navigation