Abstract
The relative merits of five algorithms for numerical orbit computation in galaxy models are discussed. Each method has its peculiar advantages; the choice of algorithm depends mainly on the complexity of the force equations and the required accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bulirsch, R. and Stoer, J.: 1966,Num. Math. 8, 1.
Clutton-Brock, M., Inanen, K. A., and Papp, K. A.: 1977,Astrophys. Space Sci. 47, 299.
Everhart, E.: 1974,Celest. Mech. 10, 35.
Fehlerg, E.: 1972, NASA Tech. Rep. R-381.
Hindmarsh, A. C. and Byrne, G. D.: 1975, EPISODE, UCID-30112, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory.
House, F. C., Innanen, K. A., and Keenan, D. W.: 1975,Celest. Mech. 11, 3.
Innanen, K. A.: 1966,Z. Astrophys. 64, 457.
Innanen, K. A.: 1973,Astrophys. Space Sci. 22, 393.
Innanen, K. A., House, F. C., and Smith, C. E.: 1971,Celest. Mech. 3, 145.
Krogh, F. T.: 1969, Tu Doc. No. CP-2308 (NPO-11643) JPL.
Krogh, F. T.: 1971, JPL Internal Document, Section 314, TM-278.
Lapidus, L. and Schiesser, H. E.: 1976,Numerical Methods for Differential Equations, Academic Press, N.Y.
Schmidt, M.: 1956,B.A.N. 13, 15.
Shampine, J. F., Watts, H. A., and Davenport, S. M.: 1976,SIAM Rev. 18, 376.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Papp, K.A., Innanen, K.A. & Patrick, A.T. A comparison of five algorithms for numerical orbit computation in galaxy models. Celestial Mechanics 21, 337–349 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01231272
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01231272