Skip to main content
Log in

Attributional processes in distressed and nondistressed married couples

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study compared the tendencies on the part of distressed and nondistressed couples to attribute their partners' positive and negative behavior to internal versus external factors. The prediction was that, compared to nondistressed spouses, distressed spouses would be inclined to attribute their partners' positive behavior to external factors, and their negative behavior to internal factors. Forty-nine nondistressed and 23 distressed couples were randomly assigned to one of two instructional manipulations, delivered to one spouse unbeknownst to the other. One set of instructions was to “act positive” during a subsequent conflict resolution interaction; the other was to “act negative.” Following the conflict resolution task, the uninstructed spouse was given the opportunity to explain his/her partner's behavior by completing a questionnaire consisting of a series of internal and external causal attributions. The findings supported the following hypothesis: Distressed couples were particularly likely to attribute their partners' negative behavior to internal factors; nondistressed couples, on the other hand, were particularly likely to attribute their partners' positive behavior to internal factors. Moreover, there was an overall tendency to favor internal attributions, regardless of distress level or valence of the behavior being interpreted. Discussion centered both on the implications of these findings and on directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop, Y. M., Feinberg, S., & Holland, P. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis. Boston: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A., Sullaway, M., & King, C. (1983). Systematic error in behavioral reports of dyadic interaction: Egocentric bias and content effects.Behavioral Assessment, 5 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W. J., & Brown, M. B. (1979).BMDP-79: Biomedical computer programs P-Series. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J. (1981a). Cognitive processes in intimate conflict: I. Extending attribution theory.American Journal of Family Therapy, 9 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J. (1981b). Cognitive processes in intimate conflict: II. Efficacy and learned helplessness.American Journal of Family Therapy, 9 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J. (1982). Attribution style and negative problem solving in marriage.Family Relations, 31 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidelson, R. J., & Epstein, N. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 715–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N. (1982). Cognitive therapy with couples.American Journal of Family Therapy, 10 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N., & Eidelson, R. J. (1981). Unrealistic beliefs of clinical couples: Their relationship to expectations, goals and satisfaction.American Journal of Family Therapy, 9 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E. (1977).The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. Boston: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F., & O'Leary, K. D. (1983). Causal inferences for spouse behavior in maritally distressed and nondistressed couples.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1979).Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, A. S. (1978). Contemporary marital therapies: A critique and comparative analysis of psychodynamic, systems, and behavioral approaches. In T. J. Paolino, Jr., & B. S. McCrady (Eds.),Marriage and marital therapy: Psychoanalytic, behavioral, and systems theory perspectives. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, A. S., & Knudson, R. M. (1978). Behavioral marriage therapy: I. A psychodynamicsystems analysis and critique.Family Process, 17 121–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. H., Wells, G. L., & Alvarez, M. D. (1978). Attribution in the context of confict and separation in close relationships. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kidd (Eds.),New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. H., Yarkin, K. L., Lightner, J. M., & Town, J. P. (1980). Unsolicited interpretation and recall of interpersonal events.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38 551–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958).The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S. (1978). A stimulus control model of change in behavioral marital therapy: Implications for contingency contracting.Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 4 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S. (1984). The modification of cognitive processes in behavioral marital therapy: Integrating cognitive and behavioral intervention strategies. In K. Hahlweg & N. S. Jacobson (Eds.),Marital interaction: Analysis and modification. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Elwood, R., & Dallas, M. (1981). The behavioral assessment of marital dysfunction. In D. H. Barlow (Ed.),Behavioral assessment of adult disorders. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & McDonald, D. W. (1982). Reactivity to positive and negative behavior in distressed and nondistressed married couples.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 706–714.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Margolin, G. (1979).Marital therapy: Strategies based on social learning and behavior exchange principles. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Moore, D. (1981). Spouses as observers of the events in their relationship.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49 269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Waldron, H., & Moore, D. (1980). Toward a behavioral profile of marital distress.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48 696–703.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jellison, J. M., & Green, J. (1981). A self-presentation approach to the fundamental attribution error: The norm of internality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40 643–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions.American Psychologist, 34 107–117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1979).Research design in clinical psychology. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution in social psychology.Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1972). Attribution in social interaction. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.),Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution.American Psychologist, 28 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. A., & Vallacher, R. R. (1981). Interpersonal engagement in social perception: The consequences of getting into the action.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40 990–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudson, R. M., Gurman, A. S., & Kniskern, D. P. (1979). Behavioral marriage therapy: A treatment in transition. In C. M. Franks & G. T. Wilson (Eds.),Annual review of behavior therapy (Vol. 7). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, B. E., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1981). Blame, control and marital satisfaction: Wives' attributions for conflict in marraige.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G. (1981). Behavior exchange in happy and unhappy marriages: A family cycle perspective.Behavior Therapy, 12 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, H. (1981a). Communication within ongoing intimate relationships: An attributional perspective.Social Psychology Bulletin, 7 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, H. (1981b). Interpretation and explanation: Influence on communicative exchanges within intimate relationships.Communication Quarterly, 8 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., & Ryder, R. G. (1970). Inventory of marital conflicts.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 3 443–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orvis, B. R., Kelley, H. H., & Butler, D. (1976). Attributional conflict in young couples. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.),New directions in attribution research. New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passer, M. W., Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1978). Multidimensional scaling of the causes for negative interpersonal behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 951–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Koivumaki, J. H. (1976). The perception of self and others: Acquaintanceship, affect, and actor-observer differences.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33 403–408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. C., & Kelley, H. H. (1981). Judgments of responsiblity for activities in close relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41 469–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkewitz, H., & O'Leary, K. D. (1981). A comparative outcome study of behavioral marital therapy and communication therapy.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (1982). The actor and the observer: How are their perceptions of causality divergent?Psychological Bulletin, 92 682–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. L. (1980). Strategic behavioral marital therapy: Toward a model for assessment and intervention. In J. P. Vincent (Ed.),Advances in family intervention, assessment and theory (Vol. 1). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. T. P., & Weiner, B. (1981). When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40 650–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., & Fichten, C. (1976). Denial of responsibility, videotape feedback and attribution theory: Relevance for behavioral marital therapy.Canadian Psychology Review, 17 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by grants from the Graduate School Research Fund at the University of Washington and by National Institute of Mental Health Grant No. 5 R01 MH 33838-02. Special thanks to the many research assistants who assisted us in various phases of this experiment: Dick Elwood, Jim Gilleland, Carolyn Phelps, Nicole Bussod, Victoria Follette, Christy Crose, George Nelson, B. J. McCrae, and Marianne DeGennaro. The authors would also like to thank Clifford Lunneborg for his valuable statistical consultation regarding the use of loglinear analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobson, N.S., McDonald, D.W., Follette, W.C. et al. Attributional processes in distressed and nondistressed married couples. Cogn Ther Res 9, 35–50 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01178749

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01178749

Keywords

Navigation