Skip to main content
Log in

Humid incubation period and plantlet age influence acclimatization and establishment of micropropagated grapes

  • Micropropagation
  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In vitro rooted grape (Vitis vinifera L.) plantlets (4 or 8 wk from culturing microcuttings) were plantedex vitro in polythene sachets (24×12 cm) filled to one-third their height with planting mixture. The sachets were misted, closed, and incubated at ambient temperature (25–30°C) under 16 h photoperiod (40–50 μ E·m−2.·sec−1) for 1,2, or 3 wk before opening. Maximum establishment with no or minimum damage toin vitro formed leaves was obtained with 3 wk of closed sachet incubation in both age groups. Opening the sachet at 2 wk from planting resulted in marginal scorching of lower leaves and some reduction in establishment and vigor. Opening at 1 wk led to severe leaf scorching and significant reduction in establisment particularly in 4-wk-oldin vitro plantlets while growth was more affected in 8-wk-old ones. Relative humidity ofin vitro culture vessel was 68–75% while closed sachets had RH values of 45–77% depending on length of incubation and ambient RH. Diurnal variation in RH of sachet in relation to ambient RH was the major factor that facilitated acclimatization rather than the overall fall in RH during the period of closed incubation. Satisfactory acclimatization of plantlets to withstand the open sachet RH (50–55%) by 3 wk and the ambient RH (30–40%) by 4 wk was achieved. Monitoring water loss from detached leaves of plantlets showed a significant reduction between the date of planting and Week 3, and again between Weeks 3 and 4. Comparison of growthin vitro andex vitro suggested that shifting toex vitro earlier was more beneficial. This observation was confirmed by transferring 3-, 4-, and 5-wk-old plantlets fromin vitro rooting medium toex vitro and recording the growth at 8 wk fromin vitro culturing when 3 wkin vitro plus 5 wkex vitro combination showed maximum vigor. The leftover stumps after subculturing of 1–4-mo.-old stock cultures could also be effectively used forex vitro establishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhojwani, S. S.; Dhawan, V. Acclimatization of tissue culture raised plants for transplantation to the field. In: Dhawan V., ed. Application of biotechnology in forestry and horticulture. New York: Plenum Press; 1988:249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blanke, M. M.; Belcher, A. R. Stomata of apple leaves culturedin vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 19:85–89; 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brainerd, K. E.; Fuchigami, L. H. Acclimatization of aseptically cultured apple plants to low relative humidity. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 106:515–518; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brainerd, K. E.; Fuchigami, L. H.; Kwiatkowski, S., et al. Leaf anatomy and water stress of aseptically cultured Pixy plum grown under different environments. HortScience 16:173–175; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Compton, M. E.; Gray, D. J.; Elmstrom, G. W. A simple protocol for micropropagating diploid and tetraploid watermelon using shoot-tip explants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 33:211–217; 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dami, I.; Hughes, H. Leaf anatomy and water, loss ofin vitro PEG-treated Valiant grape. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 42:179–184; 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhawan, V.; Bhojwani, S. S. Hardeningin vitro and morpho-physiological changes in the leaves during acclimatization of micropropagated plants ofLeucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. Plant Sci. 53:65–72; 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Driver, J. A.; Suttle, G. R. C. Nursery handling of propagules. In: Bonga, J. M.; Durzan, D. J., eds. Cell and tissue culture in forestry. Vol. 2. Specific principles and methods: growth and developments. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1987;320–335.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Faulks, L.; Mudge, K. W. Optimisation of environmental conditions of stage IV micropropagated grapes. HortScience 23:757; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fournioux, J. C.; Bessis, R. Use of carbon dioxide enrichment to obtain adult morphology of grapevinein vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 33:51–57; 1993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grenam, S., Micropropagation of grapevine (Vitis vinifera). In: Bajaj, Y. P. S., ed. Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, 18. High-tech and micropropagation II. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1988:371–398.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grout, B. W. W.; Aston, H. Modified leaf anatomy of cauliflower plantlets regenerated from meristem culture. Ann. Bot. 42:993–995; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lewandowski, V. T. Rooting and acclimatization of micropropagated grapes. HortScience 26:586–589; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marin, J. A.; Gella, R. Is desiccation the cause of the poor survival rate in the acclimatization of micropropagatedPrunus cerasus L.? Acta Hortic. 230:105–112; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mohammed, G. H.; Vidaver, W. E. The influence of acclimatization treatment and plantlet morphology on early greenhouse-performance of tissue-cultured Douglas fir [Pseudostsuga menziesii (Mixb.) Franco]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 21:111–117; 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mullins, M. G.; Nair, Y.; Sampet, P. Rejuvenation,in vitro: induction of juvenile characters, in an adult clone ofVitis vinifera L. Ann. Bot. 44:623–627; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pierik, R. L. M. Handicaps for the large scale commercial application of micropropagation. Acta Hortic. 203:63–71; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Preece, J. E.; Sutter, E. G. Acclimatization of micropropagated plants to the glasshouse and field. In: Debergh, P. C.; Zimmerman, R. H., eds. Micropropagation technology and application. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991:71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ravindra, M. B.; Thomas, P. Sachet technique—an efficient method for the acclimatization of micropropagated grapes. Curr. Sci. 68:546–548; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Read, P. E.; Fellman, C. D. Accelerating acclimatization ofin vitro propagated woody ornamentals. Acta Hortic. 166:15–20; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rugini, E.In vitro propagation of some olive (Olea europea sativa L.) cultivars with different root-ability, and medium development using analytical data from developing shoots and embryos. Sci. Hortic. 24:123–134; 1984.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sutter, E. G.; Langhans, R. W. Epicuticular wax formation on carnation plantlets regenerated from shoot tip culture. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 104:493–496; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sutter, E. G.; Novello, V.; Shackel, K. Physiological and anatomical aspects of water stress of cultured plants. Acta Hortic. 230:113–119; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thomas, P. Increase in clonal propagation of Arka Neelamani grape (Vitis vinifera L.) through induction of axillaries inin vitro layering technique. Indian J. Agric. Sci. (In Press).

  25. Werker, E.; Leshem, B. Structural changes during vitrification of carnation plantlet. Ann. Bot. 59:377–385; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ziv, M.In vitro hardening and acclimatization of tissue culture plants. In: Withers, L. A.; Alderson, P. G. Plant tissue culture and its agricultural applications. London: Butterworths; 1986:187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ziv, M. Quality of micropropagated plants—vitrification. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 27P:64–69; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, P. Humid incubation period and plantlet age influence acclimatization and establishment of micropropagated grapes. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 34, 52–56 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823123

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823123

Key words

Navigation