Skip to main content
Log in

Faculty attitudes toward student protest

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As part of a large-scale university survey, a random sample of faculty (75% of whom had had firsthand experience with serious student revolt) were asked for their reaction to a series of questions dealing with student protest — with the reasons for it, the kinds of student protest tactics employed, and the type of actions an administration might take to control it. Statistical comparisons were made between faculty, students, and administrators; and among faculty across disciplines to try to account for different attitudes. Findings suggest that faculty differ less among themselves than from other university constituent groups as to attitude about protest. They tend to distinguish sharply between dissent (which they support) and disruption (which they do not), and to favor responses to protest which keep the university open and functioning. Finally, the view is advanced that violent unrest is the unfortunate result of reciprocal escalation which can be avoided by attention to the causes of dissent rather than its dramatic manifestations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyer, A. E. (1970). College and university faculty: A statistical description. ACE Research Reports, (5)6:21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, W., and Lohnes, P. (1971). “Multivariate Data Analysis” New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, J. R. (1971). Review of Remembering the answers: Essays on the American student revolt by N. Glazer. Saturday Review, June 19:58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, A. (1972). The end of the movement. Change. April:42–47.

  • Hayakawa, S. I. Alienation is being taught by professors. In Wallerstein and Staff (eds.), “The University Crisis Reader,” Vol. II. New York: Vintage, 439–441.

  • Lipset, S. M., and Ladd, E. C., Jr. (1970). ... And what professors think. Psychology Today, 4(6).

  • Metzger, W. (1971). Authority at Columbia. In Wallerstein and Starr (eds.), “The University Crisis Reader,” Vol. II. New York: Vintage, 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, R. See any campaign speech dealing with the university.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Revised and adapted from a paper delivered at the National Convention of the American Educational Studies Association, Washington, D.C., November 1972

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francis, J.B., Lewis, S.A. & Rubin, I.S. Faculty attitudes toward student protest. Res High Educ 1, 347–366 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991669

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991669

Keywords

Navigation