Abstract
Hydrogen damage susceptibility of high-strength steel weldments and in other advanced materials, such as intermetallics, is a problem that restricts their application in many structural uses. A high-temperature (~500 °C) postweld treatment is often applied to remove the diffusible hydrogen and make the material more resistant to hydrogen damage. An electrotransport technique, using a direct current, can be applied at room temperature to move hydrogen from the underbead region, which is crack susceptible. The method has been used to electrorefine many metals and alloys containing both interstitial and substitu-tional solutes. This paper reviews the electrotransport theory and applies it to estimate the time of electrotransport treatment for lowering the hydrogen content from the underbead region by 50%. Thus, this theoretical work forms the basis for developing a new practice and provides sample calculations. Under a combined influence of the diffusional and electrotransport at room temperature using an electric field of 0.10 V/cm, ~30 min is required to remove 50% of the hydrogen from a starting concentration of 5 ppm. Theoretically, the treatment will also generate a heat of 0.95 kcal/s, which may not cause an excessive temperature increase in the workpiece. The electrotransport technique thus has the potential for a low-cost, low-temperature practice for mitigating hydrogen damage susceptibility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.P. Hirth,Metall. Trans. A, Vol 11 (No. 6), 1980, p 861
N. Yurioka and H. Suzuki,Int. Mater. Rev., Vol 35, 1990, p 217
J.N. Pratt and R.G.R. Sellors,Electrotransport in Metals and Alloys, Diffusion and Defects Monograph, DDMS-2, Trans. Tech. SA, Switzerland, 1973, p 1–202
F.R. Coe,Welding Steels without Hydrogen Cracking, The Welding Institute, 1973
D.J. Allen, B. Chew, and P. Morris,Weld. J., Vol 61, 1982, p 212
F. Matsuda, H. Kokawa, and S. Matsuzaki,Trans. Jpn Weld Soc, Vol 18, 1987, p 12
G.M. Evans and N. Christensen,Met. Const,: & British Welding J., Vol 3, 1971, p 188
R. Wang, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Annapolis, MD, private communication, 1993
R.E. Norberg,Phys. Rev., Vol 86, 1952, p 745
H.B. Huntington,Trans. TMS-AIME, Vol 245, 1969, p 2571
R.S. Sorbello,J. Phys. Chem. Solids, Vol 34, 1973, p 937
F. Skaupy, Electrizitatsleitung in Metallen,Verh. Dtsch. Phys Gesellschaft, Vol 16, 1914, p 159
V.B. Fiks, Fizika Tverdogo Tela,Sov. Phys., Vol 1, 1959, p 14
H.B. Huntington and A.R. Grone,J. Phys. Chem. Solids Vol 20 1961, p 76
C. Bosvieux and J. Friedel,J. Phys. Chem. Solids, Vol 23 1962 p 123
D.G. Westlake and J.F. Miller,J. Less-Common Met Vol 65 1979, p 139
B. Mishra and J.M. Sivertsen,Metall. Trans A Vol 14 1983 p 2255
V. Erckmann and H. Wipf,Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol 37, 1976, p 241
Y.K. Ivashina, V.F. Nemchenko, and V.G. Charnetskiy,Phys. Met. Metallogr., Vol 40, 1975, p 97
C.L. Jensen, Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University, 1977
D.E. Field, MS thesis, University of Minnesota, 1979
D.T. Peterson and C.L. Jensen,Metall. Trans A, Vol 9 1978 n 1673
R.A. Oriani and O.D. Gonzalez,Metall. Trans AIME Vol 239 1967, p 1041
R.E. Einzinger and H.B. Huntington,J. Phys. Chem. Solids Vol 35, 1979, p 1563
R. Pietrzak and B. Rozenfeld,J. Less-Common Met Vol 62 1990, p 23
C.V. Thompson and J.R. Lloyd, Electromigration and IC Interconnects,MRS Bull., December 1993, p 19
K. Shinozaki, X. Wang, and T.H. North,Metall. Trans. A, Vol 21 1990, p 1287
T. Terasaki, G.T. Hall, and R.J. Pargeter,Trans. Jpn. Weld Soc., Vol 22-1, 1991, p 52
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mishra, B., Olson, D.L. & David, S.A. Postweld electrotransport treatment. JMEP 3, 612–618 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02645259
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02645259