Skip to main content
Log in

Piloting an online art therapy course

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

THIS ARTICLE DESCRIBES the development and assessment of a graduate level online art therapy class. An introduction briefly defines art therapy and the need for distance learning in this field. The challenges inherent in teaching art therapy online, including working with art media and developing appropriate interpersonal skills and group processes among prospective art therapists are explained, as well as strategies used to meet such challenges. The focus of the article lies in exploring whether and how students can learn art therapy online, a discipline that traditionally requires face-to-face instruction. Visual and verbal examples of student work demonstrate how art therapy techniques were used to meet course objectives and to support a learning community. An objectives-oriented approach (Worthen & Sanders, 1987) was used in the summative evaluation. Conclusions and recommendations based on successful pedagogical strategies are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amercian Art Therapy Association (n.d.).About art therapy. Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.arttherapy.org/about.html

  • American Art Therapy Association (2006–2007).Art therapy educational program list 2006–2007. Retrieved August 7, 2006, from http://www.arttherapy.org/statep.html

  • Berner, R.T. (2004). Less is more: Designing an online course.DEOSNEWS, 13(4), 1–4. Retrieved February 8, 2007 from http://www.ed.psu.edu/acsde/deos/deosnews.asp

  • Ciavarelli, A. (2003).Assessing the quality of online instruction: Integrating instructional quality and web usability assessments. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED480084

  • Cohen, V. (2003). A model for assessing distance learning instruction.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(2), 98–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R-M, & Donaldson, J.A. (2004).Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coogle, C.L., Welleford, E.A., & Netting, F.E. (2002). Evaluation of a distance learning course in geriatric interdisciplinary teaming.Educational Gerontology, 28, 791–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, D.P. (2000, March/April). Carving a new path for distance education research. [Electronic version].The Technology Source Archives. Retrieved July 6, 2006, from http://technologysurce.org/article/carving_a_new_part_for_distance_education_research/

  • Edwards, T. (2005, September). Seven steps for providing constructive online discussion feedback successfully.Online Classroom: Ideas for Effective Online Instruction, 1, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, M. (2005). Teaching for transfer through integrated online traditional instruction.Studies in Art Education, 46, 170–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Gulf Coast University (n.d.).Principles of online design: Instructional design. Retrieved February 8, 2007, from http://fgcu.edu/onlinedesign/designDev.html

  • Illinois Online Netword, (n.d.).Online education overview: Key elements of an online program. Retrived February 7, 2007, from http://www.ion.uillinois.edu/resources/tutorials/overview/elements.asp

  • Kundu, R, & Bain, C. (2006). Web quests: Utilizing technology in a constructivist manner to facilitate meaning ful pre-service learning.Art Education The Journal of the National Art Education Association, 59, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malchiodi, C. (1998).The art therapy sourcebook, Los Angeles: Lowell House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malchiodi, C. (2000).Art therapy and computer technology: A virtual studio of possibilities. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzelli, S., & Dicker, L. (2005, November). Overcoming facelessness in the online classrom.Online Classroom: Ideas for Effective Online Instruction, 6, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952).Origins of intelligence in children. NY: International Universities Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, D. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(2), 152–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, P. (2005, Otober). Five common fears about teaching online: Fact vs. fiction.Online Classroom: Ideas for Effective Online Instruction, 4, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, M., Smaldino, S. Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2006).Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen, B.R., & Sanders, J.R. (1987).Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holly Feen-Calligan.

Additional information

ABOUT THE AUTHORS Holly Feen-Calligan is Assistant Professor in the College of Education at Wayne State University where she coordinates the Art Therapy Program.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feen-Calligan, H. Piloting an online art therapy course. J. Comput. High. Educ. 19, 98–120 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033428

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033428

Keywords

Navigation