Skip to main content
Log in

Packed column supercritical fluid chromatography with light-scattering detection. I. Optimization of parameters with a carbon dioxide/methanol mobile phase

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Evaporative light scattering detectors have, in recent years, gained acceptance in chromatography with dense mobile phases i.e. liquid and supercritical fluid chromatography. In the present work an instrument of this type has been used in packed column supercritical fluid chromatography with carbon dioxide/methanol mixtures. Detector response and signal-to-noise ratios have been determined using squalane as test compound. Nebulizer gas flow, evaporator temperature, photomultiplier sensitivity, and mobile phase composition were found to have an influence on instrument performance. With this type of detector the field of packed column SFC applications can be extended to include non-UV-absorbing substances even when mixed mobile phases or composition gradients are necessary for the separation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.C. Fjeldsted, R.C. Kong, M.L. Lee, J. Chromatogr.279, 449 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Leyendecker, D. Leyendecker, GIT Fachz. Lab.32, 790 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.R. Griffiths, Anal. Chem.60, 593 A (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.A. Norris, M.G. Rawdon, Anal. Chem.56, 1767 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Engelhardt, A. Gross, HRC & CC11, 38 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.M. Levy, W.M. Ritchey, J. Chromatogr. Sci.24, 242 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.J. Berry, D.E. Games, I.C. Mylchreest, J.R. Perkins, S.C. Pleasance, HRC & CC11, 61 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.O. Edlund, J.D. Henion, J. Chromatogr. Sci.27, 274 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Bruns, Fat Sci. Technol.90, 289 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.J. Palmer, F.J. Palmer, J. Chromatogr.465, 369 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G.R. Bear, J. Chromatogr.459, 91 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. v. d. Meeren, J. Vanderdeelen, M. Huys, L. Baert, J. Chromatogr.447, 436 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Lafosse, M. Dreux, L. Morin-Allory, J. Chromatogr.404, 95 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Nizery, D. Thièbaut, M. Caude, R. Rosset, M. Lafosse, M. Dreux, J. Chromatogr.467, 49 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Hoffmann, T. Greibrokk, J. Microcolumn Sep.1, 35 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Herbreteau, M. Lafosse, L. Morin-Allory, M. Dreux, J. Chromatogr.505, 299 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Lafosse, P. Rollin, C. Elfakir, L. Morin-Allory, M. Martens, M. Dreux, J. Chromatogr.505, 191 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. F.J. van Lenten, L.D. Rothman, Anal. Chem.48, 1430 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  19. INTERSIL, ICL 8038 Data Sheet 69-4-81-2.

  20. T.H. Mourey, L.E. Oppenheimer, Anal. Chem.56, 2427 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Applied Chromatography Systems, Instruction Manual for Evaporative Analyser Model 750/14, August 1987, pp. 4–7.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Upnmoor, D., Brunner, G. Packed column supercritical fluid chromatography with light-scattering detection. I. Optimization of parameters with a carbon dioxide/methanol mobile phase. Chromatographia 33, 255–260 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02276191

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02276191

Key Words

Navigation