Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement of bonding between cellulose and polypropylene by plasma treatment

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Cellulose Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plasma treatments can be utilized to upgrade the value of lignocellulosic materials for applications such as biobased composites. Poor adhesion in biobased composites is caused by incompatibility between polar cellulosics and non-polar thermoplastics. Plasma modification of both cellulose and polypropylene was evaluated by a T-peel test for improved compatibility and adhesion between these materials. Oxygen and argon plasmas were used to modify the surface of polypropylene films, while a cyclohexane plasma was used to modify the cellulose surface through deposition of a hydrophobic polymer layer. For plasma treatment of polypropylene, changes in power input had a greater effect on adhesion than changes in pressure. Surface oxidation and increased acid/base characteristics were found on both argon- and oxygen-plasma-treated polypropylene based on ESCA and wetting measurements. With the non-reactive argon plasma the persistence of reactive species, such as free radicals, was very important for enhanced adhesion. The amount of polar carbonyl groups introduced onto the surface was also an important factor for adhesion improvement. Modification of the cellulose (filter paper) surface to a hydrophobic character with a cyclohexane plasma did not improve adhesion to polypropylene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Back, E. L. and Danielsson, J. W. (1987)Nordic Pulp Paper, Res. J., Special Issue 2, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Plasma Chemistry, edited by H. V. Boenig (Lancaster, PA, USA, Technomic Pub., 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D. and Kendall, C. R. (1979)Polymer 20, 1053–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. F. and Swanson, J. W. (1971)Tappi 54, 2012–2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, J. F. and Kitze, P. T. (1980)Polymer Eng. Sci. 20, 330–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, F. H. (1991)J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 42 1319–1331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denes, F., Sarmadi, A. M., Hop, E. C. A. and Young, R. A. (1993)ibid., Polymer Symposia, in press.

  • Goring, D. A. I. (1967)Pulp and Paper Magazine of Canada 68, T-372–T-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. R., Westerdahl, C. A. L., Devine, A. T. and Bodnar, M. J. (1969)J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 13, 2085–2096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. H., Finlayson, M. F., Castille, M. J. and Goins, D. (1993)Tappi 76(2), 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. and Schwartz, D. (1990)Composites Sci. Tech. 38, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttinger, K. J. (1990). InCarbon Fibers Filaments and Composites (J. L. Figueiredoet al., eds). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, H. Z., Ward, T. L. and Benerito, R. R. (1977)Textile Res. J. 47, 217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaelble, D. H., Dynes, P. J. and Cirlin, E. H. (1974)J. Adhesion 6, 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, J. M. (1962)Polymer Processing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, D. K. (1975)J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 19, 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonhorn, H. and Hansen, R. H. (1967)ibid.,11, 1461–1474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerlind, B. S. and Berg, J. C. (1988)ibid.,36, 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda, H. and Lamaze, C. E. (1973)ibid.,17, 1533–1544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. A. (1978)Wood and Fiber 10(2), 112–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idem. (1986). InCellulose: Structure, Modification and Hydrolysis (R. A. Young and R. M. Rowell, eds). New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 91–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idem. (1992). InEmerging Technologies for Materials and Chemicals from Biomass (R. Rowell, T. Schultz and R. Narayan, eds). Washington, D. C.: Amer. Chem. Soc., pp. 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tu, X., Young, R.A. & Denes, F. Improvement of bonding between cellulose and polypropylene by plasma treatment. Cellulose 1, 87–106 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00818801

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00818801

Keywords

Navigation