Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of anterior sphincteroplasty and postanal repair in the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Both postanal repair and anterior sphincteroplasty with levatorplasty have been advocated in the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence. To assess the functional results of these procedures, physiologic and radiologic measurements were carried out prospectively in 33 patients with idiopathic incontinence undergoing operative treatment, and 12 age- and sex-matched controls. Sixteen patients had anterior sphincteroplasty and levatorplasty and 17 had postanal repair. A satisfactory postoperative outcome was defined as perfect continence or incontinence of flatus only. Ten patients in the anterior sphincteroplasty group had satisfactory results (64 percent) and 10 in the postanal repair group (59 percent). Preoperatively, both groups had decreased resting and squeeze pressures, impaired anal mucosal electrosensitivity, and marked pelvic descent vs. controls. Postoperatively, significant improvement in sphincter pressures and mucosal electrosensitivity was seen in both groups. No significant change in anorectal angle was demonstrated in the postanal repair group, whereas it was made significantly more obtuse in the anterior sphincteroplasty group. It is likely that the improved continence resulting from either of these two procedures is secondary to better anal sphincter muscle function and improved anal sensation. It would appear that the anorectal angle is not crucial in maintaining continence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle J. The syndrome of the descending perineum. Proc R Soc Med 1966;59:477–82.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parks AG. Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 1975;68:681–90.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kerremans R. Morphological and physiological aspects of anal continence and defecation. Brussels: Editions Arscia, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hardcastle JD, Parks AG. A study of anal incontinence and some principles of surgical treatment. Proc R Soc Med 1970;63(suppl):116–18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Womack NR, Morrison JF, Williams NS. Prospective study of the effects of postanal repair in neurogenic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1988;75:48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller R, Bartolo DC, Locke-Edmunds JC, Mortensen NJ. A prospective study of conservative and operative treatment for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1988;75:101–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bannister JJ, Gibbons C, Read NW. Preservation of fecal continence during rises in intra-abdominal pressure: is there a role for the flap valve? Gut 1987;28:1242–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bartolo DC, Roe AM, Locke-Edmunds JC, Virjee J, Mortensen NJ. Flap-valve theory of anorectal incontinence. Br J Surg 1986;73:1012–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller R, Orrom WJ, Cornes H, Duthie G, Bartolo C. Anterior sphincter plication and levatorplasty in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1989;76:1058–60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Browning GG, Parks AG. Postanal repair for neurogenic faecal incontinence: correlation of clinical result and canal pressures. Br J Surg 1983;70:101–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parks AG, McPartlin JF. Surgical repair of the anal sphincters following injury. In: Rob C, Smith R, eds. Operative surgery. Seven Oaks: Butterworth, 1980;249:54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roe AM, Bartolo DC, Mortensen NJ. New method for assessment of anal sensation in various anorectal disorders. Br J Surg 1986;73:310–2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keighley MR, Fielding JW. Management of faecal incontinence and results of surgical treatment. Br J Surg 1983;70:463–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scheuer M, Kuijpers HC, Jacobs PP. Postanal repair restores anatomy rather than function. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:960–3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duthie HL, Gairns FW. Sensory nerves and sensation in the anal region in man. Br J Surg 1960;47:585–95.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duthie HL, Bennett RC. The relation of sensation in the anal canal to the functional anal sphincter: a possible factor in anal continence. Gut 1963;4:179–82.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller R, Bartolo DC, Cervero F, Mortensen NJ. Differences in anal sensation in continent and incontinent patients with perineal descent. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:45–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller R, Bartolo DC, Cervero F, Mortensen NJ. Anorectal sampling: a comparison of normal and incontinent patients. Br J Surg 1988;75:44–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Henry MM, Simpson JN. Results of postanal repair: a retrospective study. Br J Surg 1985;72(Suppl):S17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yoshioka K, Hyland G, Keighley MR. Physiological changes after postanal repair and parameters predicting outcome. Br J Surg 1988;75:1220–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, April 29 to May 4, 1990.

About this article

Cite this article

Orrom, W.J., Miller, R., Cornes, H. et al. Comparison of anterior sphincteroplasty and postanal repair in the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 34, 305–310 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050589

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050589

Key words

Navigation