Skip to main content
Log in

Torasemide in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis and ascites

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects of torasemide (20 mg/day) and furosemide (50 mg/day), each given over 4 days, were compared in a randomized and crossover study carried out in seven patients with cirrhosis and tense ascites. Patients also received a low-sodium (40 mmol/day) diet and the aldosterone antagonist, potassium canrenoate (100 mg b.i.d.). Torasemide induced a remarkably higher natriuretic (120±15 vs. 33±6 mmol/day, p<0.02) and diuretic (1450±63 vs. 900±58 ml, p<0.005) effect than furosemide. Body weight loss was also significantly higher (2.5±1.6 vs. 0.2±1.3 kg, p<0.01) during the torasemide period. Kaliuresis was similar during the two treatment periods, despite the striking differences observed in natriuresis. Neither torasemide nor furosemide induced any significant change in serum electrolyte or creatinine concentrations, or in ammonia levels. The results of this study indicate that torasemide is suitable for the treatment of sodium retention in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Epstein M. Renal sodium handling in cirrhosis.Semin Nephrol 1983;3:225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schrier RW, Arroyo V, Bernardi M, et al. Peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis: A proposal for the initiation of renal sodium and water retention in cirrhosis.Hepatology 1988;8:1151–1157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Galambos JT.Cirrhosis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conn HO. The rational management of ascites.Prog Liver Dis 1972;4:269–288.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arroyo V, Rimola A, Rodes J. Pathogenesis and treatment of ascites. In: Thomas HC, Jones EA, eds.Recent Advances in Hepatology, No. 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1986:155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gentilini P, La Villa G, Laffi G, et al. Sodium retention in cirrhosis: Aspects of pathophysiology and treatment.Front Gastrointest Res 1986;9:203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campra JL, Reynolds TB. Effectiveness of high-dose spironolactone therapy in patients with chronic liver disease and relatively refractory ascites.Dig Dis Sci 1978;23:1025–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Perez-Ayuso RM, Arroyo V, Planas R, et al. Randomized comparative study of efficacy of furosemide versus spironolactone in non-azotemic cirrhosis with ascites.Gastroenterology 1984;84:961–968.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pinzani M, Daskalopoulos G, Laffi G, et al. Altered furosemide pharmacokinetics in chronic alcoholic liver disease with ascites contributes to diuretic resistance.Gastroenterology 1987;92:294–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shear L, Ching S, Gabuzda GJ. Compartimentalization of ascites and edema in patients with hepatic cirrhosis.Gastroenterology 1970;282:1391–1396.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arroyo V, Epstein M, Gallus G, et al. Refractory ascites in cirrhosis: Mechanism and treatment.Gastroenterology Int 1989;2:195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rodes J, Bosch J, Arroyo V. Clinical types and drug therapy of renal impairment in cirrhosis.Postgrad Med J 1975;27:49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sherlock S, Senewiratne B, Scott A, Walker JG. Complications of diuretic therapy in hepatic cirrhosis.Lancet 1966;1:1049–1053.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gabow PA, Moore S, Schrier RW. Spironolactone induced hyperchloremic acidosis in cirrhosis.Ann Intern Med 1979;90:338–340.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baertl JM, Sancetta SM, Gabuzda GJ. Relation of acute potassium depletion to renal ammonium metabolism in patients with cirrhosis.J Clin Invest 1963;42:696–707.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brater DC, Leinfelder J, Anderson SA. Clinical pharmacology of torasemide, a new loop diuretic.Clin Pharmacol Ther 1987;42:187–192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lambe R, Kennedy O, Kenny M, et al. Study of the tolerance and diuretic properties of torasemide following oral or intravenous administration to healthy volunteers.Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1986;31(Suppl):9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reyes AJ, Leary WP, Byl van der K. Excretion of urinary fluid and solutes after single doses of furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide and of four different single doses of the diuretic torasemide in healthy subjects.Prog Pharmacol Clin Pharmacol 1990;8(1):47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Broekhuysen J, Deger F, Douchamps J, et al. Torasemide, a new potent diuretic: Double-blind comparison with furosemide.Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1986;31(Suppl):29–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neugebauer G, Basenfelder E, von Mollendorff E. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of torasemide in man.Arzneim-Forsch 1988;38(I):164–166.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lesne M. Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of torasemide and furosemide in healthy volunteers.Arzneim-Forsch 1988;38(I):160–163.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scheen AJ, Vancrombreucq JC, Delarge J, et al. Diuretic activity of torasemide and furosemide in chronic heart failure: A comparative double-blind cross-over study.Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1986;31(Suppl):35–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spannbrucker N, Achhammer I, Metz P, Glocke M. Comparative study of the antihypertensive efficacy of torasemide and indapamide in patients with essential hypertension.Arzneim-Forsch 1988;38(I):190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Clasen W, Khartabil T, Imm S, Kindler J. Torasemide for diuretic treatment of advanced chronic renal failure.Arzneim-Forsch 1988;38(I):209–211.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Klütsch K, Großwendt J, Haecker W. Single dose comparison of torasemide and furosemide in patients with advanced renal failure.Arzneim-Forsch 1988;38(I):200–204.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brater DC. Clinical pharmacokinetics. In: Eknoyan G, Martinez-Maldonado M, eds.The physiological basis of diuretic therapy in clinical medicine. Orlando: Grune & Stratton, 1986:27–55.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sawhney VK, Gregory PB, Swezey SE, Blaschke TF. Furosemide disposition in cirrhotic patients.Gastroenterology 1981;81:1012–1016.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Villeneuve JP, Verbeeck RK, Wilkinson GR, Branch RA. Furosemide kinetics and dynamics in patients with cirrhosis.Clin Pharmacol Ther 1986;40:14–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brunner G, von Bergmann K, Häcker W, von Möllendorff E. Comparison of diuretic effects and pharmacokinetics of torasemide and furosemide after a single oral dose in patients with hydropically decompensated cirrhosis of the liver.Arzneim-Forsch 1988;38(I):176–179

    Google Scholar 

  30. Frommer JP, Wesson DE, Eknoyan G. Side effects and complications of diuretic therapy. In: Eknoyan G, Martinez-Maldonado M, eds.The Physiological Basis of Diuretic Therapy in Clinical Medicine. Orlando: Grune & Stratton, 1986:293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Perez GO, Oster JR. Altered potassium metabolism in liver disease. In: Epstein M, ed.The Kidney in Liver Disease, 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier Science, 1983:183–201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gentilini, P., Laffi, G., La Villa, G. et al. Torasemide in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Cardiovasc Drug Ther 7 (Suppl 1), 81–85 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877962

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877962

Key Words

Navigation