Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of mitochondrial dosage on transfer of chloramphenicol resistance

  • Published:
Somatic Cell Genetics

Abstract

Enucleated chloramphenicol-resistant (CAPr) AMT cytoplasts were labeled with the mitochondrial-specific fluorophore rhodamine 123 (R-123) and fused to CAP-sensitive (CAPs) 984 whole cells. Using the fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS), the cybrids were separated on the basis of the amount of CAPr donor mitochondria which they received. The cybrids were then selected in the presence of various concentrations of CAP to examine the effect of donor mitochondrial dosage on the transfer of CAP resistance. Those cybrids which received the greatest amount of CAPr mitochondria (as determined using the FACS) were found to be approximately 3-fold more resistant to CAP selection than cybrids which had received fewer donor mitochondria. In addition, those cybrids which initially received the greatest CAPr mitochondrial dosage remained more stably resistant to subsequent selection in CAP. These results indicate that the amount of donor mitochondria the cybrid receives may be important in determining the expression of mitochondrial specific markers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Bunn, C.L., Wallace, D. C., and Eisenstadt, J.M. (1974).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71:1681–1685.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunn, C.L., and Eisenstadt, J.M. (1977).Somat. Cell Genet. 3:335–341.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Walker, C., and Shay, J.W. (1981).J. Cell Biol. 91:379a.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Malech, H.L., and Wivel, N.A. (1976).Cell 9:383–391.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jakob, H., Buckingham, M.E., Cohen, A., Dupont, L., Fizman, M., and Jacob, F. (1978).Exp. Cell Res. 114:403–408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shay, J.W., Lorkowski, G., and Clark, M.A. (1981).J. Supramol. Struct. Cell. Biochem. 16:75–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schneider, E.L., Stanbridge, E.J., and Epstein, C.J. (1974).Exp. Cell Res. 84:311–318.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shay, J.W., and Clark, M.A. (1978).J. Supramol. Struct. Cell. Biochem. 11:33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schneiderman, S., Farber, J.L., and Baserga, R. (1979).Somat. Cell Genet. 5:263–269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Veomett, G., Prescott, D.M., Shay, J.W., and Porter, K.R. (1974).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71:1999–2002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Foa-Tomasi, L., Costanzo, F., and Campadelli-Fiume, G. (1976).Experientia 32:45–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wallace, D.C. (1982). InTechniques in Somatic Cell Genetics, (ed.) Shay, J.W. (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 159–187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, C., Shay, J.W. Effect of mitochondrial dosage on transfer of chloramphenicol resistance. Somat Cell Mol Genet 9, 469–476 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543047

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543047

Keywords

Navigation