Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The inferior ovary

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abbe, E. C. 1938. Studies in the phytogeny of the Betulaceae. II. Extremes in the range of variation of floral and inflorescence morphology. Bot. Gaz.99: 431–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arber, Agnes. 1937. The interpretation of the flower: a study of some aspects of morphological thought. Biol. Rev.12: 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson, G. F. 1905. A college text-book of botany.

  4. Bailey, L. H. 1910. Lessons with plants.

  5. Baillon, H. 1882. Anatomie et physiologie végétales.

  6. -. 1888. The natural history of plants. Vol. 8 [Eng. trans. by Hartog.]

  7. Bancroft, Helen. 1935. A review of researches concerning floral anatomy. Bot. Rev.1: 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barcianu, D. P. 1874. Untersuchungen ueber die Bluethenentwicklung der Onagraceen. Diss., Leipzig.

  9. Barnéould, F. M. 1848. Anatomie et organographie duTrapa natans (Linn.). Ann. Sci. Nat. III. Bot.9: 222–244.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barton-Wright, E. C. 1932. Recent advances in botany.

  11. Bartsch, E. 1882. Beiträge zur Anatomie und Entwicklung der Umbelliferenfrüchte. Diss., Breslau.

  12. Bechtel, A. R. 1921. The floral anatomy of the Urticales. Am. Jour. Bot.8: 386–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Belzung, E. 1900. Anatomie et physiologie végétales.

  14. Benson, M. S. andE. J. Welsford. 1909. The morphology of the ovule and female flower ofJuglans regia and of a few allied genera. Ann. Bot.23: 623–633.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bergman, H. F. 1920. Internal stomata in ericaceous and other unrelated fruits. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club47: 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berridge, E. M. 1914. The structure of the flower of the Fagaceae and its bearing on the affinities of the group. Ann. Bot.28: 509–526.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bertrand, C.-Eg. 1891. Des charactères que l’anatomie peut fournir à la classification des végétaux. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Autun4: 37.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bessey, C. E. 1880. Botany for high schools and colleges.

  19. —. 1897. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the angiosperms. Bot. Gaz.24: 145–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. -. 1899. The essentials of botany.

  21. —. 1915. The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.2: 109–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. -and E. A. Bessey. 1914. Essentials of college botany.

  23. Bischoff, G. W. 1834. Lehrbuch der Botanik.

  24. Black, Caroline E. 1916. The nature of the inflorescence and fruit ofPyrus Malus. N. Y. Bot. Gard. Mem.6: 519–547.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bonne, Gabrielle. 1928. Recherches sur le pédicelle et la fleur des Rosacées.

  26. Bonnier, G. 1881. Anatomie de la rose à prolifération centrale. Bull. Soc. Bot. France28: 328–330.

    Google Scholar 

  27. -et L. du Sablon. 1905. Cours de botanique. I. Phanerogames.

  28. Borthwick, H. A., Mabel Phillips andW. W. Robbins. 1931. Floral development inDaucus Carota. Am. Jour. Bot.18: 784–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boutineau, Em. 1883. De la fleur des Rosacées. Contribution à l’étude des ovaires infères. Thèse de l’École de Pharmacie de Paris.

  30. Bower, F. O. 1923. Botany of the living plant.

  31. Bower, F. O. and S. H. Vines. 1885. A course of practical instruction in botany.

  32. Braun, Al. 1839. Sur l’importance d’un examen plus exact de la position des feuilles carpillaires. Ann. Sci. Nat. II. Bot.12: 377–379.

    Google Scholar 

  33. —. 1874. Ueber die Entwickelung der Placenten. Sitzugsber Bot. Ver. Proc. Brandenburg16: 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Brongniart, Ad. 1844. Examen de quelques cas de monstruosités végétales, propres à éclairer la structure du pistil et l’origine des ovules. Ann. Sci. Nat. III. Bot.2: 20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Brooks, R. M. 1940. Comparative histogenesis of vegetative and floral apices inAmygdalus communis, with special reference to the carpel. Hilgardia13: 249–299.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Brown, Robert. 1818. Some observations on the natural families of plants called Compositae. Trans. Linn. Soc. London12: 76–142.

    Google Scholar 

  37. -. 1874. A manual of botany, anatomical and physiological.

  38. Brown, W. H. 1938. The bearing of nectaries on the phylogeny of the flowering plant. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc.79: 549–594.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Buchenau, Franz. 1852. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschte des Pistils. Linnaea25: 622–649.

    Google Scholar 

  40. —. 1872. Ueber Blüthenentwicklung bei den Compositen. Bot. Zeit.30: 305–319; 329–332; 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bugnon, P. 1926. Remarques sur la fleur desEschscholtzia. Bull. Soc. Bot. France72: 970–974.

    Google Scholar 

  42. —. 1926. Valeur morphologique de l’ovaire infère chez lesBegonia. Bull. Soc. Linn. Normandie VII.9: 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  43. —. 1928. Les bases anatomiques de la théorie de la concrescence congénitale. Bull. Soc. Bot. France V.75: 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Campbell, D. H. 1897. A morphological study ofNajas andZannichellia. Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci. III. Bot.1: 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  45. -. 1910. A university text-book of botany.

  46. Candolle, Alphonse de. 1853. Introduction à l’étude de la botanique.

  47. Candolle, A. P. de. 1813. Théorie élémentaire de la botanique.

  48. -. 1819. Théorie élémentaire de la botanique. Éd. 2.

  49. -. 1827. Organographie végétale. Vol. 1.

  50. -. 1829. Mémoire sur la famille Onagraires.

  51. -. 1829. Mémoire sur la famille des Ombellifères.

  52. -et Alphonse de Candolle. 1824–1873. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis.

  53. -. 1844. Théorie éléméntaire de la botanique.

  54. Candolle, Casimir de. 1862. Mémoire sur la famille des Juglandées. Ann. Sci. Nat. IV. Bot.18: 5–48.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Carpenter, W. B. 1875. Vegetable physiology.

  56. Cave, Ch. 1869. Structure et développement du fruit. Ann. Sci. Nat. V. Bot.10: 123–190.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Cělakovský, L. 1874. Über die Cupula und den Cupularfruchtknoten. Oesterr. Bot. Zeits.24: 358–370.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Chatin, Ad. 1855. Sur leVallisneria spiralis L. Compt. Rendu. Acad. Sci. Paris41: 473–475.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chodat, R. 1915. À propos des ovaires infères. Bull. Soc. Bot. Genève II.7: 226–229.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Chute, H. M. 1930. The morphology and anatomy of the achene. Am. Jour. Bot.17: 703–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Clapham, A. R. 1934. Advancing sterility in plants. Nature133: 704–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Clos, D. 1854. De la nécessité de faire disparâitre de la nomenclature botanique les motstorus etnectaire. Ann. Sci. Nat. IV. Bot.2: 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Coulter, J. M. 1883. Development of a dandelion flower. Am. Nat.17: 1211–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. —. 1885. On the appearance of the relation of ovary and perianth in the development of dicotyledons. Bot. Gaz.10: 360–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. -. 1913. Elementary studies in botany.

  66. -,C. R. Barnes and H. C. Cowles. 1910. A textbook of botany. I. Morphology.

  67. Coulter, J. M., and C. J. Chamberlain. 1903. Morphology of angiosperms.

  68. Cox, E. M. 1863. Goethe’s essay on the metamorphosis of plants. [Eng. trans.] Jour. Bot.1: 327–345, 360–374.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Cramer, K. 1864. Bildungsabweichungen bei einigen wichtigeren Pflanzenfamilien und die morphologische Bedeutung des Pflanzeis.

  70. Curtis, Carlton C. 1925. Nature and development of plants.

  71. Decaisne, J. 1857. Note sur l’organogénie floral du poirier. Bull. Soc. Bot. France4: 338–342.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Darrah, W. C. 1942. The biology of flowering plants.

  73. Darwin, Francis. 1896. The elements of botany.

  74. Dickson, Jean. 1936. Studies in floral anatomy. III. An interpretation of the gynoecium in the Primulaceae. Am. Jour. Bot.23: 385–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Douglas, Gertrude E. 1936. Studies in the vascular anatomy of the Primulaceae. Am. Jour. Bot.23: 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Dowding, E. S. 1931. Floral morphology ofArcenthobium amencanum. Bot. Gaz.91: 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Drude, Oscar. 1879. Die Morphologie der Phanerogamen.In Schenk, Handb. Bot. Bd. 1, 571–750.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Duchartre, P. 1841. Observation sur quelques parties de la fleur dans leDipsacus sylvestris Mill. et dansl’Helianthus annuus Lin. Ann. Sci. Nat. II. Bot.16: 221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  79. —. 1842. Observations sur la fleur et plus particulièrement sur l’ovaire de l’Oenotherosuaveolens H.P. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. II. Bot18: 339–356.

    Google Scholar 

  80. -. 1867. Éléments de botanique.

  81. —. 1891. Note sur ovaires infères et plus particulièrement celui des Pomacées. Bull. Soc. Bot. France38: 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Eames, A. J. 1930. The general anatomy of the flower with special reference to the gynoeceum. Proc. Fifth Int. Bot. Cong. Cambridge.

  83. —. 1931. The vascular anatomy of the flower with refutation of the theory of carpel polymorphism. Am. Jour. Bot.18: 147–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. -and L. C. MacDaniels. 1925. An introduction to plant anatomy.

  85. Eichler, A. W. 1875. Blüthendiagramme. I.

  86. -. 1878. Blüthendiagramme. II.

  87. Endlicher, S. und F. Unger. 1843. Grundzüge der Botanique.

  88. Engler, A. 1926. Kurze Erläuterung der Blüten und Fortpflanzungs-verhältnisse bei den Angiospermen. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 2 Aufl.14a: 1–145.

  89. -und K. Prantl. 1889. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. II Teil, 1 Aufl.

  90. Esau, Katherine. 1943. Origin and development of primary vascular tissues in seed plants. Bot. Rev.9: 125–215.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Farmer, J. B. 1899. Contributions to the morphology and physiology of pulpy fruits. Ann. Bot.3: 394–414.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Ganong, W. F. 1900. The teaching botanist.

  93. —. 1901. The cardinal principles of morphology. Bot. Gaz.31: 426–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. -. 1916. A text-book of botany for colleges.

  95. Giesenhagen, K. 1903. Lehrbuch der Botanik. 3 Aufl.

  96. Goebel, K. 1881. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Entwickelungsgeschichte der Sporangien. Bot. Zeit.39: 680–694, 697–706, 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  97. -. 1882. Grundzüge der Systematik und specielle Pflanzen-morphologie; nach die vierten Auflage des Lehrbuchs der Botanik von J. Sachs.

  98. —. 1886. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des unterständigen Fruchtknotens. Bot. Zeit.44: 729–738.

    Google Scholar 

  99. -. 1887. Outlines of classification and special morphology of plants. A new edition of Sachs’ text-book of botany. [Eng. trans. by H. E. F. Garnsey and I. B. Balfour.]

  100. -. 1901. Organographie der Pflanzen. Teil II.

  101. -. 1905. Organography of plants. Part II. [Eng. trans. by I. B. Balfour.]

  102. -. 1933. Organographie der Pflanzen. Teil III. Semenpflanzen. 3 Aufl.

  103. Goethe, J. W. von. 1790. Versuch die Metamorphose der Pflanzen zu erklären.

  104. Gravis, A. 1878. Notice sur quelques faits tératologiques. Bull. Soc. Bot. Belgique16: 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Gray, Asa. 1879. Structural botany. Ed. 6.

  106. Green, J. Reynolds. 1904. A manual of botany. Vol. I. Morphology and anatomy.

  107. -. 1909. A history of botany. 1860–1900.

  108. Greene, E. Lee. 1909. Landmarks of botanical history. Smithsonian Misc. Coll.54: 7–329.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Grégoire, V. 1931. La valeur morphologique des carpelles dans les Angiospermes. Bull. Acad. Belgique V.17: 1286–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  110. —. 1935. Sporophylles et organes floraux, tigue et axe floral. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl.32: 453–166.

    Google Scholar 

  111. —. 1938. La morphogenese et l’autonomie morphologique de l’appareil floral. I. Le carpelle. Cellule47: 287–452.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Grélot, P. 1897. Recherches sur le system libéroligneux floral des Gamopétales bicarpellées. Ann. Sci. Nat. VIII. Bot. 5: 1–154.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Grove, A. R. 1941. Morphological study ofAgave lechuguilla. Bot. Gaz. 103: 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Gundersen, Alfred. 1939. Flower buds and phylogeny of dicotyledons. Brooklyn Bot. Gard. Cont. No. 87.Also in Bull. Torr. Bot. Club66: 287–295.

  115. Haenlein, F. H. 1874. Beitraege zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Compositenbluethe. Diss., Leipzig.

  116. Hagen, C. 1873. Untersuchungen über die Entwickelung und Anatomie derMesembryanthemutn. Diss., Bonn.

  117. Hagerup, O. 1936. Zur Abstammung einiger Angiospermen durch Gnetales und Coniferae. II. Centrospermae. Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Biol. Meddeled.13(6): 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Hall, B. A. 1941. The floral anatomy of the Droseraceae with reference to the commisural stigma and on the theory of carpel polymorphism. Unpub. thesis, Cornell University.

  119. Hancy, Anna. 1916. Vascular anatomy of certain ericaceous flowers. Unpub. thesis, Cornell University.

  120. Hannah, Margaret. 1916. A comparative account of epigyny in certain monocotyledons and dicotyledons. Trans. Am. Micros. Soc.35: 207–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Henfry, Arthur. 1870. An elementary course of botany, structural, physiological, and systematic. Ed. 2.

  122. Henslow, Geo. 1888. Origin of plant structures.

  123. —. 1891. On the vascular systems of floral organs, and their importance in the interpretation of the morphology of flowers. Jour. Linn. Soc. Bot. London28: 151–197.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Hill, J. B., L. O. Overholts and H. W. Popp. 1936. Botany. A textbook for colleges.

  125. Hillmann, Aug. 1910. Vergleichend-anatomische Untersuchungen über das Rosaceenthypanth. Bot. Centbl. Beihefte26: 377–421.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Hofmeister, W. 1868. Allgemeine Morphologie der Gewächse. 1 Bd. 2 Teil, Handbuch der physiologischen Botanique.

  127. Huisgen, Franz. 1873. Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung der Placenten. Diss., Bonn.

  128. Hunt, K. W. 1937. A study of the style and stigma, with reference to the nature of the carpel. Am. Jour. Bot.24: 288–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Hyde, F. F. 1933. Notes on the floral morphology of the Campanuloideae. Rep. Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Leicester, p. 554.

  130. Jackson, Gemma. 1933. A study of the carpophore of the Umbelliferae. Am. Jour. Bot.20: 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. —. 1934. The morphology of the flowers ofRosa and certain closely related genera. Am. Jour. Bot.21: 453–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Joshi, A. C. 1935. Criticism of Dr. Thomas’ recent hypothesis on the nature of the angiosperm carpel. Jour. Bot.73: 286–294.

    Google Scholar 

  133. — andJ. V. Pantulu. 1939. Origin of the inferior ovary in the Amaryllidaceae. Current Sci.8: 212–213.

    Google Scholar 

  134. —. 1941. A morphological and cytological study ofPolianthes tuberosa Linn. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.21: 31–71.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Judson, J. E. 1929. The morphology and vascular anatomy of the pistillate flower of the cucumber. Am. Jour. Bot.16: 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Juhnke, G. von undH. Winklee. 1938. Der Balg als Grundelement des Angiospermengynaeceums. Beitr. Biol. Pflanz.25: 290–324.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Juliano, J. B. andP. E. Alcala. 1933. Floral morphology ofMusa errans (Blanco) Teodoro, var.botoan Teodoro. Philippine Agriculturist22: 91–116.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Jussieu, Adrien de. 1843. Botanique. Cours élémentaire d’histoire naturelle.

  139. Jussieu, Antoine L. de. 1789. Genera plantarum.

  140. Karsten, H. 1865. Gesammelte Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Pflanzen. Bd. 1, p. 345.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Kerner, A. von M. and F. B. Oliver. 1902. Natural history of plants. Vol. 2.

  142. King, J. R. 1938. Morphological development of the fruit of the olive. Hilgardia11: 437–454.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Kirkwood, J. E. 1905. The comparative embryology of the Cucurbitaceae. N. Y. Bot. Gard., Bull.3: 313–402.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Koehler, Aug. 1876. Practical botany, structural and systematic.

  145. Koehne, Emil. 1869. Ueber Blüthenentwicklung bei den Compositen. Diss., Berlin.

  146. Kozo-Poljanski, B. 1936. On some “third” conceptions in floral morphology. New. Phyt.35: 479–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Kraus, E. J. 1913. The pollination of the pomaceous fruits. I. Gross morphology of the apple. Oregon Agr. Coll. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 1, pt. 1, 1–12.

  148. — andG. S. Ralston. 1916. The pollination of the pomaceous fruits. III. Gross vascular anatomy of the apple. Oregon Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 138: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Landon, La Dema Mary. 1939. Ontogenetic and anatomical studies of the flower and fruit of the Fagaceae and Juglandaceae. Bot. Gaz. 101: 301–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Laubengayer, R. A. 1937. Studies in the anatomy and morphology of the polygonaceous flower. Am. Jour. Bot.24: 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Leinfellner, W. 1941. Über den unterständigen Fruchtknoten und einige Bemerkungen über den Bauplan des verwachsenblättrigen Gynoeceums an sich. Bot. Arch. Leipzig42: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  152. Le Maout, E. 1884. Leçons élémentaires de botanique.

  153. -. 1852. Botanique. Organographie et taxonomie. Histoire naturelles des familles végétales.

  154. -et J. Decaisne. 1868. Traité général de botanique descriptive et analytique.

  155. -. 1873. A general system of botany. [Eng. trans. by Mrs. J. D. Hooker.]

  156. Lestiboudois, Thém. 1848. Phyllotaxie anatomique. Ann. Sci. Nat. III. Bot.10: 15–105.

    Google Scholar 

  157. —. 1854, 1855. Carpographie anatomique. Ann. Sci. Nat. IV. Bot.2: 223–243;3:47–72.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Lignier, O. 1915. Eschscholtziées. Explication anatomique de la fleur. Bull. Soc. Bot. France62: 298–319.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Lindley, John. 1841. Elements of botany.

  160. Lindsey, A. A. 1938. Anatomical evidence for the Menyanthaceae. Am. Tour. Bot.25: 480–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Linné, Carl von. 1751. Philosophia botanica. p. 301.

  162. —. 1760. Prolepsis plantarum.In Amoenitates academicae6: 324–341.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Mac Arthur, Mary andR. H. Wetmore. 1939. Developmental studies in the apple fruit in the varieties McIntosh Red and Wagener. I. Vascular anatomy. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.17: 218–232.

    Google Scholar 

  164. MacDaniels, L. H. 1940. The morphology of the apple and other pome fruits. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Mem. 230.

  165. Magnus, P. 1869. Zur Morphologie der GattungNajas L. Bot. Zeit.27: 769–773.

    Google Scholar 

  166. McCoy, R. W. 1940. Floral organization inFrasera caroliniensis. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 600–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Maheshwari, P. 1935. The progress of work in India on the embryology of the angiosperms. Current Sci.3: 599–605.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Malpighi, Marcello. 1687. Anatome plantarum.In Opera omnia. p. 65.

  169. Manning, W. E. 1940. The morphology of the flowers of the Juglandaceae. II. The pistillate flowers and fruit. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 839–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. Martin, G. W. 1892. Development of the flower and embryo-sac inAster andSolidago. Bot. Gaz.17: 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Masters, M. T. 1869. Vegetable teratology.

  172. Mattfeld, F. 1921. Zur Kenntnis der phylogenie unterständiger Fruchtknoten bei den Caryophyllaceen. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.39: 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  173. Mirbel, C. F. B. (Brisseau-Mirbel). 1802. Traité d’anatomie et de physiologie végétales.

  174. -. 1815. Élémens de physiologie végétale et de botanique.

  175. Mohl, H. von. 1863. Eine kurze Bemerkung über das Carpophorum der Umbelliferen Frucht. Bot. Zeit.21: 264–266.

    Google Scholar 

  176. Moore, J. A. 1936. The vascular anatomy of the flower in the papilion-aceous Leguminosae. II. Am. Jour. Bot.23: 249–355.

    Google Scholar 

  177. Naudin, C. 1855. Observations relatives à la nature des vrilles et à la structure de la fleur chez les Cucurbitacées. Ann. Sci. Nat. IV. Bot.4: 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  178. Newman, I. V. 1928. Life history ofDoryanthes excelsa. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales53: 499–538.

    Google Scholar 

  179. Nicoloff, Th. 1904. Sur le type floral et le développment du fruit des Juglandées. Jour. Bot.18: 134–152, 380–385.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Parkin, J. 1926. Comments on the theory of the solid carpel and carpel polymorphism. New. Phyt.25: 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  181. -. 1934. The classical carpel and recent attacks. Rep. Bot. Exchange Club10: Pt. 3.

  182. Pax, F. 1890. Allgemeine Morphologie der Pflanzen.

  183. Payer, J. B. 1857. Éléments de botanique.

  184. -. 1857. Traité d’organogénie comparée de la fleur.

  185. Pool, R. J. 1929. Flowers and flowering plants.

  186. Prantl, K. 1886. Lehrbuch de Botanik.

  187. —. 1887. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Cupuliferen. Bot. Jahr. Engler8: 321.

    Google Scholar 

  188. Reece, P. C. 1938. The morphology of the flowers and inflorescence of the Fagaceae. Unpub. thesis, Cornell Univ.

  189. Reuther, E. 1876. Beiträge zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Blüthe. Bot. Zeit.34: 384–395, 401–447.

    Google Scholar 

  190. Richard, Achille. 1819. Nouveaux élémens de botanique.

  191. -. 1838. Nouveaux élémens de botanique. Sixième éd.

  192. -. 1846. Nouveaux élémens de botanique. Septième éd.

  193. Robbins, W. J. and H. W. Rickett. 1939. Botany. A textbook for college and university students.

  194. Robbins, W. W. 1917. Botany of crop plants. Philadelphia.

  195. Rusby, H. H. and S. E. Jelleffe. 1899. Morphology and histology of plants.

  196. Rydberg, P. A. 1898. A monograph of the North American Potentilleae. Mem. Dept. Bot. Col. Univ. Vol. 2.

  197. Sachs, J. 1870. Lehrbuch der Botanik. 2 Aufl.

  198. -. 1882. Textbook of botany. [Eng. trans. by S. H. Vines.]

  199. -. 1875. Geschichte der Botanik vom 16 Jahrhundert bis 1860.

  200. -. 1890. History of botany (1530–1860). [Eng. trans. by H. E. F. Garnsey and I. B. Balfour.]

  201. Saint-Hilaire, Aug. de. 1840. Leçons de botanique.

  202. Salisbury, R. A. 1800. Remarks on some technical terms used in botany. Trans. Linn. Soc. London5: 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  203. Satina, S. andA. F. Blakeslee. 1943. Periclinal chimeras inDatura in relation to the development of the carpel. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 453–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  204. Saunders, Edith R. 1922. The leaf-skin theory of the stem. Ann. Bot.36: 135–165.

    Google Scholar 

  205. —. 1925. Perigyny and carpel polymorphism in some Rosaceae. New. Phyt.24: 206–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. —. 1925. The inferior ovary. New. Phyt.24: 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  207. —. 1925. On carpel polymorphism. I. Ann. Bot.39: 123–167.

    Google Scholar 

  208. —. 1927. On carpel polymorphism. II. Ann. Bot.41: 569–627.

    Google Scholar 

  209. —. 1931. Illustrations of carpel polymorphism. VII. Begoniaceae. New. Phyt.30: 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  210. -. 1937, 1939. Floral morphology, a new outlook with special reference to the gynoeceum. Vols. 1, 2.

  211. Schacht, H. 1859. Lehrbuch der Anatomie und Physiologie der Gewächse.

  212. Schaefer, B. 1890. Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Frucht-knotens und der Placenta. Flora73: 62–104.

    Google Scholar 

  213. Schaeppi, H. andF. Steindl. 1937. Blütenmorpholische und embryologische Untersuchungen anOsyris alba L. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.47: 369–392.

    Google Scholar 

  214. Schaffner, J. H. 1937. The fundamental nature of the flower. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club64: 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  215. Schenk, A. 1879. Botanique.

  216. Schleiden, J. M. 1837. Einige Blicke auf die Entwicklungsgeschichte des vegetabilischen Organismus bei den Phanerogamen. Wieg. Archiv. Nat.1: 289–320.

    Google Scholar 

  217. —. 1839. Sur la signification morphologique due placentaire. Ann. Sci. Nat. II. Bot.12: 373–376.

    Google Scholar 

  218. -. 1843. Grundzüge der wissenschaftlichen Botanik. 1 Aufl. 2 Theil.

  219. -. 1846. Grundzüge der wissenschaftlichen Botanik. 2 Aufl. 2 Theil.

  220. -. 1849. Principles of scientific botany. [Eng. trans. by E. Lankester.]

  221. Schumann, K. 1904. Praktikum für morphologische und system-atische Botanik.

  222. Scott, D. F. 1932. Discussion on Dr. Hamshaw Thomas’ paper, “the old morphology and the new.” Proc. Linn. Soc. London, Session 145, Nov.145: p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  223. Shuhart, D. C. 1932. Morphology and anatomy of the fruit ofHicoria pecan. Bot. Gaz.93: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  224. Sinnott, E. W. 1923. Botany, principles and problems.

  225. — andI. W. Bailey. 1914. Investigations on the phylogeny of angiosperms. 3. Nodal anatomy and the morphology of stipules. Am. Jour. Bot.1: 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  226. —. 1915. Investigations on the phylogeny of the angiosperms. 5. Foliar evidence as to the ancestry and early climatic environment of the angiosperms. Am. Jour. Bot.2: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  227. Smith, F. H. andElizabeth, C. 1942. Anatomy of the inferior ovary ofDarbya. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 464–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  228. Smith, G. H. 1928. Vascular anatomy of Ranalian flowers. II. Bot. Gaz.85: 152–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  229. Stanford, E. E. 1937. General and economic botany.

  230. Stebbins, G. L. 1940. The Cichorieae. Mem. Torr Bot Club19: 5–76.

    Google Scholar 

  231. Strasburger, E. 1887. Handbook of practical botany. [Eng. trans. by W. Hillhouse.]

  232. Strasburger E., F. Noll, H. Schenck, und A. F. W. Schimper. 1894. Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen.

  233. -. 1898. Strasburger’s text-book of botany. [Eng. trans. by W. H. Lang.]

  234. Strasburger, E., F. Noll, H. Schenck, and G. Karsten. 1908. Strasburger’s text-book of botany. 3rd. Eng. ed. [Trans. by W. H. Lang.]

  235. Szabó, Z. 1923. The development of the flower of the Dipsacaceae. Ann. Bot.37: 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  236. Thomas, H. H. and others. 1932. The old morphology and the new. Proc. Linn. Soc. London24: Pt. 1. 17–48.

    Google Scholar 

  237. Thomas, H. H. 1934. The structure and origin of the stigma. A contribution towards a new morphological interpretation of the Angiosperm flower. New. Phyt.33: 173–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  238. Thompson, Betty F. 1942. The floral anatomy of the Caryophyllaceae. Am. Jour. Bot29: 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  239. Thompson, J. McLean. 1933. Studies in advancing sterility. VI. The theory of Scitaminean flowering. Publ. Hartley Bot Lab. Liverpool No. 11.

  240. Tillson, A. H. 1940. The floral anatomy of the Kalanchoideae. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 595–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  241. Transeau, E. N., H. C. Sampson, and L. H. Tiffany. 1940. Textbook of botany.

  242. Trécul, Aug. 1843. Observations sur les fruits desPrismatocarpus Speculum ethybridus, et sur celui des Crucifères. Ann. Sci. Nat II. Bot.20: 339–344.

    Google Scholar 

  243. —. 1853. Mémoire sur la formation des feuilles. Ana. Sci. Nat. III. Bot.20: 235–314.

    Google Scholar 

  244. —. 1881. Recherches sur l’ordre d’apparation ses premiers vaisseaux dans les organs aériens. Ann. Sci. Nat VL Bot.12: 251–281.

    Google Scholar 

  245. Treviranus, L. C. 1838. Physiologie der Gewächse. Bd. 2.

  246. —. 1859. Ueber Frucht- und Saamenbau der Mistel. Bot. Zeit.17: 345–346.

    Google Scholar 

  247. —. 1861. Über Fruchtbau und einige Gattungen der Doldengewächse. Bot. Zeit.19: 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  248. Troll, W. 1928. Zur Auffassung des parakarpen Gynäceums und des coenocarpen Gynäceums überhaupt Planta6: 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  249. —. 1931. Beiträge zur Morphologie des Gynaeceums. Planta14: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  250. —. 1932. Morphologie der schildförmigen Blätter. Planta17: 153–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  251. —. 1939. Die morphologische Natur der Karpelle. Chron. Bot5: 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  252. Tukey, H. B. andJ. O. Young. 1942. Gross morphology and histology of the developing fruit of the apple. Bot. Gaz.104: 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  253. Unruh, M. 1939. Die morphologische Bedeutung des Karpells. Beitr. Biol. Pflanz.26: 90–124.

    Google Scholar 

  254. Van Tieghem, P. 1868. Recherches sur la structure du pistil. Ann. Sci. Nat. V. Bot.9: 153–226.

    Google Scholar 

  255. —. 1869. Anatomie de la fleur fermelle et du fruit du noyer. Bull. Soc. Bot. France16: 412–420.

    Google Scholar 

  256. —. 1869. Structure du pistil des Primulacées et des Theophrastées. Ann. Sci. Nat V. Bot.12: 137–226.

    Google Scholar 

  257. —. 1871. Recherches sur la structure du pistil et sur l’anatomie comparée de la fleur. Mém. des savants étrangers à l’Institut. II,21: 1–261.

    Google Scholar 

  258. —. 1875. Recherches sur la structure du pistil et sur l’anatomie comparée de la fleur. Mém. Acad. Sci. Inst. Imp. France21: 1–261.

    Google Scholar 

  259. —. 1879. Anatomie de la rose et en général charactères anatomique des axes invaginés. Bull. Soc. Bot. France25: 309–315.

    Google Scholar 

  260. -. 1884. Traité de botanique.

  261. Velenovský, J. 1904. Die gegliederten Blüthen. Bot. Centbl. Beihefte16: 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  262. -. 1905. Vergleichende Morphologie der Pflanzen. I Teil.

  263. -. 1910. Vergleichende Morphologie der Pflanzen. III Teil.

  264. Vidal, L. 1900. Recherches sur le sommet de l’axe dans le fleur de Gamopétales. Thèse de Paris, Grenoble.

  265. Vines, S. H. 1895. A student’s text-book of botany. Vol. 2.

  266. Warming, Eug. 1872. Recherches sur la ramification des Phanérogames. Vidensk. Selskabs. Skrifter. V.10: 1–173. French résumé I-L.

    Google Scholar 

  267. —. 1878. De l’ovule. Ann. Sci. Nat. VI. Bot.5: 177–266.

    Google Scholar 

  268. -und Möbius. 1902. Handbuch der systematischen Botanik. 2 Aufl.

  269. Weatherwax, Paul. 1942. Plant biology.

  270. Wernham, F. H. 1911. Floral evolution: with particular reference to the sympetalous dicotyledons. New. Phyt.10: 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  271. White, Philip. 1928. An investigation of the floral morphology and cytology of certain types of the genus,Musa L. Zeits. Zell. Mik. Anat.7: 673–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  272. Wiesner, J. 1881. Elemente de Anatomie und Physiologie der Pflanzen.

  273. Wilson, Carl L. 1937. The phylogeny of the stamen. Am. Jour. Bot.24: 686–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  274. —. 1942. The telome theory and the origin of the stamen. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 759–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  275. -and Julia Haber. 1935. An introduction to plant life.

  276. — andTheodor Just. 1939. The morphology of the flower. Bot. Rev.5: 97–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  277. Witmer, S. W. 1937. Morphology and cytology ofValisneria spiralis L. Am. Mid. Nat.18: 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  278. Wolff, C. F. 1759. Theoria generationis.

  279. Wylie, R. B. 1904. The morphology ofElodea canadensis. Bot. Gaz.37: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  280. Yen, Tsu Hiang. 1936. Floral development and vascular anatomy of the fruit ofRibes aureum. Bot. Gaz.98: 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. New York State College for Teachers, Albany, N. Y.

    Gertrude E. Douglas

Authors
  1. Gertrude E. Douglas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Douglas, G.E. The inferior ovary. Bot. Rev 10, 125–186 (1944). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861093

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861093

Keywords

Search

Navigation