Conclusions
The electrical resistivity method appears to be the most appropriate method of delineating geothermal waters in the New Zealand Volcanic Region. The early concept of structural control of heat loss (within reasonable drilling distance from the surface) appears invalid except in isolated instances. The prospecting methods used to delineate structure have failed to prove profitable in discovering heat sources.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, A. C., andRobertson, E. I., 1955 —Geothermal Steam for Power in New Zealand (compiled byL. I. Grange). Chapter II:Geology and Geophysics. Bulletin 117, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Zealand.
Gerard, V. B., andLawrie, J. A., 1955 —Aeromagnetic Surveys in New Zealand, 1949–52. Geophysical Memoir 3, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Zealand.
Modriniak, N., andStudt, F. E., 1959 —Geological Structure and Volcanism of the Taupo-Tarawera District. N.Z.J. Geol. Geophys., 2: 654–84.
Thompson, G.E.K., 1960 —Shallow Temperature Surveying in the Wairakei-Taupo Area. N.Z.J. Geol. Geophys., 3: 553–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Paper read at the IAV International Symposium on Volcanology (New Zealand), scientific session of Nov. 29, 1965.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hatherton, T., Macdonald, W.J.P. & Thompson, G.E.K. Geophysical methods in geothermal prospecting in New Zealand. Bull Volcanol 29, 485–497 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02597171
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02597171