Skip to main content
Log in

A modified Trigg's Tracking Variable as an ‘advisory’ alarm during anaesthesia

  • Published:
International journal of clinical monitoring and computing

Abstract

We wished to assess the accuracy of a modified form of Trigg's Tracking Variable (TTV) at detecting the onset of changes in systolic blood pressure. A computer model generated systolic blood pressures which changed to a new value after period of stability. A separate algorithm based on TTV indicated when a ‘significant’ change had been detected. This signal occurred when TTV had exceeded a set limit (0.8–0.99) a predetermined number of times (1–10). Five anaesthetists were shown 40 sets of data generated by same the computer model and asked to indicate the onset of changes. The greatest number of changes (94.1%) were correctly identified when TTV exceeded 0.92 on 4 consecutive determinations. The onset of the trend was detected after an average delay of 140s. The anaesthetists correctly detected 85% of the changes after an average delay of 162s. There was no statistically significant difference between the anaesthetists and the algorithm, although only one anaesthetist performed better than the modified TTV. The modified TTV detected changes in simulated invasive systolic blood pressures faster and more accurately than four of a group of five anaesthetists. Such simple trend detection systems may be useful as ‘advisory’ alarms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sainsbury DA. An object-oriented approach to data display and storage: 3 years experience, 25,000 cases. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1993; 10: 225–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis CD. Statistical monitoring techniques. Med. Biol. Eng. 1971; 9: 315–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Avant RK, Charlton JD. A critical review of trend-detection methodologies for biomedical monitoring systems. Crit Rev Biomed. Eng. 1990; 17: 621–59.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kennedy RR, Baker AB. Analysis of uncertainty in theoretical methods of cardiac output measurement using the ‘Monte Carlo’ technique. Br J Anaesth. 1993; 71: 403–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Riegelman RK, Hirsch RP. Studying a Study and Testing a Test. How to Read the Medical Literature. Second Edition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Myles PS, Williams NJ, Powell J. Predicting outcome in anaesthesia: understanding statistical methods. Anaesth. Int. Care 1994; 22: 447–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bovill JG. Alarm systems. In: Kenny GNC, editor. Automated Anaesthetic Records. London: Balliere Tindal, 1990: 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Westenskow DR. Alarms. In: Saidman LJ, Smith NT, editors. Monitoring in Anesthesia. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993: 475–90.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Oostrom JH, Gravenstein C, Gravenstein JS. Acceptable ranges for vital signs during general anesthesia. J Clin Monit 1993; 9: 321–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sittig DF, Factor M. Physiologic trend detection and artifact rejection: a parallel implementation of a multi-state Kalman filtering algorithm. Comput Meth Progr Biomed 1990; 31: 1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Makivirta A, Koski EMJ. Alarm-inducing variability in cardiac postoperative data and the effects of prealarm delay. J Clin Monit 1994; 10: 153–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pan PH, Van der Aa JJ, Gomez FJ Van Oostrom JH, Beneken JEW, Gravenstein JS. Smart anesthesia monitoring system. Anesthesiology 1990; 73: A450.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Orr JA, Westenskow DR. A breathing circuit alarm system based on neural networks. J Clin Monit 1994; 10: 101–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohn AI, Rosenbaum SH, Miller PL. An alternative approach to intelligent haemodynamic monitoring. Anesthesiology 1990; 73: A541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hope CE, Lewis CD, Perry IR, Gamble A. Computed trend analysis in automated patient monitoring systems. Br J Anaesth. 1973; 45: 440–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bruner JMR. On the calibration of artifacts. J Clin Monit 1994; 10: 143–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Monk CR, Millard RK, Hutton P, Prys-Roberts C. Automatic arterial pressure regulation using isoflurane: comparison with manual control. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63: 22–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Murchie CJ, Kenny GNC. Comparison among manual, computer-assisted and closed-loop control of blood pressure after cardiac surgery. J Cardioth Anesth 1989; 3: 16–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Watt RC, Maslana ES, Mylrea KC. Alarms and anesthesia. Challenges in the design of intelligent systems for patient monitoring. IEEE Eng Med Biol 1993; 1993: 34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Westhorpe RN, Glass NM. The role of the anaesthetist in patient monitoring. Anaesth Int Care 1988; 16: 47–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Doyle DJ, Lee M. Evaluation of anesthesia trend display methods by ROC analysis. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39: A37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, R.R. A modified Trigg's Tracking Variable as an ‘advisory’ alarm during anaesthesia. J Clin Monitor Comput 12, 197–204 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01207199

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01207199

Key words

Navigation