Abstract
Most existing wavelet-based image denoising techniques are developed for additive white Gaussian noise. In applications to speckle reduction in medical ultrasound (US) images, the traditional approach is first to perform the logarithmic transform (homomorphic processing) to convert the multiplicative speckle noise model to an additive one, and then the wavelet filtering is performed on the log-transformed image, followed by an exponential operation. However, this non-linear operation leads to biased estimation of the signal and increases the computational complexity of the filtering method. To overcome these drawbacks, an efficient, non-homomorphic technique for speckle reduction in medical US images is proposed. The method relies on the true characterisation of the marginal statistics of the signal and speckle wavelet coefficients. The speckle component was modelled using the generalised Nakagami distribution, which is versatile enough to model the speckle statistics under various scattering conditions of interest in medical US images. By combining this speckle model with the generalised Gaussian signal first, the Bayesian shrinkage functions were derived using the maximum a posteriori (MAP) criterion. The resulting Bayesian processor used the local image statistics to achieve soft-adaptation from homogeneous to highly heterogeneous areas. Finally, the results showed that the proposed method, named GNDShrink, yielded a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) gain of 0.42 dB over the best state-of-the-art despeckling method reported in the literature, 1.73 dB over the Lee filter and 1.31 dB over the Kaun filter at an input SNR of 12.0 dB, when tested on a US image. Further, the visual comparison of despeckled US images indicated that the new method suppressed the speckle noise well, while preserving the texture and organ surfaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achim, A., Bezerianos, A., andTsakalides, P. (2001): ‘Novel Bayesian multiscale method for speckle removal in medical ultrasound images’,IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.,20, pp. 772–783
Chang, G., Yu, B., andVetterli, M. (2000): ‘Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression’,IEEE Trans. Image Process.,9, pp. 1532–1546
Dai, M., Peng, C., Chan, A. K., andLoguinov, D. (2004): ‘Bayesian wavelet shrinkage with edge detection for SAR image despeckling’,IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,42, pp. 1642–1648
Donoho, D. L. (1995): ‘De-noising by soft-thresholding’,IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory,41, pp. 613–627.
Foucher, S., Bénié, G. B., andBoucher, J. (2001): ‘Multiscale MAP filtering of SAR images’,IEEE Trans. Image Process.,10, pp. 49–60
Gupta, S., Chauhan, R. C., andSaxena, S. C. (2004): ‘A wavelet based statistical approach for speckle reduction in medical ultrasound images’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,42, pp. 189–192
Kuan, D.T., Sawchuk, A. A., Strand, T. C., andChavel, P. (1985): ‘Adaptive noise smoothing filter for images with signal dependent noise’,IEEE Trans. Pattern Analy. Mach. Intell.,PAMI-7. pp. 165–177
Lang, M., Guo, H., Odegard, J. E., Burrus, C. S., andWells Jr, R. O. (1996): ‘Noise reduction using an undecimated discrete wavelet transform’,IEEE Signal Process. Lett.,3, pp. 10–12
Lee, J. S. (1981): ‘Speckle analysis and smoothing of synthetic aperture radar images’,Comput. Graph. Image Process.,17, pp. 24–32
Mallat, S. (1989): ‘A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation’,IEEE Trans. Patterns Anal. Mach. Intell.,11, pp. 674–692
Mihçak, M. K., Kozintsev, I., Ramchandran, K., andMoulin, P. (1999): ‘Low-complexity image denoising based on statistical modeling of wavelet coefficients’,IEEE Signal Process. Lett.,6, pp. 300–303
Pižurica, A., Philips, W., Lemahieu, I., andAcheroy, M. (2003): ‘A versatile wavelet domain noise filtration technique for medical imaging’,IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging,22, pp. 323–331
Shankar, P. M. (1995): ‘A model for ultrasonic scattering from tissues based on K-distribution’,Phys. Med. Biol.,40, pp. 1633–1649
Shankar, P. M. (2001): ‘Ultrasonic tissue characterization using a generalized Nakagami model’,IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect. Freq. Control,48, pp. 1716–1720
Simard, M., Degrandi, G., Thomson, K. P. B., andBenie, G. B. (1998): ‘Analysis of speckle noise contribution on wavelet decompositions of SAR images’,IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,36, pp. 1953–1962
Solbø, S., andEltoft, T. (2004): ‘Homomorphic wavelet-based statistical despeckling of SAR images’,IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing,42, pp. 711–721
Wagner, R. F., Insana, M. F., andBrown, D. G. (1987): ‘Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope detected signals with application to medical ultrasound’,J. Opt. Soc. Am.,19, pp. 225–229
Wells, P. N. T., andHalliwell, M. (1981): ‘Speckle in ultrasonic imaging’,Ultrasonic,19, pp. 225–290
Xie, H., Pierce, L., andUlaby, F. T. (2002): ‘Despeckling SAR images using a low-complexity wavelet denoising process’,Proc. IEEE, pp. 321–324
Zong, X., Laine, A. F., andGeiser, E. A. (1998): ‘Speckle reduction and contrast enhancement of echocardiogram via multiscale nonlinear processing’,IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.,17, pp. 532–540
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, S., Chauhan, R.C. & Saxena, S.C. Robust non-homomorphic approach for speckle reduction in medical ultrasound images. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 43, 189–195 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345953
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345953