Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics of sustained-release verapamil after a single administration and at steady state

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Pharmacokinetics of conventional 80 mg tablets and two types of sustained-release (SR) tablets containing 120 and 200 mg of verapamil were compared cross-over in 12 healthy volunteers. Serum concentrations of verapamil and norverapamil were analyzed both after a single oral dose and at steady state after t.i.d. administration of conventional tablets and b.i.d. administration of SR tablets. After 120 mg SR tablets serum concentrations of verapamil usually remained below 100 ng/ml for 5 days. This inadequate bioavailability was caused by very slow absorption. The relative bioavailability of verapamil in 200 mg SR tablets was 93–96% as compared to the conventional tablets. After 200 mg × 2 and 80 mg × 3 , the peak serum levels were about 300 and 190 ng/ml, respectively and the trough levels 123–153 and 52–56 ng/ml, respectively. The verapamil/norverapamil ratio varied from 0.69 to 0.84 after a single dose and from 0.8 to 0.93 at steady-state. By the 4th days of treatment, the accumulation ratios ranged between 1.75–2.07 and 1.30–1.75 for verapamil and norverapamil, respectively. For each preparation studied, the apparent Cl101 of verapamil was significantly reduced at steady-state. These results show that 200 mg SR verapamil tablets fulfill the basic requirements of retard preparations allowing for twice or even once daily administration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rawlins M.D. (1979): Drug absorption and bioavailability: the 1980’s. In: Drug Absorption, Prescott L.F. and Nimmo W.S. (eds.). ADIS Press, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McAllister R.G. and Kirsten E.B. (1982): The pharmacology of verapamil. IV. Kinetic and dynamic effects after single intravenous and oral doses. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.,31, 418–426.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eichelbaum M., Somogyi A., von Unruh G.E. and Dengler H.J. (1981): Simultaneous determination of the intravenous and oral pharmacokinetic parameters of D,Lverapamil using stabile isotope-labelled verapamil. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.,19, 133–137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koike Y., Shimamura K., Shudo I. and Saito H. (1979): Pharmacokinetics of verapamil in man. Res. Comm. Chem. Path. Pharmacol.,24, 37–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meier J., Nüesch E. and Schmidt R. (1974): Pharmacokinetic criteria for the evaluation of retard formulations. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.,7, 429–432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McMahon T.V. and Sheaffer S.L. (1982): Verapamil. Drug Intell. Clin. Pharm.,16, 443–447.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frishman W., Kirsten E., Klein M., Pine M., Johnson S.M., Hillis L.D., Packer M. and Kates R. (1982): Clinical relevance of verapamil plasma levels in stabile angina pectoris. Am. J. Cardiol.,50, 1180–1185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reiter M.J., Shand D.G. and Pritchett E.L.C. (1982): Comparison of intravenous and oral verapamil dosing. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.,32, 711–720.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Freedman S.B., Richmond D.R., Ashley J.J. and Kelly D.T. (1981): Verapamil kinetics in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery spasm. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.,30, 644–652.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kates R.E., Keefe D.L.D., Schwartz J., Harapat S., Kirsten E.B. and Harrison D.C. (1981): Verapamil disposition kinetics in chronic atrial fibrillation. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.,30, 44–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shand D.G., Hammill S.C., Aanonsen L. and Pritchett E.L.C. (1981): Reduced verapamil clearance during long-term oral administration. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.,30, 701–703.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wood A.J.J., Carr K., Vestal R.E., Belcher S., Wilkinson G.R. and Shand D.G. (1978): Direct measurement of propranolol bioavailability during accumulation to steady-state. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.,6, 345–350.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kendall M.J., John V.A., Quarterman C.P. and Welling P.G. (1980): A single and multiple dose pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of conventional and slow-release metoprolol. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.,17, 87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meffin P.J., Winkle R.A., Peters F.A. and Harrison D.C. (1978): Dose-dependent acebutolol disposition after oral administration. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.,24, 542–547.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kates R.E. (1983): Calcium antagonists pharmacokinetic properties. Drugs,25, 113–124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mattila, J., Mäntylä, R., Taskinen, J. et al. Pharmacokinetics of sustained-release verapamil after a single administration and at steady state. European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 10, 133–138 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03189707

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03189707

Key words

Navigation