Abstract
Mate recognition for the leafhopper Graminella nigrifrons(Forbes) occurs when a male spontaneously emits a multisectional vibrational calling song to which females respond by emitting simple pulses. Significant differences were found among males in the duration, number of chirps, and chirp rate within sections of the song and the total song. Repeatability (proportion of total variation due to differences among males) of call features ranged from very low (0.04 for total chirps in song) to high (0.67 for section 3 chirp rate). However, song modification and playback experiments revealed that the variation in the measured song features was not important in determining whether a female will respond. Rather, female response depended only on the presence of two of the three types of pulses which comprise a chirp. These “essential” pulses were found within chirps of all call sections that contain chirps. Manipulation of chirp rates from 0.58 to 2.70 times the normal rate did not affect female response, nor did changing the period of silence between the “essential” pulse types from 0.25 to 1.75 times the normal period. These results suggest that components of the male calling song function in mate recognition but are not used by females to discriminate among conspecific males.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R. D. (1967). Acoustical communication in arthropods.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 12: 495–526.
Bailey, W. J. (1991).Acoustic Behavior of Insects, Chapman and Hall, New York.
Boake, C. R. B. (1989). Repeatability: its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior.Evol. Ecol. 3: 173–182.
Booij, C. J. H. (1982). Biosystematics of theMuellerianella complex (Homoptera, Delphacidae), interspecific and geographic variation in acoustic behaviour.Z. Tierpsychol. 58: 31–52.
Bradbury, J. W., and Andersson, M. B. (1987).Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, Wiley, New York.
Claridge, M. F. (1985). Acoustic behavior of leafhoppers and planthoppers: Species problems and speciation. In Nault, L. R., and Rodriguez, J. G. (eds.)The Leafhoppers and Planthoppers, Wiley, New York, pp. 103–125.
Claridge, M. F. (1990). Acoustic recognition signals: barriers to hybridization in Homoptera Auchenorrhyncha.Can. J. Zool. 68: 1741–1746.
Claridge, M. F., Den Hollander, J., and Morgan, J. C. (1984). Specificity of acoustic signals and mate choice in the brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens (Stal).Entomol. Exp. Appl. 35: 221–226.
Claridge, M. F., Den Hollander, J., and Morgan, J. C. (1985). Variation in courtship signals and hybridization between geographically definable populations of the rice brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens (Stal).Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 24: 35–49.
Claridge, M. F., Den Hollander, J., and Morgan, J. C. (1988). Variation in hostplant relations and courtship signals of weed-associated populations of the brown planthopper,Nilaparavata lugens (Stal)-host race of biological species?Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 35: 79–93.
de Winter, A. J., and Rollenhagen, T. (1990). The importance of male and female acoustic behaviour for reproductive isolation inRibautodelphax planthoppers (Homoptera: Delphacidae).Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 40: 191–206.
den Bieman, C. F. M. (1986). Acoustic differentiation and variation of the genusRibautodelphax (Homoptera, Delphacidae).Neth. J. Zool. 36: 461–480.
Ewing, A. W. (1989).Arthropod Bioacoustics: Neurobiology and Behaviour, Comstock, Ithaca, N.Y.
Falconer, D. S. (1981).Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Longman, New York.
Heady, S. E., and Denno, R. B. (1991). Reproductive isolation inProkelisia planthoppers (Homoptera: Delphacidae): Acoustic differentiation and hybridization failure.J. Insect Behav. 4: 367–390.
Heady, S. E., and Nault, L. R. (1991). Acoustic signals ofGraminella nigrifrons (Homoptera: Cicadellidae).Great Lakes Entomol. 24: 9–16.
Heady, S. E., Nault, L. R., Shambaugh, G. F., and Fairchild, L. (1986). Acoustic and mating behavior ofDalbulus leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79: 727–736.
Huber, F., Moore, T. E., and Loher, W. (1989).Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.
Hunt, R. E., and Nault, L. R. (1990). Influence of life history of grasses and maize chlorotic dwarf virus on the biotic potential of the leafhopperGraminella nigrifrons (Forbes).Environ. Entomol. 19: 76–84.
Hunt, R. E., and Nault, L. R. (1991). Roles of interplant movement, acoustic communication, and phototaxis in mate-location behavior of the leafhopperGraminella nigrifrons. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.28: 315–320.
Ichikawa, T. (1979). Studies on the mating behaviour of four species of auchenorrhynchous Homoptera which attack the rice plant.Mem. Faculty Agric. Kagawa Univ. 34: 1–60.
Ichikawa, T., and Ishii, S. (1974). Mating signal of the brown planthopperNilaparvata lugens (Stal) (Homoptera: Delphacidae).Appl. Entomol. Zool. 9: 196–198.
Michelsen, A., Fink, F., Gogala, M., and Traue, D. (1982). Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11: 269–281.
Lessells, C. M., and Boag, T. (1987). Unrepeatable repeatabilities: A common mistake.Auk 104: 116–121.
Ryan, T. (1960). Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics.Psychol. Bull. 57: 318–328.
Schüch, W., and Barth, F. G. (1990). Vibratory communication in a spider: Female response to synthetic male vibrations.J. Comp. Physiol. A 17: 817–826.
Searcy, W. A. (1986). Sexual selection and the evolution of song.Annu. Rev. Syst. 17: 507–533.
Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hunt, R.E., Fox, J.P. & Haynes, K.F. Behavioral response ofGraminella nigrifrons (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) to experimentally manipulated vibrational signals. J Insect Behav 5, 1–13 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049154
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049154