Abstract
This chapter describes the psychometric evaluation of the Us as a Couple Questionnaire (US) for assessing relationships. Two groups of participants completed the US: 112 Dutch community couples and 50 Dutch couples, of which one of the partners had a substance-related disorder. A Rasch analysis (Robin et al., Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(1), 90–94, 1999) revealed that 17 of the 20 items were found to fit the model, confirming its unidimensionality. This shorter version (the US-2) has sufficient internal consistency and good convergent and divergent validity. There was also a significant difference between the addicted couples and community couples, which supports its construct validity. The unidimensionality of the US-2 is an advantage over existing instruments as an evaluation instrument since its self-report nature makes it straightforward and inexpensive to administer in research and therapy settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arrindell, W. A., & Ettema, J. H. M. (1986). SCL-90: Manual for a multidimensional indicator for psychopathology [SCL 90: Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator]. Lisse: Swets Zeitlinger
Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods and Research, 10(2), 141–163.
Birnbaum, G. E. (2007). Attachment orientations, sexual functioning, and relationship satisfaction in a community group of women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(1), 21–35.
Birtchnell, J. (1999). Relating in psychotherapy: The application of a new theory. London: Praeger.
Birtchnell, J., Voortman, S., DeJong, C. A. J., & Gordon, D. (2006). Measuring interrelating within couples: The Couple’s Relating to Each Other Questionnaires (CREOQ). Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 79(3), 339–364.
Birtchnell, J., & Spicer, C. (unpublished). A new interpersonal system for describing and measuring the relating of marital partners. Available from the first author; Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London.
Boesch, R. P., Cerqueira, R., Safer, M. A., & Wright, T. L. (2007). Relationship satisfaction and commitment in long-term male couples: Individual and dyadic effects. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(6), 837–853.
Busby, D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., & Larson, D. H. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(3), 289–308.
Busby, D. M., Holman, T. B., & Taniguchi, N. (2001). RELATE: Relationship evaluation of the individual, family, cultural, and couple contexts. Family Relations, 50(4), 308–317.
Crocker, L. M., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Crosby, J. F. (1991). Cybernetics of cybernetics in assessment of marital quality. Contemporary Family Therapy, 13(1), 3–15.
DeJong, C. A. J., Mellink, D. C., & DeJong-Verhagen, J. G. (2008). A short interpersonal intervention is dyades: A pilot-study. [Een korte interpersoonlijke interventie bij dyades: een pilot-study]. Systeemtherapie, 20(2), 76–89.
Fincham, F. D., & Linfield, J. L. (1997). A new look at marital quality: Can spouses feel positive and negative about their marriage? Journal of Family Psychology, 11(4), 489–502.
Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). Ideals, perceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 933–940.
Hassebrauck, M., & Aron, A. (2001). Prototype matching in close relationships. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(9), 1111–1122.
Hendrick, S. S., Dicke, A., & Hendrick, C. (1998). The Relationship Assessment Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 137–142.
Heyman, R. E., Sayers, S. L., & Bellack, A. S. (1994). Global marital satisfaction versus marital adjustment: An empirical comparison of three measures. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(4), 432–446.
Hunt, S. M., Alonso, J., Bucquet, D., Niero, M., Wiklund, I., & McKenna, S. (1991). Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures. European Group for Health Management and Quality of Life Assessment. Review. Health Policy, 19(1), 33–44.
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
Kluwer, E. S. (2001). The quality of intimate relationships: An overview [De kwaliteit van intieme relaties: een overzicht]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 56, 138–152.
Lange, A. (1983). Interactional Problem Solving Questionnaire [Interactionele Oplossings Vragenlijst]. Manual and Research [Handleiding en onderzoek]. Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus.
Larson, J. H., Vatter, R. S., Galbraith, R. C., Holman, T. B., & Stahmann, R. F. (2007). The RELATionship Evaluation (RELATE) with therapist-assisted interpretation: Short-term effects on premarital relationships. Journal of Marital Family Therapy, 33(3), 364–374.
Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45(1), 141–151.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NJ: McGraw-Hill.
Olson, D. H. (1986). Circumplex model VII: Validation studies and FACES III. Family Process, 25, 337–351.
Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family sytems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144–167.
Robin, F., Xing, D. H., & Hambleton, R. K. (1999). Rasch Scaling Program. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(1), 90–94.
Rosen-Grandon, J. R., Myers, J. E., & Hattie, J. A. (2004). The relationship between marital characteristics, marital interaction processes, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82(1), 58–68.
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101–117.
Snyder, D. K. (1979). Multidimensional assessment of marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(4), 813–823.
Suarez-Falcon, J. C., & Glas, C. A. (2003). Evaluation of global testing procedures for item fit to the Rasch model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56, 127–143.
Troy, A. B., Lewis-Smith, J., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2006). Interracial and intraracial romantic relationships: The search for differences in satisfaction, conflict, and attachment style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(1), 65–80.
Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Jong, C., DeFuentes-Merillas, L., van de Werken, F., Birtchnell, J. (2016). The Us as a Couple Questionnaire (US): A Unidimensional Measure of Couple Satisfaction. In: Birtchnell, J., Newberry, M., Kalaitzaki, A. (eds) Relating Theory – Clinical and Forensic Applications. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50459-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50459-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50458-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50459-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)