Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to assess (a) the extent of attrition in the processing of sexual assault cases in the legal systems, (b) factors associated with attrition at various stages in the process, and (c) victims' experiences in the legal system and the relations between these experiences and recovery. Our results suggest that substantial attrition continues to occur in the prosecution of rape cases, that more severe assaults are prosecuted more vigorously, that victims are generally satisfied with the police (but not with the legal system in general), and that neither attitudes nor case outcomes are associated with victims' postrape recovery. Research and policy implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (3rd ed. revised). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, C. D., & Feldman-Summers, S. (1978). Perceptions of the effectiveness of the criminal justice system: The female victim's perspective.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 5, 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, R. (1993). Predicting the reporting of rape victimizations: Have rape reforms made a difference?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 254–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradmiller, L. L. & Walters, W. S. (1985). Seriousness of sexual assault charges: Influencing factors.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 463–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caringella-MacDonald, S. (1985a). Sexual assault prosecution: An examination of model rape legislation in Michigan.Women and Politics, 4, 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caringella-MacDonald, S. (1985b). The comparability in sexual and nonsexual assault case treatment: Did statute change meet the objective?Crime and Delinquency, 31, 206–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, S. M., & Torney, M. (1981). The decisions and the processing of rape victims through the criminal justice system.California Sociologist, 4, 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cluss, P. A., Boughton, J., Frank, E., Stewart, B. D., & West, D. (1983). The repe victim: Psychological correlates of participation in the legal process.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 10, 342–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feild, H. S. (1979). Rape trials and jurors' decisions: A psychosocial analysis of the effects of victim, defendant, and case characteristics.Law and Human Behavior, 3, 261–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, P., & Borgida, E. (1992). Rape, trauma syndrome: A review of case law and psychological research.Law and Human Behavior, 16, 293–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, P., Klein, C., & Seales, L. (1996).A longitudinal study of attributions control beliefs, coping strategies, and postrape symptoms. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Frohmann, L., (1991). Discrediting victims' allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections.Social Problems, 38, 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvin, J., & Polk, K. (1983, January). Attrition in case processing: Is rape unique?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 126–153.

  • Greenberg, M. S., & Ruback, R. B. (1992).After the crime: Victim decision making. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greuel, L. (1992). Police officers' beliefs about cues associated with deception in rape cases In F. Losel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesner (Eds.),Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 234–239). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. J., & Gottfredson, M. (1976). The victim's decision to not invoke the criminal justice process. In W. F. McDonald (Ed.),Criminal justice and the victim (pp. 115–145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, K. (1980). Justice for whom? Rape victims assess the legal-judicial system.Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 8, 126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, L. L., & Burgess, A. W. (1975). Rape: The victim and the criminal justice system.International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 3, 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, L. L., & Burgess, A. W. (1978).The victim of rape: Institutional reactions, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, J. & Spohn, C. (1991). Rape law reform and instrumental change in six urban jurisdictions.Law & Society Review, 25, 117–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerstetter, W. A. (1990). Gateway to justice: Police and prosecutorial responses to sexual assaults against women.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 267–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerstetter, W. A., & Van Winkle, B. (1990). Who decides? A study of the complainant's decision to prosecute in rape cases.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 268–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudten, R. D., Meade, A., Knudten, M., & Doerner, W. (1976). The victim in the administration of criminal justice: Problems and perceptions. In W. F. McDonald (Ed.),Criminal justice and the victim (pp. 115–145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konecni, V., & Ebbesen, E. (1984). The mythology of legal decision-making.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 5–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G. D. (1980a). The effect of sexual stratification by race on official reactions to rape.American Sociological Review, 45, 842–854.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G. D. (1980b). Variables affecting guilty pleas and convictions in rape cases: Toward a social theory of rape processing.Social Forces, 58, 833–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G. D. (1981). Official reactions to social problems: Police decisions in sexual assault cases.Social Problems, 28, 582–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1977a).Forcible rape: A national survey of the response by police (Vol. 1). Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1977b).Forcible rape: A national survey of the response by prosecutors (Vol. 1) Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1977c).Forcible rape: Final project report Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCahill, T. W., Meyer, L. C., & Fischman, A. M. (1979).The aftermath of rape. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. A., & LaFree, G. D. (1982). Sexual assault and its prosecution: A comparison, with other crimes.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 73, 1282–1305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzel, M. T., & Hartung, C. M. (1993). Psychological research on the police: An introduction to a special section on the psychology of law enforcement.Law and Human Behavior, 17, 151–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F., & Thompson M. (1993). The victim in the system: The influence of police responsiveness on victim alienation.Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, 515–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polk, K. (1985). Rape reform and criminal justice processing.Crime and Delinquency, 31, 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, V. M., & Randall, S. C. (1982). The impact of investigator perceptions of victim legitimacy on the processing of rape/sexual assault cases.Symbolic Interaction, 5, 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruback, R. B. (1993). Comment on Bachman (1993). The victim-offender relationship does affect victims' decisions to report sexual assaults.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 271–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, E., Baum, M., & Shore, B. (1984). Victim readjustment following assault.Journal of Social Issues, 40, 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, B., Rich, R. F., & Reich, J. (1987). Victimization policy research.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 326–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, J. (1983). Victim-witness services and the needs of the victim.Victimology, 8, 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. G. (1989). The impact of police on victims. In E. C. Viano (Ed.),Crime and its victims: International research and public policy issues (pp. 71–77). New York: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C., & Horney, J. (1993). Rape law reform and the effect of victim characteristics on case processing.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 383–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steketee, G., & Austin, A. (1989). Rape victims and the justice system: Utilization and impact.The Social Service Review, 63, 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1992).Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1991, NCJ-139563. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weninger, R. A. (1978). Factors affecting the prosecution of a rape: A case study of Travis County, Texas.Virginia Law Review 64, 357–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. M. (1981). Few convictions in rape cases: Empirical evidence concerning some alternative explanations.Journal of Criminal Justice, 9, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 55455-0344, Minneapolis, MN

    Patricia A. Frazier & Beth Haney

Authors
  1. Patricia A. Frazier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beth Haney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Frazier, P.A., Haney, B. Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives. Law Hum Behav 20, 607–628 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499234

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499234

Keywords

Search

Navigation