Skip to main content
Log in

The interpretation of multielemental INAA data using pattern recognition methods

  • Information Processing and Control
  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three hundred ancient Turkish potsherds were analyzed by instrumental neutron activation analysis, and the resulting data analyzed by several techniques of multivariate statistical analysis, some only recently developed. The programs AGCLUS, MASLOC, and SIMCA were sequentially employed to characterize and group the samples by type of pottery and by site of excavation or collection. Comparison of the statistical analyses by each method provided archaeological insight into the site/type relationships of the samples and ultimately evidence relevant to commercial relations between the ancient communities and to specialization of pottery production over time. The techniques used for statistical analysis were found to be of significant potential utility in the future analysis of other archaeometric data sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. MARFOE, Chicago Turkish Euphrates Salvage Project, National Endowment for the Humanities Research Grant Proposal, 1979.

  2. M. OZDOGAN, Lower Euphrates Basin 1977 Survey, Lower Euphrates Project Publications 1 (2), Middle East Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. ALGAZE et al., Anatolica, in press.

  4. M. A. EVINS, Protohistoric Economic Organization in the Upper Euphrates: An Example from the Lowlands of Southeastem Turkey, Ph. D. Dissertation Proposal, University of Chicago, 1983.

  5. J. M. ONDOV et al., Anal. Chem., 47 (1975) 1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. K. HOPKE, Receptor Modeling in Environmental Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. M. BIEBER, D. W. BROOKS, G. HARBOTTLE, E. V. SAYRE, Archaeometry, 18 (1976) 59.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. C. OLIVIER, Aggregative Hierarchical Clustering Program Write-up, Preliminary Version, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. H. CHARLTON, D. C. GROVE, P. K. HOPKE, Science, 201 (1978) 807.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. THIELEMANS, M. P. DERDE, D. L. MASSART, CLUE: A Microcomputer Program for Hierarchical Clustering, Elsevier Scientific Software, Amsterdam, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. L. MASSART, L. KAUFMAN, The Interpretation of Analytical Chemical Data by the Use of Cluster Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. WISSEMAN, P. HOPKE, E. SCHINDLER-KAUDELKA, Archaeometry, in press.

  13. D. L. MASSART, F. PLASTRIA, L. KAUFMAN, Pattern Recognition, 16 (1983) 507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L. KAUFMAN, P. ROUSSEEUW, Finding Groups in Data, J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, in press.

  15. S. WOLD and M. SJOSTROM, in Chemometrics: Theory and Application, B. R. KOWALSKI (Ed.), American Chemical Society Series No. 52, American Chemical Society, 1985.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hopke, P.K., Martin, R.C. & Evins, M.A. The interpretation of multielemental INAA data using pattern recognition methods. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Articles 112, 215–222 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02037292

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02037292

Keywords

Navigation