Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improving peak capacities over 100 in less than 60 seconds: operating above normal peak capacity limits with signal processing

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A primary focus in liquid chromatography analysis of complex samples is high peak capacity separations. Using advanced instrumentation and optimal small, high-efficiency columns, complex multicomponent mixtures can now be analyzed in relatively short times. Despite these advances, chromatographic peak overlap is still observed. Recently, attention has shifted from improvements in chromatographic efficiency and selectivity to enhancing data processing after collection. Curve fitting methods can be used to trace underlying peaks, but do not directly enhance chromatographic resolution. Methods based on the properties of derivatives and power transform were recently shown to enhance chromatographic peak resolution while maintaining critical peak information (peak areas and retention times). These protocols have been extensively investigated for their fundamental properties, advantages, and limitations, but they have not been evaluated with complex chromatograms. Herein, we evaluate the use of deconvolution via Fourier transform (FT), even-derivative peak sharpening, and power law with the fast separation (< 60 s) of a 101-component mixture using ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography. High noise and peak overlap are present in this gradient separation, which is representative of fast chromatography. Chromatographic resolution enhancement is demonstrated and described. Further, accurate quantitation is maintained and shown with representative examples. Enhancements in peak capacity and peak-to-peak resolutions are discussed. Finally, the statistical theory of overlap is used for 101 peaks and predictions are made for the number of singlet, doublet, and multiplets analyte peaks. The effect of increasing peak capacity by FT even derivative sharpening and power laws leads to a decrease in the number of peak overlaps and an increase in total peak number.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patel DC, Breitbach ZS, Wahab MF, Barhate CL, Armstrong DW. Gone in seconds: praxis, performance, and peculiarities of ultrafast chiral liquid chromatography with superficially porous particles. Anal Chem. 2015;87:9137–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel DC, Wahab MF, Armstrong DW, Breitbach ZS. Advances in high-throughput and high-efficiency chiral liquid chromatographic separations. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1467:2–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barhate CL, Joyce LA, Makarov AA, Zawatzky K, Bernardoni F, Schafer WA, et al. Ultrafast chiral separations for high throughput enantiopurity analysis. Chem Commun. 2016;53:509–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barhate CL, Wahab MF, Breitbach ZS, Bell DS, Armstrong DW. High efficiency, narrow particle size distribution, sub-2 μm based macrocyclic glycopeptide chiral stationary phases in HPLC and SFC. Anal Chim Acta. 2015;898:128–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wahab MF, Wimalasinghe RM, Wang Y, Barhate CL, Patel DC, Armstrong DW. Salient sub-second separations. Anal Chem. 2016;88:8821–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Spudeit DA, Dolzan MD, Breitbach ZS, Barber WE, Micke GA, Armstrong DW. Superficially porous particles vs. fully porous particles for bonded high performance liquid chromatographic chiral stationary phases: isopropyl cyclofructan 6. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1363:89–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wahab MF, Patel DC, Wimalasinghe RM, Armstrong DW. Fundamental and practical insights on the packing of modern high-efficiency analytical and capillary columns. Anal Chem. 2017;89:8177–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hellinghausen G, Roy D, Lee JT, Wang Y, Weatherly CA, Lopez DA, et al. Effective methodologies for enantiomeric separations of 150 pharmacology and toxicology related 1°, 2°, and 3° amines with core-shell chiral stationary phases. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018;155:70–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Patel DC, Wahab MF, O’Haver TC, Armstrong DW. Separations at the speed of sensors. Anal Chem. 2018;90:3349–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ciogli A, Ismail OH, Mazzoccanti G, Villani C, Gasparrini F. Enantioselective ultra high performance liquid and supercritical fluid chromatography: the race to the shortest chromatogram. J Sep Sci. 2019;41:1307–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Catani M, Ismail OH, Gasparrini F, Antonelli M, Pasti L, Marchetti N, et al. Recent advancements and future directions of superficially porous chiral stationary phases for ultrafast high-performance enantioseparations. Analyst. 2017;142:555–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khundadze N, Pantsulaia S, Fanali C, Farkas T, Chankvetadze B. On our way to sub-second separations of enantiomers in high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2018;1572:37–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barhate CL, Regalado EL, Contrella ND, Lee J, Jo J, Makarov AA, et al. Ultrafast chiral chromatography as the second dimension in two-dimensional liquid chromatography experiments. Anal Chem. 2017;89:3545–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wahab MF, Dasgupta PK, Kadjo AF, Armstrong DW. Sampling frequency, response times and embedded signal filtration in fast, high efficiency liquid chromatography: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta. 2016;907:31–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barhate CL, Wahab MF, Tognarelli DJ, Berger TA, Armstrong DW. Instrumental idiosyncrasies affecting the performance of ultrafast chiral and achiral sub/supercritical fluid chromatography. Anal Chem. 2016;88:8864–672.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hellinghausen G, Readel ER, Wahab MF, Lee JT, Lopez DA, Weatherly CA, et al. Mass spectrometry-compatible enantiomeric separations of 100 pesticides using core–shell chiral stationary phases and evaluation of iterative curve fitting models for overlapping peaks. Chromatographia. 2019;82:221–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hellinghausen G, Wahab MF, Armstrong DW. Improving visualization of trace components for quantification using a power law based integration approach. J Chromatogr A. 2018;1574:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wahab MF, O’Haver TC, Gritti F, Hellinghausen G, Armstrong DW. Increasing chromatographic resolution of analytical signals using derivative enhancement approach. Talanta. 2019;192:492–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wahab MF, Gritti F, O’Haver TC, Hellinghausen G, Armstrong DW. Chromatographia. 2019;82:211–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wahab MF, Hellinghausen G, Armstrong DW. Progress in peak processing. LC GC Eur. 2019;32:22–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vanderheyden Y, Broeckhoven K, Desmet G. Peak deconvolution to correctly assess the band broadening of chromatographic columns. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1465:126–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Savitzky A, Golay MJE. Smoothing and diffraction of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem. 1964;36:1627–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cook DW, Rutan SC, Stoll DR, Venkatramani C. Peak purity in liquid chromatography, part II: potential of curve resolution techniques. LC GC N Am. 2018;36:248–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wahab MF, Berthod A, Armstrong DW. Extending the power transform approach for recovering areas of overlapping peaks. J Sep Sci. 2019; 42:3604–3610.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shalliker RA, Stevenson PG, Shock D, Mnatsakanyan M, Dasgupta PK, Guiochon G. Application of power functions to chromatographic data for the enhancement of signal to noise ratios and separation resolution. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217:5693–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dasgupta PK, Chen Y, Serrano CA, Guiochon G, Liu H, Fairchild JN, et al. Black box linearization for greater linear dynamic range: the effect of power transforms on the representation of data. Anal Chem. 2010;82:10143–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gilar M, Daly AE, Kele M, Neue UD, Gelber JC. Implications of column peak capacity on the separation of complex peptide mixtures in single-and two-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2004;1061:183–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Giddings JC. Unified separation science. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Davis JM, Giddings JC. Statistical theory of component overlap in multicomponent chromatograms. Anal Chem. 1983;55:418–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Fabrice Gritti from Waters Corporation (Milford, MA, USA) for the gift of the CORTECS T3 columns and helpful discussions.

Funding

This work was supported by the Robert A. Welch Foundation (Y0026).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA

    Garrett Hellinghausen, M. Farooq Wahab & Daniel W. Armstrong

Authors
  1. Garrett Hellinghausen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Farooq Wahab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel W. Armstrong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel W. Armstrong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM1

(PDF 109 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hellinghausen, G., Wahab, M.F. & Armstrong, D.W. Improving peak capacities over 100 in less than 60 seconds: operating above normal peak capacity limits with signal processing. Anal Bioanal Chem 412, 1925–1932 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02444-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02444-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation