Summary
The effect of experimental conditions such as gas flow rates, detector and column temperatures on sulphur response are discussed. It is concluded that the response of the flame photometric detector is affected by the O/H ratio and the total gas flow. Column temperature has an important influence upon S2 emission. It is shown that the sulphur response of the FPD is dependent on the compound containing the sulphur.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. K. Stevens, J. D. Mulik, A. E. O'Keefe, J. K. Krost, Anal Chem.43, 827–31 (1971).
C. D. Pearson, J. Chromatogr. Sci.14, 154–58 (1976).
C. H. Burnett, D. F. Adams, S. O. Farewell, J. Chromatogr. Sci.16, 68–73 (1978).
C. H. Burnett, D. F. Adams, S. O. Farewell, J. Chromatogr. Sci.15, 230–32 (1977).
A. E. Mizany, J. chromatogr. Sci.3, 151–54 (1970).
R. Greenhalgh, W. P. Cochrane, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem.3, 213–28 (1974).
T. Sugiyama, J. Suzuki, T. Takeuchi, J. Chromatogr.77, 309–316 (1973).
T. J. Cardwell, P. J. Marriott, J. Chromatogr. Sci.20, 83–90 (1982).
M. Maruyama, M. Kakemoto, J. Chromatogr. Sci.16, 1–7 (1978).
J. G. Eckhardt, M. B. Denton, J. L. Moyers, J. Chromatogr. Sci.13, 133–37 (1976).
S. K. Gangwal, D. E. Wagoner, J. Chromatogr. Sci.17, 196–201 (1979).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quincoces, C.E., González, M.G. Characterization of the flame photometric detector in the sulphur mode. Chromatographia 20, 371–375 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02269065
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02269065