Abstract
THIS ARTICLE DESCRIBES the development and assessment of a graduate level online art therapy class. An introduction briefly defines art therapy and the need for distance learning in this field. The challenges inherent in teaching art therapy online, including working with art media and developing appropriate interpersonal skills and group processes among prospective art therapists are explained, as well as strategies used to meet such challenges. The focus of the article lies in exploring whether and how students can learn art therapy online, a discipline that traditionally requires face-to-face instruction. Visual and verbal examples of student work demonstrate how art therapy techniques were used to meet course objectives and to support a learning community. An objectives-oriented approach (Worthen & Sanders, 1987) was used in the summative evaluation. Conclusions and recommendations based on successful pedagogical strategies are given.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amercian Art Therapy Association (n.d.).About art therapy. Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.arttherapy.org/about.html
American Art Therapy Association (2006–2007).Art therapy educational program list 2006–2007. Retrieved August 7, 2006, from http://www.arttherapy.org/statep.html
Berner, R.T. (2004). Less is more: Designing an online course.DEOSNEWS, 13(4), 1–4. Retrieved February 8, 2007 from http://www.ed.psu.edu/acsde/deos/deosnews.asp
Ciavarelli, A. (2003).Assessing the quality of online instruction: Integrating instructional quality and web usability assessments. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED480084
Cohen, V. (2003). A model for assessing distance learning instruction.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(2), 98–120.
Conrad, R-M, & Donaldson, J.A. (2004).Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Coogle, C.L., Welleford, E.A., & Netting, F.E. (2002). Evaluation of a distance learning course in geriatric interdisciplinary teaming.Educational Gerontology, 28, 791–804.
Diaz, D.P. (2000, March/April). Carving a new path for distance education research. [Electronic version].The Technology Source Archives. Retrieved July 6, 2006, from http://technologysurce.org/article/carving_a_new_part_for_distance_education_research/
Edwards, T. (2005, September). Seven steps for providing constructive online discussion feedback successfully.Online Classroom: Ideas for Effective Online Instruction, 1, 6.
Erickson, M. (2005). Teaching for transfer through integrated online traditional instruction.Studies in Art Education, 46, 170–185.
Florida Gulf Coast University (n.d.).Principles of online design: Instructional design. Retrieved February 8, 2007, from http://fgcu.edu/onlinedesign/designDev.html
Illinois Online Netword, (n.d.).Online education overview: Key elements of an online program. Retrived February 7, 2007, from http://www.ion.uillinois.edu/resources/tutorials/overview/elements.asp
Kundu, R, & Bain, C. (2006). Web quests: Utilizing technology in a constructivist manner to facilitate meaning ful pre-service learning.Art Education The Journal of the National Art Education Association, 59, 6–11.
Malchiodi, C. (1998).The art therapy sourcebook, Los Angeles: Lowell House.
Malchiodi, C. (2000).Art therapy and computer technology: A virtual studio of possibilities. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley
Marzelli, S., & Dicker, L. (2005, November). Overcoming facelessness in the online classrom.Online Classroom: Ideas for Effective Online Instruction, 6, 8.
Piaget, J. (1952).Origins of intelligence in children. NY: International Universities Press.
Poole, D. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(2), 152–177.
Shank, P. (2005, Otober). Five common fears about teaching online: Fact vs. fiction.Online Classroom: Ideas for Effective Online Instruction, 4, 6.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S. Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2006).Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Worthen, B.R., & Sanders, J.R. (1987).Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ABOUT THE AUTHORS Holly Feen-Calligan is Assistant Professor in the College of Education at Wayne State University where she coordinates the Art Therapy Program.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feen-Calligan, H. Piloting an online art therapy course. J. Comput. High. Educ. 19, 98–120 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033428
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033428