Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitation of chromatographic peaks in the 0.1 to 1.0% range

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Quantitation by peak area or height has been investigated for small peaks which are accompanied by a large neighbour of 100 or 1000 times greater size. The peaks were generated by a computer and evaluated with an integrator. The parameters varied were peak order, relative peak width, tailing, and resolution. First eluted small peaks were evaluated by vertical drop; for last eluted small peaks vertical drop and tangent skimming methods were compared.

It was found that the size of small peaks can be determined accurately if they precede the large one and if their height is used for quantitation. Under these conditions even poor resolution and tailing can be tolerated. However, if the peaks are truly Gaussian, the elution order is of minor importance. If the small peak is eluted after the large one the only recommendation is to achieve true baseline resolution if possible. The quantitation of narrow “rider” peaks is problematical.

The results are not only presented in tabulated form but representative peak pairs are also shown as an aid for the analyst. A real liquid chromatographic separation confirms the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Ciccioli, A. Cecinato, E. Brancaleoni, M. Frattoni, A. Liberti, J. High Res. Chromatogr.15, 75 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. A. Perry, J. D. Rateike, T. J. Szczerba, J. Chromatogr.389, 57 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. D. Doyle, in “Chiral Separations by Liquid Chromatography”, S. Ahuja, Ed., American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1991, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Impurities in New Drug Substances. European Commission, Directory-General III, Industry, Industrial affairs III: Consumer goods industries, Pharmaceuticals. Draft, Belgium, 1994.

  5. L. R. Snyder, J. Chromatogr. Sci.10, 200 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. R. Meyer, LC GC Int.7, 94 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. R. Meyer, J. Chromatogr. Sci.33, 26 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. A. Perry, J. Liquid Chromatogr.13, 1047 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. J. Maggs, A. S. Mead in “Gas Chromatography 1970”, R. Stock, Ed., The Institute of Petroleum, London, 1971, p. 310.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Kipiniak, J. Chromatogr. Sci.19, 332 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. L. Inman, H. J. Tenbarge, J. Chromatogr. Sci.26, 89 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Hayashi, R. Matsuda, Anal. Chem.66, 2874 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Pörschmann, W. Engewald, in “Packings and Stationary Phases in Chromatographic Techniques”, K. K. Unger, Ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1990, p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Lämmerhofer, W. Lindner, Chirality6, 261 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. P. Foley, J. G. Dorsey, J. Chromatogr. Sci.22, 40 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. K. Strasters, in “Diode Array Detection in HPLC”, L. Huber, S. A. George, Eds. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1993, p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  17. e.g. PeakFit By Jandel Scientific, 2591 Kerner Vlvd., San Rafael, CA 94901, USA.

  18. R. Sedgewick, “Algorithms”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 2nd. ed., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Weimann, Chromatographia7, 472 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, V.R. Quantitation of chromatographic peaks in the 0.1 to 1.0% range. Chromatographia 40, 15–22 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274601

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274601

Key Words

Navigation