Soviet Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics

, Volume 7, Issue 8, pp 612–618 | Cite as

Densification of nonstoichiometric niobium-carbide phases

  • S. S. Ordan'yan
  • A. I. Avgustinik
  • L. V. Kudryasheva
Theory and Technology of Sintering, Thermal, and Chemicothermal Treatment Processes


  1. 1.

    A study was made of the influence of temperature on the density of compacts produced from powders of nonstoichiometric NbCX phases of approximately the same specific surface area. It was established that, with increasing carbon deficiency, the relative density at any given temperature increases, because the diffusional mobility of the carbon and niobium atoms is greater in a “looser” crystalline lattice.

  2. 2.

    The energy of activation, q, for vacancy formation (per 1 g-form) in the NbCX alloys investigated was calculated. It was found that, with increasing defectiveness of the C sublattice, q decreases, from 110 kcal/g-form for NbC1.0 to 83.6 kcal/g-form for NbC0.72.

  3. 3.

    Self-diffusion coefficients for NbCX alloys have been calculated over a wide temperature range. It is demonstrated that, at low temperatures, self-diffusion coefficients increase with rise in carbon concentration in the alloys, which explains the increase in relative density observed experimentally during the sintering of alloys of lower carbon content. The parity of the self-diffusion coefficients at the melting points of the NbCX phases investigated indicates that transition from the solid state into liquid takes place at equal loss in the stability of the crystalline lattices of the alloys in the region of homogeneity of niobium monocarbide.

  4. 4.

    A comparison of relative density with calculated self-diffusion coefficients was instrumental in establishing that the sintering of nonstoichiometric niobium-carbide phases occurs at self-diffusion coefficients ranging from 10−11 to 10−6 cm2/sec. By analyzing the magnitude of the principal component parts of relative density, it was ascertained that, for the NbCX phases investigated, the observed difference in experimental values of relative density is apparently linked with difference in the capacity of these phases for plastic flow (diffusion creep); this flow is effected as a result of dislocation migration (climb) under the action of capillary forces and is governed by the diffusional mobility of the niobium and carbon atoms.



Relative Density Niobium Carbon Concentration Plastic Flow Wide Temperature Range 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    P. S. Kislyi, A. D. Panasyuk, and G. V. Samsonov, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 2 (1962).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. I. Avgustinik, V. M. Gropyanov, V. Sh. Vigdergauz, and G. V. Drozdetskaya, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 6 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. S. Neshpor, S. S. Ordan'yan, A. I. Avgustinik, and M. B. Khusidman, Zh. Prikl. Khim.,37, 2375 (1964).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. I. Avgustinik, V. M. Gropyanov, V. Sh. Vigdergauz, and G. V. Drozdetskaya, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 2 (1963).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. V. Deryagin, Determination of the Specific Surface of Powder Materials from the Resistance to Filtration of Rarefied Air [in Russian], Izd-vo AN SSSR (1957).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. I. Duderov, Handbook of the Technology of Ceramics and Refractories [in Russian], Promstroiizdat (1953).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. V. Gel'd and V. D. Lyubimov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Tekhn. Nauk, Met. i Toplivo, 119 (1961).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Fries, J. Chem. Phys., VII,37, No. 2, 320 (1962).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. A. Osipov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Tekhn. Nauk, No. 7, 35 (1957).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. A. Osipov, in: Investigations of Heat-Resisting Alloys [in Russian], Vol. 3, No. 61, Izd-vo AN SSSR (1958).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. A. Osipov, Problems of the Theory of Heat Resistance of Metals and Alloys [in Russian], Izd-vo AN SSSR, Moscow (1960).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. A. Osipov and T'ien Te Ch'eng, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Tekhn. Nauk, No. 2 (1961).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. A. Osipov, Some Activated Processes in Solids and Alloys [in Russian], Izd-vo AN SSSR, Moscow (1962).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. N. Oshcherin, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 1 (1962).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. V. Gel'd and F. G. Kusenko, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Tekhn. Nauk, Met. i Toplivo, No. 2, 79 (1960).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. G. Turchanin, S. S. Ordan'yan, and V. V. Fesenko, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 9, 23 (1967).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. K. Storms and N. H. Krikorian, J. Phys. Chem.,64, 1471 (1960).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. G. Avarbé, A. I. Avgustinik, Yu. N. Vil'k, and S. S. Ordan'yan, Abstracts of Papers to a Scientific-Technical Conference of the Lensovet Leningrad Institute of Technology [in Russian], Goskhimizdat (1962).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. F. Ormont, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,106, 687 (1956).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Huber et al., J. Phys. Chem.,65, No. 10, 1844 (1961).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. Ya. Pines, Essays on Metal Physics [in Russian], Izd. Khar'kovsk. Un-ta, Khar'kov (1961).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. S. Ordan'yan
    • 1
  • A. I. Avgustinik
    • 1
  • L. V. Kudryasheva
    • 1
  1. 1.Lensovet Leningrad Institute of TechnologyUSSR

Personalised recommendations