Skip to main content
Log in

Methods for preparing comparative standards and field samples for neutron activation analysis of soil

  • Radioanalytical Methods: Data Quality, Method Validation and Use of Standard Reference Materials
  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the more difficult problems associated with comparative neutron activation analysis (CNAA) is the preparation of standards which are tailor-made to the desired irradiation and counting conditions. Frequently, there simply is not a suitable standard available commercially, or the resulting gamma spectrum is convoluted with interferences. In a recent soil analysis project, the need arose for standards which contained about 35 elements. In response, a computer spreadsheet was developed to calculate the appropriate amount of each element so that the resulting gamma spectrum is relatively free of interferences. Incorporated in the program are options for calculating all of the irradiation and counting parameters including activity produced, necessary flux/bombardment time, counting time, and appropriate source-to-detector distance. The result is multi-element standards for CNAA which have optimal concentrations. The program retains ease of use without sacrificing capability. In addition to optimized standard production, a novel soil homogenization technique was developed which is a low cost, highly efficient alternative to commercially available homogenization systems. Comparative neutron activation analysis for large scale projects has been made easier through these advancements. This paper contains details of the design and function of the NAA spreadsheet and innovative sample handling techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. R. BARNHARD-HATMAKER, J. L. ENGELS, G. S. FLEMING, S. B. GADSON, T. L. HATMAKER, C. W. KIMBROUGH, L. M. POTTER, D. B. SHEHEE, D. E. VANCE, D. R. WATKINS,Validation Procedures Used in the Background Soil Characterization Project on the Oak Ridge Reservation, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, ES/ER/TM-75, 1993.

  2. United States Environmental Protection Agency,Statement of Work for Inorganic Analysis, Document Number ILMO2.1, Sept., 1991.

  3. J. W. WADE, F. F. DYER, L. ROBINSON, N. A. TEASLEY, J. R. STOKELY,Neutron Activation Analysis of East Fork Poplar Creek Samples, ORNL Standard Analytical Method, AC-MM-222002, Oac Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, March 3, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. ROBINSON, F. F. DYER, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 179 (1994) 305

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. F. DYER, L. ROBINSON,Multi-Element Comparative Neutron Activation Analysis, ORNL Standard Analytical Method, AC-MM-222003, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, April 15, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. M. NAZAROV, V. P. CHINAEVA, M. V. FRONTASYEVA, S. PARRY, B. A. BENNET, CHEN SEN PAL, LI CHEL, ZU, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 179 (1994) 305.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. F. DYER, J. F. EMERY, L. ROBINSON, N. A. TEASLEY, J. Trace and Microprobe Tech. 6(2) (1988) 147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glasgow, D.C., Dyer, F.F. & Robinson, L. Methods for preparing comparative standards and field samples for neutron activation analysis of soil. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Articles 192, 361–370 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02041741

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02041741

Keywords

Navigation