Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation between hydrophobic and molecular shape descriptors and retention data of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in reversed-phase chromatography on non-liquid-crystalline, nematic, and smetic stationary phases

  • Originals
  • Column Liquid Chromatography
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The local anisotropic ordering of side-chain liquid-crystalline polymer (SCLCP) stationary phases has been revealed statistically. For this purpose the RP HPLC separation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) on silica coated with three classes (non-liquid-crystalline, nematic, and smectic) of side-chain polymer (SCP) has been compared. The logarithm of the capacity factor (logk) was correlated with three PAH descriptors-the connectivity index (χ) or the hydrophobic fragmental constant (logP), the length-to-breadth ratio (L/B), and a non-planarity term (N p). Statistical results revealed good correlation between the model and experimental data, enabling the different stationary phases to be compared. Recognition of solute size seems similar for each class of polymer but solute non-planarity recognition grows continuously as ordering of the liquid-crystal polymer increases. Recognition of solute lengthening is non-existent for non-liquid-crystalline polymers and suddenly, appears with liquid crystalline polymers. Shape recognition is better for smectic than for nematic SCP. The predictive, ability of this model was tested on highly condensed aromatic compounds. The connectivity index, χ, did not seem appropriate for such systems. its replacement by Rekker's hydrophobic, fragmental constant, logP, was necessary for fitting the retention of these solutes on liquid-crystalline stationary phases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keller, H.Z. Anal. Chem. 1963,198, 254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Finkelmann, H.; Laub, R.J.; Roberts, W.L.; Smith, C.A. InPolynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Physical and Biological Chemistry: Cooke, M.; Dennis, A.J.; Fisher, G.L. Eds, Battele Press, Columbus, OH,1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gritti, F.; Félix, G.; Achard, M.-F.; Hardouin, F.J. Chromatogr. A 2000,893, 359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marciniak, W.; Witkiewicz, Z.J. Chromatogr. 1981,207, 333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marciniak, W.; Witkiewicz.Z. Biul. Wojsk. Akad. Techn. 1980,29, 73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Serpinet, J.Wiad. Chem. 1976,30, 793.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jamil Chowdhury, M.A.; Ihara, H.; Sagawa, T.; Hirayama, C.J. Chromatogr. A 2000,877, 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klein, B.H.; Springer, J.J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1991,14, 1519.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gritti, F.; Félix, G.; Achard, M.-F.; Hardouin, F.J. Chromatogr. A 2001,913, 147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gritti, F.; Félix, G.; Achard, M.-F.; Hardouin, F.J. Chromatogr. A 2000,897, 131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gritti, F.; Félix, G.; Achard, M.-F.; Hardouin, F.J. Chromatogr. A,2001,922, 51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Keller, P.; Hardouin, F.; Mauzac, M.; Achard, M.-F.Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1988,155, 171.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mauzac, M.; Hardouin, F.; Richard, H.; Achard, M.-F.; Sigaud, G.; Gasparoux, H.Eur. Polym. J. 1986,22, 137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gray, G.; Hill, J.S.; Lacey, D.Angew. Chem. Int. Educ. Engl. Adv. Mater. 1989,28, 1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Terrien, I.; Achard, M.-F.; Félix, G.; Hardouin, F.J. Chromatogr. A 1998,810, 19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rekker, R.F. InThe Hydrophobic Fragmental Constant: Elsevier, Amsterdam.1977.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Randic, M.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975,97, 6609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sander, L.C.; Wise, S.A. InPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Structure Index: NIST Special Publication 922, December1997.

  19. Hall, L.H., Kier, L.B.; Murray, W.J.; Randic, M.J. Pharm. Sci. 1975,64, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hall, L.H.; Kier, L.B.; Murray, W.J.J. Pharm. Sci. 1975,64, 1974.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hall, L.H., Kier, L.B.; Murray, W.J.J. Pharm. Sci. 1975,64, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Radecki, A.; Lamparczyk, H.; Kaliszan, R.Chromatographia 1979,12, 595.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jinno, K.; Kawasaki, K.Chromatographia 1983,17, 445.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wise, S.A.; Bonnett, W.J.; Guenther, F.R.; May, W.E.J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1981,19, 457.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Terrien, I., PhD thesis, Université Bordeaux 1, Bordeaux,1998.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gritti, F., Sourigues, S., Félix, G. et al. Correlation between hydrophobic and molecular shape descriptors and retention data of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in reversed-phase chromatography on non-liquid-crystalline, nematic, and smetic stationary phases. Chromatographia 55, 149–156 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492135

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492135

Key Words

Navigation