Summary
The structure of impact-parameter functions is investigated for several versions of the impact-parameter representation defined for two-particle scattering amplitudes which satisfy Mandelstam analyticity and polynomial bounds.
Riassunto
Si è ricercata la struttura delle funzioni dei parametri d’urto per varie versioni della rappresentazione dei parametri d’urto definita per ampiezza della diffusione di due particelle che soddisfano la condizione di analiticità di Mandelstam e limiti polinomiali.
Реэюме
Исследуется структура функций прицельного параметра для нескольких вариантов представления прицельного параметра, определенного для амплитуд рассеяния двух частиц, которые удовлетворяют аналитичности Манделстама и полиномиальным границам.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. J. Galuber:Lectures in Theoretical Physics, Vol.1 (New York, N. Y., 1959), p. 315.
R. Blankenbecler andM. L. Goldberger:Phys. Rev.,126, 766 (1962).
W. N. Cottingham andR. F. Peierls:Phys. Rev.,137, B 147 (1965).
M. M. Islam:Lectures in Theoretical Physics, Vol.10 B (New York, London, Paris, 1968), p. 97.
(seee.g. ref.(5)p. 236)
W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger andR. P. Soni:Formulas and Theorems for the Special Functions of Mathematical Physics, 3rd ed. (Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1966).
A. H. Zemanian:Generalized Integral Transforms (New York, London, Sydney, Toronto, 1968).
R. Henzi:Nuovo Cimento,46 A, 370 (1966).
J. Kupsch andI. O. Stamatescu:Nuovo Cimento,15 A, 663 (1973).
T. Adachi andT. Kotani:Suppl. Progr. Theor. Phys., Extra Number, 316 (1965);T. Adachi:Progr. Theor. Phys.,35, 463 (1966);T. Adachi andT. Kotani:Progr. Theor. Phys.,35, 485 (1966);39, 430, 785 (1968).
The existence of such functions is incompatible with the bounds derived byMartin for form factors (10).
A. Martin:Nuovo Cimento,37, 671 (1965).
We use the notations of ref. (11).
I. M. Gelfand andG. E. Shilov:Generalized Functions, Vol.1 (New York and London, 1963).
I. S. Gradshteyn andI. M. Ryzhik:Tables of Integrals, Series and Products (New York and London, 1965).
E. Predazzi:Ann. of Phys.,36, 228 (1966).
Unitarity still allows for logarithmic singularities within the physical region (14) and does not lead to a restriction of the singularities in the double-spectral regions.
A. Martin: CERN Report TH 727 (1967).
The domain of holomorphy can be taken smaller than the domain of Mandelstam analyticity, see ref. (7).
T. Kinoshita, J. J. Loeffel andA. Martin:Phys. Rev.,135, B 1464 (1964).
G. Höhler andH. P. Jakob:Zeits. Phys.,261, 371 (1973);G. Höhler:Strong Interaction Physics, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol.17 (Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1973), p. 21.
For an explicit calculation of the BG transform of a Veneziano ansatz see ref. (17)
T. Obara:Progr. Theor. Phys.,49, 586 (1973).
F. Zachariasen:Phys. Rep.,2 C, 1 (1971).
B. Schrempp andF. Schrempp: CERN preprint TH 1641 (1973).
M. G. Schmidt andI. O. Stamatescu:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,3, 645 (1972).
H. D. I. Abarbanel:Strong Interaction Physics, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol.17 (Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1973), p. 146.
We use the notation of ref. (11).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kupsch, J., Stamatescu, I.O. Impact-parameter amplitudes. Nuov Cim A 20, 317–353 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02821096
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02821096