Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Marital satisfaction and conventionalization examined dyadically

  • Articles
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Edmonds (1967) developed the Marital Conventionalization Scale to measure an apparent social desirability bias in marital quality measurement at the individual level. The original conceptualization of marital conventionalization has not been supported by subsequent research and conventionalization appears to represent another aspect of marital quality. This study investigated whether marital satisfaction and conventionalization are best conceptualized at the individual or couple level. A series of analyses suggest that these constructs must be interpreted as dyadic variables rather than simply as individual perceptions of marriage. Husbands and wives tend to report similar levels of marital satisfaction and conventionalization, especially among dissatisfied couples and couples with a high level of satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birchler, G.R., Weiss, R.L., & Vincent, J.P. (1975). A multimethod analysis of social reinforcement exchange between maritally distressed and nondistressed spouse and stranger dyads.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone, J.D. (1967). Social desirability and marital happiness.Psychological Reports, 21, 770–772.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cone, J.D. (1971). Social desirability, marital satisfaction, and concomitant perceptions of self and spouse.Psychological Reports, 28, 173–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M.C. & Milligan, G.M. (1984). The effect of error on determining the number of clusters.College Administrative Science Working Paper Series, 84–2. Columbus: The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, V.H. (1967). Marital conventionalization: Definition and measurement.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 681–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, V.H. Whithers, G. & Dibatista, B. (1972). Adjustment, conservatism, and marital conventionalization.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 34, 96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1948). The value of marriage prediction tests.American Sociological Review, 13, 710–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957).A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filsinger, E.E., & Wilson, M.R. (1983). Social anxiety and marital adjustment.Family Relations, 32, 513–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F.D. (1985). Attribution processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: 2. Responsibility for marital problems.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 183–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F.D., Beach, S.R., & Baucom, D.H. (1987). Attribution processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: 5. Self-partner attribution differences.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 739–748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F.D., Beach, S. R., & Nelson, G. (1987). Attribution processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: 3. Causal and responsibility attributions for spouse behavior.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F.D. & Bradbury, T.N. (1987). The impact of attributions on marriage: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 510–517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F.D. & Bradbury, T.N. (1989). Perceived responsibility for marital events: Egocentric or partnercentric bias?Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F.D. & O’Leary, K.D. (1983). Causal inferences for spouse behavior in maritally distressed and nondistressed couples.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B.J. (1990). An interactional approach to standardized marital assessment: A literature review.Family Relations, 39, 368–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B.J. & Applegate, B. (1995). Is marital conventionalization a social desirability response bias? A confirmatory factor analysis.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 237–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B.J., Applegate, B., Olson, D.H., & Pomerantz, B. (1994). Marital conventionalization as a measure of marital satisfaction: A confirmatory factor analysis.Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 98–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B.J. & Olson, D.H. (1986). Predicting marital success with PREPARE: A predictive validity study.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12, 403–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B.J. & Olson, D.H. (1989). ENRICH marital inventory: A discriminant validity and cross-validation assessment.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B.J. & Olson, D.H. (1993). ENRICH marital satisfaction scale: A reliability and validity study.Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 176–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, B.J. & Pomerantz, B. (November, 1992).Reconceptualizing marital conventionalization: Examining psychological, relational, and cultural explanations. Presented at the Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop of the National Council on Family Relations, Orlando, FL.

  • Glenn, N.D. (1990). Quantitative research on marital quality in the 1980s: A critical review.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 818–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J.M. (1979).Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. & Taylor, S.E. (1976). When love is blind.Human Relations, 29, 751–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halweg, K., Revenstorf, D., & Schindler, L. (1984). Effects of behavioral marital therapy on couples’ communication and problem-solving skills.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 553–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G.L. (1981). Marital adjustment and conventionalization: A reexamination.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 855–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J.L. (1966). The Locke marital adjustment test and social desirability.Journal of marriage and the Family, 28, 193–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. & Rodgers, R. (1964). The development approach. In Christensen, H.T. (Ed.),Handbook of marriage and the family. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A. & Jacobson, N.S. (1985). Causal attributions of married couples: When do they search for causes? What do they conclude when they do?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1398–1412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N.S., McDonald, D.W., Follette, W.C., & Berley, R.A. (1985). Attributional processes in distressed and nondistressed married couples.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobso, N.S., Follette, W.C., & McDonald, D.W. (1982). Reactivity to positive and negative behavior in distressed and non-distressed married couples.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 706–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.R., Amoloza, T.O., & Booth, A. (1992). Stability and change in marital quality: A three wave panel analysis.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 582–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, S.O., & Falbo, T. (1985). Relationships between marital stress and attributional preferences for own and spouse behavior.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 3, 339–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Abate, L., & Bagarozzi, D.A. (1993).Sourcebook of marriage and family evaluation. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, A.S. & Olson, D.H. (1989). Predicting marital satisfaction using PREPARE: A replication study.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavin, T.J. (1987). Divergence and convergence in the causal attributions of married couples.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, H.J. (1981). The prediction of marital success: A five-year follow-up.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 760–762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, J.T., & Biaggio, M.K. (1989). Sexual satisfaction as a function of life meaning.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18, 59–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, G.W. & Cooper, M.C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set.Psychometrika, 50, 159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B.I., & Beck, G.D. (1972). Person perception, marriage adjustment, and social desirability.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39, 396–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D.H., Fournier, D.G., & Druckman, J.M. (1987).Counselor’s manual for PREPARE/ENRICH (revised edition). PREPARE/ENRICH, Inc., Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D.H., McCubbin, H.I., Barnes, H.L., Larsen, A.S., Muxen, M.J., & Wilson, M.A. (1989).Families: What makes them work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, B. (1995). Positive illusions: An examination of the unrealistically positive views individuals hold of themselves and their spouses as an explanation for the marital conventionalization bias. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.

  • Robinson, E.A. & Anderson, L.L. (1983). Family adjustment, parental attitudes, and social desirability.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 247–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rychtarik, R.G., Tarnowski, K.J., & St. Lawrence, J.S. (1989). Impact of social desirability response sets on the self-report of marital adjustment in alcoholics.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50, 24–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatelli, R.M. (1988). Measurement issues in marital research: A review and critique of contemporary survey instruments.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 891–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M.F. & Carver, C.S. (1985). Optimism, coping and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.Health Psychology, 4, 219–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, W.R., Hess, J.L., Bollman, S.R. & Jurich, A.P. (1981). Marital conventionalization revisited.Psychological Reports, 49, 607–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, W.R., Paff-Bergen, L.A., Hatch, R.C., Obiorah, F.C., Copeland, J.M., Meens, L.D., & Bugaighis, M. A. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D.K. (1979). Multidimensional assessment of marital satisfaction.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 813–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D.K. (1981).Marital satisfaction inventory manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G.B. & Cole, C.L. (1976). Toward clarification and investigation of marital adjustment.International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 6, 121–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S.E. (1989).Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L., & Jurich, J. (1995). Predicting marital success after five years: Assessing the predictive validity of FOCCUS.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Studies, University of Miami, PO Box 248065, 33124, Coral Gables, FL

    Blaine J. Fowers & Brooks Applegate

Authors
  1. Blaine J. Fowers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brooks Applegate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fowers, B.J., Applegate, B. Marital satisfaction and conventionalization examined dyadically. Current Psychology 15, 197–214 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686877

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686877

Keywords

Search

Navigation