Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of situated learning using computer environments

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a theory of situated learning, assessment must emphasize process as much as product. Assessment must move away from a linear additive model, accepting at the outset the complex, nonlinear, and possibly chaotic nature of real learning. Assessment must adapt to and take advantage of students working with technologies that extend their perceptual and problem-solving capacities beyond what they could do alone. To illustrate these points, several assessment examples are given, including a computer-based planning assistant for a videodisc mathematics and science video, suggestions for computer-based portfolio assessment, and speculations about embedded assessment of virtual situations. In all cases, the theory of situated learning emphasized perception over memory and the codetermined nature of learning and thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Case, R. (1985).Intellectual Development: Birth to Adulthood, Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • CTGV (Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt). (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition.Educational Research 19(6): 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • CTGV (Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt). (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design.Education Technology, Research and Development 40(1): 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • CTGV (Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt). (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited.Educational Technology March: 52–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • CTGV (Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt) (1994). MOST Environments for excellerating literacy development, prepared for NATO Advanced Studies Institute on the Psychological and Educational. Foundations of Technology-based Learning Environments, July 26–August 2.

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., and Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Resnick, L. B. (Ed.),Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A. (1988). What will it mean to be “educated” in 2020? In Nickerson, R. S., and Zodhiates, P. P. (Eds.),Technology in Education: Looking toward 2020, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1986).The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D. (1987).Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E. R. (1991). Realism in research.Educational Researcher 20(6): 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. J. (1977). Remember that old theory of memory? Well forget it! In Shaw, R. E., and Bransford, J. D. (Eds.),Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 413–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugler, P. N., Shaw, R. E., Vincente, K. J., and Kinsella-Shaw, J. (1991). The role of attractors in the self-organization of intentional systems. In Hoffman, R. R., and Palermo, D. S. (Eds.),Cognition and the Symbolic Processes, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulikowich, J. M., and Young, M. F. (1991). Complementing verbal report data, paper presented to the annual meeting of the Northeast Educational Research Association, Ellenville, New York.

  • Kumar, D. D. (1993). Toward a technology for assessment: Can cognitive psychology shape computer technology for performance assessment?Cgnosos 2(2): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nastasi, B., Braunhardt, L., Young, M., and Margiano, S. (1993). Cooperative and mathematical problem-solving in the Jasper context, presentation to NERA, New York.

  • Saloman, G., Perkins, D. N., and Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies.Educational Researcher 20(3): 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E., and Mandinach, E. B. (1991). Integrating assessment and instruction: A research and development agenda, Research Report RR-91-8, ETS, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning.Educational Technology Research and Development 41(1): 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. F., and McNeese, M. (1993). A situated cognition approach to problem solving with implications for computerbased learning and assessment. In Salvendy, G., and Smith, M. J. (Eds.), Advances in Human Factors/Ergonomics, 19B.Human-Computer Interaction: Software and Hardware Interfaces, Elsevier Science Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, M. Assessment of situated learning using computer environments. J Sci Educ Technol 4, 89–96 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211586

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211586

Key words

Navigation