Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shoot development and flowering in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

  • Review
  • Published:
Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The shoot system of potato is a configuration of stems with terminal inflorescences. In this review, shoot development is quantified in terms of stem production, while stem development is quantified in terms of leaf and flower primordia production per stem, which are functions of the rates and the durations of primordia initiation. The effect of the position of the stem in the shoot system on number of leaves and flowers per stem is also evaluated.

Flowering of individual stems is described by the ‘time to flower primordia initiation’ (expressed in number of leaves produced) and ‘flower production’ (a function of the number and the development of flower primordia). At warmer temperatures and longer daylengths the number of leaves and flower primordia per stem, and the number of stems per shoot increase by prolonging stem production and primordia development. Temperature and photoperiod also affect flower primordia survival by altering assimilate production and partitioning.

The photothermal response of the number of leaves per stem is small compared to the response of stem production; at higher temperatures, flower primordia survival becomes the principal factor determining flower production.

The similarity of the signals leading to flower primordia initiation and tuberization, and the relation between shoot and tuber growth are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Wahab, A.E. & J.C. Miller, 1963. Re-evaluation of some techniques and their effect on stimulating flowering in four Irish potato varieties in Louisiana.American Potato Journal 40: 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Addicott, F.T. & A.B. Addicott, 1982. Abscission. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, K.U., 1977. Potatoes for the tropics. Mumtaj Kamal, Dacca, Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, J.C.S. & T.B. Daynard, 1976. Effect of photoperiod on development and number of spikelets of a temperate and some low-latitude wheats.Annals of Applied Biology 83: 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders, C.J.M. 1991. Flowering and true seed production in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). 2. Effects of stem density and pruning of lateral stems.Potato Research 34: 379–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders, C.J.M. 1992. The effect of photoperiod on flowering and TPS production in the warm tropics.Potato Research 35: 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders, C.J.M. 1993. Effect of plant density on the inflorescence production of stems and the distribution of flower production in potato.Potato Research 36: 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders, C.J.M., J.H. Neuteboom & P.C. Struik, 1995. Relation between berry weight, number of seeds per berry and 100-seed weight in potato inflorescences.Scientia Horticulturae 61: 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders, C.J.M. & P.C. Struik, 1994. Photothermal response of sympodium development and flowering in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under controlled conditions.Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 42(4): 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders, C.J.M. & S.G. Wiersema, 1991. Flowering and true seed production in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Effects of inflorescence position, nitrogen treatment, and harvest date of berries.Potato Research 34: 365–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous, 1987. EPPO crop growth stage keys. No. 12. Potato.EPPO Bulletin 17: 497–502.

  • Atherton, J.G. & G.P. Harris, 1986. Flowering. In: J.G. Atherton & J. Rudich (Eds), The tomato crop. A scientific basis for improvement. Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp. 167–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A.D., 1991. Plant form. An illustrated guide to flowering plant morphology (p. 250). Oxford University Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodlaender, K.B.A., 1963. Influence of temperature, radiation, and photoperiod in development and yield. In: J.D. Ivins & E.L. Milthorpe (Eds.), The growth of the potato. Butterworths, London, pp. 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolle-Jones, E.W., 1954. Nutrient levels and flower production in the potato.Physiologia Plantarum 7: 698–703.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner, P.M. & M.A. Taha, 1966. Studies in potato agronomy. The effects of variety, seed size and time of planting on growth, development and yield.Journal of Agricultural Science 66: 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.L., 1964. Carbohydrate utilization as a factor in plant growth.Australian Journal of Biological Science 17: 867–877.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, W.G., 1989. The potato. Propagation by true seed (Chapter 3). Longman, Essex, UK. pp. 68–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, A., 1969. Studies on the post-initiation development of flower buds of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum).Journal of Horticultural Science 44: 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, G.P. & H.W. Howard, 1945. Note on the inheritance of the King Edward type of colour in potatoes.Journal of Genetics 46: 358–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chailakhyan, M.Kh., L.I. Yanina, A.G. Devedzhyan & G.N. Lotova, 1981. Photoperiodism and tuber formation in graftings of tobacco onto potato.Doklady Akademic Nauk S.S.S.R. 257: 1276–1280.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIP, 1977. CIP Annual Report 1977, Lima, Peru, 156 pp.

  • Clarke, A.E. & P.M. Lombard, 1939. Relation of length of day to flower and seed production in potato varieties.American Potato Journal 16: 236–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A.E. & P.M. Lombard, 1942. Flower bud formation in the potato plant as influenced by variety, size of seed piece, and light.American Potato Journal 19: 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dam, J. van, P.L. Kooman & P.C. Struik, 1996. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on early growth and final number of tubers in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.).Potato Research 39: 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danert, S., 1957. Über den Sprossaufbau und die Blattentwicklung bei der Kartoffel.Der Züchter 27: 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman, J.A. & E. Heuvelink, 1992. Factors affecting the number of leaves preceding the first inflorescence in tomato.Journal of Horticultural Science 67: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, M. & J. Rudich, 1985. Effect of heat stress on assimilate partitioning in tomato.Annals of Botany 56: 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, C.M. & J.G. Hawkes, 1943. Photoperiodism in the potato. Imperial Bureau of Plant Breeding and Genetics. Cambridge, England: Technical Communication (Part I).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwelle, R.B., G.E. Kleinkopf & J.J. Pavek, 1981. Stomatal conductance and gross photosynthesis of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as influenced by irradiance, temperature and growth stage.Potato Research 24: 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, E.M., 1908. Some essential points in potato breeding.Connecticut Experimental Station Report 31: 429–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.H., R.J. Summerfield, G.O. Edmeades & E.H. Roberts, 1992. Photoperiod, leaf number, and interval from tassel initiation to emergence in diverse cultivars from maize.Crop Science 32: 398–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, E.E., 1985. Cuttings as simplified models of the potato plant. In: P.H. Li (Ed.), Potato Physiology. Academic Press, Orlando, USA, pp. 154–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, E.E. & P.C. Struik, 1992. Tuber formation in potato: induction, initiation, and growth.Horticultural Reviews 14: 89–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firman, D.M., P.J. O'Brien & E.J. Allen, 1991. Leaf and flower initiation in potato (Solanum tuberosum) sprouts and stems in relation to number of nodes and tuber initiation.Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 117: 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W.W. & H.A. Allard, 1923. Further studies in photoperiodism, the response of the plant to relative length of the day and night.Journal of Agricultural Research 23: 871–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R.M. & J. Moorby, 1967. The effect of CCC on the initiation of potato tubers.European Potato Journal 10: 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, L.E., 1956. Some factors for tuberization in the potato.Annals of Botany 43: 281–288.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, L.E., 1965. Physiology of tuberization in plants. Handbuch Pflanzenphysiologie: 1328–1354.

  • Griess, H., 1987. Code zur Kennzeichnung von Entwicklungsstadien und-phasen der Kartoffel (Anleitung). Berlin, Akademie der Landwirtschaftswissenschaften der DDR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griess, H., 1989. Code of developmental stages for potato. In: Summaries of EAPR Section Physiology meeting. Gross Lüsewitz, German Democratic Republic, June 1989. Gross Lüsewitz, GDR. Institute for Potato Research of the Academy for Sciences of the GDR, pp. 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, J.G., 1943. The photoperiodic reactions of some South American potatoes. Imperial Bureau of Plant Breeding and Genetics. Cambridge, England: Technical Communication (Part II).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heemst, H.D.J. van, 1986. The distribution of dry matter during growth of a potato crop.Potato Research 29: 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helder, J., 1993. Tuber formation in the wild potato speciesSolanum demissum Lind. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helder, H., A. van der Maarl, D. Vreugdenhil & P.C. Struik, 1993. Stolon characteristics and tuber initiation in a wild potato species (Solanum demissum Lindl.).Potato Research 36: 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelink, E., 1996. Tomato growth and yield: quantitative analysis and synthesis. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, L.C. & J.D. Hewitt, 1986. Fruit development. In: J.G. Atherton & J. Rudich (Eds), The tomato crop. A scientific basis for improvement. Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp. 201–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, R.G., 1973. Long-day effects on growth and flower initiation of tomato plants in low light.Annals of Applied Biology 73: 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, G., 1963. Growth and development in the young tomato. I. The effect of temperature and light intensity on growth of the shoot apex and leaf primordia.Journal of Experimental Botany 14: 326–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansky, S.H. & D.M. Thompson, 1990. The effect of flower removal on potato tuber yield.Canadian Journal of Plant Science 70: 1223–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies, R.A. & H.M. Lawson, 1991. A key for the stages of development of potato (Solanum tuberosum).Annals of Applied Biology 119: 387–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessup, R.J., 1958. Potato breeding in New South Wales.The Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, March 1958: 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H.A. & H.A. Borthwick, 1938. Influence of photoperiod and other factors on the formation of flower primordia in the potato.American Potato Journal 15: 331–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinet, J.M., 1977. Effect of light conditions on the development of the inflorescence in tomato.Scientia Horticulturae 6: 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinet, J.M. & R.M. Sachs, 1984. Light and flower development. In: D. Vince-Prue, B. Thomas, K.E. Cockshull (Eds), Light and the flowering process. Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooman, P., 1995. Yielding ability of potato crops as influenced by temperature and daylength. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, F.A., 1939. Incidence and inheritance of pollen sterility in potato.Journal of Agricultural Research 58: 593–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krijthe, N., 1962. Ontwikkeling en groei van aardappelknol en plant. Publication 84. Institute for Storage and Processing of Agricultural Produce (IBVL). Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku, S.B., G.E. Edwards & C.B. Tanner, 1977. Effects of light, carbon dioxide and temperature on photosynthesis and transpiration inSolanum tuberosum.Plant Physiology 59: 868–872.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A.C., 1949. Flower initiation in total darkness.Plant Physiology 24: 530–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A.C. & S.L. Lam, 1960. A leaf factor influencing tomato earliness.Proceedings of the American Society of Horticultural Science 76: 543–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. & N. Kedar, 1985.Solanum tuberosum. In: A.H. Halevy, Handbook of flowering, Volume IV: CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp. 363–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundegårdh, H., 1966. Plant physiology (revised and edited translation by F.M. Irvine & W.O. James). Oliver & Boyd. Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malagamba, P., 1988. Potato production from true seed.HortScience 23(3): 495–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcelis, L.F.M., 1993. Simulation of biomass allocation in greenhouse crops-a review.Acta Horticulturae 328: 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinus, J., 1993. Production of above-ground seed tubers on stem cuttings from eight potato cultivars.Potato Research 36: 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinus, J. & K.B.A. Bodlaender, 1975. Response of some potato varieties to temperature.Potato Research 18: 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marré, E. & A. Murneek, 1953. Carbohydrate metabolism in the tomato fruit as affected by pollination, fertilization and application of growth regulators.Plant Physiology 28: 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C., R. Vernoy & N. Paynot, 1982. Physiologie végétale. Photopériodisme, tubérisation, floraison et phénolamides. C.R. Acad. Sc., Série III 295: 565–567.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClean, J.G. & F.J. Stevenson, 1952. Methods of obtaining seed on Russet Burbank and similar-flowering varieties of potatoes.American Potato Journal 29: 206–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, C.N. & F.C. Hsu, 1976. Position-dependent development of tobacco meristems.Nature 259: 564–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, C.N., S.R. Singer, J.S. Gebhardt & K.A. Dennin, 1987. Floral determination: a critical process in meristem ontogeny. In: J.G. Atherton (Ed.), Manipulation of flowering. Butterworths, London, pp. 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, T.P., 1927. The potato: its history, varieties, culture and diseases. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miglietta, F., 1992. Simulation of wheat ontogenesis. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, G., 1985. TPS research in Korea. In: Innovative methods for propagating potatoes. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru, pp. 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, A. & W. Henninger, 1978. Genotypische Photosyntheserate von Kartoffeln und ihre mögliche Rolle für die Ertragsbildung.Photosynthetica 12: 51–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D.A. & A.J. Newell, 1987. The regulation of assimilate partitioning and inflorescence development in tomato. In: J.G. Atherton (Ed.), Manipulation of flowering. Butterworths, London, pp. 379–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nösberger, J. & E.C. Humphries, 1965. The influence of removing tubers on dry matter production and net assimilation rate of potato plants.Annals of Botany 29: 579–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallais, N., 1987. True potato seed quality.Theoretical and Applied Genetics 73: 784–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallais, N., 1994. True Potato Seed: a global perspective.CIP Circular 20 (1): 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C.F., 1953. A method of obtaining fruits in the potato variety Russet Burbank.American Potato Journal 30: 89–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudfoot, K.G., 1965. The effects of flowering and berry formation on tuber yield inSolanum demissum Lindl.European Potato Journal 8: 118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M.S. & J.H. Wilson, 1977. Determination of spikelet number in wheat. I. Effect of varying photoperiod on ear development.Australian Journal of Agricultural Science 28: 565–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E.H. & R.J. Summerfield, 1987. Measurement and prediction of flowering in annual crops. In: J.G. Atherton (Ed.), Manipulation of flowering. Butterworths. London, pp. 17–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadik, S., 1983. Potato production from true seed. Present and future. In: W.J. Hooker (Ed.), Research for the potato in the year 2000. Proceedings of the International Congress in celebration of the tenth anniversary of the International Potato Center. Lima, Peru, 22–27 February, 1982, pp. 18–25.

  • Salisbury, F.B., 1963. The flowering process. Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, G.R., 1990. The physiology of tropical crop production. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, F.C., U. Moreno & W.M. Roca, 1981. Growth, form and composition of potato plants as affected by environment.Annals of Botany 48: 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struik, P.C. & E.E. Ewing, 1995. Crop physiology of potato (Solanum tuberosum): responses to photoperiod and temperature relevant to crop modelling. In: A.J. Haverkort & D.K.L. MacKerron (Eds). Ecology and modelling of potato crops under conditions limiting growth. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht. The Netherlands, pp. 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struik, P.C., J. Geertsema & C.H.M.G. Custers, 1989. Effects of shoot, root and stolon temperature on the development of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plant. I. Development of the haulm.Potato Research 32: 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, B., 1962. Some factors affecting stolon and tuber formation in the potato plant.European Potato Journal 5: 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiagarajah, M.R. & L.A. Hunt, 1982. Effects of temperature on leaf growth in corn (Zea mays).Canadian Journal of Botany 60: 1647–1652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thijn, G.A., 1954. Observations on flower induction with potatoes.Euphytica 3: 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbitts, T.W., W. Cao & R.M. Wheeler, 1994. The growth of potatoes for CELLS. NASA Contractor Report 177646, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A.D. & E.E. Ewing, 1988. Effects of photoperiod, night temperature, and irradiance on flower production in potato.Potato Research 31: 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umaerus, M., 1987. True potato seed. Proceedings of the 10th Triennial conference of the European Association for Potato Research. Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 72–102.

  • Upadhya, M.D., K.C. Thakur, Asha Juneja & M.S. Kadian, 1985. True Potato Seed Production: Flowering, Quality and Economics. In: Innovative methods for propagation of potatoes. CIP, Lima, Peru, pp. 117–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince-Prue, D., 1975. Photoperiodism in plants. McGraw-Hill, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, J., 1995. The foliar development of the potato plant and modulations by environmental factors. In: P. Kabat, B.J. van den Broek, B. Marshall, J. Vos (Eds), Modelling and parameterization of the soil-plant-atmosphere system. A comparison of potato growth models. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, pp. 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren Wilson, J., 1972. Introduction 2. Control of crop processes. In: A.R. Rees, K.E. Cockshull, D.W. Hand & R.G. Hurd (Eds), Crop processes in controlled environment. Proceedings of an International symposium, Littlehampton, Sussex. July 1991. Academic Press, London, pp. 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H.O., 1934. The effect of controlled nitrogen supply with different temperatures and photoperiods upon the development of the potato plant.Nebraska Agricultural Experimental Station Research Bulletin 75.

  • Werner, H.O., 1942. Relation of length of photoperiod and intensity of supplemental light to the production of flowers and berries.Journal of Agricultural Research 64: 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, H.T., 1944. Het probleem van de steriliteit bij de aardappel.Mededelingen NAK 1: 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, E., 1971. Kartoffelbau in Tirol. II. Photosynthese Vermogen und Respiration von verschiedene Kartoffelsorten.Potato Research 14: 1–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S., A. Marani & J. Rudich, 1990. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on assimilate partitioning in potato plants.Annals of Botany 66: 513–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeeuw, D. de, 1954. De invloed van het blad op de groei.Mededelingen Landbouw Hogeschool, Wageningen 54: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agronomy, Wageningen Agricultural University, Haarweg 333, 6709 RZ, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    C. J. M. Almekinders & P. C. Struik

Authors
  1. C. J. M. Almekinders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. C. Struik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almekinders, C.J.M., Struik, P.C. Shoot development and flowering in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Potato Res 39, 581–607 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02358477

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02358477

Additional keywords

Search

Navigation