Skip to main content
Log in

Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes and beliefs regarding curriculum integration

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper summarises the results of a three-day workshop conducted between October and December of 2007 as part of a larger project dedicated to improving teacher quality at the pre-service and in-service levels. Both pre- and post-test measures were administered before and after workshop completion in order to capture changes in knowledge, attitude, and perception. For contextual relevance, findings are summarised in light of extant literature pertaining to curriculum integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anfara, V. A., & Lipka, R. P. (2003). Relating the middle school concept to student achievement.Middle School Journal, 35, 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (1990).A middle school curriculum: From rhetoric to reality. Columbus, OH: National School Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (1993). A middle school curriculum: From rhetoric to reality (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: National School Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolak, K., Bialach, D., & Dunphy, M. (2005). Standards-based, thematic units integrate the arts and energize students and teachers.Middle School Journal, 36, 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCorse, C. B. (1996). Teachers and the integrated curriculum: An intergenerational view.Action in Teacher Education, 18, 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHart, P., & Cook, P. A. (1997). Transforming middle schools through integrated curriculum.Voices From the Middle, 4, 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, T. (2007). Relevant, challenging, integrative and exploratory curriculum design: Perspective from theory and practice for middle level schooling in Australia.The Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. (2004).Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandson, C., & McVittie, J. (2001). Student Voices on Integrative Curriculum.Middle School Journal, 33(2), 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felner, R. D., Jackson, A. W., Kasak, D., Mulhall, P., Brand, S., & Flowers, N. (1997). The impact of school reform for the middle years.Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 528–532, 541-550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers.American Education Research Journal, 38, 915–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzler, D. (2000). A meta-analysis of studies conducted on integrated curriculum programs and their effects on student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2006). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 55, 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homestead, E. R. (1998). How middle school teachers conceptualize and implement curriculum integration: A study of three cases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. H. (1989).Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. H. (1997).Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum and assessment K-12. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall, B. D. (1997).Instigating the curriculum: A case study of two teachers collaborating on an integrated unit of study. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, C. T. (2007). Linking the disciplines — and achievement.District Administration, 43, 70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, S. B., & Flowers, N. (2003). Middle school practices improve student achievement in high poverty schools.Middle School Journal, 35, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, R., & Lehman, N. (1996). Curriculum integration: Changing classrooms.Action in Teacher Education, 18, 82–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P., & McKinnon, D. (2003). Enhancing the middle in a New Zealand secondary school: Integration, experiential learning, and computer use.International Journal of Educational Reform, 12, 230–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation.American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. A., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1998). Integrating mathematics, science, and technology: Effects on students.International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1119–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., & Bruce, C. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy: Results of a randomized field trial.The Journal of Educational Research, 101, 50–60, 64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaunessy, E. (2005). Assessing and addressing teachers’ attitudes toward information technology in the classroom.Gifted Child Today, 28, 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988).Nonparametric statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. K., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms? Elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 396–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, H. H., & Wei, K. K. (2001). Effective use of computer aided instruction in secondary schools: A causal model of institutional factors and teachers’ roles.Journal of educational Computing Research, 25, 385–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toren, Z., Maiselman, D., & Inbar, S. (2008). Curriculum integration: Art, literature and technology in pre-service kindergarten teacher training.Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(4), 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunks, J., & Neapolitan, J. (2007).A framework for research on professional development school. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vars, G. F. (1996). The effects of interdisciplinary curriculum and instruction. In P. S. Hlebowitsh & W. G. Wraga (Eds.),Annual review of research for school leaders (pp. 147–164). Jefferson City, MO: Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vars, G. F. (1997). Effects of integrative curriculum and instruction. In J. L. Irvin (Ed.),What current research says to the middle level practitioner (pp. 179–186). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Assocation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vars, G. F. (2001). Can curriculum integration survive in an era of high-stakes testing?Middle School Journal, 33, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2009).Research Methods in Education: An Introduction (9th ed). Boston, MA: Person.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weilbacher, G. (2001). Is curriculum integration an endangered species?Middle School Journal, 33, 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wixson, K. K., Dutro, E., & Athan, R. G. (2003). The challenge of developing content standards.Review of Research in Education, 27, 69–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shriner, M., Schlee, B.M. & Libler, R. Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes and beliefs regarding curriculum integration. Aust. Educ. Res. 37, 51–62 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216913

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216913

Keywords

Navigation