Skip to main content
Log in

State estimation in robotic manipulators: Some experimental results

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple asymptotic observer is proposed for the estimation of the generalized veocities of a robotic manipulator. The singular perturbation theory is used in the stability analysis of the error dynamics. High-gains are used in the attenuation of the nonlinearities characterizing the dynamic behaviour of the robot. The accuracy of the proposed algorithm is illustrated in simulation runs and verified through some experimental tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brady, M., Hollerbach, J.M., Johnson, T.L., Lozano-Perez, T., and Mason, M. (eds),Robot Motion: Planning and Control, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Whitney, D.E., Lozinski, C.A., and Rourke, J.M., Industrial robot forward calibration method and results,J. Dynamic Systems, Meas., Control 108, 1–8 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blauer, M. and Belonger, P.R., State and parameter estimation for robotic manipulator using force measurement,IEEE Trans. Automat Control AD-32, 1055–1066 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paul, R.P.,Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming, and Control MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Atkenson, C.G., An, C.H., and Hollerbach, J.M., Estimation of inertial parameters of manipulator loads and links,Proc. Third Internat. Symp. Robotics Research, Gouvieux (Chantilly), France, pp. 32–39 (1985).

  6. Olsen, H.B., and Bekey, G.A., Identification of parameters in models of robots with rotary joints,Proc. 1985 IEEE Conf. Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, pp. 1045–1050 (1985).

  7. Cannon, R.H., and Schmitz, E., Initial experiments on the end-point control of a flexible one-link robot,Internat. J. Robot. Res. 3(3), 62–75 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nicosia, S., Tomei, P., and Tornambè, A., Nonlinear control and observation algorithms for a singlelink flexible robot arm,Internat. Control 49, 827–840.

  9. Nicosia, S., Tomei, P., and Tornambè, A., A nonlinear observer for elastic robots,IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat. RA-4(1), 45–52 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nicosia, S. and Tornambè A., High-gain observers in the state and parameter estimation of robots elastic joints,Systems Control Lett. 13, (1989).

  11. Tornambè, A., Use of asymptotic observers having-high-gains in the state and parameter estimation,Proc. 28th IEEE CDC, Tampa, FL (1989).

  12. Markiewicz, B., Analysis of the computed torque drive method and comparison with conventional position servo for a computer-controlled manipulator, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bejczy, A.K., Robot arm dynamics and control, 33–669, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Luh, J.Y.S., Walker, M.W., and Paul, R.P.C., Resolved-acceleration control of mechanical manipulators,IEEE Trans. Automat Control AC-25, 468–474 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbert, E.G. and Ha, I.J., An approach to nonlinear feedback control with applications to robotics,IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet SMC-14, 879–884.

  16. Willems, J.C., Almost invariant subspaces: an application to high-gain feedback design-part 2: almost conditionally invariant subspaces,IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 27, 1071–1085 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Esfandiari, F. and Khalil, H.K., Observer design of uncertain systems: recovering state feedback robustness under matching conditions,Proc. 1987 Allerton Conference, Monticello, Ill. (1987).

  18. Saberi, A. and Sannuti, P., Observer design for loop transfer recovery and for uncertain dynamical systems,Proc. 1988 American Control Conference, Atlanta, Georgia (1988).

  19. Petersen, I.R. and Hololot, C.V., Using observers in the stabilization of uncertain linear systems and in the disturbance rejection problems,Proc. 25th IEEE CDC, Athens, Greece (1986).

  20. Petersen, I.R. and Hollot, C.V., High-gain observers approach to disturbance attenuation using measurement feedback,Int. J. Control 48(6), 2453–2464 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fenichel, N., Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations,J. Differential Equations 31, 53–98 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hoppensteadt, Properties of solutions of ordinary differential equations with small parameters,Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 24, 807–840 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hoppensteadt, Singular perturbations on the infinite interval,Trans. Amer Math. Soc. 123, 521–535 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kokotovich, P.V., O'Malley R.E., and Sannuti, P., Singular perturbations and order reduction in control theory — an overview,Automatica 12, 123–132 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  25. An, C.H., Atkenson, C.G., and Hollerbach, J.M., Experimental determination of the effect of feedforward control on trajectory tracking errors,Proc. 1986 IEEE Conf. Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, Calif. (1986).

  26. Khosla, P.K., Estimation of robot dynamics parameters: theory and application,Proc. 2nd Internat. IASTED Conf. on Applied Control and Identification, Los Angeles, Calif. (1986).

  27. Khosla, P.K. and Kanade, T., Experimental evaluation of the feedforward compensation and computed torque control schemes,Proc. 1986 Amer. Control Conference, Seattle, Washington (1986).

  28. Bejczy, A.K., Tarn, T.J., and Chen, Y.L., Robot arm dynamic control by computer,Proc.IEEE Conf. Robotics and Automation, St Louis (1985).

  29. Golla, D.F., Garg, S.C., and Hughes, P.C., Linear state feedback control of manipulators,Mech. Machine Theory 16, 93–103 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Khosla, P.K. and Kanade, T., Parameter identification of robot dynamics,Proc. 24th Conf. on Decision and Control, Ft Lauderdale, Florida (1985).

  31. Olsen, H.B. and Bekey, G., Identification of parameters in models with rotary joints,Proc. IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, Georgia (1985).

  32. Atkenson, C.G., An, C.H., and Hollerbach, J.M., Estimation of inertial parameters of manipulators loads and links,Int. J. Robot. Res. 5(3), 101–119 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Atkenson, C.G., An, C.H., and Hollerbach, J.M., Estimation of inertial parameters of rigid body links of manipulators,Proc. 24th Conf. on Decision and Control, Ft Lauderdale, Florida (1985).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by CNR funds, under contract No. 89.00531.67.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicosia, S., Tornambè, A. & Valigi, P. State estimation in robotic manipulators: Some experimental results. J Intell Robot Syst 7, 321–351 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01257771

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01257771

Key words

Navigation