Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trends and current issues in adult fecal incontinence (FI): Towards enhancing the quality of life for FI patients

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Our goals are to review the literature on the definition and epidemiology of fecal incontinence (FI), the risk factors involved, available treatment options, and measurement of the quality of life (QOL) of patients with this condition. Articles included for review were searched following the guidelines set by Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook. FI was defined variously depending upon the duration, type, and amount of leakage. About 17 published papers were reviewed on the prevalence of FI that ranged from 1.4% to 50%. Potential risk factors included perianal injury/surgery, and fair/poor general health. QOL assessment using various grading scales provided an objective method of evaluating patients before and after treatment. Management included medical, physiotherapy, and surgical options. Through the range of various references, a clear definition of FI should be specified, which reflects its epidemiology in the various studies. These differences in definition would significantly affect its prevalence. Many risk factors have been sited but further epidemiological studies are necessary to elucidate FI. Understanding the etiology of the disease is an important initial step to provide adequate treatment of FI. QOL assessment provides objective and subjective method in the analysis of effectiveness of therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 1995; 274(7): 559–561.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis. Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Madoff RD, Williams JG, Caushaj PF. Fecal incontinence. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992; 326: 1002–1007.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nivatongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy. An experience with 1555 polypectomies. Dis. Colon rectum 1986; 29: 825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giamundo P, Welber A, Weiss E, Vernava III A, Nogueras J, Wexner S. The Procon incontinence device: a new nonsurgical approach to preventing episodes of fecal incontinence. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002; 97(9): 2328–2332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lahr C. Evaluation and treatment of incontinence. Practical Gastroenterol. 1988; 12: 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anon. Profile of Wisconsin Nursing Home Residents 1992. Maddison, WI, USA: Center for Health Statistics, Division of Health, Department of Health and Social Services 1994.

  8. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Anorectal manometry: techniques and clinical applications. South Med. J. 1993; 86: 924–931.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wexner SD, Jorge JM. Colorectal physiological tests: use or abuse of technology? Eur. J. Surg. 1994; 160: 167–174.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. A practical guide to basic anorectal physiology investigations. Contemp. Surg. 1993; 43: 214–224.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clarke M, Oxman AD, editors. Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook 4.1.6 [updated January 2003]. http://www.cochrane.dk/cochrane/handbook/handbook.htm (Accessed 17 February 2003).

  12. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. Relationship of symptoms in faecal incontinence to sphincter abnormalities. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 1995; 10: 152–155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Giebel GD, Lefering R, Troidl H, Blochl H. Prevalence of fecal incontinence: what can be expected? Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 1998; 13: 73–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lucia Oliveira. Current Trends in the Non-Surgical Treatment of Anal Incontinence 2002. http://www.proctosite.com/procto2001/news/trends/ current_trends_lucia_fecal_incontinence.htm (Accessed 28 Oct 2002)

  15. Lam L, Kennedy M, Chen F, et al. Prevalence of faecal incontinence: obstetric and constipation risk factors: a population based study. Colorectal Dis. 1999; 1: 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas TM, Egan M, WalgroveA, Meade TW. The prevalence of faecal and double incontinence. Community Med. 1984; 6: 216–220.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Drossman DA, Li Z, Andruzzi E, et al. US householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1993; 38: 1569–1580.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Campbell AJ, Reinken J, McCosh L. Incontinence in the elderly: prevalence and prognosis. Age Ageing 1985; 14(2): 65–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kok AL, Voorhorst FJ, Burger CW, van Houten P, Kenemans P, Janssens J. Urinary and faecal incontinence in community-residing elderly women. Age Ageing 1992; 21(3): 211–215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bock JU, Jongen J. Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in fecal incontinence in general practice of the surgically educated proctologist. Praxis fur Enddarmkrankheiten Kiel. Zentralbl Chir. 1996; 121(8): 659–664.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Enck P, Bielefeldt K, Rathmann W, et al. Epidemiology of faecal incontinence in selected patient groups. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 1991; 6: 143–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas TM, Egan M, Meade TW. The prevalence and implications of faecal (and double) incontinence. Br. J. Surg. 1985; 72 (suppl): S141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1996; 91: 33–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Walter S, Hallbook R, Gotthard M, Bergmark M, Sjodahl R. A population-based study on bowel habits in a Swedish community: Prevalence of faecal incontinence and constipation. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2002; (8): 911–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chan LW, Pang MW, Leung HY, Yip S. Faecal incontinence in women attending urogynaecology clinic-prevalence and characteristics. Poster Presentation: 32nd Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society; 2002 Aug; Heidelberg, Germany.

  26. Nakanishi N, Tatara K, Shinsho F, Murakami S, Takatorige T, Fukuda H, Nakajima K, Naramura H. Mortality in relation to urinary and faecal incontinence in elderly people living at home. Age and Ageing 1999; 28(3).

  27. American Academy of Family Physicians. 1999. http://familydoctor.org/handouts/067.html (Accessed 28 Oct 2002).

  28. Whitehead WE, Wald A, Norton NJ. Treatment options for fecal incontinence. Dis. Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 131–144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kalantar JS, Howell S, Talley NJ. Prevalence of faecal incontinence and associated risk factors: An underdiagnosed problem in the Australian community? Med. J. Aus. 2002; 1762: 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  30. MacArthur C, Bick DE, Keighley MRB. Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1997; 104: 46–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Swash M. Faecal incontinence: childbirth is responsible for most cases. BMJ 1993; 307: 636–637.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Setchell M, Henry MM. Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet 1984; ii: 546–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartam CI. Anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993; 329: 1905–1911.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Donnelly VS, Fynes M, Campbell D, Johnson H, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998; 92: 955–961.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith ARB, Warrell DW. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neuropsychological study. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1990; 97: 770–779.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bek M, Laurberg S. Risk of anal incontinence from subsequent vaginal delivery after a complete anal sphincter tear. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1992; 99: 724–726.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Matthews SE, Henry MM. Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5 year follow up. Br. J. Surg. 1990; 77: 1358–1360.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME, Stuijk PC, Hop WC, Wallenburg HCS. Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: Functional outcome and risk factors for fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2001; 80: 830–834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Donaldson LJ, Jagger C. Survival and functional capacity: three year follow up of an elderly population in hospitals and homes. J Epidemiol. Community Health 1983; 37: 176–179.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ekelund P, Rundgren A. Urinary incontinence in the elderly with implications for hospital care consumption and social disability. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 1987; 6: 11–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Berrios GE. Urinary incontinence and the psychology of the elderly with cognitive failure. Gerontology 1986; 32: 119–124.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Goldfarb AI. Predicting mortality in the institutionalized aged: a seven-year follow-up. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1969; 21: 172–176.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Koyano W, Shibata H, Suyama Y. Incontinence and its outcome in the elderly living at home: five-year follow-up (In Japanese). Jpn. J. Public Health 1985; 33: 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care. I. Applications and issues in assessment. Br. Med. J. 1992; 305: 1074–1077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Deyo RA. The quality of life, research, and care. Ann. Intern. Med. 1991; 15: 695–697.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J. Chronic Dis. 1985; 38: 27–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bernkelev T, Moum B, Moum T, & the Inflammatory Bowel South-Eastern Norway (IBSEN) Group of Gastroenterologists. Quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Translation, data quality, scaling assumptions, validity, reliability and sensitivity to change of the Norwegian version of IBDQ. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2002; 10: 1164–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 1999; 44: 77–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Malouf AJ, Chambers MG, Kamm MA. Clinical and economic evaluation of surgical treatments for faecal incontinence. Br. J. Surg. 2001; 88: 1029–1036.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 2000; 355: 260–265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rockwod TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, et al. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis. Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lehur PA, Zerbib F, Neunlist M, Glemain P, Bruley des Varannes S. Comparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation. Dis. Colon Rectum 2002; 45(4): 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ho Y-H, Chiang J-M, Tan M, Low JY. Biofeedback therapy for excessive stool frequency and incontinence following anterior resection or total colectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 1289–1292.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Takahashi T, Garcia-Osogobio S, Valdovinos M, Mass W, Jimenez P, Jauregui J, Bobadilla J, Belmonte C, Edelstein P, Utley D. Radiofrequency energy delivery for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis. Colon Rectum 2001; 44(4): A37.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Corman ML. Anal Incontinence. In: Corman ML, ed. Colon & Rectal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1989; 171–207.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Browning GG, Parks AG. Postanal repair for neuropathic faecal incontinence: correlation of clinical result and anal canal pressures. Br. J. Surg. 1983; 70: 101–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Browning GG, Motson RW. Anal sphincter injury: management and results of Parks sphincter repair. Ann. Surg. 1984; 199: 351–357.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Blaisdell PC. Repair of the incontinent sphincter ani. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1940; 70: 692–697.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Schoetz DJ Jr. Operative therapies for anal incontinence. Surg. Clin. North Am. 1985; 65: 35–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Parks AG. Anorectal incontinence. J. R. Soc. Med. 1975; 68: 681–690.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Scheuer M, Kuijpers HC, Jacobs PP. Postanal repair restores anatomy rather than function. Dis. Colon Rectum 1989; 32: 960–963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Womack NR, Morrison JF, Williams NS. Prospective study of the effects of postanal repair in neurogenic faecal incontinence. Br. J. Surg. 1988; 75: 48–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Orrom WJ, Miller R, Cornes H, Duthie G, Mortensen NJ, Bartolo DC. Comparison of anterior sphicteroplasty and postanal repair in the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis. Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 305–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Laurberg S, Swash M, Henry MM. Effect of post anal repair on progress of neurogenic damage to the pelvic floor. Br. J. Surg. 1990; 77: 519–522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Keighley MR, Oya M, Ortiz J, Pinho M, Asperer J, Chattaphaday G. What is the optimum pelvic floor repair for neuropathic fecal incontinence? (Meeting abstr.) Dis. Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Jagelman DG. The role of sphincteroplasty for faecal incontinence reevaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review. Dis. Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 22–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Fleshman JW, Dreznick Z, Fry RD, Kodner IJ. Anal sphincter repair for obstetric injury: manometric evaluation of functional resutls. Dis. Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 1061–1067.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Laurberg S, Swash M, Henry MM. Delayed external sphincter repair for obstetric tea. Br. J. Surg. 1988; 75: 786–788.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Ctercteko GC, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL, Melia M. Anal sphincter repair: a report of 60 cases and a review of the literature. Aust. N. Z. J. Surg. 1988; 58: 703–710.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Pickrell KL, Broadbent IR, Masters FW, Metzger JT. Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle. A report of four cases in children. Ann. Surg. 1952; 135: 853–862.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Simonsen OS, Stolf NA, Aun F, Raia A, Habr-Gama A. Rectal sphincter reconstruction in perineal colostomies after abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Br. J. Surg. 1976; 63: 389–391.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Corman ML. Follow-up evaluation of gracilis muscle transposition for fecal incontinence. Dis. Colon Rectum 1980; 23: 552–555.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Corman ML. Gracilis muscle transposition for anal incontinence: late results. Br. J. Surg. 1985; 72: 521–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Leguit P Jr, van Baal JG, Brummelkamp WH. Gracilis muscle transposition in the treatment of faecal incontinence: long term follow-up and evaluation of anal pressure recordings. Dis. Colon Rectum 1985; 28: 1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Caldwell KP. The electrical control of sphincter incompetence. Lancet 1963; 2: 174–175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. William NS, Hallan RI, Koeze TH, Watkins ES. Restoration of gastrointestinal continuity and continence after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum using an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33: 561–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Hallan RI, Williams NS, Hutton MR, et al. Electrically stimulated sartorius neosphincter: canine model of activation and skeletal muscle transformation. Br. J. Surg. 1990; 77: 208–213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Salmons S, Henriksson J. The adoptive response of skeletal muscle to increased use. Muscle Nerve 1981; 4: 94–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Matzel KE, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA. Neuroanatomy of the striated muscular anal continence mechanism: implications for the use of neurostimulation. Dis. Colon Rectum 1990; 33: 666–673.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Baeten CGMI, Konsten J, Heineman E, Soeters PB. Dynamic graciloplasty for anal atresia. J. Pediatr. Surg 1994; 29: 922–925.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Geerdes BP, Heinemann E, Konsten J, Soeters PB, Baeten CG. Dynamic graciloplasty. Complications and management. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 912–917.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Wexner SD, Gonzalez-Padron A, Rius J, Teoh T-A, Cheong DM, Nogueras JJ, et al. Stimulated gracilis neosphincter operation. Initial experience, pitfalls, and complications. Dis. Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 957–964.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Mander BJ, Wexner SD, Williams NS, Bartolo DC, Lubowski DZ, Oresland T, Romano G, Keighley MRB. Preliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter. British Journal of Surgery 1999; 1543–1548.

  84. Adang EMM, Engel GL, Rutten FFH, Geerdes BP, Baeten CGMI. Cost-effectiveness of dynamic graciloplasty in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis. Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 725–733.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Madoff R. Cost-effectiveness of dynamic graciloplasty in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis. Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 725–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Borrie MJ, Davidson HA. Incontinence in institutions: costs and contributing factors. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1992; 147: 322–328.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Sangwan YP, Coler JA. Fecal incontinence. Surg. Clin. North Am. 1994; 74: 1377–1398.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Cheskin L, Schuster M. Fecal incontinence. In: Hazzard W, Andres R, Biernan E, Blass J, editors. Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology 1990; 1143–1145.

  89. Leigh R, Turnberg L. Faecal incontinence: the unvoiced symptom. Lancet 1984; 12: 1349–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Cerulli MA, Nikoomanesh P, Schuster MM. Progress in biofeedback conditioning for rectal incontinence. Gastroenterology 1979; 76: 742–746.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Wald A. Biofeedback for neurogenic fecal incontinence: rectal sensation is a determinant of outcome. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 1983; 2: 302–306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. MacLeod JH. Management of anal incontinence by biofeedback. Gastroenterology 1987; 93: 291–294.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Ruiboli EB, Francio M, Pitto G, Reboa G, Zanolla R. Biofeedback conditioning for fecal incontinence. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1988; 69: 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Jensen LL, Lowry AC. Biofeedback: a viable treatment option for anal incontinence. (Meeting abstr). Dis. Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 6.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Edwards NI, Jones D. The prevalence of faecal incontinence in older people living at home. Age and Ageing 2001; 30: 503–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. College Library: Evidence-based medical information. Grades of recommendations & published evidence-Canadian task force on preventive health care. http://www.ctfphc.org/ctfphc&methods.htm#Table_2 (Accessed 17 Feb 2003).

  97. Talley NJ, O’Keefe EA, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: a population-based study. Gastroenterol 1992; 102: 895–910.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Roberts RO, Jacobsen SJ, Reilly WT, et al. Prevalence of combined fecal and urinary incontinence: a community-based study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1999; 837–841.

  99. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C, Matthews RJ, Assassa RP, Dallosso H, Williams K, Brittain KR, Azam U, Clarke M, Jagger C, Mayne C, Castleden CM, and the Leicestershire MRC Incontinence Study Team. Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 2002; 50: 480–484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Tetzschner T, Sorensen M, Lose G, Christiansen J. Anal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1996; 103(10): 1034–1040.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Kerrigan SJ, Hull TL, Managing fecal incontinence in women: Identification of the “silent” affected is crucial. Women’s Health in Primary Care 2001; 4(11): 725–732.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Pescatori M, Anastacio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A. New grading and scoring for anal incontinence: evaluation of 335 patients. Dis. Colon Rectum 1992 35: 482–487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Schmitt S, Wexner S. Anterior and posterior repair. Sem. Col. & Rec. Surg. 1992; 3: 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health for Senior Citizens, Division of Preventive Medicine, Social Medicine Cluster, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita 15 Jo Nishi 7 Chome, Kita-ku, 060-8638, Sapporo, Japan

    Gino C. Matibag, Hiroshi Nakazawa & Hiko Tamashiro

  2. Department of Surgery, Hospital S. Spirito, Via Vittorio Emanuele 2, Bra (CN), Italy

    Paolo Giamundo

Authors
  1. Gino C. Matibag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroshi Nakazawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paolo Giamundo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hiko Tamashiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiko Tamashiro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matibag, G.C., Nakazawa, H., Giamundo, P. et al. Trends and current issues in adult fecal incontinence (FI): Towards enhancing the quality of life for FI patients. Environ Health Prev Med 8, 107–117 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02897914

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02897914

Key words

Search

Navigation