Advertisement

Chromatographia

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 18–20 | Cite as

Lipophilicity determination of some 3,5-dinitro-benzoic-acid esters on unimepregnated cellulose layer

  • T. Cserháti
Originals

Abstract

Unimpregnated cellulose layers proved to be suitable for the determination of the lipophilic character of 14 3,5-dinitro benzoic acid esters under reversed-phase, thin-layer chromatographic conditions. Lipophilic characters measured on unimpregnated cellulose layers correlated well with similar values determined on impregnated silica and on impregnated alumina. Minor differences in retention of the three types of layers were observed.

Key Words

Thin-layer chromatography Lipophilic character 3,5-dinitro benzoic acid esters Cellulose layers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    T. Fujita, J. Iwasa, C. Hansch, J. Am. Chem. Soc.86, 5175 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. Hansch, W. J. Dunn, J. Pharm. Sci.61, 1 (1972).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. Hansch, I. M. Clayton, J. Pharm. Sci.62, 1 (1973).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    C. Hansch, S. M. Anderson, J. Org. Chem.32, 2583 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. S. Mirrlees, S. J. Moulton, C. T. Murphy, P. J. Taylor, J. Med. Chem.19, 615 (1976).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. M. McCall, J. Med. Chem.18, 549 (1975).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    W. J. Haggerty, E. A. Murrill, Res. Dev.25, 30 (1974).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    C. B. C. Boyce, B. V. Milborrow, Nature208, 537 (1965).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. L. Biagi, M. C. Guerra, A. M. Barbaro, M. F. Gamba, J. Med. Chem.13, 511 (1970).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    G. L. Biagi, A. M. Barbaro, M. C. Guerra, J. Chromatogr.41, 371 (1969).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    E. Stahl, “Dünnschichtchromatographie”, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1962, p. 179 and 202.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    U. A. Th. Brinkmann, G. De Vries, in “Proc. of the 2nd Int. Symp. on Instrumental High Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography”,R. E. Kaiser, ed., Institute for Chromatography, Bad Dürkheim, 1982, p. 11.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    W. F. Van Giesen, L. H. M. Janssen J. Chromatogr.237, 199 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. C. Guerra, A. M. Barbaro, G. Cantelliforti, M. T. Foffani, G. L. Biagi, P. A. Borea, A. Fini, J. Chromatogr.216, 79 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    E. B. Klaas, Cs. Horvath, W. R. Melander, A. Nahum J. Chromatogr.203, 65 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    C. Hansch, A. Leo, “Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology”, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Cserháti
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Protection Institute of Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations