Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Designing authentic activities in web-based courses

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

INFLUENCED by constructivist educational theory and advances in technology, there is increasing interest in authentic activities as a basis for learning in both face-to-face and Web-based courses. Whereas traditionally, real-world activities have primarily served as vehicles for practice of skills or processes that are taught using traditional instructional methods, a more radical approach is to build a whole course of study around authentic activities and tasks. The authors of this paper argue that the value of authentic activity is not constrained to learning in real-life locations and practice, but that there are critical characteristics of authentic activities that can be incorporated into the design of Web-based courses to enhance learning online. We include a description of the theory, research, and development initiatives that provide the foundations for this approach. Finally, we present guidelines and examples for the design of complex authentic activities for online learning, together with the implications of this approach for teachers, students, and designers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barab, S.A., & Landa, A. (1997). Designing effective interdisciplinary anchors.Educational Leadership, 54, 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S.A., Squire, K.D., & Dueber, W. (2000). A co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity.Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., Harper, B., & Hedberg, J. (2001). Designing real-life cases to support authentic design activities. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, & T. Petrovic (Eds.),Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 73–81). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottge, B. A., & Hasselbring, T.S. (1993). Taking word problems off the page.Educational Leadership, 50(7), 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Solomon, N. (Eds.) (2001).Work-Based Learning: A New Higher Education? Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R.D., Hasselbring, T.S., Kinzer, C.K., & Williams, S.M. (1990a). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.),Cognition, education and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Vye, N., Kinzer, C., & Risko, V. (1990b). Teaching thinking and content knowledge: Toward an integrated approach. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.),Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 381–413). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (1991). Activities as instructional tools: A framework for analysis and evaluation.Educational Researcher, 20(4), 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayden, E., Desforges, C., Mills, C., & Rawson, W. (1994). Authentic activity and learning.British Journal of Educational Studies, 42(2), 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990a). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition.Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990b). Technology and the design of generative learning environments.Educational Technology, 31(5), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. C. (1993). Four misconceptions about authentic learning.Educational Leadership, 50(7), 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchastel, P. C. (1997). A Web-based model for university instruction.Journal of educational technology systems, 25(3), 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, T. M., Lowyck, J., & Jonassen, D. H. (Eds.). (1993).Designing environments for constructive learning. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyler, J., & D. E. Giles, J. (1999).Where’s the Learning in Service-Learning? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons, J. (2001).Designing an effective online unit: Theory and practice. Paper presented at the Teaching Online in Higher Education Online Conference, Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, Indiana. [Online]. Available: http:/ /www.ipfw.edu/as/tohe/2001/abstracts/fitzsimmons.htm.

  • Gordon, R. (1998). Balancing real-world problems with real-world results.Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 390–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic assessment and multimedia: How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment.Higher Education Research and Development, 17(3), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T.C. (2002, December).The suspension of disbelief in authentic online learning environments, Paper presented at the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.

  • Honebein, P. C., Duffy, T. M., & Fishman, B. J. (1993). Constructivism and the design of learning environments: Context and authentic activities for learning. In T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.),Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 87–108). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998).Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (1991). Evaluating constructivistic learning.Educational Technology, 31(9), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, R.J., Waddington, T., & Osgood, R.E. (2000). Fostering the suspension of disbelief: The role of authenticity in goal-based scenarios.Interactive Learning Environments, 8(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenders, A. (2002). Creating opportunities from challenges in on-line introductory biology. In A. Goody, J. Herrington, & M. Northcote (Eds.),Quality conversations: Research and Development in Higher Education, Volume 25 (pp. 393–400). Jamison, ACT: HERDSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, D., & Wager, W. W. (1994). Authentic activity as a model for appropriate learning activity: Implications for emerging instructional technologies.Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 25(3), 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luca, J., & Oliver, R. (2001). Developing generic skills through on-line courses. In C. Montgomerie & J. Viteli (Eds.),Proceedings of Ed-Media 2001 (Vol. 2, pp. 1163–1164). Tampere, Finland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, H. (1997). Creating virtual communities via the web. In B. H. Khan (Ed.),Web-based instruction (pp. 185–190). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, H. (Ed.). (1996).Situated learning perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. (1993). A trial for Dmitri Karamazov.Educational Leadership, 50(7).

  • Oliver, R., & Omari, A. (1999). Using online technologies to support problem based learning: Learners responses and perceptions.Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(158–79).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennell, R., Durham, M., Ozog, M., & Spark, A. (1997). Writing in context: Situated learning on the web. In R. Kevill, R. Oliver, & R. Phillips (Eds.),What works and why: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 463–469). Perth, WA: Curtin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, H.R. (1999). Authentic activities for business education.Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 41(1), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petraglia, J. (1998). The real world on a short leash: The (mis)application of constructivism to the design of educational technology.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T.C. (2002). Distance education and the professorate: The issue of productivity. In C. Vrasidas & G. V. Glass (Eds.),Distance education and distributed learning (135–156). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2002). Authentic activities and online learning. In A. Goody, J. Herrington, & M. Northcote (Eds.),Quality conversations: Research and Development in Higher Education, Volume 25 (pp. 562–567). Jamison, ACT: HERDSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T.C., & Laffey, J.M. (1999). Design, assessment, and evaluation of a problem-based learning environment in undergraduate engineering.Higher Education Research and Development Journal, 18(2), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T.C., & Okey, J.R. (1996). Alternative assessment for constructivist learning environments. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.),Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 191–202). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. (1987). Learning in school and out.Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D.A. (1987).Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (2000). Inventing the future. In P. Hutchings (Ed).Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Publications. [Online]. Available: http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/elibrary/docs/ inventing.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, T.K., Giles, Jr., D.E., & Cruz, N.I. (1999).Service-learning: A movement’s pioneers reflection on its origins, practice, and future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J., Wagner, R.K., & Okagaki, L. (1993). Practical intelligence: The nature and role of tacit knowledge in work and at school. In J. M. Puckett & H. W. Reese (Eds.),Mechanisms of everyday cognition (pp. 205–227). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. G. (Ed.). (1996).Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S.S. (1989). Remembrance of theories past.Educational Researcher, 18(5), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W. (1993). Instructional design and situated learning: Paradox or partnership.Educational Technology, 33(3), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M.F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M.F. (1995). Assessment of situated learning using computer environments.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(1), 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M.F., & McNeese, M. (1993). A situated cognition approach to problem solving with implications for computer-based learning and assessment. In G. Salvendy & M. J. Smith (Eds.),Human-computer interaction: Software and hardware interfaces, (Vol. II, pp. 825–830). New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Communications and Multimedia, Edith Cowan University, Australia

    Jan Herrington & Ron Oliver

  2. College of Education, The University of Georgia, USA

    Thomas C. Reeves & Younghee Woo

Authors
  1. Jan Herrington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas C. Reeves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ron Oliver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Younghee Woo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., Oliver, R. et al. Designing authentic activities in web-based courses. J. Comput. High. Educ. 16, 3–29 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960280

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960280

Keywords

Search

Navigation