Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

System influences on posthomicide beliefs and distress

  • Barbara Dohrenwend Memorial Lecture
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Criminal justice system experiences in 150 family members of homicide victims were investigated. The study had two goals: (a) to document the experiences of homicide survivors in the criminal justice system, including case outcomes, criminal justice system activities, and satisfaction with system personnel; and (b) to determine if experiences with the police impacted posthomicide beliefs (cognitive assumptions about the world and one’s relationship to it) and psychological distress. The sample, which was identified through the Medical Examiner’s Office, was drawn from all criminal homicides from 1.5 to 5 years prior to selection. Results showed that family members of homicide victims were very dissatisfied with their experiences in the criminal justice system. Additionally, whereas objective system outcomes (e.g, arrest) did not directly affect posthomicide beliefs and distress, subjective system outcomes (e.g., police satisfaction) directly affected beliefs and indirectly affected distress. There was some support for both equity theory and a cognitive theory of change, the two theories that guided the model specification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amick-McMullan, A., Kilpatrick, D., & Veronen, L. (1989). Family survivors of homicide victims: A behavioral analysis.Behavior Therapist, 12, 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axsom, D., Bogle, T., Cunningham, P., & Canfield, D. (1994).Adjustment among mothers of African American homicide victims. Conference on Psychosocial and Behavioral Factors in Women’s Health. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Bard, M., Arnone, H., & Nemiroff, D. (1980). Contextual influences on the post-traumatic stress adaptation of homicide survivor-victims. In: C. Figley (Ed.)Trauma and its wake: Vol 2. Traumatic stress theory, research, and intervention (pp. 292–304). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, M., & Connolly, H. (1982).A retrospective study of homicide adaptation. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, M., & Sangrey, D. (1985).The crime victim’s book (2nd ed.). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bettleheim, B. (1979).Surviving and other essays. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E., & McIver, J. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis covariance structures. In G. Bohrnstedt & E. Borgatta (Eds.),Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Hoberman, H. (1983). Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 99–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, R. (1993).Multicultural assessment perspectives for professional psychology, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, E. D., & van der Zouwen, J. (1988). Data quality in telephone and face to face surveys: A comparative meta analysis. In R. Groves, P. Biemer, L. Lyberg, J. T. Massey, W. Nicholls, & J. Waksberg (Eds.)Telephone survey methodology (pp. 283–299). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L., & Spencer, P. (1982).The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual-1. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. (1978).Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York, Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubrow, N., & Garbarino, J. (1989). Living in the war zone: Mothers and young children in a public housing development.Child Welfare, 68, 3–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, R. (1984). Alienating the victim: Compensation and victim attitudes.Journal of Social Issues, 40, 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K., & LaGrange, R. (1987). The measurement of fear of crime.Sociological Inquiry, 57, 70–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, P., & Haney, B. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives.Law and Human Behavior, 20, 607–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I., Hymer, S., & Greenberg, M. (1987). Describing the crime victim: Psychological reactions to victimization.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J., Kostelny, K., & Dubrow, N. (1991).No place to be a child: Growing up in a War Zone. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, R., Schoor, J., & Goldstein, K. (1989). Longitudinal study of appraisal at Three Mile Island: Implications for life event research.Social Science and Medicine, 28, 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M., Ruback, R., & Westcott, D. (1983). Seeking help from the police: The victim’s perspective. In A. Nadler, J. Fisher, & B. DePaulo (Eds.),New directions in helping: Vol. 3. Applied perspectives on help-seeking, and-receiving (pp. 71–103). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. (1984).The ecology of stress. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A., & Redlich, F. (1958).Social class and mental illness. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992).Shattered assumptions: Toward a new psychology of trauma. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janoff-Bulman, R., & Frieze, I. (1983). A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization.Journal of Social Issues, 39, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1988).LISREL 7: A guide to the programs and applications. Chicago: National Educational Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaniasty, K. (1988).Pretest of candidate measures: Results of two studies. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville Urban Studies Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, T., Caddell, J., & Taylor, K. (1988). Mississippi Scale for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder: Three studies in reliability and validity.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 85–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1986). Content and process: An ecological view of the interdependence of practice and research.American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 581–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, D., Amick, A., & Resnick, H. (1990). The impact of homicide on surviving family members. Final report.

  • Liska, A., & Baccaglina, W. (1990). Feeling safe by comparison: Crime in the newspapers.Social Problems, 37, 360–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorion, R., & Saltzman, W. (1993). Children’s exposure to community violence: Following a path concern to research to action. In D. Reiss, J. Richters, M. Radke-Yarrow, & D. Scharff (Eds.)Children and violence (pp. 55–65). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marans, S., & Cohen, D. (1993). Children and inner-city violence: Strategies for intervention. In L. Leavitt & N. Fox (Eds.),Psychological effects of war and violence on children (pp. 281–302). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, L., Sakheim, D., & Abrahamson, D. (1988). Trauma and victimization: A model of psychological adaptation.Counseling Psychogist, 16, 531–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, R., Friedman, L., & Getzel, G. (1988). Helping families of homicide victims: A multidimensional approach.Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1, 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Injury Control and Prevention. (1993).Ten leading causes of death in the United States—1993. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. (1990). Screening for traumatic stress: A scale for use in the general population.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1704–1718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F., & Johnson, K. (1988) The effects of “self-help” precautionary measures on criminal victimization and fear.Journal of Urban Affairs, 10, 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F., & Kaniasty, K. (1991). The psychological experience of crime: A test of the mediating role of beliefs in explaining the distress of victims.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 239–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F., & Thompson, M. (1993). Victims in the system: The influence of police responsiveness on victim alienation.Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, 515–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osofsky, J. (1995). The effects of exposure to violence on young children.American Psychologist, 50, 782–788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967).Task Force report: Crime and its impact—An assessment. Washington DC.: U.S. Goverment Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Task Force on Victims of Crime. (1982).Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R., Gutek, B., & Walsh, J. (1980). Telephone interviewing: A reappraisal and a field experiment.Basic and Applied Psychology, 1, 127–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resick, P. (1984). The trauma of rape and the criminal justice system.Justice System Journal, 9, 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D., & Kilpatrick, D. (1990). Families’ and friends’ indirect victimization by crime. In A. Lurigio, W. Skogan, & R. Davis (Eds.),Victims of crime: Problems, policies, and programs (pp. 120–138). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965).Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Internal-external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs,80(1, Whole No. 609).

  • Russell, D., & Cutrona, C. (1984).The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.

  • Sales, E., Baum, M., & Shore, B. (1984). Victim readjustment following assault.Journal of Social Issues, 40, 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidner, A., Burling, T., Fisher, L., & Blair, T. (1990). Characteristics of telephone applicants to a residential rehabilitation program for homeless veterans.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 825–831.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shakoor, B., & Chalmers, D. (1991). Co-victimization of African American children who witness violence and the theoretical implications of its effects on their cognitive, emotional, and behavioral development.Journal of the National Medical Association, 83, 233–238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, J. (1985). The criminal justice system and the victim.Victimology: An International Journal, 10, 585–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. (1989). The impact of police on victims. In E. Viano (Ed.),Crime and its victims: International research and public policy issues (pp. 71–77). New York: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W., Lurigio, A., & Davis, R. (1990). Criminal victimization. In A. Lurigio, W. Skogan, & R. Davis (Eds.),Victims of crime: Problems, policies, and programs (pp. 120–138). Newbury Pack, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sue, S. (1991). Ethnicity and culture in psychological research and practice. In J. D. Goodchilds (Ed.),Psychological perspectives on human diversity in America. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, M. (1980). The “second injury” to victims. In L. Kivens (Ed.),Evaluation and change: Services for survivors (pp. 36–38). Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tausing, J., & Freeman, E. (1988). The next best thing to being there: Conducting the clinical research interview by telephone.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 418–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation.American Psychologist, 38, 1161–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., & Norris, F. (1992). Crime, social status, and alienation.American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 97–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. (1984). Toward a distinctive community psychology: An ecological metaphor for training and the conduct of research.American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchfarber, A., & Klecka, W. (1976).Measuring crime victimization: An efficient method. Washington DC: The Police Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (1994).FBI Uniform Crime Reports. Washington DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G., & Berscheid, E. (1978).Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, C. (1983). Coping with victimization: Conclusions and implications for future research.Journal of Social Issues, 39, 197–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. R. Barry Ruback

    Present address: Crime, Law and Justice Program, Department of Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania

  2. Martie P. Thompson

    Present address: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Grady Health System, 80 Butler Street, 30335, Georgia, Atlanta

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Georgia State University, Georgia, USA

    Martie P. Thompson, Fran H. Norris & R. Barry Ruback

Authors
  1. Martie P. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fran H. Norris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Barry Ruback
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This study was funded by a predoctoral National Research Service Award fellowship to Martie Thompson, from the Violence and Traumatic Stress Research Branch at the National Institute of Mental Health. We thank Paula Vardaman for her help with sample recruitment and data collection, Nancy Deore and Kelly Harlan for their help with data collection, and Ann Price for help with data entry. Additionally, we would like to thank Lieutenant Agan of the Atlanta Homicide Division, the staff at the Fulton County Medical Examiner’s Office, and the staff at the Victim Witness Assistance Program for making this study possible by providing access to their files. Finally, we thank Morton Bard for his feedback in quastionnaire development and study design.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, M.P., Norris, F.H. & Barry Ruback, R. System influences on posthomicide beliefs and distress. Am J Commun Psychol 24, 785–809 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511035

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511035

Key words

Search

Navigation