Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosomal evolution withinPiperaceae

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chromosome numbers for 26 different species of the generaPiper, Peperomia andPothomorphe (Piperaceae) are reported. The basic chromosome numbers are 2n = 26, x = 13 (Piper, Pothomorphe) and 2n = 22, x = 11 (Peperomia), polyploid series are characteristic forPiper andPeperomia. Piper has the smallest chromosomes and prochromosomal interphase nuclei,Peperomia the largest ones and mostly reticulate to euchromatic nuclei.Pothomorphe is intermediate in both characters. The karyomorphological differences betweenPothomorphe andPiper underline their generic separation. Interspecific size variation of chromosomes occurs inPiper andPeperomia. Infraspecific polyploidy was observed inPiper betle. C-banding reveals different patterns of heterochromatin (hc) distribution between the genera investigated. The genome evolution is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abele, K., 1924: Untersuchungen an Gametophyten vonPeperomia incana. — Bot. Archiv7: 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, C., Smith, F. L. S., 1975: The genusMacropiper (Piperaceae). — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.71: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blot, J., 1960: Contribution à l'étude cytologique du genrePeperomia. — Rev. Gén. Bot.67: 522–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brücher, H., 1977: Tropische Nutzpflanzen. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, W. C., 1971: The problems withPiper. — Amer. J. Bot.58: 462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D., Janakiammal, E. K., 1945: Chromosome atlas of flowering plants. — London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta A., Datta, P. C., 1976: Cytotaxonomy ofPiperaceae. — Cytologia41: 697–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F., Schweizer, D., Greger, H., Humphries, C., 1977: Chromosome banding and synthetic systematics inAnacyclus (Asteraceae - Anthemideae). — Taxon26: 387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble J. S., 1925: Flora of Presidency of Madras7: 1202–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, M., 1983: O uso de Giemsa na citogenética vegetal — comparação entre a coloração simples e o bandeamento. — Ciência e Cultura35: 190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R., 1916: Beitr. allg. Bot.1: 115. — InDarlington, C. D., Wylie, A. P., 1955, (Eds.): Chromosome atlas of flowering plants. — London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. A., 1973: Notes on thePiperaceae of the Lesser Antilles. — J. Arn. Arb.54: 377–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, H., 1987:Piperaceae. — InDassanayake, M. D., Fosberg, F. R., (Eds.): A revised handbook to the Flora of Ceylon. Vol. 6. — New Delhi: Amerind Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose, J., Sharma, A., 1985: Structure and behaviour of chromosomes inPiper andPeperomia (familyPiperaceae). — Cytologia50: 301–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F. W., Gregory, L. E., 1962: Mode of pollination and factors affecting fruit set inP. nigrum L. in Puerto Rico. — Crop Sci.2: 295–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew, P. M., 1958: Studies onPiperaceae. — J. Indian Bot. Soc.37: 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1973: Karyomorphological studies inPiper nigrum L. — J. Plant. Crops, Suppl.1: 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz, W., 1981: Karyologie und ökologisch-morphologische Differenzierung vonPeumus boldus (Monimiaceae, Laurales). — Pl. Syst. Evol.138: 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985: Beiträge zur Karyologie und Systematik der GattungThottea (Aristolochiaceae). — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.107: 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986a: Remarks on karyological differentiation patterns in tropical woody plants. — Pl. Syst. Evol.152: 49–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986b: Systematics and karyoevolution inMagnoliidae:Tetrameranthus as compared with otherAnnonaceae genera of the same chromosome number. — Pl. Syst. Evol.154: 147–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: Karyosystematics and evolution of AustralianAnnonaceae as compared withEupomatiaceae, Himantandraceae, andAustrobaileyaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.159: 49–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada, H., 1975: Karyomorphological studies in woodyPolycarpicae. — J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. B., Div. 2, Bot.15: 115–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986: Karyomorphology and relationships in some genera ofSaururaceae andPiperaceae. — Bot. Mag. Tokyo99: 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampathkumar, R., 1981: InLöve, A., (Ed.): Chromosome number reports 72. — Taxon30: 696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, M. R. A., Bavappa, K. V. A., 1981: Chromosome numbers in the genusPiper. — Curr. Sci.50: 197–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzacher, T., Ambros, P., Schweizer, D., 1980: Application of Giemsa C-banding to orchid karyotype analysis. — Pl. Syst. Evol.134: 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. K., Bhattacharyya, N. K., 1959: Chromosome studies on two genera of the familyPiperaceae. — Genetica29: 256–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B., 1966: Chromosome numbers inPeperomia Ruiz. & Pav. (Piperaceae) and a note on chromosome number ofPiper magnificum Trelease. — Kew Bull.20: 521–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijistella Bai, G., Subramanian, D., 1985: Cytotaxonomical studies of South IndiaPiperaceae. — Cytologia50: 583–592.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samuel, R., Morawetz, W. Chromosomal evolution withinPiperaceae . Pl Syst Evol 166, 105–117 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937879

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937879

Key words

Navigation