Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A model for assessing distance learning instruction

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

AS MORE INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION offer computer-mediated distance learning instruction, courses must be well-designed and frequently evaluated. This article proposes a model for assessing distance learning instruction based on six constructs: The Process of Teaching and Learning, Developing a Community of Learners, The Instructor, The Student, Implementation of the Course, and Technology Use. This paper examines each construct by reviewing the research in the field and makes recommendations for their design and evaluation. It is proposed that computer-mediated distance learning instruction be grounded in time-tested and research-based theories of learning to ensure that students receive high quality instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, J., & Faris, S. (Winter 2000). Integrating technology in preservice literacy instruction: A survey of elementary education students’ attitudes toward computers.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J., & McKay, M. (April 2001). Designing and delivering an online course for K-12 educators.T.H.E. Journal, 28(9), 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, R., Rojo de Rubaleava, B., & St. Pierre, D. (2000). Collaborative online distance learning: Issues for future practice and research.Distance Education; An International Journal, 21(2), 290–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • BlackBoard [Online]. Available: http://www.blackboard.com

  • Butzin, S.M. (2000). Project CHILD: A decade of success for young children.T.H.E. Journal. [Online]. Available: http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A2882B.cfm

  • Cohen, V. (2000). Using the web to enhance field experiences for preservice teachers. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE) 2000, San Diego, CA.

  • Creed, T. (1996). Extending the classroom walls electronically. Adapted from W. Campbell & K. Smith (Eds.).New Paradigms for College Teaching. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co. [Online]. Available: http://www.employees.csbsju.edu/tcreed/ecw.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, D. (March/April 2000). Carving a new path for distance education research.The Technology Source. [Online]. Available:http://horizon.unc.edu/TS/default.asp?show=article+id=648

  • Draves, W. (2000).Teaching online. River Falls, WI: LERN Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, M., & Sheperd, M. (April 2001). Distance learning in accounting: A comparison between a distance and a traditional graduate accounting class.T.H.E. Journal, 28(9), 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C., Cagiltay, K., Lim, B., Craner, J., & Duffy, T. (March/April 2001). Seven principles of effective teaching: A practical lens for evaluating online courses.The Technology Source. [Online]. Available: http://horizon.unc.edu/TS/default.asp?show=article+id=839

  • Green, R., & Gentemann, K. (2001). Technology in the curriculum: An assessment of the impact of on-line courses. [Online]. Available: http://assessment.gmu.edu/reports/Eng302

  • Grossman, C., & Wagner, J. (2000). Assessing learners online.Practitioner File. ERIC/ACVE. [Online]. Available: http://ericacve.org/does/pfile03.htm

  • Hermann, F. (1998). Building on-line communities of practice: An example and implications.Educational Technology, 38(1), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, L. (2000). Technology-based math curriculums.T.H.E. Journal, 28(3), 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illinois Online Network (2000a). Instructional design for online course development. [Online]. Available:http://illinois.online.uillinois.edu/ONresources/instructionalDesign/index.html

  • Illinois Online Network (2000b). ION Resources: Synergy in the classroom. [Online]. Available: http://illinois.online.uillinois.edu/resources/conferencing.index.html [March 15, 2001]

  • The Institute for Higher Education Policy (March 2000).Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in internet-based distance education. Washington DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy. [Online]. Available: http://www.ihep.com/Publications.php?parm=Pubs/abstract?30

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D., Aragon, D.R., Shaik, N., & Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments.Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, G. (2000).Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, P. (1998). Assessment tools for distance learning: A review of the literature.ERIC document ED426 725.

  • MacKennon, G. (2000). The dilemma of evaluating electronic discussion groups.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Market Data Retrieval (2002). Distance learning programs.The College Technology Review. [Online]. Available: http://www.schooldata.com

  • Mitra, A., & Steffensmeier, T. (Spring 2000). Changes in student attitudes and student computer use in a computer-enriched environment.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(3), 417–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., & Thompson, M. (1990). The effects of distance learning: A summary of literature.ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED330 321.

  • Moore, M., & Thompson, M. (1997). The effects of distance learning (ACSDE Research Monograph No.15). University Park, PA: American Center for the Study of Distance Education, Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, C.A. (1998). The impact of the internet on management education: What the research shows. [Online]. Available: http://horizon.unc.edu/TS/cases/1998-06.asp

  • Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999).Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington DC:The Institute for Higher Education Policy. [Online] Available: http://www.ihep.com/Publications.php?parm=Pubs/Abstract?9

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, D. (Winter 2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(2), 152–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riel, M., & Fulton, K. (2001). The role of technology in supporting learning communities.Kappan, 87(7), 518–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R.C. (January, 2000). Student assessment comparison of lecture and online construction equipment and methods classes.T.H.E. Journal, 27(6). [Online]. Available: http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A2596B.cfm

  • Schulman, A.H., & Sims, R.L. (June, 1999). Learning in an online format versus an in-class format: An experimental study.T.H.E. Journal, 26 (11), 54–56. [Online]. Available: http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Edward’s University (2000). Instructional design workshop. St. Edward’s University: Center for Teaching Excellence. [Online]. Available: http://stedwards.edu/cte/idesign.htm

  • University of Wisconsin (2001). Online resources for instructors. University of Wisconsin, Madison: Learning Technology and Distance Education. [Online]. Available: http://wiscinfo.doit.wisc.edu/ltde/ORFI/index.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, W. (October, 1999). Assessment in distance learning: What do students know and how do we know that they know it?T.H.E. Journal, 27(3), 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Vicki L. Cohen

    Present address: School of Education, Fairleigh Dickinson University, USA

Authors and Affiliations

    Authors
    1. Vicki L. Cohen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Vicki L. Cohen.

    Additional information

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Vicki L. Cohen is an Associate Professor in the School of Education at Fairleigh Dickinson University (FDU). She coordinates the Instructional Technology Program and teaches graduate technology courses and literacy courses. Her areas of interest include instructional technology, literacy, and assessment. Dr. Cohen presently teaches two online classes. She is closely involved in the development of FDU’s distance learning program, a program in which all students will be required to take one online course each year.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Cohen, V.L. A model for assessing distance learning instruction. J. Comput. High. Educ. 14, 98–120 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940940

    Download citation

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940940

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation