Skip to main content
Log in

Configuration interaction calculations on the propane radical cation, C3H +8

  • Published:
Theoretica chimica acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Proton isotropic hyperfine coupling constants have been calculated for three low-energy nuclear conformations on the ground state potential surface of the propane cation, using a multireference singles and doubles configuration interaction (MR-SDCI) wave function. The lowest point found on the potential surface hadC 2v symmetry and the electronic wave function at this point had2B2 symmetry. At this point, the largest isotropic coupling constant is calculated to be 88.6 G, which is in fair agreement with the experimental value of 98 G obtained in an SF6 matrix at 4 K. No support is found for a “long-bond” ground state of lower symmetry thanC 2v . AnotherC 2v minimum on the ground state potential energy surface was found at which the wave function had2 B 1 symmetry. At this point, two large coupling constants of 198 G and 35 G were calculated. AC 2v stationary point was also found on the ground state potential surface at which the wave function had2 A 1 symmetry. At this point, couplings of 86 G and 25 G were obtained. None of these agree closely with the other experimental result of couplings at both 100–110 G and 50–52.5 G which was obtained in freon matrices. It is suggested that the latter spectra might correspond to a dynamical average of two distorted2 A' states inC s symmetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and notes

  1. For a recent review, see: Lund A, Lindgren M, Lunell S, Maruani J (1989) In: Maruani J (ed) Molecules in physics, chemistry, and biology, vol 3, pp 259–300

  2. Becker D, Plante K, Sevilla MD (1983) J Phys Chem 87:1648

    Google Scholar 

  3. Toriyama K, Nunome K, Iwasaki M (1982) J Chem Phys 77:5891

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lunell S, Huang MB, Lund A (1984) Faraday Discuss Chem Soc 78:35

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feller D, Davidson ER (1984) J Chem Phys 80:1006; Theor Chim Acta 68:57 and references therein

    Google Scholar 

  6. The MELD suite of programs was developed by Davidson ER and coworkers, Department of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana

  7. Van Duijneveldt FB (1971) IBM Technical Report RJ945

  8. Tanaka K, Davidson ER (1979) J Chem Phys 70:2904

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feller D, Davidson ER (1981) J Chem Phys 74: 3977

    Google Scholar 

  10. GAUSSIAN 82, Binkley JS, Frisch MJ, DeFrees DJ, Raghavachari K, Whiteside RA, Schlegel HB, Fluder EM, Pople JA (1980) Department of Chemistry, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

  11. Davidson ER, Silver DW (1977) Chem Phys Letters 52:403

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bouma WJ, Poppinger D, Radom L (1983) Israel J Chem 23:21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lunell S, Huang M-B (1989) J Chem Soc Chem Comm 1931

  14. Bellville DJ, Bauld NL (1982) J Am Chem Soc 104:5700

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feller D, Huyser, ES, Borden WT, Davidson ER (1983) J Am Chem Soc 105:1459

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frey RF, Davidson ER (1988) J Chem Phys 88:1775; Paddon-Row MN, Fox DJ, Pople JA, Houk KN, Pratt DW (1985) J Am Chem Soc 107:7696

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lunell, S., Feller, D. & Davidson, E.R. Configuration interaction calculations on the propane radical cation, C3H +8 . Theoret. Chim. Acta 77, 111–122 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01114536

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01114536

Key words

Navigation