Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Le rôle de l’endoscopie dans le diagnostic et la surveillance de I’ulcère duodénal

The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of duodenal ulcer

Papel de la endoscopia en el diagnóstico y segumiento de la úlcera duodenal

  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

Résumé

Les auteurs évaluent la contribution de l’endoscopie au diagnostic et à la surveillance de l’ulcère duodénal. Trois aspects sont examinés en détail:

  • — la place de la première endoscopic chez les patients dont les symptômes sont évocateurs d’un ulcère duodénal;

  • — l’influence de la morphologie endoscopique de l’ulcère sur l’évolution à court et à long terme de la lésion, en rapport avec le traitement médical;

  • — l’utilité des contrôles endoscopiques pendant et après le processus de cicatrisation de l’ulcère.

Summary

The authors review the contribution of endoscopy to the diagnosis and management of duodenal ulcer. Three points are examined in detail:

  • — the place of primary panendoscopy in patients whose symptoms call out for duodenal ulcer;

  • — the contribution of endoscopic ulcer morphology in short and long-term outcome of the lesion in relationship with medical therapy;

  • — the usefulness of endoscopic controls during and after ulcer healing process.

Resumen

Los autores evalúan la contribución de la endoscopia al diagnóstico y al seguimiento de la úlcera duodenal. Se examinan en detalle tres aspectos de la cuestión:

  • — el papel de la primera endoscopia en los pacientes con síntomas sugestivos de ulcus duodenal;

  • — la influencia de la morfología endoscópica de la úlcera en su evolución a corto y largo plazo y en función del tratamiento médico;

  • — la utilidad de los controles endoscópicos durante y después del proceso de cicatrización de la úlcera.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ASGE Publication. — The role of endoscopy in the management of the patient with peptic ulcer disease. Guidelines for clinical application.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1988,34 (suppl.), 21S-22S.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BANK L., WRIGHT J.P., LUCRE W., MARKS I.N. — Peptic ulcer. A follow-up study.J. Clin. Gastroenterol., 1986,8, 381–384.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. BARDHAN K.D. — Refractory duodenal ulcer.Gut., 1984,25, 711–717.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. BARDHAN K.D., DHANDE D., HINCHLIFFE R.F.C., MORRIS P., THOMPSON M., CARROLL N.J.H., DALY M.J. — Omeprazole in the treatment of ultra refractory duodenal ulcer.Gastroenterology, 1988,94, A22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. BARDHAN K.D., NAESDAL J., BIANCHI PORRO G., LAZZARONI M., HINCHLIFFE R.F.C., THOMPSON M., MORRIS P., DALY M.J., CARROLL N.J.H., WALAN A., RIKNER L. — Omeprazole (OM) in the treatment of refractory peptic ulcer (RPU).Gastroenterology, 1988,94, A22.

    Google Scholar 

  6. BELBER J.P. #x2014; Endoscopic examination of the duodenal bulb: a comparison with x-ray.Gastroenterology, 1971,61, 55–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. BERNIER J.J., BITOUN A. — Les Ulcères duodénaux linéaires sont-ils plus résistants que les autres à la thérapeutique médicale ?.. probablement pas...Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 1981,5, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. BIANCHI-PORRO G., PETRILLO M. — The natural history of peptic ulcer disease: the influence of H2-antagonist treatment.Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1986,21 (suppl. 121), 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. BIGARD M.A., ISAL J.P., GALMICHE J.P., EBRARD F., BADER J.P. — Efficacité comparée de l’oméprazole et de la cimétidine dans le traitement de 1’ulcère duodénal en poussée évolutive. Essai thàrapeutique, contrôle multicentrique français.Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 1987,11, 753–757.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blackstone M. — Interpretazione endoscopica. Cortina Ed. 1986, pp. 242-258.

  11. BLASI A., MANGIAMELI A., CASTELLI G., GIRELLI M., FAMILIARI L., FERRAU O., FERRARI L., MIGNEMI G., GATTO G., PAGLIARO L., MICALIZZI A., ROMANO S. — Long-term (24-month) ranitidine in prevention of duodenal ulcer relapses: comparison of continuous and seasonal treatment.Ital. J. Gastroenterol., 1987,19, 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bplum A.L., Armstrong D., Damman H., Fischer M., Greiner L., Haase W., Hogeboomverdegal A., Lizskay M., Stolte M., Sulser H., Simon, B. — The effect of Helicobacter pylori on the healing and relapse of duodenal ulcer. D.D.W., San Antonio May 1990, Ab. Book A-60, 239.

  13. Blum A.L., Arnold R., Classen M., Goebell H., Fischer M., Witzel L. — Prospective study of the risk factors for duodenal ulcer recurrence in 2 109 patients. D.D.W., San Antonio May 1990, Ab. Book A-216, 860.

  14. Bodemar G., Gotthard R., Strom M., Walan A. — Maintenance treatment, length of therapy and indications. In « Cimetidine in 80s », Churchill Livingstone Ed. 1981, pp. 75-84.

  15. BOYD E.J.S., WILSON J.A., WORMSLEY G.K. — Safety of ranitidine maintenance treatment of duodenal ulcer.Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1984,19, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  16. BOYD E.J.S., JOHNSTON D.A., PENSTON J.G., WORMSLEY K.G. — Does maintenance therapy keep duodenal ulcers healed?Lancet, 1988,11, 1324–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. BURLAND W., HAWKINS B., BARESFORD J. — Cimetidine treatment for the prevention of recurrence of duodenal ulcer: an international collaborative study.Postgraduate Medical Journal, 1980,56, 173–176.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. CHANG-CHIU C., WU C., CHUS P., LIN D., CHU C., FANG K., GHCEN I., LIAW Y. — Different implications of stigmate of recurrent hemorrhage in gastric and duodenal ulcers.Dig. Dis. Sci., 1988,33, 400–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. CHELI R. — Duodenitis and duodenal ulcer.Digestion, 1968,1, 175–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. CHELI R., GIACOSA A., MOLINARI F. — Role of magnified image endoscopy in the diagnosis of chronic duodenitis.Ital. J. Gastroenterol., 1982,14, 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  21. CLASSEN M., DEMMON H., DOMSEHKE W., HUTTEMANN W., LONDONY W., REHNAR M., SIMON B., WITZEL L., BURGER J. — Omeprazole heals duodenal, but not gastric ulcers more rapidly than ranitidine. Results of two german multicentre trials.Hepato-Gas-troenterol., 1985,32, 243–245.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. COGLAN G., HUMPHSIES H., DOOLEY C. — Campylobacter pylory and recurrence of duodenal ulcer: a 12 month follow-up study.Lancet, 1987,11, 1109–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. COLIN-JONES D.G. — The role of endoscopy in peptic ulcer disease and dyspepsia.Ital. J. Gastroenterol., 1987,19, 288–290.

    Google Scholar 

  24. CORTOT A., HENRY-AMAR M., PAPPO M., PARIS J.C. — Efficacité comparée de la ranitidine (150 mg × 2) et de la cimétidine (400 mg × 2) dans le traitement de 1’ulcère duodénal en poussée. Essai thérapeutique contrôlé multicentrique français.Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 1987,11, 136–141.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. COTTON P.B. — Fiberoptic endoscopy and the barium meal — results and implications.Br. Med. J., 1973,2, 161–165.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cotton P.B., Shorvon P.J. — L’endoscopia e la radiologia nella diagnosi, nel controllo e nella terapia dell’ulcera peptica. In « Diagnosi e terapia dell’ulcera peptica », Gastroenterologia Clinica, II Pensiero Scient. Ed., Roma, 1984, pp. 1-26.

  27. DELMÉE M., DEBONGNIE J.C, WARZÉE P., MAINGUET P. — Une méthode originate de prélèvement bactériologique pour l’étude de «Campylobacter pylori » dans l’ulcère duodénal.Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 1987,11, 550–553.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DESCHAMPS J.P., ALLEMAND H., GAUFFENY B., PERRIGUEY G., LASSÈGUE A., BIRH E., VUITTON D., WEILL F., CARAYON P. — Evaluation diagnostique et économique de l’endoscopie digestive haute en première intention dans l’exploration œso-gastro-duo-dénale: résultats d’une étude prospective, en dehors des hémorragies digestives. A propos de 184 malades.Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 1982,6, 229–234.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. DI MARIO F., VIANELLO F., BATTAGLIA G., LAZZARETTO M.L., LEANDRO G., FARINATI F., DEL FAVERO G., FARINI R., NACCARATO R. — Rischio di recidiva di ulcera duodenale in pazienti con e senza bulboduodenite.Giorn. Ital. End. Dig., 1982,5, 155–156.

    Google Scholar 

  30. DIVE Ch., FIASSE R., STOMA S., BARBIER F., ELEWANT A., COBATER M., LANKENS P., de BAERE H., HOLLER F., HENDRIEKX H., RUTGEERTS P. — Rate of duodenal ulcer healing during treatment with omeprazole. A double-blind comparison of a daily dose of 30 mg versus 60 mg.Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1986 (suppl.118), 175–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dobrilla G., Granata F., Felder M., Piazzi L., Castelli G. — A single nocturnal dose of ranitidine for short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer: interim results of an Italian multicentre study. In « Ranitidine therapeutic advances », Excerpta Medica 1984, pp. 154-168.

  32. DOBRILLA G. — Prevention of ulcer relapse: rationale.Hepato-Gastroenterol., 1988,35, 295–299.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. DOOLEY C.P., LARSON A.W., STACE N.H., RENNER I.G., VALENZUELA J.E., ELIASOPH J., COLLETTI P.M., HALLS J.M., WEINER J.M. — Doublecontrast barium meal and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.Ann. Intern. Med., 1984,101, 538–545.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. FAMILIARI L., FERRAÙ O., PUSTORINO S., LUZZA G., CONSOLO F. — Il dyeing test al bleu di metilene nel controllo endoscopico della patologia ulcerosa duodenale.Giorn. Ital. End., 1980,3, 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  35. FORREST D., MILASZEWSKI K., LOSOWSKY M. — Stigmate of recent haemorrhage in diagnosis and prognosis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Br. Med. J., 1978,1, 1173–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  36. FULLMAN H., VANDEVENTER G., SCHNEIDMAN D., WALSH J., ELASHOFF J., WEINSTEIN W. — « Healed » duodenal ulcers are histologically ill.Gastroenterology, 1985,88, 1390.

    Google Scholar 

  37. GARRIGUES-GIL V., CLAMP S.E., MORGAN A.G., OHMANN C, DE DOMBAL F.T. — Do the stigmata of recent haemorrhage have additional prognostic value in patients with bleeding duodenal ulcer?Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1988,23 (suppl. 144), 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  38. GILINSKY N.H.. — Peptic ulcer disease in the elderly.Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1988,23 (suppl. 146), 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gilmour H.M., Forrest J.A.H., Fettes M., Logan R.F.A., Heading R.C. — The effect of cimetidine on duodenitis. In Wastell C. and Lane P. (Eds.), «Cimetidine. The Westminster Hospital Symposium », Churchill Livingstone, 1978, pp. 141-146.

  40. GJORUP T., AGNER E., BORDING JENSEN L., MORUP JENSEN A., MOLLMANN K.M. — The endoscopic diagnosis of duodenal ulcer disease. A randomized clinical trial of bias and of interobserver variation.Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1986,21, 261–267.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. GRIFFITHS W., NEUMEUR D., WALSH J. — The visible vessel as an indicator of uncontrolled or recurrent gastrointestinal hemorrhage.N. Engl. J. Med., 1979,300, 1411–1413.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. GUGLER R. — Current diagnosis and selection of patients for treatment of peptic ulcer disease.Dig. Dis. Scie, 1985,30 (suppl.), 30S-35S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. GUSTAVSSON S., KELLY K.A., HENCH V.S., MELTON L.J. III. — Giant gastric and duodenal ulcers: a population-based study with a comparison to nongiant ulcers.World J. Surg., 1987,11, 333–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. HALLERBACK B., SOLHAUG J.H., CARLING L., GLISE H., HALLGREN T., KAGEVI I., SVEDBERG L.E., WAHLBY L. — Recurrent ulcer after treatment with cimetidine or sucralfate.Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1987,22, 791–797.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. HUNT P. — The management of bleeding chronic peptic ulcer. A ten year prospective study.Ann. Surg., 1984,199, 44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. HUNT P. — Bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers: selection of patients for surgery.World J. Surg., 1987,11, 289–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. IPPOLITI A.F. — Prognostic factors in ulcer disease: are they real, are they relevant?J. Clin. Gastroenterol., 1985,7, 445–446.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. JOHNSTON B., REED P., ALI M. — Campylobacter-like organisms in duodenal and antral endoscopic biopsies: relationship to inflammation.Gut, 1986,27, 1132–1137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. JONSSON K.A., BODEMAR G., NORRBY K., WALAN A., TYSK C. et al. — Are endoscopic and/or histologic findings in gastroduodenal mucosa a predictor of clinical outcome in peptic ulcer disease?Scand. J. Gastroenterol, 1988,23, 199–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. KANG J.Y., NASIRY R., GUAN R., LABROOY S., LIM K.P., YAP I., PIPER D.W. — Influence of the site of a duodenal ulcer on its mode of presentation.Gastroenterology, 1986,90, 1874–1876.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. KAWAI K., IDA K., MISAKI F., AKASAKA Y., KOHLI Y. — Comparative study for duodenal ulcer by radiology and endoscopy.Endoscopy, 1973,5, 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  52. KLING P.A., EDIN K., DOMELOFF L. — Observer variability in upper gastrointestinal fiber endoscopy.Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1985,20, 462–465.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. KOHLI Y., MISAKI F., KAWAI K. — Endoscopical follow-up observation of duodenal ulcer.Endoscopy, 1972,4, 202–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. LAM S.K., KOO J. — Accurate prediction of duodenal- ulcer healing rate by discriminant analysis.Gastroenterology, 1983,85, 403–412.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. LAMBERT R., MAINGUET P., MOULINIER B. — Endoscopy in the management of duodenal ulcer.Digestion, 1978,18, 110–124.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. LAMBERT R., MOULINIER B. — L’endoscopie de première intention dans l’exploration œso-gastro-duodénale.Nouv. Presse Med., 1979,8, 1309–1310.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. LAMBERT R. — Riposta alla lettera di Bernier-Bitoun.Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 1981,5, 697–698.

    Google Scholar 

  58. LAMOULIATTE H., MEGRAUD F., DE MASCAREL A., ROUX D., QUINTON A. — « Campylobacter pyloridis » and epigastric pain: endoscopic, histological, and bacteriological correlations.Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 1987,11, 212–216.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. LAMY V., FAMEREE D., FAVERLY D., FIEVEZ M., CAPELLI J., MOISSE R. — Comparaison entre cytologic, histologie et bactériologie de prélèvements obtenus en cours d’endoscopie pour recherche du Campylobacter pylori (CP) dans deux situations cliniques: la dyspepsie non ulcéreuse et l’ulcère duodénal résistant.Acta Endoscopica, 1987,17, 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. LANGMAN M.J.S. — Endoscopy in the management of duodenal ulcer.Acta Endoscopica, 1982,12, 187–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. LAUFER I., MULLENS J.E., HAMILTON J. — The diagnostic accuracy of barium studies of the stomach and duodenum — correlation with endoscopy.Radiology, 1975,115, 569–573.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. LAUFER I. — Assessment of the accuracy of double contrast gastroduodenal radiology.Gastroenterology, 1976,71, 874–878.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. LAVELLE M.I., VENABLES C.W., DOUGLAS A.P., THOMPSON M.H., OWEN J.P., HACKING P.M. — A comparative study of double contrast and single contrast barium meals with endoscopic arbitration in the diagnosis of peptic ulcer.Clin. Radiol., 1977,28, 625–627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. MAINGUET P., DUMONT A., HAOT J., FIEVEZ CI. — Etude endoscopique avec coloration vitale des cicatrices d’ulcer duodénal chez les patients symptomatiques.Acta Endoscopica, 1978, VIII, 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. MAINGUET P., DEBONGNIE J.C., FRANK J., MAC-CHI H. — Criteri endoscopica nella diagnosi e nel controllo delle ulcere duodenali.Giorn. Ital. End. Dig., 1983,6, 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

  66. MARCHEGGIANO A., IANNONI C, AGNELLO M., PAOLUZI P., PALLONE F. — Campylobacter-like organisms on the human gastric mucosa. Relation to type and extent of gastritis in different clinical groups.Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 1987,11, 376–381.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. MARKS I.N., GIRDWOOD A.H. — Recurrence of duodenal ulceration in patients on maintenance sucralfate. A 12-month follow-up study.S. Afr. Med. J., 1985,67, 626–628.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. MARTIN T.R., VENNES J.A., SILVIS S.E., ANSEL H.J. — A comparison of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and radiography.J. Clin. Gastroenterol., 1980,2, 21–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. MASSARRAT S., EISENMANN A. — Factors affecting the healing rate of duodenal and pyloric ulcers with lowdose antacid treatment.Gut, 1981,22, 97–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. MASSARRAT S., MULLER H.G., SCHMITZ-MOORMANN P. — Risk factors for healing of duodenal ulcer under antacid treatment: do ulcer patients need individual treatment?Gut, 1988,29, 291–297.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. MATTHEWSON K., PUGH S., NORTHFIELD T.C. — Which peptic ulcer patients bleed?Gut, 1988,29, 70–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. MEIER R.F., SIEBER R., BAUERFEIND P., BLUM A.L. — Ilvalore dell’endoscopica negli studi controllati dei disturbi peptici.Gastroenterologia Clinica, 1986,15, 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  73. MISIEWICZ J. — Future trends in the management of peptic ulcer disease.Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1988,23 (suppl. 146), 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. MORINI S., BASSI O., COLAVOLPE V. — Raffronto endoscopico-radiologico nella diagnosi di ulcera duodenale.Giorn. Ital. End. Dig., 1979,2, 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  75. MOULE E.D., COCHRANE K.M., SOKHI G.S., RUSSELL R.I., BLUMGART L.H. — A comparative study of the diagnostic value of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and radiology.Gut, 1975,16, 411.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. MOULINIER B., BRUHIERE J., GRENIER-BOLEY Ph., LAMBERT R. — Etude endoscopique du bulbe duodénal: correlation radio-endoscopique.Acta End. Radiocinem., 1972,2, 94–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. NAVA G., PIPPA G., BALLANTI R., PAPI C, NAVA G. Jr. — Role of ulcer morphology in evaluating prognosis and therapeutic outcome in duodenal ulcer.Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1979,14 (suppl.), 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  78. PAOLUZI P., PALLONE F., PALAZZESI P., MARCHEGGIANO A., IANNONI C. — Frequency and extent of bulbar duodenitis in duodenal ulcer, endoscopic and histological study.Endoscopy, 1982,14, 193–195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. PAOLUZI P., RICOITA G., RIPOLI F. — Incompletely and completely healed duodenal ulcers outcome in main- tenance treatment: a double blind controlled study.Gut, 1983,24, A469.

    Google Scholar 

  80. PAOLUZI P., PALLONE F., ZACCARDELLI E., RIPOLI F., MARCHEGGIANO A., CARRATÙ R. — Outcome of ulcer-associated duodenitis after short-term medical treatment.Dig. Dis. Scie., 1985,30, 624–629.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. PAPP J.P. — Endoscopic experience in 100 consecutive cases with the Olympus GIF endoscope.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1973,60, 466–472.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. PARIENTE E.A., KERLAU M., LANOE J.L., MORIN T., FARDEAU M., BADER J.P. — Fisbroscopie ou radiographic œso-gastro-duodénale de première intention? Une évaluation pragmatique.Nouv. Presse Med., 1981, 10, 3477–3480.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. PENSTON J.G., WORMSLEY K.G. — Long term treatment of duodenal ulcers.Gastroenterology, 1988,94, A349.

    Google Scholar 

  84. PERMUTT R., CELLO J. — Duodenal ulcer disease in the hospitalized elderly patient.Dig. Dis. Sci., 1982,27, 1–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. PIAI G., SABBATINI F., MINICI M., GRECO L., SOLLANO R., MAZZACCA G. — The influence of severe bulb deformity on duodenal ulcer relapse.Hepatogastroenterol., 1990,37, 131–134.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. PIMPL W., BOECKL O., WACLAWICZEK H.W., HEINERMAN M. — Estimation of the mortality rate of patients with severe gastroduodenal hemorrhage with the aid of a new scoring system.Endoscopy, 1987,19, 101–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. PIPER D.W. — The refractory ulcer.World J. Surg., 1987,11, 268–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. POYNARD T., TOURNADE J., ALBEROLE B., PAPPO M. — Sémiologie de l’ulcère gastro-duodénal prouvé par endoscopie: analyse épidémiologique de 1800 cas.Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 1988,12, 596–603.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. PRICE A., LEVI J. DOLBY J., DUNREOMBE P., CLARK J., STEPHENSON M. — Campylobacter pyloridis in peptic ulcer disease: microbiology, pathology, and scanning electron microscopy.Gut, 1985,26, 1183–1188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. QUATRINI M., BASILISCO G., BIANCHI P.A. — Treatment of « cimetidine-resistant » chronic duodenal ulcers with ranitidine or cimetidine: a randomised multicentre study.Gut, 1984,25, 1113–1117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. REYNOLDS J. — Four independent variables predict duodenal ulcer healing by famotidine in a relatively unselected patient population: a multivariate analysis of a prospective multicenter study.Gastroenterology, 1988,94, A374.

    Google Scholar 

  92. REYNOLDS J. — Famotidine therapy for active duodenal ulcers: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting early healing.Ann. Inter. Med., 1989,111, 7–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. RODRIGUEZ M., MACQUART-MOULIN G., CORNEE J., DURBEC J.P., GREGOIRE A., BERTHEZENE P., GUIOL J., SAHEL J., SARLES H. — Etude de l’efficacite des examens radiologiques et endoscopiques en gastroentérologie en relation avec leur coût.Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 1981,5, 733–741.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. RUSSO A., SANFILIPPO G., GIANNONE G., MORICI E., ASCANIO C. — Lo studio endoscopico del bulbo duodenale: raffronto con l’indagine radiologica.Min. Gastroent., 1975,21, 243–247.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. RUSSO A., SANFILIPPO G., VIRGILIO C, RIZZO L. — Attualità nella diagnostica endoscopica dell’ulcera gastrica e duodenale.Argomenti di Chirurgia, 1983,2, 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  96. RUSSO A., GIANNONE G. — Magnifying endoscopy in the study of normal gastric mucosa and gastritis. A prospective trial.Acta Endoscopica, 1985,15, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  97. RUSSO A., MAGNANO A., VIRGILIO C. — Endoscopie et ulcère duodénal. In « La maladie ulcéreuse », Progrès en hépato-gastroentérologie 5, Ch. Dive Ed., Doin Editeurs, Parigi 1990, p. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  98. RUSSO A., MAGNANO A., VIRGILIO C, PASSANISI G., SANFILIPPO G. — Endoscopia ed ulcera duodenale.Giorn. Ital. End. Dig., 1989,12, 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  99. SCHEURER U., WITZEL L., HALTER F., KELLER H., HUBER R., GALEAZZI R. — Gastric and duodenal ulcer healing under placebo treatment.Gastroenterology, 1977,72, 838–841.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. SCHILLER L.R., FORDTRAN J.S. — Ulcer complications during short-term therapy of duodenal ulcer with active agents and placebo.Gastroenterology, 1986,90, 478–481.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. SILVERSTEIN F. — Endoscopic risk assessment predictors of rebleeding: are they reliable. ASGE Postgraduate Course, New Orleans, May 1988, p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  102. SONNENBERG A., MULLER-LISSNER S.A., VOGEL E., SCHMID P., GONVERS J.J., PETER P., STROHMEYER G., BLUM A.L. — Predictors of duodenal ulcer healing and relapse.Gastroenterology, 1981,81, 1061–1067.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. STOREY D., BOWN S., SWAIN C, SALMON P., KIRKHAM J., NORTHFIELD T. — Endoscopic prediction of recurrent bleeding in peptic ulcer.N. Engl. J. Med., 1981,305, 915–916.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. SWAIN C.P., STOREY D., BOWN S., HEATH J., MILLS T., SALMON P., NORTHFIELD T., KIRKHAM J., O’SULLIVAN J. — Nature of the bleeding vessel in recurrently bleeding gastric ulcers.Gastroenterology, 1986,90, 595–608.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. SWAIN P., KALABAKAS A., GRANDISON A., POLLOCK D. — Size and pathology of vessel and ulcer in patients with fatal bleeding from duodenal ulcer. D.D.W., San Antonio, May 1990, Ab. Book A-464, 1853.

    Google Scholar 

  106. VALLON A., COTTON P., LAURENCE B., ARMENGOL MIRO J., SALORD ORES J. — Randomized trial of endoscopic argon laser photocoagulation in bleeding peptic ulcers.Gut, 1981,22, 228–233.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. WARA P. — Endoscopic prediction of major rebleeding — a prospective study of stigmate of hemorrhage in bleeding ulcer.Gastroenterology, 1985,88, 1209–1214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. WEINSTEIN W. — Duodenitis in duodenal ulcer disease: is the doctor dilemme important to the patient? ASGE Postgraduate Course, New York, May 1985, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universita di Catania, Italy

    A. Russo, A. Magnano, C. Virgilio, G. Passanisi & N. Giannone

Authors
  1. A. Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Magnano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Virgilio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Passanisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N. Giannone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, A., Magnano, A., Virgilio, C. et al. Le rôle de l’endoscopie dans le diagnostic et la surveillance de I’ulcère duodénal. Acta Endosc 20, 495–511 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02966780

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02966780

Mots-clés

Key-words

Palabras clave

Search

Navigation