Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of applying microelectrostimulation to different cell type zones in the caudate nucleus

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Abstract

The effects of applying electromicrostimulation to areas of the caudate nucleus with different neuronal activity patterns were investigated during chronic experiments on four cats. Caudate sites containing neurons responding to presentation of various sensory stimuli were selected for the first set of experiments and those where no neuronal activity manifested in the second series. Histological verification of electrolytic marker sites produced by electrical stimulation took place at the end of each experimental sequence and the cell types surrounding these lesions were examined. Microelectrostimulation consistently produced movement in the animal in the first set of experiments; markers were located along the surface of striosomes among large-sized cells, bundles of fibers, and blood vessels. In the second, electrical stimulation produced no alteration in naturally occurring animal behavior; markers were located within striosomes in accumulations of small- and medium-sized cells. A survey of the findings obtained would confirm our hypothesis that the neurons from which activity had been recorded by extracellular techniques in the caudate nucleus are large-sized cells with long axons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. T. A. Leontovich, "Spatial organization of tissue elements in the dog caudate nucleus," Neirofiziologiya,15, No. 5, 474–484 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu. K. Mukhina, E. I. Mukhin, and T. A. Leontovich, "Efferent connections between the striatum and temporal area EP of the cat cerebral cortex," Arkh. Anat. Histol. Émbriol.,91, No. 7, 5–13 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. N. Pigarev, "A manipulator for microelectrode research into cerebral neurons without removal of the pia dura," Fiziol. Zh., SSSR,63, No. 7, 1060–1062 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. I. Rodionova and I. N. Pigarev, "Neuronal response of the cat caudate nucleus to sensory stimulation," Neirofiziologiya,22, No. 1, 3–10 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. I. Rodionova and I. N. Pigarev, "Distribution of neurons responding to sensory stimulation and organization of topic projections in the cat caudate nucleus," Neirofiziologiya,22, No. 2, 156–162 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. A. Cherkes and V. S. Zelenskaya, "Neuronal response in the caudate nucleus to different visual stimuli in active waking cats," Neirofiziologiya,15, No. 4, 370–376 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. R. Gerfen, "The neostriatal mosaic: Compartmentalization of corticostriatal input and striatonigral output systems," Nature,311, No. 5985, 461–464 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. S. Goldman-Rakic, "Cytoarchitectonic heterogeneity of the primate neostriatum: Subdivision into island and matrix cellular compartments," J. Comp. Neurol.,205, No. 4, 398–413 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. M. Graybiel and M. F. Chesselet, "Compartmental distribution of striatal cell bodies expressing Met-enkephalin-like immunoreactivity," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA,81, 7980–7984 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. M. Graybiel and C. W. Ragsdale, Jr., "Striosomal organization of the caudate nucleus. 1. Acetylcholinesterase histochemistry of the striatum in the cat, rhesus monkey and human being," Neurosci. Abstr.,4, 44 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. M. Kemp and T. P. S. Powell, "The structure of caudate nucleus of the cat: Light and electron microscopy," Phil. Trans. R. Soc., London, Ser. B.,262, No. 2, 384–401 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. T. Stecker, G. E. Steinfels, E. D. Abercrombie, and B. L. Jacobs, "Caudate unit activity in freely moving cats: Effects of phasic auditory and visual stimuli," Brain Res.,329, No. 1/2, 350–353 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Institute for Research into Information Transmission, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow. Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 162–171, March–April, 1990.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodionova, E.I., Pigarev, I.N. & Leontovich, T.A. Effects of applying microelectrostimulation to different cell type zones in the caudate nucleus. Neurophysiology 22, 123–130 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052159

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052159

Keywords

Navigation