Abstract
The low energy (30–50 kVp) beams from an intra-operative X-ray source are modelled using a basic analytical model considering just primary beam attenuation and absorption. Spatial dosimetry at such low energies is difficult due to the rapid changes in dose-rate from the radiation source. The purpose of the model was to determine the variation with distance in water of coefficients required for beam dosimetry and to validate beam measurements performed in water of high-gradient dose distributions. The model predicts a change in mean mass-energy absorption coefficient of up to 3 % over the range of clinically-relevant distances in water. Distance-dose distributions (variation in dose with distance in water) for the X-ray source were calculated with the model and found to be in agreement with measurement (at clinically-relevant distances), to within a spatial distance comparable to the dimensions and positional accuracy of the ionization chamber used, and comparable to the expected dosimetric anisotropy of the radiation source. Measured and calculated distance-doses begin to diverge at relatively large distances from the radiation source, which is where dose-rates are so low that detector signal levels are comparable with noise.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beatty, J., Biggs, P.J., Gall, K., Okunieff, P. and Pardo, F.S.A new miniature X-ray device for interstitial radiosurgery: dosimetry, Med. Phys. 23: 53–62, 1996.
Dinsmore, M., Harte, K., Sliski, A., Smith, D., Nomikos, P., Dalterio, M.J., Boom, A., Loenard, W., Oettinger, P. and Yanch, J.A new miniature X-ray source for interstitial radiosurgery: device description, Med. Phys. 23: 45–52, 1996.
Douglas, R., Beatty, J., Gall, K., Valenzuela, R., Biggs, P. and Pardo, F.Dosimetric results from a feasibility study of a novel radiosurgical source for irradiation of intracranial metastases, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 36: 443–450, 1996.
Fisher B., Redmond C., Poisson R. et al.Eight year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 320: 822–828, 1989.
Fisher B. and Anderson S.Conservative surgery for the management of invasive and carcinoma of the breast NSABP Trial. World. J. of Surg. 18: 63–69, 1994.
Blichert-Toft M., Rose C., Andersen J.A. et al.Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life analysis. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. Monographs. 11: 19–26, 1992.
Liljegren C.G., Holmberg L., Adami H.W. et al.Sector resection with or without post-operative radiotherapy for Stage I breast cancer five year results of a randomized trial. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 86: 717–22, 1994.
Sarrazin D., Le M., Amagada R. et al.Ten year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment and mastectomy in early breast cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 14: 177–184, 1989.
Straus K., Lichter A., Lippmann M. et al.Results of the National Cancer Institute early breast cancer trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monographs. 11: 27–32, 1992.
Van Dangen J.A., Bartelink H., Fentiman I.S. et al.Randomized clinical trial to assess the value of breast conserving therapy in stage I and II breast cancer EORTC 10801 trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monographs. 11: 15–18, 1992.
Veronesi V., Luini A., Del Vecchiolo M. et al.Radiotherapy after breast preserving surgery in women with localized cancer of the breast. N. Engl. J. Med. 328: 1587–1591, 1993.
Vaidya, J.S., Baum, M., Tobias, J.S., D’Souze, D.P., Naidu, S.V., Morgan, S., Harte, K.J., Sliski, A.P., Thomson, E. and Varricchione, T.R.An innovative method of local treatment for breast cancer, Br. J. Cancer. 80, Suppl 6: 285, 1999.
Klevenhagen, S.C., Aukett, R.J., Harrison, R.M., Moretti, C., Nahum, A.E. and Rosser, K.E.The IPEMB code of practice for determination of absorbed dose for X-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al — 4 mm Cu HVL; 10–300 kV generating potential), Phys. Med. Biol., 41, 2605–2625. (1996)
Ipe, N., Rosser, K.E., Moretti, C.J., Manning, J.W. and Palmer, M.J.Air KERMA calibration factors and chanber correction values for PTW soft X-ray, NACP and Roos ionisation chambers at very vlow X-ray energies, Phys. Med. Biol., 46, 2107–2117. (2001)
Seuntjens, J., Thierens, H. and Schneider, U. (1993) Correction factors for a cylindrical ionisation chamber used in medium energy X-ray beams,Phys. Med. Biol. 38, 805–832.
Ma, C-M. and Seuntjens, J.P.Mass-energy absorption coefficient and backscatter factor ratios for kilovoltage X-ray Phys. Med. Biol., beams, 44, 131–143. (1999)
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements,Photon, Electron, Proton and Neutron Interaction Data for Body Tissues, ICRU Report 46, Bethesda, MD. (1992)
Berger, M.J. and Hubbell, J.H.XCOM: Photon cross sections on a personal computer, Report No. NBSIR 87-3597, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. (1987)
http://hpngp01.kaeri.re.kr
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebert, M.A., Carruthers, B., Lanzon, P.J. et al. Dosimetry of a low-kV intra-operative X-ray source using basic analytical beam models. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 25, 119–123 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178772
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178772