Skip to main content
Log in

Bibliography of plant resistance to arthropods in vegetables, 1977–1991

  • Bibliography
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This bibliography includes literature on plant resistance to insects and mites in vegetables from 1977 to 1991. It is arranged by plant family and crop plant, and has references to onions, garlic, cabbage and other crucifers, carrot, parsnip, celery, sweet potato, tomato, potato, eggplant, peppers, cucumber, melons, other cucurbits, spinach, lettuce, and various peas and beans. There is an index by arthropod species, a review of the literature, and tables listing references by subject area within plant resistance: screening; mechanisms; plant characteristics correlated with resistance; inheritance and traditional breeding programs; use of biotechnology; releases of resistant germplasm; comparisons of marketable yield; stability of resistance over different locations and insect populations; interactions with cultural methods and plant phenology, insecticide efficacy, and biological control; and effect on plant disease vectored by insects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited

  • Adang, M.J., Firoozabady, E„ Klein, J., DeBoer, D., Sekar, V., Kemp, J.D., Murray, E., Rocheleau, T.A., Rashka, K., Staffeld, G., Stock, C, Sutton, D. and Merlo, D.J. (1987) Expression of aBacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal protein gene in tobacco plants, pp. 345–353.In: Arntzen, C.J. and Ryan, C. [Eds.] Molecular Strategies for Crop Protection. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard, R.W. (1960) Principles of Plant Breeding. Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, J.M. and Tingey, W.M. (1979) Aspects of interaction between plant genotypes and biological control.Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 25: 275–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, M.-D. (1988) Plant genetic engineering: Progress and promise.J. Agrie. Food Chem. 36:3–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbert, F.P. Jr. and Jones, A. (1972) Resistance in sweet potatoes to Coleoptera increased by recurrent selection.J. Econ. Entomol. 65:1655–1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, M.H. and Eckenrode, C.S. (1975). Variation inBrassica oleracea resistance to cabbage looper and imported cabbage worm in greenhouse and field.J. Econ. Entomol. 68: 757–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallun, R.L., Starks, K.J. and Guthrie,W.D. (1975) Plant resistance to insects attacking cereals.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 20: 337–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilder, V.A., Gatehouse, A.M.R., Sheerman, S.E., Barker, R.F. and Boulter, D. (1987) A novel mechanism of insect resistance engineered into tobacco.Nature (Lond.) 330:160–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hille, J., Koornneef, M., Famanna, M.S. and Zabel, P. (1989) Tomato: A crop species amenable to improvement by cellular and molecular methods.Euphytica 42: 1–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G.G. (1976) Host plant resistance and spread of plant viruses.Environ. Entomol. 5:827–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G.G. (1978) Recent advances in insect resistance of vegetable and fruit crops in North America: 1966–1977.Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 24: 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G.G., Gould, F., Ponti, O.M.B. de and Stinner, R.E. (1987) Ecological, agricultural, genetic, and commercial considerations in the deployment of insect-resistant germplasm.Environ. Entomol. 16: 327–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M. and Ortman, E.E. (1978) Antixenosis - A new term proposed to replace Painter’s “non-preference” modality of resistance.Bull. Enlomol. Soc. Am. 24: 175–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku, J. (1982) Induced immunity to plant disease.BioScience 32: 854–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutschler, M.A. (1990) Use of biotechnology to create or transfer novel traits in tomato.HortScience 25: 1521–1522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielson, M.W. and Lehman,W.F. (1980) Breeding approaches in alfalfa, pp. 277–312.In: Maxwell, F.G. and Jennings, P.R. [Eds.] Breeding Plants Resistant to Insects. Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niles, G.A. (1980) Breeding cotton for resistance to insect pests, pp. 337–370.In: Maxwell, F.G. and Jennings, P.R. [Eds.] Breeding Plants Resistant to Insects. Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelhaf, R.C. (1978) Organic Agriculture: Economic and Ecological Comparisons with Conventional Methods.Halstead, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, R.H. (1951) Insect Resistance in Crop Plants. Macmillan, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponti, O.M.B. de (1982) Plant resistance to insects: A challenge to plant breeders and entomologists.Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Insect-Plant Relationships (Wageningen, Holland), pp. 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R.A. (1980) The pathosystem concept, pp.157–181.In: Maxwell, F.G. and Jennings, P.R. [Eds.] Breeding Plants Resistant to Insects. Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Serrano, J.J., Keil, M., O’Connor, A., Schell, J. and Willmitzer, L. (1987) Woundinduced expression of a potato proteinase inhibitor II gene in transgenic tobacco plants.EMBO J. 6:303–306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, J.M. and Ratcliffe, R.H. (1976) Evaluation of ARS program on alternative methods of insect control: Host plant resistance to insects.Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 22:7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.M. (1989) Plant Resistance to Insects: A Fundamental Approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.M. (1990) Adaptation of biochemical and genetic techniques to the study of plant resistance to insects.Am. Entomol. 36:141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, A.K. (1970) Breeding for insect resistance in vegetables.HortScience 5:76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley, S.D. and Rick, C.M. (1980) Isozymic gene linkage map of the tomato: Applications in genetics and breeding.Theor. Appl. Genet. 57:161–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thornburg, R.W., An, G., Cleveland, T.E., Johnson, R. and Ryan, C.A. (1987) Woundinducible expression of a potato inhibitor II-chloramphenicol acyltransferase gene fusion in transgenic tobacco plants.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:744–748.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tingey, W.M. (1981) The environmental control of insects using plant resistance, pp. 175- 197.In: Pimentel, D. [Ed.] CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture. Vol. I. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tingey, W.M. and Singh, S.R. (1980) Environmental factors influencing the magnitude and expression of resistance. pp. 87–113.In: Maxwell, F.G. and Jennings, P.R. [Eds.] Breeding Plants Resistant to Insects. Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaeck, M., Hofte, H., Reynaerts, A., Leemans, J., Montagu, M. vanand Zabeau, M. (1987) Engineering of insect resistant plants using aB.thuringiensis gene. pp. 355–366.In: Arntzen, C.J. and Ryan, C.A. [Eds.] Molecular Strategies- for Crop Protection. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, M.J. (1989) The relevance of molecular biology to pure and applied entomology.Entomol. Exp. Appl 53:1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A.M. (1989) Insects of Economic Importance: A Checklist of Preferred Names. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

General Reviews (multiple crops)

  1. Berlinger, M.J. (1986) Host plant resistance toBemisia íDabaci.Agric. Ecosyst. and Environ. 17:69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Botterman H, and Leemans, J. (1989) Field testing of insect and herbicide resistant crops.Vortr. Pflzanzenzücht. 16:455–459. (English version in: Science for plant breeding. Proceedings of the XII Congress of EUCARPIA, Göttingen, FRG, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Costa, H.S., Brown, J.K. and Byrne, D.N. (1991) Life history traits of the whitefly,Bemisia tabaci on six virus-infected or healthy plant species.Environ.Entomol. 20:1102–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Honée, G. and Visser, B. (1988) [Resistance to insects with the help of molecular improvement.]Prophyta 42:219–220. (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kashyap, R.K. and Kalloo. (1983) An appraisal of insect resistance in vegetable crops — a review.Haryana J. Hortic. Sci. 12: 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kennedy, G.G. (1978) Recent advances in insect resistance of vegetable and fruit crops in North America: 1966–1977.Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 24: 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laska, P. (1987) Resistance of vegetables to pests and the possibilities of breeding for resistance, pp. 217–232.In: Lebeda, A. [Ed.] Vyuzití fytopatologickych metod ve slechteni zelenin na rezistenci k chorobam a skudcum. Olomouc, Czechoslovakia. (in Czech, with English summary)

  8. Ponti, O.M.B. de (1980) Host plant resistance to insects and mites: a neglected but essential part of integrated pest control. pp. 113–120.In: Russ, K. and Berger, H. [Eds.] Proc. Int. Symp. of IOBC/WPRS on Integrated Control in Agriculture and Forestry. Bundesanstalt für Pflanzenschutz, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ponti, O.M.B. de (1982) Plant resistance to insects: a challenge to plant breeders and entomologists.Proc. 5fh Int. Symp. on Insect-Plant Relationships (Wageningen, the Netherlands), pp. 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ponti, O.M.B. de, Romanow, L.R. and Berlinger, M.J. (1990) Whitefly-plant relationships: Plant resistance, pp. 91–106.In: Gerling, D. [Ed.] Whiteflies: Their Bionomics, Pest Status and Management. Intercept Ltd., Andover, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan, C.A. (1989) Proteinase inhibitor gene families: strategies for transformation to improve plant defenses against herbivores.Bioessays 10 (l):20–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schalk, J.M. (1990) Plant resistance to insects in vegetables for the southern United States.Fla Entomol. 73:396–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Amaryllidaceae Onion and garlic

  1. Bortoli, S.A. de and Castellane, P.D. (1990) Reaction of garlic genotypes to attack byThrips tabaci. Hortic.Brasileira 8:19–21. (in Portuguese, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coudriet, D.L., Kishaba, A.N., McCreight, J.D. and Bohn, G.W. (1979) Varietal resistance in onions to thrips.J. Econ. Entomol. 72:614–615.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis, P.R. and Eckenrode, C.J. (1979) Factors influencing resistance inAllium sp. to onion maggot.Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 25:151–153.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis, P.R., Eckenrode, C.J. and Harman, G.E. (1979) Influence of onion cultivars and their microbial colonizers on resistance to onion maggot.J. Econ. Entomol. 72:512–515.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ellis, P.R., Soni, S.K. and Mayne, H.J. (1986) Resistance of vegetables to insect pests. Onions, p. 31.In: 36th Annual Report 1985, National Vegetable Res. Stn., Wellesbourne, UK

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fornazier, M.J., Carmo, C.A.S. do, Souza, J. and Dessaune Filho, N. (1987) The response of different garlic cultivars toEriophyes tulipae attack. No. 44, EMCAPA, Cariacica, Brazil, (in Portuguese, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harris, M.O., Miller, J.R. and Ponti, O.M.B. de (1987) Mechanisms of resistance to onion fly egg-laying.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 43:279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Molenaar, N.D. (1984) Genetics, thrips (Thrips tabaci L.) resistance and epicuticular wax characteristics of nonglossy and glossy onions (Allium cepa L.). Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, Wl.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Patil, A.P., Nawale, R.N., Ajiri, D.S. and Moholkar, P.R. (1988) Field screening of onion cultivars for their reaction to thrips.Indian Cocoa Arecanut Spices J. 12 (1):10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pawar, D.B., Mote, U.N., Kale, P.N. and Ajri, D.S. (1987) Identification of resistant sources for thrips in onion.Curr. Res. Rep. Mahatma Phule Agric. Univ. 3:115–117.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peres Domingues, E. and Boica Junior, A.L. (1987) Susceptibility evaluation of early crops of six onion cultivars toThrips tabaci Lindeman, 1888.Científica (Jaboticabal) 15:79–84. (in Spanish, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ponti, O.M.B. de and Inggamer, H. (1984) Resistance to the onion fly inAllium cepa andAllium fistulosum. pp. 21-23.In: 3rd EUCARPIAAllium Symposium (Wageningen, the Netherlands).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singh, D., Deol, B.S., Gill, S.P.S. and Singh, L. (1983) Field screening of onion cultivars (seed crop) against gram caterpillar.Punjab Hortic. J. 23:242–243.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singh, D., Sidhu, A.S. and Thadur, J.C. (1986) Relative resistance of onion and garlic cultivars to thrips,Thrips tabaci (Lind.).J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 23:P424–427.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soni, S.K., Freeman, G.H. and Ellis, P.R. (1984) A glasshouse screening method to assess resistance in onions to damage by onion fly (Delia antiqua) larvae.Ann. Appl. Biol. 105:565–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Cruciferae Cabbage, cauliflower, radish, turnip and other cole crops

  1. Abro, G.H. and Wright, D.J. (1989) Host plant preference and the influence of different cabbage cultivars on the toxicity of abamectin and cypermethrin againstPlutella xylostella. Ann. Appl. Biol. 115: 481–487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alborn, H., Karlsson, H., Lundgren, L., Ruuth, P. and Stenhagen, G. (1985) Resistance in crop species of the genusBrassica to oviposition by the turnip root flyHylemya floralis.Oikos 44: 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asyakin, B.P. (1983) Effectiveness of natural enemies of cabbage flies on cabbage varieties with differing resistance, pp. 62–66.In: Novozhilov, K.V. [Ed.] Biotsenoticheskoe obosnovanie kriteriev effektivnosti prirodnykh entomofagov. Vsesoyznaya Akademiya Seľskokhozyatstvennykh Nauk im V.I.Lenina, Leningrad, USSR, (in Russian, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asyakin, B.P. (1985) Resistance of cruciferous root vegetables to cabbage flies (Delia brassicae Bouche, D. floralis Fall.), pp. 89–95.in: Ustoichivost s.-k. rast. k vreditelyam i probl, zashchity rast. FromReferativnyi Zhurnal (1985) 12.65.348. (in Russian, with English summary)

  5. AVRDC. (1987) Screening Chinese cabbage accessions for resistance to cabbage webworm. pp. 19–20.In: Progress Report, 1985, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  6. AVRDC. (1987) Influence of trichome density on the oviposition of diamondback moth on Chinese cabbage leaves, pp. 28–29.In: Progress Report, 1985, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Birch, A.N.E. (1989) A field cage method for assessing resistance to turnip root fly in brassicas.Ann. Appl. Biol. 115: 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bogdanov, V.B., Asyakin, B.P. and Shapiro, I.D. (1988) [Method of determining the resistance of cabbage varieties toBrevicoryne brassicae]. USSR Patent (1988) A.s. 1404034. From Referativnyi Zhurnal (1988) 12.65.292. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chandra, J. and Lal, O.P. (1977) Development and survival of caterpillar of cabbage butterflyPieris brassicae Linn, on some varieties of cabbage.Indian J. Entomol. 38:187–188.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crisp, P. (1982) The use of an evolutionary scheme for cauliflowers in the screening of genetic resources.Euphytica 31:725–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dickson, M.H. and Eckenrode, C.J. (1980) Breeding for resistance in cabbage and cauliflower to cabbage looper, imported cabbageworm and diamondback mqth.J. Am. Soc. Horlic. Sci. 105:782–785.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dickson, M.H., Eckenrode, C.J. and Blamble, A.E. (1984) NY IR 9602, NY IR 9605, and NY IR 8329: Lepidopterous pest-resistant cabbage breeding Unes.HortScience 19:311–312.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dickson, M.H., Eckenrode, C.J. and Lin, J. (1985) Breeding for diamondback moth resistance inBrassica olerácea. pp. 137–143.In: Diamondback Moth Management: First International Workshop. Asian Vegetable Res. Dev. Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dickson, M.H., Shelton, A.M., Eigenbrode, S.D., Vamosy, M.L. and Mora, M. (1990) Selection for resistance to diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella ) in cabbage.HortScience 25:1643–1646.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dodd, G.D. and Emden, H.F. van (1979) Shifts in host plant resistance to the cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae) exhibited by Brussels sprout plants.Ann. Appl. Biol. 91:251–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eckenrode, C.J., Dickson, M.H. and Lin, J. (1985) Resistance in crucifers to diamondback moth and other lepidopterous pests, pp. 129–136.In: Diamondback Moth Management: First International Workshop. Asian Vegetable Res. Dev. Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edelson, J.V. and Dickson, M.H. (1988) Resistance to insects by cabbage lines developed in New York when grown in south Texas.Crop Prot. 7:391–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eigenbrode, S.D. and Shelton, A.M. (1990) Behavior of neonate diamondback moth larvae on glossy-leafed resistantBrassica oleracea L.Environ. Entomol. 19:1566–1571.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eigenbrode, S.D. and Shelton, A.M. (1990) Effect of plant age on survival of diamondback moth on two cabbage genotypes.HortScience 25:362.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eigenbrode, S.D., Shelton, A.M. and Dickson, M.H. (1990) Two types of resistance to the diamondback moth in cabbage.Environ. Entomol. 19:1086–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eigenbrode, S.D., Stoner, K.A., Shelton, A.M. and Kain, W.C. (1991) Characteristics of glossy leaf waxes associated with resistance to diamondback moth inBrassica oleracea.J. Econ. Entomol. 84:1609–1618.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ellis, P.R. (1977) The search for resistance toDelia brassicae in crucifers andPsila rosae in carrots. EUCARPIA/International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group Breeding for Resistance to Insects and Mites. Report of first meeting, Wageningen, the Netherlands. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 3:7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ellis, P.R. (1988) Investigations of resistance in vegetable crops to root-feeding dipterous pests.Acta Horlic. (Wageningen) 219:31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ellis, P.R., Hardman, J.A., Crisp, P. and Johnson, A.G. (1979) The influence of plant age on resistance of radish to cabbage root fly egg-laying.Ann. Appl. Biol. 93:125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ellis, P.R., Hardman, J.A., Thompson, A.R., Mayne, H.J. and Saw, P.L. (1986) Resistance of vegetables to insect pests. Brassicas. p. 29.In: 36th Annual Report 1985, National Vegetable Res. Stn., Wellesbourne, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Emden, H.F. van (1977) Risk-rating plants in relation to aphid susceptibility, using analysis of plant material. EUCARPIA/Intemational Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group Breeding for Resistance to Insects and Mites. Report of first meeting, Wageningen, the Netherlands. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 3:91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Freuler, J. (1978) Glasshouse studies of the effects of cabbage root fly larvae,Delia brassicae (Hoffrn.) on cauliflower varieties.Z. Angew. Entomol. 86:98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gilbert, N. and Coaker, T.H. (1988) Differential survival of British and Mediterranean strains ofPieris rapae on different brassica cultivars.Bull. Entomol. Res. 78:669–671.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gowers, S., Munro, I.K. and Gemmel, D.J. (1984) Turnip root-fly resistance in swedes.Cruciferae Newsl. 9:22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hardman, J.A. and Ellis, P.R. (1978) Host plant factors influencing the susceptibility of cruciferous crops to cabbage root fly attack.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24:393–397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hoy, C.W. and Kretchman, D.W. (1991) Thrips injury to cabbage cultivars in Ohio.J. Econ. Entomol. 84:971–977.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Karl, E. and Eisbein, K. (1987) Susceptibility toBrevicoryne brassicae (L.) andMyzus persicae (Sulz.) of some cabbage varieties and breeding lines with different cuticular wax structure levels.Arch. Phytopathol. Pflanzenschutz 23:369–376. (in German, with English and Russian summaries)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kennedy, G.G. and Abou-Ghadir, M.F. (1979) Bionomics of the turnip aphid on two turnip cultivars.J. Econ. Entomol. 72.754–757.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Khaire, V.A., Lawande, K.E., Ajri, D.S. and Kale, P.N. (1986) Occurrence of insect pests on different cauliflower cultivars.Curr. Res. Rep. Mahatma Phule Agric. Univ. 2:205–208.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lal, O.P., Gill, H.S. and Singh, R. (1987) Varietal resistance in cabbage against mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysismi Kalt.).Cruciferae Newsl. 12:83.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lammerink, J. and Hart, R.W. (1985) ‘Tina’, a new swede cultivar with resistance to dry rot and clubroot.N.Z. J. Exp. Agric. 13:417–420.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lara, F.M., Coelho, A. and Mayor, J. Jr. (1979) Varietal resistance in kale toBrevicoryne brassicae (Linnaeus, 1758). II. Antibiosis.An. Soc. Entomol. Bras. 8:217–223. (in Portuguese, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lara, F.M., Mayor, J. Jr., Coelho, A. and Fornasier, I.B. (1978) Resistance of varieties of cabbage toBrevicoryne brassicae I. Preference, under field and laboratory conditions.An. Soc. Entomol. Bras. 7:175–182. (in Portuguese, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Letourneau, D.K. and Fox, L.R. (1989) Effects of experimental design and nitrogen on cabbage butterfly oviposition.Oecologia (Berl.) 80:211–214.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lin, J., Dickson, M.H. and Eckenrode, C.J. (1984) Resistance ofBrassica lines to the diamondback moth in the field, and inheritance of resistance.J. Econ. Entomol. 77:1293- 1296.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lin, J., Eckenrode, C.J. and Dickson, M.H. (1983) Variation inBrassica oleracea resistance to diamondback moth.J. Econ. Entomol. 76:1423–1427.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Malik, R.S. (1988) Comparative aphid tolerance in cultivated species ofBrassica.New Bot. 165:113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Malik, R.S., Anand, I.J. and Srinivasachar, D. (1983) Effect of glucosinolates in relation to aphid (Lipaphis erysimi Kalt.) fecundity in crucifers.Int. J. Trop. Agrie. 1:273–278.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Mohamad, B.M. and Emden, H.F. van (1989) Host plant modification to insecticide susceptibility inMyzus persicae (Sulz.).Insect Sci. Appl. 10:699–703.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mustafa, T.M. (1986) Spatial distribution of onion thrips and cabbage aphid on and response to some cruciferous crop plants.Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenschutz 93:271–277.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pukhaev, R.V., Asyakin, B.P. and Shapiro, I.D. (1987) [Method of determining the resistance of cabbage plants to cabbage flies.] USSR Patent (1987) A.S.1299550. FromReferativnyl Zhurnal (1987) 9.65.256. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Renwick, J.A.A. and Radke, C.D. (1983) Chemical recognition of host plants for oviposition by the cabbage butterfly,Pieris rapae.Environ. Entomol. 12:446–450.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ruuth, P. (1988) Resistance of cruciferous crops to turnip root fly.J. Agric. Sci. Finl. 60:269- 279.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ruuth, P. and Hellqvist, S. (1988) [The significance of partial resistance in the control of the greater cabbage fly (Delia floralis).]Växskyddsrapporter, Jordbruk 53:164. (in Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ruuth, P. and Hellqvist, S. (1989) Trials of partially resistant varieties in integrated control of turnip root fly (Delia floralis).Vaxtskyddsnotiser 53:76–81. (in Swedish, with summary in English)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sastrosiswojo, S., Permadi, A., Dibyantoro, A.L.H. and Misra, I. (1987) Resistance of crucifers to the diamondback mothPlutella xylostella.Bul. Penelitian Hortik. 15:29–37. (Indonesian, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Shapiro, I.D. and Asyakin, B.P. (1977) Details of the biology of the spring (Delia brassicae Bouche) and summer (Delia floralis Fall.) cabbage flies while feeding on different varieties of cabbage.Tr. Vses. Nauchnoissled. Inst. Zashch. Rast. 53:107–112. (in Russian, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Shelton, A.M., Becker, R.F. and Andaloro, J.T. (1983) Varietal resistance to onion thrips in processing cabbage.J. Econ. Entomol. 76:85–86.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Shelton, A.M., Hoy, C.W., North, R.C., Dickson, M.H. and Barnard, J. (1988) Analysis of resistance in cabbage varieties to damage by Lepidoptera and Thysanoptera.J. Econ. Entomol. 81:634–640.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Singh, D., Singh, H. and Brar, H.S. (1987) Influence of varieties and dates of planting radish stecklings on infestation by mustard aphid,Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach).J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 24:396–398.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Stoner, K.A. (1990) Glossy leaf wax and plant resistance to insects inBrassica oleracea under natural infestation.Environ. Entomol. 19:730–739.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Stoner, K.A., Dickson, M.H. and Shelton, A.M. (1989) Inheritance of resistance to damage byThrips tabaci Lindeman in cabbage.Euphytica 40:233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stoner, K.A. and Shelton, A.M. (1988) Role of nonpreference in the resistance of cabbage varieties to the onion thrips.J. Econ. Entomol. 81: 1062–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Stoner, K.A. and Shelton, A.M. (1988) Effect of planting date and liming of growth stages on damage to cabbage by onion thrips.J. Econ. Entomol. 81:1186–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Stoner, K.A. and Shelton, A.M. (1988) Influence of variety on abundance and within-plant distribution of onion thrips on cabbage.J. Econ. Entomol. 81:1190–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Stork, N.E. (1980) Role of waxblooms in preventing attachment to brassicas by the mustard beetle,Phaedon cochleariae.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 28:100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sundstrom, F.J. and Story, R.N. (1987) Influence of growing season and insecticide frequency on cabbage.Louisiana Agric. 30 (2):6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Verma, T.S., Bhagchandani, P.M., Singh, N. and Lal, O.P. (1981) Screening of cabbage germplasm collections for resistance toBrevicoryne brassicae andPieris brassicae.Indian J. Agric. Sci. 51:302–305.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Vukasinovic, S., Bes, A. and Gligorevic, B. (1986) Study of the yield and quality characters of cabbage and the degree of susceptibility to attack by cabbage moth in Semberija.Rad. Poljoprivrednog Fak. Univ. Sarajevu 34 (38):63–76. (in Serbo-Croat, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Walgenbach, P.J. and Libby, J.L. (1979) Progress in screening for insect resistance in crucifers.Proc. N. Central Branch Entomol. Soc. Am. 33:52 (abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Weibull, J. and Melin, G. (1990) Free amino acid content of phloem sap from Brassica plants in relation to performance ofLipaphis erysimi.Ann. Appl. Biol. 116:417–423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

unbelliferae Carrot, celery and parsnip See also 49, 50]

  1. Berenbaum, M.R., Nitao, J.K. and Zangerl, A.R. (1991) Adaptive significance of furanocoumarin diversity inPastinaca saliva.J. Chem. Ecol. 17:207–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cole, R.A. (1985) Relationship between the concentration of chlorogenic acid in carrot roots and the incidence of carrot fly larval damage.Ann. Appl. Biol. 106:211–217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cole, R.A. (1987) Intensity of radicle fluorescence as related to the resistance of seedlings of lettuce to the lettuce root aphid and carrot to the carrot fly.Ann. Appl. Biol. 111: 629–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cole, R.A., Morgan, A. and Lancashire, B. (1987) Measurement of fluorescence intensity in microscope preparations using a photodiode detector.Ann. Appl. Biol. 111: 739–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cole, R.A., Phelps, K., Ellis, P.R. and Hardman, J.A. (1987) The effects of time of sowing and harvest on carrot biochemistry and the resistance of carrots to carrot fly.Ann. Appl. Biol. 110: 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cole, R.A., Phelps, K., Ellis, P.R., Hardman, J.A. and Rollason, S.A. (1988) Further studies relating chlorogenic acid concentration in carrots to carrot fly damage.Ann. Appl. Biol. 112:13–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cole, R.A., Rollason, S.A., Hardman, J.A. and Ellis, P.R. (1990) The incidence of seed-borne bacteria in carrots and their association with damage caused by the larvae of the carrot fly (Psila rosae).Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Pests and Diseases - 1990. Vol. 1, pp. 343–347.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cole, R.A., Rollason, S.A., Morgan, A., Gilchrist, J., Baker, S.A. and Springer, P. (1988) A rapid non-destructive technique for screening carrot seedlings for resistance to carrot fly damage.Ann. Appl. Biol. 112:159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis, P.R., Dowker, B.D., Freeman, G.H. and Hardman, J.A. (1985) Problems in field selection for resistance to carrot fly (Psila rosae) in carrot cv. Long Chantenay.Ann. Appl. Biol. 106:349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellis, P.R., Freeman, G.H., Dowker, B.D., Hardman, J.A. and Kingswell, G. (1987) The influence of plant density and position in field trials designed to evaluate the resistance of carrots to carrot fly (Psila rosae) attack.Ann. Appl. Biol. 111:21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis, P.R., Freeman, G.H. and Hardman, J.A. (1984) Differences in the relative resistance of two carrot cultivars to carrot fly attack over five seasons.Ann. Appl. Biol. 105:557–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis, P.R. and Hardman, J.A. (1981) The consistency of the resistance of eight carrot cultivars to carrot fly attack at several centres in Europe.Ann. Appl. Biol. 98:491–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellis, P.R. and Hardman, J.A. (1988) Non-insecticidal contributions to an integrated programme for the protection of carrots against carrot fly. International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group, Integrated Control in Field Vegetable Crops. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 9 (l):33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ellis, P.R., Hardman, J.A., Cole, R.A. and Phelps, K. (1987) The complementary effects of plant resistance and the choice of sowing and harvest times in reducing carrot fly (Psila rosae) damage to carrots.Ann. Appl. Biol. 111:415–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellis, P.R., Hardman, J.A. and Dowker, B.D. (1982) Screening of Japanese carrot cultivars for their susceptibility to carrot fly.Ann. Appl. Biol. 100 (Suppl.): 94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ellis, P.R., Hardman, J.A. and Dowker, B.D. (1982) Screening of carrot cultivars for their susceptibility to carrot fly 1976–1980.Ann. Appl. Biol. 100 (Suppl.):96–97.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ellis, P.R., Hardman, J.A. and Saw, P.L. (1990) Wild umbelliferous species as sources of resistance to carrot fly.Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Pests and Diseases - 1990. Vol. 1, pp. 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ellis, P.R., Wheatley, G.A. and Hardman, J.A. (1978) Preliminary studies of carrot susceptibility to carrot fly.Ann. Appl. Biol. 88:159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guerin, P.M. and Ryan, M.F. (1980) Insecticidal effect of trans-2-nonenal, a constituent of carrot root.Experientia (Basel) 36:1387–1388.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Guerin, P.M. and Ryan, M.F. (1984) Relationship between root volatiles of some carrot cultivars and their resistance to the carrot flyPsila rosae.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 36:217–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Guerin, P.M. and Stadler, E. (1984) Carrot fly cultivar preferences: some influencing factors.Ecol. Entomol. 9:413–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kettunen, S., Havukkala, I., Holopainen, I.K. and Knuuttila, T. (1988) Non-chemical control of carrot rust fly in Finland.Ann. Agric. Fenn. 27:99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maki, A., Kitajima, J., Abe, F., Stewart, G. and Ryan, M.F. (1989) Isolation, identification, and bioassay of chemicals affecting nonpreference carrot-root resistance to carrot-fly larva.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1883–1897.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maki, A. and Ryan, M.F. (1989) Root-mediated effects in carrot resistance to the carrot fly,Psila rosae.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1867–1882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Meade, T. and Hare, J.D. (1991) Differential performance of beet armyworm and cabbage looper larvae on selectedApium graviolens cultivars.Environ. Entomol. 20:1636–1644.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nieuwhof, M. (1977) Some preliminary data on research into carrot fly (Psila rosae) resistance. EUCARPIA/International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group Breeding for Resistance to Insects and Mites. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 3:13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sazonova, L.V. (1982) Field evaluation of the resistance of carrot toPsila rosae F.Byull. Vses. Ord. Lenina Ord. Druzhby Narodov Nauchno-issled. Inst. Rasteniev.Imeni Vavilova 120:44- 48. (in Russian, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Trumble, J.T., Dercks, W., Quiros, C.F. and Beier, R. (1990) Host plant resistance and linear furanocoumarin content ofApium accessions.J. Econ. Entomol. 83:519–525.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Trumble, J.T. and Quiros, C.F. (1988) Antixenotic and antibiotic resistance inApium species toLiriomyza trifolii.J. Econ. Entomol. 81:602–607.

    Google Scholar 

Convolvulaceae Sweet potato

  1. Alleyne, E.H. (1984) Attempts at control of the West Indian sweet potato weevil using sweet potato varieties.Carib. Plant Prot. Newsl. l (4):7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anota, T. and Odebiyi, J.A. (1984) Resistance in sweet potato toCylas punclicollis Boh.Biol. Afr. 1: 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. AVRDC. (1987) Search for germplasm sources resistant to sweetpotato weevil, pp. 67–68.In: Progress Report, 1985, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  4. AVRDC. (1987) Correlation of root characteristics and root infestation by sweetpotato weevil. pp. 68–70.In: Progress Report, 1985, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  5. AVRDC. (1987) Third screening of selected sweet potato accessions for resistance to sweet potato vine borer, pp. 71–72.In: Progress Report, 1985, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  6. AVRDC. (1987) Evaluation for weevil resistance in sweet potato, pp. 388–389.In: Progress Report, 1985, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baker, J.E., Woo, S.M. and Mullen, M.A. (1984) Distribution of proteinases and carbohydrases in the midgut of larvae of the sweet potato weevilCylas formicarius elegantulus and response of proteinases to inhibitors from sweet potato.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 36:97–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barlow, T. and Rolston, L.H. (1981) Types of host plant resistance to the sweet potato weevil found in sweet potato roots.J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 54:649–657.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bernardo, E.N. and Esguerra, N.M. (1983) Technique for evaluation of resistance of sweet potato accessions to the weevil,Cylas formicarius elegantulus Fabr.Proc. Sixth Symp. Int. Society for Tropical Root Crops (Lima, Peru), p. 589.

  10. Bhat, P.S. (1987) Screening and chemical control of sweet potato weevilCylas formicarius F. p. 103.In: Annual Progress Report, 1986, Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Collins, W.W. and Moyer, J.W. (1982) ‘Pope’ sweet potato.HortScience 17:265.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Collins, W.W. and Moyer, J.W. (1987) ‘Sweet Red’ sweet potato.HortScience 22:514–515.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cuthbert, F.P. and Davis, B.W. (1979) Resistance in sweet potatoes to damage by soil insects.J. Econ. Entomol. 63:360–363.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cuthbert, F.P. and Jones, A. (1978) Insect resistance as an adjunct or alternative to insecticides for control of sweet potato soil insects.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 103:443–445.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dukes, P.D., Hamilton, M.G., Jones, A. and Schalk, J.M. (1978) ‘Sumor’, a multi-use sweet potato.HortScience 22:170–171.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dukes, P.D., Jones, A., Hamilton, M.G. and Cuthbert, F.P. (1978) ‘W51’ root knot resistant sweet potato germplasm.HortScience 13:201–202.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hahn, S.K., Isoba, J.C.G. and Ikotun, T. (1989) Resistance breeding in root and tuber crops at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria.Crop Prot. 8:147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall, M.R. and Harmon, S.A. (1989) ‘Coastal Red’ sweet potato.HortScience 24:176–177.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hamilton, M.G., Dukes, P.D., Jones, A. and Schalk, J.M. (1985) ‘HiDry’ sweet potato.HortScience 20:954–955.

    Google Scholar 

  20. IITA. (1986) Integrated management for control of sweet potato weevils, p. 122In: Annual Report and Research Highlights, 1985, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jansson, R.K., Bryan, H.H. and Sorensen, K.A. (1987) Within-vine distribution and damage of sweet potato weevil,Cylas formicarius elegantulus, on four cultivars of sweet potato in southern Florida.Fla. Entomol. 70:523–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones, A., Dukes, P.D., Schalk, J.M. and Hamilton, M.G. (1989) ‘Excel’ sweet potato.HortScience 24:171–172.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jones, A., Dukes, P.D., Schalk, J.M. and Hamilton, M.G. (1991) I/13 and J/8 sweet potato mass selection populations.HortScience 26:929–930.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jones, A., Dukes, P.D., Schalk, J.M., Hamilton, M.G. and Baumgardner, R.A. (1987) ‘Southern Delite’ sweet potato.HortScience 22:329–330.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jones, A., Dukes, P.D., Schalk, J.M., Hamilton, M.G., Mullen, M.A., Baumgardner, R.A., Paterson, D.R. and Boswell, T.E. (1983) ‘Resisto’ sweet potato.HortScience 18:251–252.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jones, A., Dukes, P.D., Schalk, J.M., Hamilton, M.G., Mullen, M.A., Baumrgardner, R.A., Paterson, D.R., and Boswell, T.E. (1985) ‘Regal’ sweet potato.HortScience 20:781–782.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jones, A., Dukes, P.D., Schalk, J.M., Mullen, M.A., Hamilton, M.G., Paterson, D.R. and Boswell, T.E. (1980) W-71, W-115, W-119, W-125, W-149 and W-154 sweet potato germplasm with multiple insect and disease resistance.HortScience 15:835–836.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jones, A., Schalk, J.M. and Dukes, P.D. (1979) Heritability estimates for resistances in sweet potato to soil insects.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 104:424–426.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jones, A., Schalk, J.M. and Dukes, P.D. (1987) Control of soil insect injury by resistance in sweet potato.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 112:195–197.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moralde, N.M., Pedro, deL.B. and Bernardo, E.N. (1982) Technique for evaluating sweet potato varieties for resistance to false spider mite,Brevipalpus californicus Banks.Philipp. Entomol. 5:345–354.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mullen, M.A. (1984) Influence of sweetpotato weevil infestation on the yields of twelve sweet potato lines.J. Agric. Entomol. 1:227–230.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mullen, M.A., Jones, A., Arbogast, R.T., Schalk, J.M., Paterson, D.R., Boswell, T.E. and Earhart, D.R. (1980) Field selection of sweet potato lines and cultivars for resistance to the sweetpotato weevil.J. Econ. Entomol. 73:288–290.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mullen, M.A., Jones, A., Paterson, D.R. and Boswell, T.E. (1981) Resistance of sweet potato lines to infestations of sweet potato weevil,Cylas formicarius elegantulus (Summers).HortScience 16:345–350.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mullen, M.A., Jones, A., Paterson, D.R. and Boswell, T.E. (1982) Resistance of sweet potato lines to the sweetpotato weevil.HortScience 17:931–932.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mullen, M.A., Jones, A., Paterson, D.R. and Boswell, T.E. (1985) Resistance in sweet potatoes to the sweetpotato weevil,Cylas formicarius elegantulus (Summers).J. Entomol. Sci. 20:345–350.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nottingham, S.F., Son, K.C., Severson, R.F., Arrendale, R.F. and Kays, S.J. (1989) Attraction of adult sweet potato weevils,Cylas formicarius elegantulus (Summers), to sweet potato leaf and root volatiles.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1095–1106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nottingham, S.F., Son, K.C., Wilson, D.D., Severson, R.F. and Kays, S.J. (1988) Feeding by adult sweet potato weevils,Cylas formicarius elegantulus, on sweet potato leaves.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 48:157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nottingham, S.F., Son, K.C., Wilson, D.D., Severson, R.F. and Kays, S.J. (1989) Feeding and oviposition preference of sweet potato weevil,Cylas formicarius elegantulus (Summers), on storage roots of sweet potato cultivars with differing surface chemistries.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:895–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nottingham, S.F., Wilson, D.D., Severson, R.F. and Kays, S.J. (1987) Feeding and oviposition preferences of the sweet potato weevil,Cylas formicarius elegantulus, on the outer periderm and exposed inner core of storage roots of selected sweet potato cultivars.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 45:271–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Paterson, D.R., Fuqua, M.C., Motes, J.E. and Earhart, D.R. (1984) ‘Cordner’ sweet potato.HortScience 19:455.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rajamma, P. and Pillai, K.S. (1987) Screening sweet potato varieties for weevil resistance and factors governing resistance, pp. 49–50.In: Annual Progress Report, 1986, Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rolston, L.H., Barlow, T., Hernandez, T., Nilakhe, S.S. and Jones, A. (1979) Field evaluation of breeding lines and cultivars of sweetpotato resistance to the sweetpotato weevil.HortScience 14:634–635.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rolston, L.H., Barlow, T., Jones, A. and Hernandez, T. (1981) Potential of host plant resistance in sweet potato for control of a white grub,Phyllophaga ephilida Say.J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 54:378–380.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rolston, L.H., Clark, C.A., Cannon, J.M., Randle, W.M., Riley, E.G., Wilson, P.W. and Robbins, M.L. (1987) ‘Beauregard’ sweet potato.HortScience 22:1338–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schalk, J.M. and Creighton, C.S. (1989) Influence of sweet potato cultivars in combination with a biological control agent (Nematoda:Heterorhabditis heliolhidis) on larval development of the banded cucumber beetle.Environ. Entomol. 18:897–899.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schalk, J.M., Dukes, P.D., Jones, A. and Jarret, R.L. (1991) Evaluation of sweetpotato clones for soil insect damage.HortScience 26:1548–1549.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schalk, J.M. and Jones, A. (1982) Methods to evaluate sweetpotatoes for resistance to banded cucumber beetle in the field.J. Econ. Entomol. 75:76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Schalk, J.M., Jones, A. and Creighton, C. (1979) Artificial infestation of sweet potato with banded cucumber beetle eggs.HortScience 14:740–741.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schalk, J.M., Jones, A. and Dukes, P.D. (1986) Factors associated with resistance in recently developed sweet potato cultivars and germplasm to the banded cucmber beetle,Diabrotica balteata LeConte.J. Agric. Entomol. 3:329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schalk, J.M., Peterson, J.K., Jones, A., Dukes, P.D. and Walter, W.M. Jr. (1986) The anatomy of sweet potato periderm and its relationship to wireworm,Diabrotica, Systena resistance.J. Agric. Entomol. 3: 350–356.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Singh, B., Yazdani, S.S. and Hameed, S.F. (1989) Sources of resistance toCylas formicarius Fab. in sweet potato. I. Morphological characters.Indian J. Entomol. 49:414–419.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Son, K.C., Severson, R.F., Arrendale, R.F. and Kays, S.J. (1990) Surface chemical differences between sweetpotato lines with varying levels of resistance to the sweetpotato weevil.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 115:696–699.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Son, K.C., Severson, R.F. and Kays, S.J. (1991) A rapid method for screening sweetpotato genotypes for oviposition stimulants to the sweetpotato weevil.HortScience 26:409–410.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Son, K.C., Severson, R.F. and Kays, S.J. (1991) Pre- and postharvest changes in sweetpotato root surface chemicals modulating insect resistance.HortScience 26:1514–1516.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Son, K.C., Severson, R.F., Snook, M.E. and Kays, S.J. (1991) Root carbohydrate, organic acids, and phenolic chemistry in relation to sweetpotato weevil resistance.HortScience 26:1305–1308.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Talekar, N.S. (1981) Identification of sources of resistance to sweet potato weevil.Chin. J. Entomol. 1:135–136. (abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Talekar, N.S. (1987) Feasibility of the use of resistant cultivars in sweetpotato weevil control.Insect Sci. Appl. 8: 815–817.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Talekar, N.S. (1987) Resistance in sweetpotato to sweetpotato weevil.Insect Sci. Appl. 8:819–823.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Talekar, N.S. and Cheng, K.W. (1987) Nature of damage and sources of resistance to sweetpotato vine borer in sweet potato.J. Econ. Entomol. 80:788–791.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Thompson, P.G. and Hurley, R.M. (1989) Marketable yields of insect-resistant sweet potato cultivars. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Bull. 14 (1).

  61. Waddill, V.H. and Conover, R.A. (1978) Resistance of white-fleshed sweet potato cultivars to the sweetpotato weevil.HortScience 13:476.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wilson, D.D., Son, K.C., Severson, R.F. and Kays, S.J. (1990) Effect of a pentacyclic triterpene from sweet potato storage roots on oviposition by the sweetpotato weevil.Environ. Entomol. 19:1663–1665.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Solanaceae Tomato

  1. AVRDC. (1987) Screening hairy tomatoes for resistance to tomato fruitworm. pp. 109–110.In: Progress Report, 1985, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barbour, J.D., Farrar, R.R. Jr. and Kennedy, G.G. (1991) Interaction of fertilizer regime with host-plant resistance in tomato.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 60:289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berlinger, M.J. (1980) Resistance in tomato to the greenhouse whitefly in relation to integrated control in glasshouses. International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group, Integrated Control in Glasshouses. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 3 (3): 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berlinger, M.J. (1986) Host plant resistance toBemisia tabaci.Agric. Ecosysl. &Environ. 17:69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berlinger, M.J. and Dahan, R. (1987) Breeding for resistance to virus transmission by whiteflies in tomatoes.Insect Sci. Appl. 8:783–784.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berlinger, M.J., Dahan, R., Berlinger, O.C. and Mordechi, S. (1990) Honeydew excretion as a possible tool to screen tomato resistance to virus transmission byBemisia tabaci. EUCARPIA/International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group Breeding for Resistance to Insects and Mites. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 8 (6):121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berlinger, M.J., Dahan, R. and Shevach-Urkin, E. (1983) Breeding for resistance to whiteflies in tomatoes — in relation to integrated pest control in greenhouses. International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group, Integrated Control in Glasshouses. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 6 (3): 172–176.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berlinger, M.J., Dahan, R. and Shevach-Urkin, E. (1984) Resistance to the tobacco whitefly,Bemisia tabaci, in tomato and related species: A quick screening method. EUCARPIA/International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group Breeding for Resistance to Insects and Mites. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 7 (4):39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berlinger, M.J., Magal, Z. and Benzioni, A. (1983) The importance of pH in food selection by the tobacco whitefly,Bemisia tabaci.Phytoparasitica 11:151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berlinger, M.J. and Ponti, O.M.B. de (1981) Methods for testing resistance to whiteflies in tomato and related species. EUCARPIA/International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group Breeding for Resistance to Insects and Mites. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 4:115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bordat, D., Laterrot, H., Renand, M. and Morelti, A. (1987) Phenomena of resistance toLiriomyza trifolii (Burgess) andL. sativae Blanchard inLycopersicon cheesmanii Riley.Agron. Trap. 42 (l):43–46. (in French, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Broadway, R.M., Duffey, S.S., Pearce, G. and Ryan, C.A. (1986) Plant proteinase inhibitors: a defense against herbivorous insects?Entomol. Exp. Appl. 41:33–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell, B.C. and Duffey, S.S. (1979) Tomatine and parasitic wasps: potential incompatibility of plant antibiosis with biological control.Science (Washington D.C.) 205:700–702.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carter, C.D., Gianfagna, T.J. and Sacalis, J.N. (1989) Sesquiterpenes in glandular trichomes of a wild tomato species and toxicity to the Colorado potato beetle.J. Agric. Food Chem. 37:1425–1428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carter, C.D., Sacalis, J.N. and Gianfagna, T.J. (1989) Zingiberene and resistance to Colorado potato beetle inLycopersicon hirsutum f.hirsutum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 37:206–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carter, CD. and Snyder, J.C. (1985) Mite responses in relation to trichomes ofLycopersicon esculentum XL. hirsutum F2 hybrids.Euphytica 34:177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carter, C.D. and Snyder, J.C. (1986) Mite response and trichome characters in a full-sib F2 family ofLycopersicon esculentum X L. hirsutum.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 111:130–133.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chiavegato, L.G. and Mischan, M.M. (1981) Resistance in varieties of tomatoLycopersicon esculentum Mill to the miteTetranychus (T.) urticae (Koch, 1836) Boudreaux and Dosse, 1963 under laboratory conditions.Científica (Jaboticabal) 9:267–171.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cosenza, G.W. and Green, H.B. (1979) Behavior of the tomato fruitwonn,Heliothis zea (Boddie), on susceptible and resistant lines of processing tomatoes.HortScience 14:171–173.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dhillon, N.P.S. (1986) Growth of the army worm(Spodoptera littoralis Boisd.) on three selections ofLycopersicon and on various concentrations of alpha-tomatine in artificial diets.Crop Res. 26:79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dimock, M.B. and Kennedy, G.G. (1983) The role of glandular trichomes in the resistance ofLycopersicon hirsutum f.glabratum toHeliothis zea.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 33:263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Duffey, S.S. (1986) Plant glandular trichomes: their partial role in defence against insects, pp. 151–172.In: Juniper, B. and Southwood, T.R.E. [Eds.] Insects and the Plant Surface. Edward Arnold, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Duffey, S.S. and Isman, M.B. (1981) Inhibition of insect larval growth by phenolics in glandular trichomes of tomato leaves.Experientia (Basel) 37:574–576.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Elliger, C.A., Wong, Y., Chan, B.G. and Waiss, A.C. Jr. (1981) Growth inhibitors in tomato(Lycopersicon) to tomato fruitworm(Heliothis zea).J. Chem. Ecol. 7:753–758.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Farrar, R.R. Jr. and Kennedy, G.G. (1987) 2-Undecanone, a constituent of the glandular trichomes ofLycopersicon hirsutum f.glabratum: effects onHeliothis zea andManduca sexta growth and survival.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 43:17–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Farrar, R.R. Jr. and Kennedy, G.G. (1987) Growth, food consumption and mortality ofHeliothis zea larvae on foliage of the wild tomato,Lycopersicon hirsutum f.glabratum, and the cultivated tomato,L. esculentum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 44:213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Farrar, R.R. Jr. and Kennedy, G.G. (1988) 2-Undecanone, a pupal mortality factor inHeliothis zea: sensitive larval stage andin planta activity inLycopersicon hirsulum f.glabratum.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 47:205–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Farrar, R.R. Jr. and Kennedy, G.G. (1990) Growth inhibitors in host plant resistance to insects: examples from a wild tomato withHeliothis zea.J. Entomol. Sci. 25:46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Farrar, R.R. Jr. and Kennedy, G.G. (1991) Relationship of leaf lamellar-based resistance toLeptinotarsa decemlineata andHeliothis zea in a wild tomato,Lycopersicon hirsulum f.glabratum, PI 134417.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 58:61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Farrar, R.R. Jr. and Kennedy, G.G. (1991) Inhibition ofTelenomus sphingis, an egg parasitoid ofManduca spp., by trichome/2-tridecanone-based host plant resistance in tomato.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 60:157–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Felton, G.W., Broadway, R.M. and Duffey, S.S. (1989) Inactivation of protease inhibitor activity by plant-derived quinones: complications for host-plant resistance against noctuid herbivores.J. Insect Physiol. 35:981–990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Felton, G.W., Donato, K., Vecchio, R.J. del and Duffey, S.S. (1989) Activation of plant foliar oxidases by insect feeding reduces nutritive quality of foliage for noctuid herbivores.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:2667–2694.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Felton, G.W., Duffey, S.S., Vail, P.V., Kaya, H.K. and Manning, J. (1987) Interaction of nuclear polyhedrosis virus with catechols: potential incompatibility for host-plant resistance against noctuid larvae.J. Chem. Ecol. 13: 947–957.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fery, R.L., Cuthbert, F.P. Jr. and Perkins, W.D. (1979) Artificial infestation of the tomato with eggs of the tomato fruitworm.J. Econ. Entomol. 72:392–394.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fery, R.L. and Kennedy, G.G. (1987) Genetic analysis of 2-tridecanone concentration, leaf trichome characteristics, and tobacco homworm resistance in tomato.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 112:886–891.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fery, R.L., Kennedy, G.G. and Sorenson, C.E. (1984) Genetic analysis of 2-tridecanone concentration and resistance to the tobacco homworm(Manduca sexla) and the Colorado potato beetle(Leptinotarsa decemlineata) inLycopersicon species.HorlScience 19:562.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fischhoff, D.A., Bowdish, K.S., Perlak, F.J., Marrone, P.G., McCormick, S.M., Niedermeyer, J.G., Dean, D.A., Kusano-Kretzmer, K., Mayer, E.J., Rochester, D.E., Rogers, S.G. and Fraley, R.T. (1987) Insect tolerant transgenic tomato plants.Bio/Technology 5:807–813.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Franca, F.H., Maluf, W.R., Rossi, P.E.F., Miranda, J.E.C. and Coelho, M.C.F. (1984) [Evaluation and selection of tomato for resistance to tomato moth.] p. 143.In: XXIV Congresso Brasileiro de Olericultura. I, Reunião Latino-Americana de Olericultura, Resumos e Plaestras. Sociedade de Olericultura do Brasil. (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gelder, W.M.J. van and Ponti, O.M.B. de (1987) Alpha-tomatine and other steroidal glycoalkaloids in fruits of tomato lines resistant to the glasshouse whitcfly(Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westw.).Euphytica 36:555–561. 224.Georgiev, K. and Sotirova, V. (1986)Results and problems of breeding for resistance to the greenhouse whitefly(Trialeurodes vaporariorum West) in tomatoes. pp. 21-26.In: Prva natsionalna konferentsia po immunogenetika na rasteniyata, Sofiya, 1986. Dokl. T.2. FromReferativnyi Zhurnal (1988) 6.65.274. (in Bulgarian, with English summary)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Georgiev, K. and Sotirova, V. (1988) Problems and achievements in tomato breeding for pest resistance.Selskostop. Nauka 26: 59–62. (in Bulgarian, with English and Russian summaries)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Georgiev, K., Vulkova-Achkova, Z. and Sotirova, V. (1984) The trigenome hybrid(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. -L. chilense Dun. -L. peruvianum var.humifusum Mill.) a new source of resistance to the greenhouse white fly(Trialeurodes vaporariorum). pp. 125–126.In: A New Era in Tomato Breeding. Synopses, IXth Meeting, EUCARPIA Tomato Working Group. Institute for Horticultural Plant Breeding, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Goffreda, J.C. and Mutschler, M.A. (1989) Inheritance of potato aphid resistance in hybrids betweenLycopersicon esculentum andL. pennellii.Theor. Appl. Genet. 78:210–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Goffreda, J.C, Mutschler, M.A. and Tingey, W.M. (1988) Feeding behavior of potato aphid affected by glandular trichomes of wild tomato.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 48:101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Goffreda, J.C, Steffens, J.C. and Mutschler, M.A. (1990) Association of epicuticular sugars with aphid resistance in hybrids with wild tomato.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 115:161–165.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Goffreda, J.C, Szymkowiak, E.J., Sussex, I.M. and Mutschler, M.A. (1990) Chimeric tomato plants show that aphid resistance and triacylglucose production are epidermal autonomous characters.Plant Cell 2:643–649.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Graham, J.S., Hall, G., Pearce, G. and Ryan, C.A. (1986) Regulation of synthesis of proteinase inhibitors I and II mRNAs in leaves of wounded tomato plants.Planta (Berl.) 169:399–405.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Isman, M.B. and Duffey, S.S. (1982) Phenolic compounds in foliage of commercial tomato cultivars as growth inhibitors to the fruitworm,Heliothis zea.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107:167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Isman, M.B. and Duffey, S.S. (1982) Toxicity of tomato phenolic compounds to the fruitworm,Heliothis zea.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 31:370–376.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Juvik, J.A., Babka, B.A. and Timmerman, E.A. (1988) Influence of trichome exudates from species ofLycopersicon on oviposition behavior ofHeliothis zea (Boddie).J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1261–1278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Juvik, J.A. and Stevens, M.A. (1982) Inheritance of foliar alpha-tomatine content in tomatoes.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107:1061–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Juvik, J.A. and Stevens, M.A. (1982) Physiological mechanisms of host-plant resistance in the genusLycopersicon toHeliothis zea andSpodoptera exigua, two insect pests of the cultivated tomato.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107:1065–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Juvik, J.A., Stevens, M.A. and Rick, C.M. (1982) Survey of the genusLycopersicon for variability in alpha-tomatine content.HortScience 17: 764–766.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kakar, K.L., Bhalla, O.P. and Dhaliwal, M.S. (1990) Screening of tomato germplasm and breeding for resistance against fruit borer,Heliothis armigera (Hub.).J. Insect Sci. 3:57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kalloo, Bannerjee, M.K., Kashyap, R.K. and Yadav, A.K. (1989) Genetics of resistance to fruit borer,Heliothis armigera Hübner, inLycopersicon.Plant Breeding 102:173–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kashyap, R.K., Kennedy, G.G. and Farrar, R.R. Jr. (1991) Behavioral response ofTrichogramma pretiosum Riley andTelenomus sphingis (Ashmead) to trichome/methyl ketone mediated resistance in tomato.J. Chem. Ecol. 17:543–556.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Kashyap, R.K. and Verma, A.N. (1986) Screening of tomato germplasm for susceptibility to the fruitborer,Heliothis armigera Hiibner.Indian J. Entomol. 48 (i):46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kashyap, R.K. and Verma, A.N. (1987) Factors imparting resistance to fruit damage byHeliothis armigera (Hübner) in some tomato phenotypes.Insect Sci. Appl. 8:111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kauffman, W.C. and Kennedy, G.G. (1989) Inhibition ofCampoletis sonorensis parasitism ofHeliothis zea and of parasitoid development by 2-tridecanone-mediated insect resistance of wild tomato.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1919–1930.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Kauffman, W.C. and Kennedy, G.G. (1989) Relationship between trichome density in tomato and parasitism ofHeliothis spp. eggs byTrichogramma spp.Environ. Entomol. 18:698–704.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kennedy, G.G. (1984) 2-Tridecanone, tomatoes andHeliothis zea: potential incompatibility of plant antibiosis with insecticidal control.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 35:305–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Kennedy, G.G. and Dimock, M.B. (1983) 2-Tridecanone: a natural toxicant in a wild tomato responsible for insect resistance. Proc. 5th Int. Congr. of Pesticide Chemistry (Kyoto, Japan), pp. 123–128.

  62. Kennedy, G.G. and Farrar, R.R. Jr. (1987) Response of insecticide-resistant and susceptible Colorado potato beetles,Leptinotarsa decemlineata, to 2-tridecanone and resistant tomato foliage: the absence of cross resistance.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 45:187–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Kennedy, G.G., Farrar, R.R. Jr. and Riskallah, M.R. (1987) Induced tolerance of neonateHeliothis zea to host plant allelochemicals and carbaryl following incubation of eggs on foliage ofLycopersicon hirsutum f.glabratum. Oecologia (Berl.) 73:615–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kennedy, G.G. and Henderson, W.R. (1978) A laboratory assay for resistance to the tobacco hornworm inLycopersicon andSolarium species.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 103:334–336.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kennedy, G.G., Nienhuis, J. and Helentjaris, T. (1987) Mechanisms of arthropod resistance in tomatoes, pp. 145–154.In: Nevin, D.J. and Jones, R.A. [Eds.] Tomato Biotechnology. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Kennedy, G.G. and Sorenson, C.E. (1985) The role of glandular trichomes in the resistance ofLycopersicon hirsutum f.glabratum to Colorado potato beetle.J. Econ. Entomol. 78:547- 551.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kennedy, G.G. and Yamamoto, R.T. (1979) A toxic factor causing resistance in a wild tomato to the tobacco hornworm and some other insects.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 26:121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kennedy, G.G., Yamamoto, R.T., Dimock, M.B., Williams, W.G. and Bordner, J. (1981) Effect of day length and light intensity on 2-tridecanone levels and resistance inLycopersicon hirsutum f.glabratum toManduca sexta.J. Chem. Ecol. 7:707–716.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Kielkewicz, M. and Tomczyk, A. (1987) Susceptibility of cucumber and tomato varieties to spider mites.Mater. Sesji Inst. Ochr. Roslin 27:17–22. (in Polish, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kisha, J.S.A. (1981) Observations on the trapping of the whiteflyBemisia tabaci by glandular hairs on tomato leaves.Ann. Appl. Biol. 97:123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Kisha, J.S.A. (1984) Whitefly,Bemisia tabaci, infestations on tomato varieties and a wildLycopersicon species.Ann. Appl. Biol. 104 (Suppl. 5):124–125.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Kozyreva, O.G., Belash, O.V., Bondarenko, L.V., Bairamova, N.L. and Inge-Vechtomov, S.G. (1989) [Selection of cell lines of tomato with altered phylosterol composition and their evaluation in a plant/insect system.] p. 81.In: Vsesoyuznaya konferentsiya po genetike somaticheskikh kletok v kulľture, posvyashchennaya pamyati N. I. Shapiro, Zvenigorod. Tezisy dokladov. Moscow, USSR. FromReferativnyi Zhurnal (1990) 8Ya3344. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lal, O.P. (1985) Field resistance of some tomato cultivars against the fruit-worm,Heliothis armigera (Hb.) in Tripoli.Bull. Entomol. 26 (l):96–97.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lara, F.M., Barbieri, J. and Churata-Masca, M.G.C. (1980) Behaviour of tomato cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) in relation to attack by the small borer —Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Guen. 1854) (Lepidoptera, Pyraustidae).An. Soc. Entomol. Bras. 9:53–66. (in Portuguese, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Lin, S.Y.H. and Trumble, J.T. (1986) Resistance in wild tomatoes to larvae of a specialist herbivore,Keiferia lycopersicella.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 41:53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Lin, S.Y.H., Trumble, J.T. and Kumamoto, J. (1987) Activity of volatile compounds in glandular trichomes ofLycopersicon species against two insect herbivores.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:837–850.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Minkenberg, O.P.J.M. and Fredrix, M.J.J. (1989) Preference and performance of an herbivorous fly,Liriomyza trifolii, on tomato plants differing in leaf nitrogen.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82: 350–354.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Minkenberg, O.P.J.M. and Ottenheim, J.J.G.W. (1990) Effect of leaf nitrogen content of tomato plants on preference and performance of a leafmining fly.Oecologia (Berl.) 83:291–298.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Moreira, J.O.T. and Lara, F.M. (1982) Studies on the resistance of determinate tomato cultivars to the small fruitworm(Neoleucinodes eleganlalis Guenée 1954). Relatorio, Faculdade de Ciencias Agrarias e Veterinarias, Jaboticabal. Sub projeto 11. (in Portuguese, with English summary)

  80. Nienhuis, J., Helentjaris, T., Slocum, M., Ruggero, B. and Schaefcr, A. (1987) Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of loci associated with insect resistance in tomato.Crop Sci. 27:797–803.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Okopnyi, N.S., Sadykin, A.V. and Sadykina, E.I. (1988) [Resistance of tomato forms and lines to greenhouse whitefly.] pp. 27–31.In: Zashchita Selľskokhozyaistvennykh kulľtur of boleznei, vrediteliei i sornyakov v usloviyakh MSSR. Kishinev, Moldavian SSR. FromReferalivnyl Zhurnal (1988) 12. 65. 290. (in Russian)

  82. Pearce, G., Liljegren, D. and Ryan, C.A. (1987) Proteinase inhibitors in wild tomato species. pp. 139–144.In: Nevins, D.J.and Jones, R.A. [Eds.] Tomato Biotechnology. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Pearce, G., Ryan, C.A. and Liljegren, D. (1988) Proteinase inhibitors I and II in fruit of wild tomato species: transient components of a mechanism for defense and seed dispersal.Planta (Berl.) 175:527–531.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Perlak, F.J. and Fischhoff, D.A. (1990) Expression ofBacillus thuringiensis insect control protein in genetically modified plants.Proc. Abstr. Vth Int. Colloquium on Invertebrate Pathology and Microbial Control (Adelaide, Australia), pp. 461–465.

  85. Ponti, O.M.B. de and Steenhuis, M.M. (1984) Prospects of resistance to whitcflies fromLycopersicon hirsutum glabratum. pp. 103–106.In: A New Era in Tomato Breeding. Synopses, IXth Meeting, EUCARPIA Tomato Working Group. Institute for Horticultural Plant Breeding, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ponti, O.M.B. de, Steenhuis, M.M. and Elzinga, P. (1983) Partial resistance of tomato to the greenhouse whitefly(Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westw.) to promote its biological control.Meded. Fac. Landbouwwet. Rijksuniv. Gent 48: 195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Quiros, C.F., Stevens, M.A., Rick, C.M. and Kok-Yokomi, M.L. (1977) Resistance in tomato to the pink form of the potato aphid (Macrosiphum euphorbiae Thomas): the role of anatomy, epidermal hairs, and foliage composition.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 102:166–171.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Romanow, L.R., Ponti, O.M.B. deand Mollema, C. (1991) Resistance in tomato to the greenhouse whitefly: analysis of population dynamics.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 60:247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Schuster, D.J. (1977) Effect of tomato cultivars on insect damage and chemical control.Fla. Entomol. 60:227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Schuster, D.J. (1977) Resistance in tomato accessions to the tomato pinworm.J. Econ. Entomol. 70:434–436.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Schuster, D.J., Waddill, V.H., Augustine, J.J. and Volin, R.B. (1979) Field comparisons ofLycopersicon accessions for resistance to the tomato pinworm and vegetable leafmincr.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 104:170–172.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Sinden, S.L., Schalk, J.M. and Stoner, A.K. (1978) Effects of daylength and maturity of tomato plants on tomatine content and resistance to the Colorado potato beetle.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 103:596–600.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Sinha, N.K. and Juvik, J.A. (1987) Resistance among accessions ofLycopersicon hirsutum toHeliothis zea, the tomato fruitworm.HortScience 22:1105. (abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Sinha, N.K. and McLaren, D.G. (1989) Screening for resistance to tomato fruitworm and cabbage looper among tomato accessions.Crop Sci. 29:861–868.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Snyder, J.C. and Carter, C.D. (1984) Leaf trichomes and resistance ofLycopersicon hirsutum andL. esculentum to spider mites.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 109:837–843.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Sorenson, C.E., Fery, R.L. and Kennedy, G.G. (1989) Relationship between Colorado potato beetle and tobacco hornworm resistance inLycopersicon hirsutum f.glabratum.J. Econ. Entomol. 82:1743–1748.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Sotirova, V. and Georgiev, K. (1984) [Selection of tomato varieties resistant to the glasshouse whitefly.]Rastit. Zashch. 32 (2):26–27. (in Bulgarian)

    Google Scholar 

  98. Steenhuis, M.M. and Gelder, van W.M.J. (1985) [Tomato with while fly resistance is nutritionally safe.]Zaadbelangen 39:191–192. (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  99. Weston, P.A., Johnson, D.A., Burton, H.T. and Snyder, J.C. (1989) Trichome secretion composition, trichome densities, and spider mite resistance of ten accessions ofLycopersicon hirsutum`.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 114:492–498.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Weston, P.A. and Snyder, J.C. (1990) Thumbtack bioassay: a quick method for measuring plant resistance to twospotted spider mites.J. Econ. Entomol. 83:500–504.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Williams, W.G., Kennedy, G.G., Yamamoto, R.T., Thacker, J.D. and Bordncr, J. (1980) 2- Tridecanone: a naturally occurring insecticide from the wild tomatoLycopersicon hirsutum f.glabratum.Science (Washington D.C.) 207:888–889.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Wolfson, J.L. and Murdock, L.L. (1990) Growth ofManduca sexta on wounded tomato plants: role of induced proteinase inhibitors.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 54:257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Zamir, D., Ben-David, T.S., Rudich, J. and Juvik, J.A. (1984) Frequency distributions and linkage relationships of 2-tridecanone in interspecific segregating generations of tomato.Euphytica 33:481–488.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Potato

  1. Arx, R. von, Cheikh, M., Tamo, M. and Goueder, J. (1987) [Varietal resistance to potato tuber mothPhthorimaea operculella (Zeller) observed in Tunisia.]10th Triennial Conf. European Association for Potato Research. (Aalborg, Denmark), pp. 40–41 (abstr., in French)

  2. Avé, D.A., Gregory, P. and Tingey, W.M. (1987) Aphid repellent sesquiterpenes in glandular trichomes ofSolanum berthaultii and S.tuberosum.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 44:131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bintcliffe, E.J.B. and Wratten, S.D. (1982) Antibiotic resistance in potato cultivars to the aphidMyzus persicae.Ann. Appl. Biol. 100:383–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boiteau, G. (1988) Control of the Colorado potato beetle,Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say): learning from the Soviet experience.Bull. Entomol. Soc. Canada 20:9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boiteau, G. and Singh, R.P. (1988) Resistance to the greenhouse whitefly,Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), in a clone of the wild potatoSolanum berthaultii Hawkes.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 81:428–431.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bouthyette, P.Y., Eannetta, N. and Hannigan, K.J. (1987)Solanum berthaultii trichomes contain unique polyphenoloxidases and a peroxidase.Phytochemistry (Oxf.) 26:2949–2954.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cantelo, W.W., Douglas, L.W., Sanford, L.L., Sinden, S.L. and Deahl, K.L. (1987) Measuring resistance to the Colorado potato beetle in potato.J. Entomol. Sci. 22: 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carter, C.D. (1987) Difference in pyrethroid efficacy amongSolanum clones resistant and susceptible to Colorado potato beetle.Am. Potato J. 64: 432. (abstr.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carter, C.D. (1987) ScreeningSolanum germplasm for resistance to Colorado potato beetle.Am. Potato J. 64: 563–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carter, C.D. and Ghidiu, G.M. (1988) Host plant affects response of Colorado potato beetle to a pyrethroid insecticide.HortScience 23: 306–308.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chavez, R., Schmiediche, P.E., Jackson, M.T. and Raman, K.V. (1988) The breeding potential of wild potato species resistant to the potato tuber moth,Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller).Euphytica 39:123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choudhary, R., Singh, M. and Anand, S.K. (1983) Variation in leafhopper burn incidence inSolanum tuberosum andandigena collection.Indian J. Entomol. 45:493–497.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cirio, U. (1987) Biological control techniques for the regulation of insects in agriculture.In: La patata in Italia e nei Paesi in via di sviluppo: nuove strategie di intervento.Inf. Agrar. parte speciale pp. 48–50, 52. (in Italian, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Costa, S.D. and Gaugler, R. (1989) Influence ofSolanum host plants on Colorado potato beetle susceptibility to the entomopathogenBeauveria bassiana.Environ. Entomol. 18:531–536.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deahl, K.L. and Sinden, S.L. (1987) A technique for rapid detection of leptine glycoalkaloids in potato foliage.Am. Potato J. 64:285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deahl, K.L., Sinden, S.L. and Cantelo, W.W. (1988) The effects of light intensity on leptine levels and resistance to the Colorado potato beetle inSolanum chacoense. Am. Potato J. 65:476–477 (abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dimock, M.B., Lapointe, S.L. and Tingey, W.M. (1986)Solanum neocardenasii: a new source of potato resistance to the Colorado potato beetle.J. Ecol. Entomol. 79:1269–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dimock, M.B. and Tingey, W.M. (1987) Mechanical interaction between larvae of the Colorado potato beetle and glandular trichomes ofSolanum berthaultii Hawkes.Am. Potato J. 64:507- 515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dimock, M.B. and Tingey, W.M. (1988) Host acceptance behavior of Colorado potato beetle larvae influenced by potato glandular trichomes.Physiol. Entomol. 13:399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Doss, S.A. (1987) Relative susceptibility of seventeen potato varieties to infestations by three insect pests in the field and the density of potato tuber moth infestation in stores.Bull. Soc. Entomol. Egypte 65:157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fenemore, P.G. (1980) Susceptibility of potato cultivars to potato tuber moth,Phthorimaea operculella Zell.N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 23: 539–546.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gaynor, J.J. and Unkenholz, K.M. (1989) Sequence analysis of a genomic clone encoding an endochitinase fromSolanum tuberosum.Nucleic Acids Res. 17:5855–5866.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghalla, O.P. and Chandla, V.K. (1986) Screening potato for resistance to potato tuberworm,Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller), (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae).Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. (India) 9 (2):35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ghidiu, G.M., Carter, C. and Silcox, C.A. (1990) The effect of host plant on Colorado potato beetle susceptibility to pyrethroid insecticides.Pestic. Sci. 28:259–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gibson, R.W. and Pickett, J.A. (1983) Wild potato repels aphids by release of aphid alarm pheromone.Nature (Lond.) 302:608–609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gibson, R.W. and Turner, R.H. (1977) Insect-trapping hairs on potato plants.PANS (Pest Artic. News Summ.) 23:272–277.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gregory, P., Avé, D.A., Bouthyette, P.Y., Plaisted, R.L. and Tingey, W.M. (1984) Research progress: glandular trichome biochemistry and potato resistance to insects, pp. 125–131.In: Report of the XXVII Planning Conference on Integrated Pest Management. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gregory, P., Avé, D.A., Bouthyette, P.Y. and Tingey, W.M. (1986) Insect-defensive chemistry of potato glandular trichomes. pp. 173–183.In: Juniper, B. and Southwood, T.R.E. [Ed.] Insects and the Plant Surface. Edward Arnold, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Groden, E. and Casagrande, R.A. (1986) Population dynamics of the Colorado potato beetle,Leptinotarsa decemlineata onSolanum berthaultii.J. Econ. Entomol. 79:91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Guglielmetti, M.H. (1978) Study of the susceptibility of twenty cultivars of potato to the potato moth(Phthorimaea operculella).Agric. Tec. (Santiago) 38:40–41. (in Spanish, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Has, A. and Kansu, I.A. (1987) A study of the effect of the food plant on the development of the Colorado potato beetle.In: Turkiye I. Entomoloji Kongresi Bildirileri, Ege Universitesi, Nomova, Izmir, pp. 249–258. (in Turkish, with English summary)

  32. Holbrook, F.R. (1980) An index of acceptability to green peach aphids forSolanum germplasm and for a suspected non-host plant.Am. Potato J. 57:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Horváth, J. (1988) Potato gene centres, wildSolanum species, viruses and aphid vectors.Acta Phytopathol.Entomol. Hung. 23:423–448.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Huamán, Z. (1987) Inventory of Andean Potato Cultivars with Resistance to Some Pests and Diseases and Other Desirable Traits. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jansson, R.K. and Smilowitz, Z. (1986) Influence of potato persistence, foliar biomass, and foliar nitrogen on abundance ofLeptinotarsa decemlineata.Environ. Entomol. 15: 726–732.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kashyap, R.K., Bhanot, J.P. and Taneja, A.D. (1988) Correlation and path analysis of leaf biochemical constituents forMyzus persicae (Sulz.) multiplication on potato genotypes.J. Insect Sci. 1:53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kowalski, S.P., Bamberg, J.B., Tingey, W.M. and Sleffens, J.C. (1990) Inheritance of polyphenol oxidase in type A glandular trichomes ofSolarium berthaultii.J. Hered. 81:475- 478.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kowalski, S.P., Eanetta, N.T. and Steffens, J.C. (1988) Insect resistance in potato: purification and characterization of a polyphenol oxidase in glandular trichomes of wild potato.Plant Physiol. 86: 107. (abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kuroli, G. (1983) Relationship between the number ofMyzus persicae Sulz. individuals and leaf composition values in potato.Mosonmagyarovári Mezogazdaságludományi kar kozlemenyei 25:397–408. (in Hungarian, with English, German, and Russian summaries)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lal, L. and Verma, K.D. (1988) Incidence ofMyzus persicae (Sulzer) on certain potato cultivars grown in north-eastern hill region of India.J. Aphidol. 2:76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lapointe, S.L. and Tingey, W.M. (1984) Feeding response of the green peach aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) to potato glandular trichomes.J. Econ. Enlomol. 77:386–389.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lapointe, S.L. and Tingey, W.M. (1986) Glandular trichomes ofSolanum neocardenasii confer resistance to green peach aphid.J. Econ. Entomol. 79:1264–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lapointe, S.L., Tingey, W.M. and Zitter, T.A. (1987) Potato virus Y transmission reduced in an aphid-resistant potato species.Phytopathology 77:819–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee, M.H., Radcliffe, E.B. and Lauer, F.I. (1984) Progress in utilization of aphid resistance, pp. 133–159.In: Report of the XXVII Planning Conference on Integrated Pest Management. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lentini, Z., Plaisted, R.L. and Earle, E.D. (1988) Incorporation of insect resistance into improved potato varieties through somaclonal variation.Am. Potato J. 65:487–488. (abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mariani, S., Savino, F., Sonnino, A. and Cirio, U. (1987) Attempts to determine the resistance to Colorado potato beetle in micropropagated potato cultivars andSolanum sp. before field release.10th Triennial Conf. of the European Association for Potato Research (Aalborg, Denmark), pp. 318–319.

  47. Nabi, M.N. (1984) Resistance of potato lines to potato moth,Phthorimaea operculella.Ann. Appl. Biol. 104 (Suppl. 5):122–123.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nderitu, J.H. and Mueke, J.M. (1989) Susceptibility of eight potato cultivars toMyzus persicae Sulzer in the greenhouse.Insect Sci. Appl. 10:229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Neal, J.J., Steffens, J.C. and Tingey, W.M. (1989) Glandular trichomes ofSolanum berthaultii and resistance to the Colorado potato beetle.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 51:133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Obrycki, J.J. and Tauber, M.J. (1984) Natural enemy activity on glandular pubescent potato plants in the greenhouse: an unreliable predictor of effects in the field.Environ. Entomol. 13:679–683.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Obrycki, J.J., Tauber, M.J. and Tingey, W.M. (1983) Predator and parasitoid interaction with aphid-resistant potatoes to reduce aphid densities: a two year field study.J. Econ. Entomol. 76:456–462.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ortiz, R., Iwanaga, M., Raman, K.V. and Palacios, M. (1990) Breeding for resistance to potato tuber moth,Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller), in diploid potatoes.Euphytica 50:119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Peferoen, M., Jansens, S., Reynaerts, A. and Leemans, J. (1990) Potato plants with engineered resistance against insect attack, pp. 193–204.In: Vayda, M.E. and Park, W.D. [Eds.] The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Potato. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Pelletier, Y. and Smilowitz, Z. (1990) Effect of trichome B exudate ofSolanum berthaultii Hawkes on consumption by the Colorado potato beetle,Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say).J. Chem. Ecol. 16:1547–1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Pelletier, Y. and Smilowitz, Z. (1991) Feeding behavior of the adult Colorado potato beetle,Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) onSolanum berthaultii Hawkes.Can. Entomol. 123:219- 230.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Pogorelova, N.S. and Pogorelov, M.N. (1987) [Main diseases and pests in wide-ridge crops of seed potato under the conditions of the southern zone of the Pskov region.]Tr. Latv. Skh. Akad. 237:61–64. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Radcliffe, E.B., Lauer, F.I., Lee, M.H. and Robinson, D.P. (1981) Evaluation of the United States potato collection for resistance to green peach aphid and potato aphid.Tech. Bull. Agric. Exp. Stn. Univ. Minn. 331.

  58. Radcliffe, E.B., Tingey, W.M., Gibson, R.W., Valencia, L. and Raman, K.V. (1988) Stability of green peach aphid resistance in wild potato species.J. Econ. Entomol. 81:361–367.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Raman, K.V. (1988) Insecticide toxicity to three strains of green peach aphid (Myzus persicae Sulzer) reared on resistant and susceptible potato cultivars.Crop Prot. 7:62–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Raman, K.V. and Palacios, M. (1982) Potential of physical resistance mechanisms for the control of major insect virus vectors of potato, p. 156.In: Proceedings of the International Congress in Celebration of the Tenth Anniversary of the International Potato Center. Research for the Potato in Year 2000. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Raman, K.V. and Palacios, M. (1982) Screening potato for resistance to potato tuberworm.J. Econ. Entomol. 75:47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Raman, K.V., Tingey, W.M. and Gregory, P. (1979) Potato glycoalkaloids: effect on survival and feeding behavior of the potato leafhopper.J. Econ. Entomol. 72:337–341.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Robinson, D.P. and Radcliffe, E.B. (1979) Biotype evaluation of two green peach aphid populations on aphid resistant, tuber-bearingSolanum species.Proc. N. Central Branch Entomol. Soc. Am. 33:55. (abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ruberson, J.R., Tauber, M.J., Tauber, C.A., and Tingey, W.M. (1989) Interactions at three trophic levels:Edovum puttleri Grissell, the Colorado potato beetle, and insect-resistant potatoes.Can. Entomol. 121:841–851.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sanford, L.L. and Cantelo, W.W. (1989) Larval development rate and mortality of Colorado potato beetle on detached leaves of wildSolanum species.Am. Potato J. 66:575–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sanford, L.L., Deahl, K.L., Sinden, S.L. and Ladd, T.L. Jr. (1990) Foliar solanidine glycoside levels inSolanum tuberosum populations selected for potato leafhopper resistance.Am. Potato J. 67:461–466.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Sanford, L.L. and Ladd, T.L. Jr. (1979) Selection for resistance to potato leafhopper in potatoes. II. Progress after two cycles of phenotypic recurrent selection.Am. Potato J. 56:541–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Sanford, L.L. and Ladd, T.L. Jr. (1986) Tolerance to potato leafhopper inSolanum tuberosum L. Gp. Tuberosum clones.Am. Potato J. 63:39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Sanford, L.L. and Ladd, T.L. Jr. (1987) Recurrent selection for potato leafhopper resistance in potato,Solanum tuberosum L. Gp. Tuberosum.Am. Potato J. 64:367–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Sanford, L.L. and Ladd, T.L. Jr. (1987) Genetic transmission of potato leafhopper resistance from recurrent selection populations in potatoSolanum tuberosum L. Gp. Tuberosum.Am. Potato J. 64:655–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Sanford, L.L., Ladd, T.L. Jr., Sinden, S.L. and Cantelo, W.W. (1984) Early generation selection of insect resistance in potato.Am. Potato J. 61:405–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Savino, F., Mariani, S. and Sonnino, A. (1988) Establishment of a screening method for resistance to C.P.B. (Colorado potato beetle) in potato cultivars andSolanum spp.Genet. Agrar. 42:93. (abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Scurrah, M. and Raman, K.V. (1984) Breeding and screening for resistance to major potato pests, pp. 103–113.In: Report of the XXVII Planning Conference on Integrated Pest Management. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Shuster, M.M. (1989) [Resistance of potato to Colorado potato beetle.]Zashch. Rast. (Mosc.) 6:36–37. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Shuster, M.M., Teutul, O.V. and Romanyuk, O.P. (1985) Results of evaluating potato varieties and hybrids for resistance to Colorado beetle.In: Ustoichivost’s-khi rast. k vreditelyami probl. zashchity rast. FromReferativnyi Zhurnal (1985) 12.65.331 (in Russian, with English summary).

  76. Sinden, S.L., Sanford, L.L., Cantelo, W.W. and Deahl, K.L. (1988) Bioassays of segregating plants: a strategy for studying chemical defenses.J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1941–1950.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Sinden, S.L., Sanford, L.L., Cantelo, W.W. and Deahl, K.L. (1986) Leptine glycoalkaloids and resistance to the Colorado potato beetle inSolarium chacoense.Environ. Entomol. 15:1057–1062.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Steffens, J.C., Kowalski, S.P. and Yu, H. (1990) Characterization of glandular trichome and plastid polyphenol oxidases of potato, pp. 103–112.In: Vayda, M.E. and Park, W.D. [Eds.] The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Potato. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Tingey, W.M. and Gibson, R.W. (1978) Feeding and mobility of the potato leafhopper impaired by glandular trichomes ofSolanum berthaullii andS. polyadenium.J. Econ. Entomol. 71:856–858.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Tingey, W.M., Gregory, P., Plaisted, R.L. and Tauber, M.J. (1984) Research progress: potato glandular trichomes and steroid glycoalkaloids. pp. 115–124.In: Report of the XXVII Planning Conference on Integrated Pest Management. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Tingey, W.M. and Laubengayer, J.E. (1981) Defense against the green peach aphid and potato leafhopper by glandular trichomes ofSolanum berthaullii.J. Econ. Entomol. 74:721–725.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Tingey, W.M. and Laubengayer, J.E. (1986) Glandular trichomes of a resistant hybrid potato alter feeding behavior of the potato leafhopper.J. Econ. Entomol. 79:1230–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Valencia, L. (1984) Mechanisms of resistance to potato moth oviposition on foliage, pp. 161- 187.In: Report of the XXVII Planning Conference on Integrated Pest Management. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Wolfson, J.L. and Murdock, L.L. (1987) Suppression of larval Colorado potato beetle growth and development by digestive proteinase inhibitors.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 44:235–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Xia, J.K. and Tingey, W.M. (1986) Green peach aphid: developmental and reproductive biology on aSolanum tuberosum X S. berthaullii hybrid potato.J. Econ. Entomol. 79:71–75.

    Google Scholar 

Eggplant

  1. Bajaj, K.L., Singh, D., and Kaur, G. (1989) Biochemical basis of relative field resistance of eggplant (Solanum melongena) to the shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guen.).Vegetable Sci. 16:145–149.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bindra, O.S. and Mahal, M.S. (1981) Varietal resistance in eggplant (brinjal) (Solanum melongena) to the cotton jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula).Phytoparasitica 9:119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dhankhar, B.S. and Sharma, N.K. (1986) Variability in relation to shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guen.) infestation in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.).Haryana J. Hortic. Sci. 15:243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gleddie, S., Fassuliotis, G., Keller, W.A. and Setterfield, G. (1985) Somatic hybridization as a potential method of transferring nematode and mite resistance into eggplant.Z. Pflanzenzücht. 94:348–351.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gowda, P.H.R., Shivashankar, K.T. and Joshi, S. (1990) Interspecific hybridization betweenSolanum melongena andSolanum macrocarpon: study of the F1 hybrid plants.Euphytica 48:59–61.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mishra, P.N., Singh, Y.V. and Nautiyal, M.C. (1988) Screening of brinjal varieties for resistance to shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guen.).South Indian Hortic. 36:188–192.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mishra, K.K. and Somchoudhury, A.K. (1989) Seasonal incidence ofTetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisd) on some selected accessions of brinjal and their susceptibility in West Bengal condition.Orissa J. Agric. Res. 2:50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mote, U.N. (1981) Varietal resistance in eggplant toLeucinodes orbonalis Guen. I. Screening under field conditions.Indian J. Entomol. 43:112–115.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raj, K.G. and Kumaraswami, T. (1979) Screening of egg plants for resistance toEpilachna vigintioctopunctata.Sci. Cult. 45:60–61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Raju, B., Reddy, G.P.V., Murthy, M.M.K. and Prasad, V.D. (1987) Biochemical factors in varietal resistance of eggplant for the spotted leaf-beetle and shoot- and fruit-borer.Indian J. Agric. Sci. 57:142–146.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reddy, G.V.P. and Biradar, S.P. (1990) Varietal resistance of eggplant toAphis gossypii Glover.Adv. Plant Sci. 3:178–182.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schreiner, I.H. (1990) Resistance and yield response toAmrasca biguttula in eggplant (Solanum melongena).Philipp. Entomol. 8:661–669.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tewari, G.C. and Moorthy, P.N.K. (1986) Evaluation of eggplant varieties for resistance against leafhopperAmrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida.Capsicum Newsl. 5:70–71.

    Google Scholar 

Pepper

  1. Chandler, L.D. and Villalon, B. (1989) Laboratory comparisons ofCapsicum annuum cultivars for determination ofLiriomyza trifolii host preference.Southwest. Entomol. 14:419–429.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fery, R.L. and Schalk, J.M. (1991) Resistance in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to western flower thrips [Franldiniella occidentalis (Pergande)].HortScience 26:1073–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lakshmi, N., Murthy, N.S.R., Prakash, N.S., Rao, Y.R. and Harini, I. (1989) Leafy calyx: a useful mutant in chili (Capsicum annuum L.).J. Hered. 80:80–82.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laska, P., Betlach, J. and Havrankova, M. (1982) Resistance to the glasshouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westw.) in sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.).Euphytica 31:977–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laska, P., Betlach, J. and Havrankova, M. (1985) Resistance in sweet pepper to glasshouse whitefly.Capsicum Newsl. 4:70.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laska, P., Betlach, J. and Havrankova, M. (1986) Variable resistance in sweet pepper,Capsicum annuum, to glasshouse whitefly,Trialeurodes vaporariorum.Acta Entomol: Bohemoslov. 83:347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lenteren, J.C. van, Vianen, A. van, Hatala-Zseller, I. and Budai, C. (1989) The parasite-host relationship betweenEncarsia formosa Gahan andTrialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood). XXIX. Suitability of two cultivars of sweet pepper,Capsicum annuum L., for two different strains of whiteflies.J. Appl. Entomol. 108:113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tewari, G.C, Deshpande, A.A. and Anand, N. (1985) Chili pepper genotypes resistant to thrips,Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood.Capsicum Newsl. 4:73–74.

    Google Scholar 

Other solanaceous vegetables and wild relatives

  1. Boer, D. de and Hanson, F.E. (1987) Feeding responses to solanaceous allelochemicals by larvae of the tobacco hornworm,Manduca sexta.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 45:123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sachan, G.C. and Rathore, Y.S. (1979) Developmental potential ofHenosepilachna vigintioctopunctata (F.) on some wild solanaceous plants.Z. Angew. Entomol. 88:527–532.

    Google Scholar 

Cucurbitaceae Cucumber

  1. Abdel-Hafez, M.A., Farrag, A.M.I., and Adul-Ela, M.S. (1982) Relative resistance of some cucurbit varieties to the common spider mite in Egypt.Agric. Res. Rev. (Cairo) 60:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ajlan, A.M. and Potter, D.A. (1991) Does immunization of cucumber against anthracnose byColletotrichum lagenarium affect host suitability for arthropods?Entomol. Exp. Appl. 58:83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, P.B. and Robinson, R.W. (1985) Evaluations of selectedCucurbita accessions for cucumber beetle complex resistance.Search Agric. (Geneva N.Y.) No. 31.

  4. Elsey, K.D. (1981) Pickleworm: Survival, development, and oviposilion on selected hosts.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 74:96–99.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elsey, K.D. and Wann, E.V. (1982) Differences in infestation of pubescent and glabrous forms of cucumber by pickleworms and melon worms.HortScience 17:253–254.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gorski, P.M., Jaworski, A., Shannon, S. and Robinson, R.W. (1986) Rapid TLC and HPLC quantification of cucurbitacin C in cucumber cotyledons.HortScience 21:1034–1036.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gould, F. (1978) Predicting the future resistance of crop varieties to pest populations: a case study of mites and cucumbers.Environ. Entomol. 7:622–626.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gould, F. (1978) Resistance of cucumber varieties toTetranychus urticae: genetic and environmental determinants.J. Econ. Entomol. 71:680–683.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kielkewicz, M. and Tomczyk, A. (1987) Susceptibility of cucumber and tomato varieties to spider mites.Mater.Sesji Inst. Ochr. Roslin 27:17–22. (in Polish, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kowalewski, E. and Robinson, R.W. (1977) White fly resistance inCucumis. EUCARPIA/International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group Breeding for Resistance to Insects and Mites. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 3:149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lal, O.P. (1977) Relative susceptibility of some cucumber and squash varieties to melon aphid,Aphis gossypii Glov.Indian J. Plant Prot. 5:208–210.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Laska, P. and Lebeda, A. (1989) Resistance in wildCucumis species to glasshouse whitefly.Arch. Züchtungsforsch. 19:89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pierce, L.K. and Wehner, T.C. (1990) Review of genes and linkage groups in cucumber.HortScience 25:605–615.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ponti, O.M.B. de (1977) Breeding of cucumber resistant to the twospotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch.). EUCARPIA/International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group Breeding for Resistance to Insects and Mites. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 3:25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ponti, O.M.B. de (1977) Resistance inCucumis sativus L. toTetranychus urticae Koch. 1. The role of plant breeding in integrated control.Euphytica 26:633–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ponti, O.M.B. de (1977) Resistance inCucumis sativus L. toTetranychus urticae Koch. 2. Designing a reliable laboratory test for resistance based on aspects of the host-parasite relationship.Euphytica 26:641–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ponti, O.M.B. de (1978) Resistance inCucumis sativus L. toTetranychus urticae Koch. 3. Search for sources of resistance.Euphytica 27:167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ponti, O.M.B. de (1978) Resistance inCucumis sativus L. toTetranychus urticae Koch. 4. The genuineness of the resistance.Euphytica 27:435–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ponti, O.M.B. de (1979) Resistance inCucumis sativus L. toTetranychus urticae Koch. 5. Raising the resistance level by the exploitation of transgression.Euphytica 28:569–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ponti, O.M.B. de (1980) Contributions of plant breeding to integrated pest control illustrated on the glasshouse cucumber and its pestsTetranychus urticae andTrialeurodes vaporariorum.Bull. OEPP (Organ. Eur. Mediterr. Prol. Plant.) 10:357–363.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Quisumbing, A.R. and Lower, R.L. (1978) Influence of plot size and seeding rate in field screening studies for cucumber resistance to cucumber beetles.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 103:523–527.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson, J.F., Day, A., Cuthbert, R. and Wann, E.V. (1979) The pickleworm: laboratory rearing and artificial infestation of cucumbers.J. Econ. Entomol. 72:305–307.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson, R.W. (1986) A radiation induced cucumber mutant with marked pleiotropic effects.Mutat. Breed. Newsl. 28:7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tomczyk, A., Kropczynska, D. and Kielkiewicz, M. (1987) Manifestations of resistance to spider mites in cultivated plants, pp. 65-79.In: Mater. XXVII Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roslin. Czesc I-Referaty. (in Polish, with summaries in English and Russian)

  25. Wehner, T.C., Elsey, K.D. and Kennedy, G.G. (1985) Screening for cucumber antibiosis to pickleworm.HortScience 20:1117–1119.

    Google Scholar 

Melons

  1. Coudriet, D.L., Kishaba, A.N. and Bohn, G.W. (1981) Inheritance of resistance to muskmelon necrotic spot virus in a melon aphid-resistant breeding line of muskmelon.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 106:789–791.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dhooria, M.S., Singh, D., Sukhija, B.S. and Bathal, G.S. (1987) Differential response of watermelon cultivars for resistance to red spider mite,Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval).J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 24:590–594.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gautney, T.L. and Norton, J.D. (1982) Muskmelon pickleworm resistance.HortScience 17:404–405.

    Google Scholar 

  4. INRA. (1984) [Soon, varieties of melon resistant to aphids.]Rev. Suisse Vilic. Arboric. Hortic. 16:160. (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy, G.G., Bohn, G.W., Stoner, A.K. and Webb, R.E. (1978) Leafminer resistance in muskmelon.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 103:571–574.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kennedy, G.G. and Kishaba, A.N. (1977) Response of alate melon aphids to resistant and susceptible muskmelon lines.J. Econ. Entomol. 70:407–410.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kennedy, G.G., McLean, D.L. and Kinsey, M.G. (1978) Probing behavior ofAphis gossypii on resistant and susceptible muskmelon.J. Econ. Entomol. 71:13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khandelwal, R.C. and Nath, P. (1978) Inheritance of resistance to fruit fly in watermelon.Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 20:31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khandelwal, R.C. and Nath, P. (1979) Evaluation of cultivars of watermelon for resistance to fruit fly.Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol. 8:46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mansour, F. and Karchi, Z. (1990) The evaluation of antibiosis of selected lines for resistance of melon to the carmine spider miteTetranychus cinnabarinus.Bull. Entomol. Res. 80:345- 347.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCreight, J.D., Kishaba, A.N. and Bohn, G.W. (1984) AR Hale’s Best Jumbo, AR 5, and AR Topmark: Melon aphid resistant muskmelon breeding lines.HortScience 19:309–310.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nugent, P.E. (1984) Release of enhanced muskmelon germplasm C922-B1, C922-B2 and C922-B3. USDA-ARS, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nugent, P.E., Cuthbert, F.P. Jr. and Hoffman, J.C. (1984) Two genes for cucumber beetle resistance in musk melon.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 109:756–759.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pal, A.B., Srinivasan, K. and Vani, A. (1983) Development of breeding lines of muskmelon for resistance to fruitfly.Prog. Hortic. 15:100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pitrat, M. and Lecoq, H. (1980) Inheritance of resistance to cucumber mosaic virus transmission byAphis gossypii inCucumis melo.Phytopathology 70:958–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pitrat, M. and Lecoq, H. (1982) Genetic relations between non-acceptance and antibiosis resistance toAphis gossypii in melon. Search for linkage with other genes.Agronomie (Paris) 2:503–508. (in French, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pitrat, M., Maestro, C., Ferriere, C., Ricard, M. and Alvarez, J. (1988) Resistance toAphis gossypii in Spanish melon (Cucumis melo).Rep. Cucurbit Genet. Coop. U.S.A. No. 11:50- 51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Romanow, L.R., Moyer, J.W. and Kennedy, G.G. (1986) Alteration of efficiencies of acquisition and inoculation of watermelon mosaic virus 2 by plant resistance to the virus and to an aphid vector.Phytopathology 76:1276–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Squash, pumpkin and other cucurbits

  1. Bonjour, E.L., Fargo, W.S. and Rensner, P.E. (1990) Ovipositional preference of squash bugs among cucurbits in Oklahoma.J. Econ. Entomol. 83:943–947.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dhillon, N.P.S. and Sharma, B.R. (1987) Genetics of resistance to red pumpkin beetle (Aulacophora foveicollis) in summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.).Theor. Appl. Genet. 73:711–715.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dhillon, N.P.S. and Sharma, B.R. (1989) Relationship between field and cage assessments for resistance to red pumpkin beetle in summer squash.Euphytica 40:63–65.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elsey, K.D. (1985) Resistance mechanisms inCucurbita moschata to pickleworm and melonworm.J. Econ. Entomol. 78:1048–51.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferguson, J.E., Metcalf, E.R., Metcalf, R.L. and Rhodes, A.M. (1983) Influence of cucurbitacin content in cotyledons of Cucurbitaceae cultivars upon feeding behavior of Diabroticina beetles.J. Econ. Entomol. 76:47–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCreight, J. D. and Kishaba, A.N. (1991) Reaction of cucurbit species to squash leaf curl virus and sweetpotato whitefly.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 116:137–141.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paige, J. III, Morrison, W.P., Wangberg, J.K. and Whitworth, R.J. (1989) Ovipositional host association ofAnasa tristis (Degeer) and variousCucurbita cultivars on the Texas High Plains.J. Agric. Entomol. 6:5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pal, A.B., Srinivasan, K., Bharatan, G. and Chandravadana, M.V. (1978) Location of sources of resistance to the red pumpkin beetle,Raphidopalpa foveicollis Lucas amongst pumpkin germplasms.J. Entomol. Res. 2:148–153.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raman, K. and Annadurai, R.S. (1985) Host selection and food utilization of the red pumpkin beetle,Raphidopalpa foveicollis.Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Anim. Sci. 94:547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma, B.L. and Pande, Y.D. (1986) A study of relationship between the population ofTetranychus neocaledonicus Andre and external characteristics of cucurbit leaves and their NPK contents.J. Adv. Zool. 7:42–45.

    Google Scholar 

Compositae Lettuce

  1. Alleyne, E.H. and Morrison, F.O. (1978) Resistance of lettuce varieties to attacks by the root apterae ofPemphigus bursarius (L.).Ann. Soc. Entomol. Québec 23:158–167.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Byrne, D.N. and Draeger, E.A. (1989) Effect of plant maturity on oviposilion and nymphal mortality ofBemisia tabaci.Environ. Entomol. 18:429–432.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cole, R.A. (1984) Phenolic acids associated with the resistance of lettuce cultivars to the lettuce root aphid.Ann. Appl. Biol. 105:129–145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cole, R.A., Sutherland, R.A. and Riggall, W.E. (1991) The use of polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis to identify variation in isozymes as markers forLacluca species and resistance to the lettuce root aphidPemphigus bursarius.Euphytica 56:237–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dieleman, F.L. and Eenink, A.H. (1977) Resistance in lettuce toNasonovia ribis nigri. EUCARPIA/International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group Breeding for Resistance to Insects and Mites. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 3:67–68.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dunn, J.A. (1977) Resistance to root aphid (Pemphigus bursarius (L.)) in lettuce. EUCARPIA/International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group Breeding for Resistance to Insects and Mites. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 3:57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dunn, J.A. and Kempton, D.P.H. (1980) Susceptibilities to attack by root aphid inLactuca saliva.Ann. Appl. Biol. 94 (Suppl. 1):54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunn, J.A. and Kempton, D.P.H. (1980) Susceptibilities to attack by top aphids in varieties of lettuce.Ann. Appl. Biol. 94 (Suppl. l):58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eenink, A.H. and Dieleman, F.L. (1977) Resistance inLactuca L.toMyzus persicae Sulzer. EUCARPIA/International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants. Working Group Breeding for Resistance to Insects and Mites. Bull. West Palearctic Regional Section 3:61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eenink, A.H. and Dieleman, F.L. (1977) ScreeningLactuca for resistance toMyzus persicae.Nelh. J. Plant Pathol. 83:139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eenink, A.H. and Dieleman, F.L. (1980) Development ofMyzus persicae on a partially resistant and on a susceptible genotype of lettuce (Lactuca sativa ) in relation to plant age.Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 86:111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eenink, A.H. and Dieleman, F.L. (1983) Inheritance of resistance to the leaf aphidNasonovia ribis-nigri in the wild lettuce speciesLactuca virosa.Euphytica 32:691–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eenink, A.H., Dieleman, F.L. and Groenwold, R. (1982) Resistance of lettuce (Lactuca) to the leaf aphidNasonovia ribis nigri II. Inheritance of the resistance.Euphytica 31:301–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eenink, A.H., Dieleman, F.L. and Groenwold, R. (1983) Components for partial resistance ofLactuca toBremia lactucae andMyzus persicae. Proc. 10th Congr. of the European Association for Research on Plant Breeding, EUCARPIA (Wageningen, the Netherlands), p. 310.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eenink, A.H., Dieleman, F.L., Groenwold, R., Aarts, P. and Clerkx, B. (1984) An instant bioassay for resistance of lettuce to the leaf aphidMyzus persicae.Euphytica 33:825–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gustafsson, I. and Ramert, B. (1977) [The lettuce root aphidPemphigus bursarius (L.) Observations and the results of experiments in 1977 in Skåne.]Växtskyddsnotiser 41:155- 156. (in Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kishaba, A.N., McCreight, ID., Coudriet, D.L., Whitaker, T.W. and Pesho, G.R. (1980) Studies of ovipositional preference of cabbage looper on progenies from a cross between cultivated lettuce and prickly lettuce.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 105:890–892.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mentink, P.J.M. (1986) [New approaches in resistance testing in lettuce.]Zaadbelangen 40:194–195. (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Montllor, C.B. and Tjallingii, W.F. (1989) Stylet penetration by two aphid species on susceptible and resistant lettuce.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 52:103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reinink, K. and Dieleman, F.L. (1989) Comparison of sources of resistance to leaf aphids in lettuce.Euphytica 40:21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reinink, K. and Dieleman, F.L. (1989) Resistance in lettuce to the leaf aphidsMacrosiphum euphorbiae andUroleucon sonchi.Ann. Appl. Biol. 115:489–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reinink, K., Dieleman, F.L., Jansen, J. and Montenarie, A.M. (1989) Interactions between plant and aphid genotypes in resistance of lettuce toMyzus persicae andMacrosiphum euphorbiae.Euphytica 43:215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Chenopodiaceae Spinach

  1. McLeod, P., Morelock, T.E. and Goode, M.J. (1991) Preference, developmental time, adult longevity and fecundity of green peach aphid on spinach.J. Entomol. Sci. 26:95–98.

    Google Scholar 

Leguminosae General reviews or multiple species

  1. Auclair, J.L. (1978) Biotypes of the pea aphid,Acyrthosiphon pisum, in relation to host plants and chemically defined diets.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24:212–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Horber, E. (1978) Resistance to pests of grain legumes in the U.S.A.In: Singh, S.R., Emden, H.F. van and Taylor, T.A [Eds.] Pests of Grain Legumes: Ecology and Control. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ramasubramanian, G.V. and Babu, P.C.S. (1989) Comparative biology of the spotted pod borer,Maruca testulalis (Geyer) on three host plants.Legume Res. 12:177–178.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ramasubramanian, G.V. and Babu, P.C.S. (1989) Ovipositional preference of the spotted pod borer,Maruca testulalis (Geyer).Legume Res. 12:193–195.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Srikanth, J. and Lakkundi, N.H. (1988) Host preference studies of cowpea aphidAphis craccivora Koch.Indian J. Plant Prot. 16:103–107.

    Google Scholar 

Cowpea

  1. Akingbohungbe, A.E., Agbede, T. and Olaifa, J.I. (1980) Oviposition preference by the black cowpea moth,Cydia ptychora (Meyrick), for different varieties of cowpea.Bull. Entomol. Res. 70:439–443.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ansari, A.K. and Emden, H.F. van (1989) Graft-transmissibility of resistance to cowpea aphid,Aphis craccivora Koch, in six highly antibiotic cowpea varieties.Bull. Entomol. Res. 79:393–399.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atiri, G.I., Ekpo, E.J.A. and Thottappilly, G. (1984) The effect of aphid-resistance in cowpea on infestation and development ofAphis craccivora and the transmission of cowpea aphid- borne mosaic virus.Ann. Appl. Biol. 104:339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atiri, G.I. and Thottappilly, G. (1984) Relative usefulness of mechanical and aphid inoculation as modes of screening cowpeas for resistance against cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus.Trop. Agric. 61:289–292.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Atiri, G.I. and Thottappilly, G. (1985)Aphis craccivora settling behaviour and acquisition of cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus in aphid-resistant cowpea lines.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 39:241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barfoot, P.D. and Connett, R.J.A. (1989) AGC’s cowpea enzyme inhibitor gene: potential market opportunity.AgBiolech News & Inf. 1:177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bata, H.D., Singh, B.B., Singh, S.R. and Ladeinde, T.A.O. (1987) Inheritance of resistance to aphid in cowpea.Crop Sci. 27:892–894.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bosque-Perez, N.A., Foster, K.W. and Leigh, T.F. (1987) Heritability of resistance in cowpea to the western plant bug.Crop Sci. 27:1133–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boulter, D., Gatehouse, A.M.R. and Hilder, V. (1989) Use of cowpea trypsin inhibitor (CpTI) to protect plants against insect predation.Biotechnol. Adv. 7:489–497.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiang, H.S. and Jackai, L.E.N. (1988) Tough pod wall: A factor involved in cowpea resistance to pod sucking bugs.Insect Sci. Appl. 9:389–393.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chiang, H.S. and Singh, S.R. (1988) Pod hairs as a factor inVigna vexillata resistance to the pod-sucking bugClavigralla tomentosicollis.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 47:195–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuthbert, F.P. Jr. and Fery, R.L. (1979) Value of plant resistance for reducing cowpea curculio damage to the southernpea (Vigna unguiculala (L.) Walp).J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 104:199- 201.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dabrowski, Z.T., Bungu, D.O.M. and Ochieng, R.S. (1983) Studies on the legume pod-borer,Maruca testulalis (Geyer) -III. Methods used in cowpea screening for resistance.Insect Sci. Appl. 4:141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dhanorkar, B.K. and Daware, D.G. (1980) Differences in number of aphids found on lines of cowpea in a replicated trial.Trop. Grain Legume Bull. 19:3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dharmasena, C.M.D. and Fernando, M.H.J.P. (1988) Resistance of cowpea varieties to beanfly -Ophiomyia phaseoli (Tryon).Trop. Agric. (Columbo) 144:155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Doss, S.A. and Faris, F.S. (1989) Relative susceptibility of twenty-five cowpea cultivars toLampides boeticus L. infestation, with special reference to the effect of host plants on some biological aspects.Assiul J. Agric. Sci. 20:71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Echendu, T.N.C. and Akingbohungbe, A.E. (1989) The larval population and crop growth phase for screening cowpea for resistance toMaruca testulalis (Geyer) in Nigeria based on flower, pods and yield loss.Trop. Pest Manage. 35:173–175.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Echendu, T.N.C. and Akingbohungbe, A.E. (1990) Intensive free-choice and no-choice cohort test for evaluating resistance toMaruca testulalis in cowpea.Bull. Entomol. Res. 80:289- 293.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ezueh, M.I. (1981) The biological bases of resistance in cowpea to the cowpea moth,Cydia ptychora.Ann. Appl. Biol. 99:313–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ezueh, M.I. and Taylor, T.A. (1981) Field resistance in cowpea,Vigna unguiculata, to the cowpea moth,Cydia ptychora.Ann. Appl. Biol. 99:307–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fatunla, T. and Badaru, K. (1983) Inheritance of resistance to cow-pea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus Fabr.).J. Agric. Sci. 101:423–426.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fery, R.L. and Cuthbert, F.P. Jr. (1978) Inheritance and selection of nonpreference resistance to the cowpea curculio in the southernpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.).J. Am. Soc. Horlic. Sci. 103:370–372.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fery, R.L. and Cuthbert, F.P. Jr. (1979) Measurement of pod-wall resistance to the cowpea curculio in the southernpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.).HortScience 14:29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fery, R.L. and Dukes, P.D. (1984) ‘Carolina Cream’ southernpea.HortScience 19:456–457.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Firempong, S. (1988) Components of resistance toAphis craccivora in some cowpea cultivars.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 48:241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Givovich, A., Weibull, J. and Pettersson, J. (1988) Cowpea aphid performance and behavior on two resistant cowpea lines.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 49:259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hobbs, H.A. and Kuhn, C.W. (1987) Differential field infection of cowpea genotypes by southern bean mosaic virus.Phytopathology 77:136–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. IITA. (1986) Improved aphid resistant cowpeas. pp. 60–61.In: Annual Report and Research Highlights (1985) Int. Inst. Trop. Agric, Ibadan, Nigeria.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jackai, L.E.N. (1981) Relationship between cowpea crop phenology and field infestation by the legume pod borer,Maruca testulalis.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 74:402–408.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jackai, L.E.N. (1982) A field screening technique for resistance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) to the pod-borerMaruca testulalis (Geyer).Bull. Entomol. Res. 72:145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jackai, L.E.N. (1983) Feeding behaviour of pod bugs: implications for plant resistance studies.10th Int. Congr. of Plant Protection, British Crop Protection Council (Brighton, UK), p. 105.

  32. Jackai, L.E.N. (1984) Studies on the feeding behavior ofClavigralla tomenlosicollis (Stål.) and their potential use in bioassays for host plant resistance.Z. Angew. Entomol. 98:344–350.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jackai, L.E.N. (1990) Screening of cowpeas for resistance toClavigralla tomenlosicollis Stél.J. Econ. Entomol. 83:300–305.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jackai, L.E.N. (1991) Laboratory and screenhouse assays for evaluating cowpea resistance to the legume pod borer.Crop Prot. 10:48–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jackai, L.E.N. and Oghiakhe, S. (1989) Pod wall trichomes and resistance of two wild cowpea,Vigna vexillata, accessions toMaruca testulalis (Geyer) andClavigralla tomenlosicollis Stål.Bull. Entomol. Res. 79:595–605.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jackai, L.E.N. and Singh, S.R. (1983) Varietal resistance in the integrated pest management of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) pests.Insect Sci. Appl. 4:199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jackai, L.E.N., and Singh, S.R. (1988) Screening techniques for host plant resistance to cowpea insect pests.Trop. Grain Legume Bull. 35:2–18.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jayappa, B.G. and Lingappa, S. (1988) Causes of resistance toAphis craccivora Koch. in cowpea germplasm in India.Trop. Pest Manage. 34 (1): 59–61, 116, 121.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jayappa, B.G. and Lingappa, S. (1988) Screening of cowpea germplasm for resistance toAphis craccivora Koch, in India.Trop. Pest Manage. 34 (1): 62–64, 116, 121.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Karel, A.K. and Malinga, Y. (1980) Leafhopper and aphid resistance in cowpea varieties.Trop. Grain Legume Bull. 20:10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Khaemba, B.M. (1986) Search in the available cowpea germplasm for sources of resistance to the common pod-sucking bugsRiptortus dentipes (F.) andAnoplocnemis curvipes (F.).East Afr. Agric. For. J. 50:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Khaemba, B.M. and Mbogo, C.N.M. (1990) Search for resistance sources in cowpea against the cowpea aphid in selected cultivars.East Afr. Agric. For. J. 53:205–208.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kitch, L.W., Shade, R.E. and Murdock, L.L. (1991) Resistance to the cowpea weevil(Callosobruchus maculatus) larva in pods of cowpea(Vigna unguiculata). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 60:183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ladeinde, T.A.O. (1988) Cytogenetics and the breeding of cowpeaV. unguiculata to insect resistance.Genome 30 (Suppl. 1): 276. (abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ladipo, J.L. and Allen, D.J. (1979) Identification of resistance to cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus.Trop. Agric. 56:353–359.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Latunde-Dada, A.O. (1990) Genetic manipulation of the cowpea(Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) for enhanced resistance to fungal pathogens and insect pests.Adv. Agron. 44:133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lin, C.S. (1981) Resistance of beans to insects.Chin. J. Entomol. 1:1–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Macfoy, C.C.A. and Dabrowski, Z.T. (1984) Preliminary studies on cowpea resistance toAphis craccivora Koch. Z.Angew.Entomol. 97:202–209.

    Google Scholar 

  49. MacFoy, C.A., Dabrowski, Z.T. and Okech, S. (1983) Studies on the legume pod-borer,Maruca testulalis (Geyer) — VI. Cowpea resistance to oviposition and larval feeding.Insect Sci. Appl. 4:147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Marfo, K.O. (1985) Evolving insect pest resistant cowpea varieties in Ghana.Insect Sci. Appl. 6:385–388.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Moraes, G.J. de, Magalhaes, A.A. de and Oliveira, C.A.V. (1981) Resistance of varieties ofVigna unguiculata to attack byLiriomyza sativae.Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 16 (2): 219–221. (in Portuguese, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Moshy, A.J., Leigh, T.F., Foster, K.W. and Schreiber, F. (1983) Screening selected cowpea,Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., lines for resistance toLygus hesperus.J. Econ. Entomol. 76:1370–1373.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nangju, D., Flinn, J.C. and Singh, S.R. (1979) Control of cowpea pests by utilization of insect-resistant cultivars and minimum insecticide application.Field Crops Res. 2:373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ng, N.Q., Piergiovanni, A.R. and Perrino, P. (1988) Biochemical analysis of cowpea. pp. 8–10.In: Annual Report, Int. Inst. Trop. Agric, Genetic Resources Unit, Ibadan, Nigeria.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ngugi, E.C.K., Shakoor, A. and Omanga, P.G.A. (1985) Breeding for resistance against some of the major insects of cowpea and pigeon pea.Insect Sci. Appl. 6:365–367.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Nilakhe, S.S. and Chalfant, R.B. (1982) Cowpea cultivars screened for resistance to insect pests.J. Econ. Entomol. 75:223–227.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nwanze, K.F. and Horber, E. (1976) Seed coat of cowpeas affect oviposition and larval development ofCallosobruchus maculalus.Environ. Entomol. 5:213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ofuya, T.I. (1987) Effect of spacing in cowpea(Vigna unguiculata) on damage by the black cowpea moth,Cydia ptychora.Ann. Appl. Biol. 111:773–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ofuya, T.I. and Akingbohungbe, A.E. (1986) Aspects of varietal resistance in cowpea to the black cowpea moth,Cydia ptychora (Meyrick).Insect Sci. Appl. 7:777–780.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ofuya, T.I. and Akingbohungbe, A.E. (1987) Preliminary field evaluations of cowpea varieties for resistance to the black cowpea moth,Cydia ptychora (Meyrick).Trop. Agric. 64:134–138.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ofuya, T.I. and Akingbohungbe, A.E. (1988) Intensive screening of some cowpea varieties for resistance to the black cowpea moth,Cydia ptychora (Meyrick).Trop. Agric. 65:229–232.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Okech, S.H.O. and Saxena, K.N. (1990) Responses ofMaruca testulalis larvae to variably resistant cowpea cultivars.Environ. Entomol. 19:1792–1797.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ombakho, G.A., Tyagi, A.P. and Pathak, R.S. (1987) Inheritance of resistance to the cowpea aphid in cowpea.Theor. Appl. Genet. 74:817–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Otieno, D.A., Hassanali, A. and Njoroge, P.W. (1985) Chemical basis of TVu 946 stem resistance toMaruca testulalis (Geyer).Insect Sci. Appl. 6:259–262.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Parh, LA. (1983) Greenhouse studies on the feeding damage of two species ofEmpoasca on sixcultivars of cowpea. Zimb.Agric. J. 80:111–113.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Pathak, R.S. (1988) Genetics of resistance to aphid in cowpea.Crop Sci. 28:474–476.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Pathak, R.S. and Olela, J.C. (1986) Registration of 14 cowpea cultivars.Crop Sci. 26:647–648.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Perrin, R.M. (1977) Screening for resistance in cowpea toCydia ptychora.Trop. Grain Legume Bull. 8:17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Perrin, R.M. (1978) The effect of some cowpea varieties on the development and survival of larvae of the seed moth,Cydia ptychora (Meyrick).Bull. Entomol. Res. 68:57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Perrin, R.M. (1978) Varietal differences in the susceptibility of cowpea to larvae of the seed moth,Cydia ptychora (Meyrick).Bull. Entomol. Res. 68:47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Piergiovanni, A.R., Sonnante, G., Delia Gatta, C. and Perrino, P. (1991) Digestive enzyme inhibitors and storage pest resistance in cowpea(Vigna unguiculata) seeds.Euphylica 54:191–194.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Ram, S., Path, B.D. and Purohit, M.L. (1984) Cowpea varieties resistant to major insect pests.Indian J. Agric. Sci. 54:307–311.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Raman, K.V. (1977) Leafhopper resistance in cowpea varieties.Trop. Grain Legume Bull. 8:14.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Raman, K.V., Singh, S.S. and Emden, H.F. van (1980) Mechanisms of resistance to leafhopper damage in cowpea.J. Econ. Entomol. 73:484–488.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Rusoke, D.G. and Fatunla, T. (1987) Inheritance of pod and seed resistance to the cow-pea seed beetle(Callosobruchus maculatus Fabr.)J. Agric. Sci. 108:655–660.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Russel, C.E. and Chalfant, R.B. (1979) An evaluation of ‘Worthmore’, a new variety of southern pea, for resistance to the cowpea curculio,Chalcodermus aeneus Boh.J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 14:155–157.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Rymal, K.S., Hunter, A.G. and Chambliss, O.L. (1987) Chromatographic profiles of seedling volatiles as indices of cowpea curculio resistance in southernpeaVigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.HortScience 22:1098. (abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Salifu, A.B. (1984) A screenhouse technique for evaluating cowpea resistance to cowpea flower thripsMegalurothrips sjostedti (Trybom).Trop. Grain Legume Bull. 29:7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Salifu, A.B., Hodgson, C.J. and Singh, S.R. (1988) Mechanism of resistance in cowpea(Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.j genotype TV x 3236 to the bean flower thrips,Megalurolhrips sjostedti (Trybom). 1. Ovipositional nonpreference.Trop. Pest Manage. 34:180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Salifu, A.B., Singh, S.R. and Hodgson, C.J. (1988) Mechanism of resistance in cowpea(Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) genotype TV x 3236 to the bean flower thrips,Megalurolhrips sjostedti (Trybom). 2. Nonpreference and antibiosis.Trop. Pest Manage. 34:185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Schalk, J.M. and Fery, R.L. (1986) Resistance in cowpea to the southern green stink bug.HortScience 21:1189–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Singh, S.R. (1977) Cowpea cultivars resistant to insect pests in world germplasm collection.Trop. Grain Legume Bull. 9:3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Singh, S.R. (1978) Resistance to pests of cowpea in Nigeria, pp. 267–279.In: Singh, S.R., Emden, H.F. van and Taylor, T.A [Eds.] Pests of Grain Legumes: Ecology and Control. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Singh, S.R. (1987) Host plant resistance for cowpea insect pest management.Insect Sci. Appl. 8:765–769.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Singh, S.R. and Jackai, L.E.N. (1988) The legume pod-borer,Maruca leslulalis (Geyer): past, present and future research.Insect Sci. Appl. 9:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Sulochana, K.A. and Peter, K.V. (1986) Evaluation for host reaction toAphis craccivora Koch in cowpea.Agric. Res. J. Kerala 24:63–65.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ta’ama, M. (1983) Yield performance of thrips resistant cultivars under no insecticide application.Trop. Grain Legume Bull. 27:26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Wien, H.C. and Roesingh, C. (1980) Ethylene evolution by thrips-infested cowpea provides a basis for thrips resistance screening with ethephon sprays.Nature (Lond.) 283:192–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Mung bean [see also 524]

  1. AVRDC. (1987) Mungbean entomology. pp. 185-191. AVRDC Publication No. 86-264. 1984 Progress Report. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Catedral, I.G. and Lantican, R.M. (1978) Mungbean breeding program of UPLB, Philippines. pp. 225–227.In: Cowell, R. [Ed.] 1st Int. Mungbean Symposium. Asian Vegetable Res. Dev. Center, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chhabra, K.S. and Kooner, B.S. (1980) Sources of whitefly,Bemisia labaci G. and yellow mosaic virus resistance inVigna radiata Wilczek.Trop. Grain Legume Bull. 19:26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chhabra, K.S., Kooner, B.S., Sharma, A.K. and Saxena, A.K. (1988) Sources of resistance in mungbean(Vigna radiata) to insect pests and mungbean yellow mosaic virus. pp. 308-314.In: Shanmugasundaram, S. and McLean, B.T. [Eds.] Mungbean. Proc. 2nd Int. Symposium. AVRDC Publication No. 88-304, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chhabra, K.S., Kooner, B.S. and Singh, G. (1979) Field resistance of certain cultivars of mungbean to whitefly,Bemisia tabaci G., and yellow-mosaic virus.J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 16:385–388.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chiang, H.S., Su, C.Y. and Rose, R.I. (1978) Major mungbean insect pest management alternatives. pp. 180–182.In: Cowell, R. [Ed.] 1st Int. Mungbean Symposium. Asian Vegetable Res. Dev. Center, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chiang, H.S. and Talekar, N.S. (1980) Identification of sources of resistance to the beanfly and two other agromyzid flies in soybean and mungbean.J. Econ. Enlomol. 73:197–199.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duangploy, S. (1978) Breeding mungbean for Thailand conditions. pp. 228–229.In: Cowell, R. [Ed.] 1st Int. Mungbean Symposium. Asian Vegetable Res. Dev. Center, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goh, H.G., Song, H.S. and Jin, Y.M. (1984) Preference of beanflies on mungbean varieties. Research Reports, Office of Rural Development, S. Korea, Soil Fertilizer, Crop Protection, Mycology and Farm Products Utilization. 26 (2): 84–87.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Park, H.G. and Yang, C.N. (1978) The mungbean breeding program at the Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center. pp. 214-216.In: Cowell, R. [Ed.] 1st Int. Mungbean Symposium. Asian Vegetable Res. Dev. Center, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Talekar, N.S. (1987) Host plant resistance to insects attacking soybean and mungbean in the tropics.Insect Set. Appl. 8:777–782.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Talekar, N.S. and Lin, Y.H. (1981) Two sources with differing modes of resistance toCallosobruchus chinensis in mungbean.J. Econ. Enlomol. 74:639–642.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Talekar, N.S., Yang, H.C. and Lee, Y.H. (1988) Morphological and physiological traits associated with agromyzid resistance in mungbean.J. Econ. Enlomol. 81:1352–1358.

    Google Scholar 

Common bean and lima bean

  1. Alvarado-Rodriguez, B., Leigh, T.F., Foster, K.W. and Duffey, S.S. (1986) Resistance in common bean(Phaseolus vulgaris) toLygus hesperus Knight.J. Econ. Enlomol. 79:484–489.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarado-Rodriguez, B., Leigh, T.F., Foster, K.W. and Duffey, S.S. (1987) Life tables forLygus hesperus on susceptible and resistant common bean cultivars.Environ. Enlomol. 16:45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alves de Souza, L. (1988) Resistance of ten bean genotypes toAcanlhoscelides obtectus in the laboratory.Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 23:15–18. (in Portuguese, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Antonelli, A.L. and O’Keeffe, L.E. (1981) Possible resistance in bean varieties to the western bean cutworm.J. Econ. Enlomol. 74:499–501.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boica Junior, A.L. and Vendramim, J.D. (1986) Development ofBemisia labaci (Gennadius, 1889) in genotypes of bean(Phaseolus vulgaris L.).An. Soc. Enlomol. Bras. 15:231–238. (in Portuguese, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cardona, C, Kornegay, J., Posso, C.E., Morales, F. and Ramirez, H. (1990) Comparative value of four arcelin variants in the development of dry bean lines resistant to the Mexican bean weevil.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 56:197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cardona, C., Posso, C.E., Kornegay, J., Valor, J. and Serrano, M. (1989) Antibiosis effects of wild dry bean accessions on the Mexican bean weevil and the bean weevil.J. Econ. Entomol. 82:310–315.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chrispeels, M.J. and Raikhel, N.V. (1991) Lectins, lectin genes, and their role in plant defense.Plant Cell 3:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cranshaw, W.S. and Radcliffe, E.B. (1984) Influence of cultivar and plant age on European corn borer infestation in snap beans.J. Econ. Entomol. 77:374–376.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dicke, M., Sabelis, M.W., Takabayashi, J., Bruin, I. and Posthumus, M.A. (1991) Plant strategies of manipulating predator-prey interactions through allelochemicals: Prospects for application in pest control.J. Chem. Ecol. 16:3091–3118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dover, B.A., Noblet, R., Moore, R.F. and Shepard, B.M. (1987) Development and emergence ofPediobius foveolatus from Mexican bean beetle larvae fed foliage fromPhaseolus lunatus and resistant and susceptible soybeans.J. Agric. Entomol. 4:271–279.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eckenrode, C.J. and Webb, D.R. (1989) Establishment of various European com borer races on selected cultivars of snap beans.J. Econ. Entomol. 82:1169–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Enkerlin, S.D. and Medina, M.B. (1979) [Susceptibility of 99 lines and varieties of beansPhaseolus vulgaris L. to attack byEmpoasca spp. and their adaptation to the environmental conditions of Apodaca N.L.]Informe de Investigacion 16:93–95. (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eskafi, F.M. and Schoonhoven, A. van (1978) Comparison of greenhouse and field resistance of bean varieties toEmpoasca kraemeri.Can. Entomol. 110:853–858.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eskafi, F.M. and Schoonhoven, A. van (1981) Interactions of leafhopper population, varietal resistance, insecticide treatment, and plant growth on dry bean yields in a tropical environment.J. Econ. Entomol. 74:7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Galwey, N.W. and Evans, A.M. (1982) Alternative methods of interpreting measurements of resistance to the leafhopperEmpoasca kraemeri Ross and Moore in the common bean,Phaseolus vulgaris L.Euphytica 31:225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Galwey, N.W. and Evans, A.M. (1982) Inheritance of resistance toEmpoasca kraemeri Ross and Moore in the common bean,Phaseolus vulgaris.Euphytica 31:933–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Galwey, N.W., Temple, S.R. and Schoonhoven, A. van (1985) The resistance of genotypes of two species ofPhaseolus beans to the leafhopperEmpoasca kraemeri.Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:147–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Garza Garcia, R., Vera Graziano, J. and Zárate de Lara, G. (1987) Economic damage level by the Mexican bean beetleEpilachna varivestis Mulsant in three cultivars ofPhaseolus vulgaris L.Agrociencia 67:57–67. (in Spanish, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gepp, J. (1977) Hindrance of movement in arthropods by the hairs on bean plants(Phaseolus vulgaris L.).Anz. Schädlingskd. Pflanzenschutz Umwellschutz 50 (1): 8–12. (in German, with English summary)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gomez, C.E.P., Valor, J.F. and Schoonhoven, A. van (1987) Resistance of wild and cultivatedPhaseolus vulgaris L. to the common weevilAcanthoscelides obtectus (Say) in the field and laboratory.Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 11:3–8. (in Spanish, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gupta, R.N., Pandey, R.C. and Katiyar, R.R. (1988) Relative susceptibility of some bean genotypes to aphid,Aphis craccivora. Indian J. Entomol. 47:247–277.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hartweck, L.M. and Osbom, T.C. (1988) Origin of gene encoding arcelin, an insecticidal seed proteinof Phaseolus vulgaris.Genome 30 (Suppl. 1): 136. (abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heyer, W., Cruz, B. and Chiang Lok, M.L. (1986) Behavior and preference ofDiabrotica balteata, Andrector ruficornis, Systena basalis andEmpoasca fabae adults on bean.Cienc. Agric. 27:61–70. (in Spanish, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hohmann, C.L., Schoonhoven, A. van and Cardona, C. (1979) Management of pests of bean(Phaseolus vulgaris Linnaeus, 1753) through the use of soil cover associated with varietal resistance.An. Soc. Entomol. Bras. 8:239–250. (in Portuguese, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Komegay, J. and Cardona, C. (1990) Development of an appropriate brecding scheme for tolerance toEmpoasca kraemeri in common bean.Euphytica 47:223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Komegay, J. and Cardona, C. (1991) Breeding for insect resistance in beans, pp. 619–648.In: Schoonhoven, A. van and Voysest, O. [Eds.] Common Beans: Research for Crop Improvement. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Komegay, J.L. and Cardona, C. (1991) Inheritance of resistance toAcanthoscelides oblecius in a wild common bean accession crossed to commercial bean cultivars.Euphytica 52:103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Komegay, J.L., Cardona, C., Esch, J. van and Alvarado, M. (1989) Identification of common bean lines with oppositional resistance toEmpoasca kraemeri.J. Econ. Entomol. 82:649–654.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Komegay, J.L., Cardona, C. and Schoonhoven, A. van (1986) The mechanisms of resistance in common beans to the leafhopperEmpoasca kraemeri.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 40:273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lyman, J.M., Cardona, C. and Garcia, J. (1981) Studies on resistance in lima beans toEmpoasca kraemeri Ross and Moore.Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 7:27–32. (in Spanish, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pawar, D.B., Kale, P.N. and Lawande, K.E. (1987) Reaction of some French bean varieties to stemfly infestation under field conditions.J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 12:263.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pillemer, E.A. and Tingey, W.M. (1978) Hooked trichomes and resistance ofPhaseolus vulgaris toEmpoasca fabae (Harris).Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24:83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Raina, A.K., Benepal, P.S. and Sheikh, A.Q. (1978) Evaluation of bean varieties for resistance to Mexican bean beetle.J. Econ. Entomol. 71:313–314.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Raina, A.K., Benepal, P.S. and Sheikh, A.Q. (1980) Effects of excised and intact leaf methods, leaf size, and plant age on Mexican bean beetle feeding.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 27:303–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rêgo, A.F.M., Lãao Veiga, A.F.S., Rodrigues, Z.A., Oliveira, M.L. de and Reis, O.V. dos (1986) Effect of the incidence ofZabrotes subfascialus (Bohemann, 1833) on genotypes ofPhaseolus vulgaris L. An. Soc. Entomol. Bras. 15 (Suppl.): 53–69. (in Portuguese, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rogers, D.J. (1980) Host plant resistance toOphiomyia phaseoli (Tryon) inPhaseolus vulgaris.J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 18:245–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schoonhoven, A. van, Cardona, C. and Valor, J.F. (1983) Resistance to the bean weevil and the Mexican bean weevil in noncultivated common bean accessions.J. Econ. Entomol. 76:1255–1259.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Serrano, M.S., Schoonhoven, A. van, Valor, J.F. and Cardona, C. (1983) Sources of resistance to the common bean weevil,Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) in wild bean lines.Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 9:13–18. (in Spanish, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smitanond, B., Tanaka, K., Honda, H. and Yamamoto, I. (1990) An ecochemical in kidney beans which inhibits larval growth of the azuki bean weevil.J. Pestic. Sci. 15:89–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Webb, D.R., Eckenrode, C.J. and Dickson, M.H. (1987) Variation among green and wax beans in survival of larvae of a bivoltine-E race of the European corn borer.J. Econ. Entomol. 80:521–524.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wells, P.W., Dively, G.P. and Schalk, J.M. (1984) Resistance and reflective foil mulch as control measures for the potato leafhopper onPhaseolus species.J. Econ. Entomol. 77:1046–1051.

    Google Scholar 

Faba bean

  1. Birch, N. and Wratten, S.D. (1984) Patterns of aphid resistance in the genusVicia.Ann. Appl. Biol. 104:327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boughdad, A., Gillon, Y. and Gagnepain, C. (1986) Influence of the condensed tannins of the integument of faba bean on the larval development ofCallosobruchus maculatus.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 42:125–132. (in French, with English summary)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Geissler, K. (1983) Differences in resistance toAphis fabae in aVicia faba collection.Tagungsber. Akad. Landwirtschaftswiss. Dtsch. Demokrat. Repub. 216, II:679–684. (in German, with English and Russian summaries)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geissler, K., Lehmann, W. and Schliephake, E. (1983) Studies on the suitability of the walking and sucking activity ofAphis fabae Scop. for the laboratory testing of possible differences in resistance of field bean varieties.Arch. Phytopathol. Pflanzenschutz 19:185–191. (in German, with English and Russian summaries)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holt, J. (1979) Aphid resistance inVicia faba.Newsl. Faba (Broad) Bean Inf. Serv. 1:26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holt, J. (1981) Antibiotic resistance toAphis fabae inVicia faba cultivars.Ann. Appl. Biol. 97 (Suppl. 2): 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holt, J. and Birch, N. (1984) Taxonomy, evolution and domestication ofVicia in relation to aphid resistance.Ann. Appl. Biol. 105:547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holt, J. and Wratten, S.D. (1986) Components of resistance toAphis fabae in faba bean cultivars.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 40:35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Klingauf, F.A.J. (1981) Breeding for resistance to aphids. pp. 285–295.In: Hawtin, G. and Webb, C. [Eds.] Faba Bean Improvement. Proceedings of the Faba Bean Conference. Martinus Nijhoff, Hague, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mohammad, M.A. and Mahmoud, T.T. (1988) Study on the susceptibility of broad bean varieties to infestation by the black bean aphid,Aphis fabae Scop., and the effect of chemical fertilizers on the infestation level in Mosul region.Mesopotamia J. Agric. 20:243–253. (in Arabic, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morvan, Y., Borgemeister, C. and Poehling, H.M. (1988) Colonization, food intake and development ofAphis fabae on susceptible and partially resistant varieties ofVicia faba.Entomol. Gen. 13:27–220. (in German, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tahhan, O. and Emden, H.F. van (1989) Resistance of faba bean,Vicia faba toBruchus dentipes Baudi.Bull. Entomol. Res. 79:211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tahhan, O. and Hariri, G. (1981) Screening of aphid resistance in faba bean lines.FABIS Newsl. 3:57.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Younis, M.A., Abid, M.K. and Hamoudi, R.F. (1985) Effect of varietal differences on growth, reproduction and survival of black broad bean aphidAphis fabae Scopoli.Iraqi J. Agric. Sci. 3:1–10. (in Arabic, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zebitz, C.P.W., Baur, U. and Tenhumberg, B. (1988) [Expression of resistance properties ofVicia faba toAphis fabae depending on abiotic and biotic factors.]Mitt. Biol. Bundesanst.Land. Forstwirtsch. Berl. Dahlem 245:313. (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zebitz, C.P.W. and Kehlenbeck, H. (1991) Performance ofAphis fabae on chocolate spot disease-infected faba bean plants.Phytoparasilica 19:113–119.

    Google Scholar 

Garden pea or field pea

  1. Annis, B. and O’Keeffe, L.E. (1987) Influence of pea genotype on parasiti/ation of the pea weevil,Bruchus pisorum byEupteromalus leguminis.Environ. Entomol. 16:653–655.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azarova, E.F. (1987) [Inducing conditions of increased pea aphid infestation for the evaluation of pea varieties for resistance.]Nauchno-Tekhn. Byull. Vses. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Zernobobov. Krupyan. Kul’tw 35:91-94. (in Russian) FromReferativnyi Zhurnal (1987) 3.55.268.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berim, M.N., Vilkova, N.A. and Pukhaev, R.V. (1985) [A method of determining resistance to pea aphid in pea forms.] USSR Patent (1985) A.s. 1158114. (in Russian) FromReferativnyi Zhurnal (1985) 12.55.316.

  4. Chaplygina, I.N. and Amelina, K.A. (1987) [Resistance of pea to diseases and pests and the search for means to increase it.]Sel. Semenovod. USSR 4:27–28. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chodulska, L.M. (1978) Research on the susceptibility of several varieties of pea(Pisum sativum L.) to attack by the pea moth —Laspeyresia nigricana Steph. in relation to different applications of mineral fertilisers.Rocz. Nauk Roln. Ser. E, Ochr. Rosl. 7 (1): 171–179. (in Polish, with Russian and English summaries)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dash, A.N., Patnaik, N.C. and Nandi, A. (1988) Reaction of some garden pea cultivars to the pea leaf minerPhytomyza atricornis (Meigen) in Orissa.Environ. Ecol. 6:530–531.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Havlícková, H. (1977) Pea resistance to pea leaf weevil(Sitona lineatus L.).Sb. UVTIZ Ochr. Rostl. 13 (1):33–37. (in Czech, with English, Russian and German summaries)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jane, E., Bintcliffe, B. and Wratten, S.D. (1980) Resistance in peas to the pea aphid, 1978.Ann. Appl. Biol. 94 (Suppl.): 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kareiva, P. and Sahakian, R. (1990) Tritrophic effects of a simple architectural mutation in pea plants.Nature (Lond.) 345:433–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Malakhanov, Y.A. (1985) Content of phenolic compounds in the reproductive organs of pea and its resistance to pea weevil.Byull. Vses. Nauchno-issled. Inst. Zashch. Rast. 60:45–48. (in Russian, with English summary) FromReferativnyi Zhurnal (1986) 6.65.238.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Negrobov, V.P. and Petrishcheva, V.I. (1979) Evaluation of crop resistance: peas and the bruchid.Zashch. Rast. 10:29. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pesho, G.R., Muehlbauer, F.J. and Harberts, W.H. (1977) Resistance of pea introductions to the pea weevil.J. Econ. Entomol. 70:30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Posylaeva, G.A. (1988) [Breeding pea for combined resistance to pests.]Sel. Semenovod., Kiev 65:44–46. FromReferativnyi Zhurnal (1988) 9.65.256. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Posylaeva, G.A. (1990) [Trophic patterns inAcyrthosiphon pisum and breeding pea for resistance to the pest.]Sel. Semenovo. (Kiev) 68:76–79. FromReferativnyi Zhurnal (1990) 9Ya3293. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Posylaeva, G.A. and Yanova, T.A. (1985) [Studying the behaviour of pea aphid — one of the factors in breeding pea for pest resistance.]Sel. Semenovod.Ukrainian SSR 59:48–50. (in Russian) FromReferativnyi Zhurnal (1985) 12.65.294.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Semenova, A.G. (1989) [Evaluation of the resistance of pea toAcyrthosiphon pisum by means of mass screening.]Sel. Semenovod. (Mosc.) 2:17. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Semenova, A.G. (1990) Resistance of pea toAcyrthosiphon pisum.Sb. Nauchn. Tr. Prikl. Bot. Genet. Selektsii 132:78–82. (in Russian, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singh, G. and Mishra, P.N. (1977) Note on susceptibility of certain vegetable pea varieties toMelanagromyza phaseoli (Tryon) andThrips tabaci Lindeman.Indian J. Agric. Sci. 47:587–588.

    Google Scholar 

  19. SkØt, L., Harrison, S.P., Nath, A., Mytton, L.R. and Clifford, B.C. (1990) Expression of insecticidal activity inRhizobium containing the δ-endotoxin gene cloned fromBacillus thuringiensis subsp.tenebrionis. Plant Soil 127:285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Soroka, J.J. and Mackay, P.A. (1990) Growth of pea aphid,Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), populations on caged plants of six cultivars of field peas and the effects of pea aphids on harvest components of caged field peas.Can. Entomol. 122:1193–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Soroka, J.J. and Mackay, P.A. (1991) Antibiosis and antixenosis to pea aphid in cultivars of field peas.J. Econ. Entomol. 84:1951–1956.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Waly, E.A., Hussein, M.H. and Abd-El-Aal, S.A. (1985) Inheritance of cowpea seed beetle infestation and its relation to total carbohydrate in garden pea.Beitr. Trop. Landwirtsch. Veterinärmed. 23:51–57.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Pigeonpea [see also 532]

  1. Bhalani, P.A., Patel, A.R. and Yadavendra, J.P. (1985) An assessment of damage caused by the leaf minerAproaerema modicella Deventer in seven pigeonpea cultivars in Gujarat, India.Int. Pigeonpea Newsl. 4:55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhosale, D.J. and Nawale, R.N. (1983) Relative susceptibility of pigeon pea germplasm to gram pod borer.J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 8:30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dabi, R.K., Gupta, H.C., Mehrotra, P. and Sharma, S.K. (1981) Note on the pigeonpea varieties preferred byCallosobruchus maculatus Fabricius.Indian J. Agric. Sci. 51:532–534.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dass, S.B. and Odak, S.C. (1987) Biochemical basis of resistance in pigeonpea pod walls to pod flyMelanagromyza obtusa Malloch.Crop Improv. 14:64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Govil, J.N., Sinha, S.N. and Singh, S.P. (1988) Note on the relative susceptibility of early pigeonpea genotypes to pod borer(Heliothis armigera).New Bot. 165:191–192.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ICRISAT. (1987) Pigeonpea. Biotic stresses. Insect pests, pp. 181–189. ICRISAT Annual Report, 1986. Int. Crops Res. Inst. Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jain, K..C., Lateef, S.S., Faris, D.G. and Reed, W. (1984) Heliothis-resistant pigeonpeas: a hope for the future.Int. Pigeonpea Newsl. 3:19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Naik, R.L., Pokharkar, R.N. and Ajri, D.S. (1986) Field screening of some pigeonpea entries for resistance to pod borer complex.Curr. Res. Rep. Mahalma Phule Agric. Univ. 2 (2): 275–277.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nambiar, P.T.C., Ma, S.W. and Iyer, V.N. (1990) Limiting an insect infestation of nitrogenfixing root nodules of the pigeon pea(Cajanus cajan) by engineering the expression of an entomocidal gene in its root nodules.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:2866–2869.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Naresh, J.S., Sharma, S.S. and Dahiya, B. (1983) Assessment of losses caused byHeliothis armigera andMelanagromyza obtusa in 8 varieties of-pigeonpea in Haryana.Indian J. Plant Prot. 11:37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nawale, R.N. and Jadhav, L.D. (1983) Relative susceptibility of some varieties of pigeonpea to pod borer damage.J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 8:94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Patel, J.R. and Patel, R.C. (1983) Note on varietal susceptibility and extent of damage of podfly,Melanagromyza phaseoli Tryon to pigeonpea.Indian J. Entomol. 45:314–316.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Patil, S.M. and Jadhav, L.D. (1984) Relative susceptibility of pigeonpea cultivars to pulse beetle.J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 9:42–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patnaik, H.P. and Patnaik, N.C. (1985) Relative susceptibility to the podfly of certain early-maturing pigeonpea cultivars.Int. Pigeonpea Newsl. 4:50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Patnaik, H.P., Samalo, A.P. and Samalo, B.N. (1986) Susceptibility of some early varieties of pigeonpea for pod borers under protected conditions.Legume Res. 9 (1):7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Patnaik, H.P., Senapapti, B., Behera, P.K. and Mohapatra, H.K. (1989) Relative susceptibility of some pigeonpea cultivars toHeliothis armigera (Hübner).Indian J. Plant Prot. 17:279–282.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prasad, D., Premchand and Haque, M.F. (1989) Incidence of pod boring insects in different cultivars of pigeon pea.J. Res. Birsa Agric. Univ. 1:79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Prasad, D., Premchand and Haque, M.F. (1989) Relative susceptibility of different cultivars of redgram.J. Res. Birsa Agric. Univ. 1:179–181.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rao, K.T., Rao, N.V. and Reddy, A.S. (1986) Control of pod borers of arhar.Indian Farming 36 (6): 29, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reddy, A.R., Venkateswarlu, S. and Singh, O.N. (1982) Note on screening of germplasm of pigeonpea for resistance to podfly(Melanagromyza obtusa Mall.).Indian J. Agric. Sci. 52:342.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rembold, H. and Tober, H. (1985) Kairomones as pigeonpea resistance factors againstHeliothis armigera.Insect Sci. Appl. 6:249–252.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sithanantham, S., Rao, V.R. and Reed, W. (1983) Influence of pigeonpea resistance toHeliothis on the natural parasitism ofHeliothis larvae.Int. Pigeonpea Newsl. 2:64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sithanantham, S., Rao, V.R. and Reed, W. (1985) Podfly damage in resistant and susceptible selections of pigeonpea.Int. Pigeonpea Newsl. 4:51–53.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sithanantham, S., Singh, U., Reed, W. and Jambunathan, R. (1983) Differences of some chemical constituents of pigeonpea pod walls in relation to podfly susceptibility.Int. Pigeonpea Newsl. 2:68–69.

    Google Scholar 

Chickpea

  1. Bhalani, P.A., Parsana, G.J. and Yadavendra, J.P. (1987) Susceptibility of chickpea genotypes toHeliothis armigera (Hub.) under field conditions.Int. Chickpea Newsl. 16:7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chhabra, K.S. and Kooner, B.S. (1980) Sources of resistance in chickpea to the gram pod borer,Heliothis armigera Hiibner.J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 17:13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dias, C.A.R., Lal, S.S. and Yadava, C.P. (1983) Differences in susceptibility of certain chickpea cultivars and local collections toHeliothis armigera (Hübner).Indian J. Agric. Sci. 53:842–845.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lal, S.S., Yadava, C.P. and Dias, C.A.R. (1989) Effect of planting density and chickpea cultivars on the infestations of the black aphid,Aphis craccivora Koch.Madras Agric. J. 76:461–462.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lateef, S.S., Bhagwat, V.R. and Reed, W. (1981) Screening of chickpea cultivars for borer(Heliothis armigera) susceptibility in pesticide free conditions at ICRISAT center.Int. Chickpea Newsl. 5:13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pundir, R.P.S. and Reddy, K.N. (1989) Induction, genetics and possible use of glabrousness in chickpea.Euphytica 42:141–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rembold, H. (1981) Malic acid in chickpea exudate — a marker forHeliothis resistance.Int. Chickpea Newsl. 4:18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sahoo, B.K., Jena, B.C., Sahu, P.N. and Mishra, T.K. (1989) Evaluation of chickpea varieties against pod borer damage.Environ. Ecol. 7:1045–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sithanantham, S., Rao, V.R. and Reed, W. (1982) The influence of host-plant resistance in chickpea on parasitism ofHeliothis armigera Hb. larvae.Int. Chickpea Newsl. 6:21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Srivastava, C.P. and Srivastava, R.P. (1989) Screening for resistance to gram pod borer,Heliothis armigera (Hübner), in chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes and observations on its mechanism of resistance in India.Insect Sci. Appl. 10:255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ujagir, R. and Khare, B.P. (1987) Preliminary screening of chickpea genotypes for susceptibility toHeliothis armigera (Hüb.) at Pantnagar, India.Int. Chickpea Newsl. 17:14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ujagir, R. and Khare, B.P. (1988) Susceptibility of chickpea cultivars to gram pod borerHeliothis armigera (Hübner).Indian J. Plant Prot. 16:45–49.

    Google Scholar 

Other legumes

  1. Bhalla, S., Verma, B.R. and Thomas, T.A. (1988) Reaction of germplasm collections of differentSesbania species to seed chalcid,Bruchophagus mellipes Gahan.J. Entomol. Res. 12:129–131.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chakravarthy, A.K. and Lingappa, S. (1984) Comparison of germplasm evaluation parameters inLablab niger Medick to borer attack.Insect Sci. Appl. 5:31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chhabra, K.S. and Kooner, B.S. (1981) Field resistance in black gram,Vigna mungo L. against insect-pests complex and yellow mosaic virus.Indian J. Entomol. 43:288–293.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chhabra, K.S., Kooner, B.S., Mahal, M.S. and Gill, A.S. (1983) The black aphid,Aphis craccivora Koch on pulses in Punjab.Pranikee 4:251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chopra, N. and Pajni, H.R. (1987) Resistance of different lentil varieties to the attack ofBruchus lent is.Lens Newsl. 14:23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dabi, R.K. and Gour, H.N. (1988) Field screening of mothbean(Vigna aconitifolia) for susceptibility to insect pests and diseases.Indian J. Agric. Sci. 58:843–844.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parsai, S.K., Rawat, R.R. and Gupta, M.P. (1989) Relative susceptibility of field bean varieties to bean beetle(Callosobruchus phaseoli Gyllehal).Agric. Sci. Dig. 9:136–138.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Phookan, H.P. and Saharia, D. (1990) Yield losses in three green gram varieties caused by legume pod borerMaruca testuialis Geyer in Assam.J. Res. Assam Agric. Univ. 8:65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sahoo, B.K., Sahu, P.N. and Mishra, M.R. (1989) Field evaluation of greengram varieties against whitefly and yellow mosaic virus disease.Orissa J. Agric. Res. 2:136–137.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Singh, Y., Singh, S.P. and Gupta, S.L. (1986) Incidence ofEublemma dimidialis Fab. on green gram,Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek at Delhi.Indian J. Entomol. 48:471–473.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Srivastava, A.S., Srivastava, K.M. and Singh, L.N. (1977) Studies on relative resistance or susceptibility of gram varieties to gram pod borer,Heliothis armigera Hiibner.Labdev J. Sci. Technol. Part B Life Sci. 13:264–265.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Citations by author’s name and year refer to References Cited section at the end of this introductory section; citations by number refer to the Bibliography.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stoner, K.A. Bibliography of plant resistance to arthropods in vegetables, 1977–1991. Phytoparasitica 20, 125–138 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981279

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981279

Key Words

Navigation